See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/332849315

HALAL AND FOOD SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FOR FLOUR MILL

Research · September 2018

DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.12317.36328

CITATIONS READS

0 247

1 author:

Yousaf Ayub
University of the Punjab
10 PUBLICATIONS 4 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Human Factor Engineering View project

ISO 9001 Certification View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Yousaf Ayub on 03 May 2019.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 HALAL AND FOOD SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FORM FOR FLOUR MILL

DOC #: FRM-12.03 REV # : 01 ISSUE DATE: Sep 08, 2018

Area: _Flour Mill

Hazard Risk Significance Decision Tree Questions
Biologica

Likelihood (O)

Severity (S)
Process l Hazard Acceptable CCP/

R= (O*S)
S# Significant Control Measures
Step Chemical Detail / Non- Level Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 OPRP
Physical Significant /HCP
Halal
As material received 1st of all Y N Y Y Y
B:Fungal, Microbial
its inspection is done and
microbial growth due to 2 3 3 S Absence CCP-1
material is rejected if any sign
growth moisture
of microbial growth found
Absence of Before going to final Y N Y Y Y
chemical and processing and grinding all
C:Chemical Pesticide spray
moisture < 15 % raw material is washed to
use to use to avoid
2 2 4 S remove any such type of CCP-1
prevent pest pest growth.
material and Mill not accept
Receiving growth Moisture >15 %
material whose moisture is >
Material /
15 %
Wheat
1. Before processing material is
pouring into
passed through sieve shakers
suction area
P:Stones, Mixed during Absence of metal of multiple sizes to remove
pit (Hoddi 1)
metal processing of 3 2 6 NS stone or metal particles. PRP
particles supplier Magnets are also install in
production line to catch the
metal particles
Absence As material received 1st of all
Pest growth its inspection is done and
H: Pest is
due to 1 4 4 HCP material is rejected if any sign HCP-1
mixed in it
moisture of microbial growth or pest
found
Cleaning of
B:
wheat by
2. meshing/
Destoning
C:
(SEP-1

Page 1 of 5
 HALAL AND FOOD SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FORM FOR FLOUR MILL

DOC #: FRM-12.03 REV # : 01 ISSUE DATE: Sep 08, 2018

Hazard Risk Significance Decision Tree Questions

Biologica

Likelihood (O)

Severity (S)
Process l Hazard Acceptable CCP/

R= (O*S)
S# Significant Control Measures
Step Chemical Detail / Non- Level Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 OPRP
Physical Significant /HCP
Halal
SEP-2 Raw material is passed through
SEP-3) Stone particles Multiple mesh sizes including
P:Stone of larger sizes centrifuge separation from
2 2 4 NS Absence PRP
particles remain in small to large so in later steps
material stones particles whether small
or large is removed

H:

Wheat is Water of washing area is

B:Dirty water cleaned with 2 2 4 NS Clean water replaced periodically and it is OPRP-1
dirty water medically passed from lab

C:

Conditioner Mud/dust
3.
with water particles Water of washing area is
P:Dust
mixed with 3 2 9 NS Clean water replaced periodically and it is OPRP-1
particles
water and medically passed from lab.
wheat

H:

Annually food authority

recommended fumigation
Pest/micro- spray is done in SILOs.
Storage in B:Pest/micro
4. organism grow 1 3 3 NS Absence Furthermore SILOs are PRP
SILOs bial growth
in SILOs completely closed its 2 by 2 ft
gates open annually just for
fumigation/cleaning purpose

Page 2 of 5
 HALAL AND FOOD SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FORM FOR FLOUR MILL

DOC #: FRM-12.03 REV # : 01 ISSUE DATE: Sep 08, 2018

Hazard Risk Significance Decision Tree Questions

Biologica

Likelihood (O)

Severity (S)
Process l Hazard Acceptable CCP/

R= (O*S)
S# Significant Control Measures
Step Chemical Detail / Non- Level Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 OPRP
Physical Significant /HCP
Halal
Fumigation
After fumigation SILOs are
C:Fumigation chemical can
1 3 3 NS Absence cleaned properly before PRP
Chemical also fused into
storage of raw material
wheat

P:

H:

B:

Machine lubricant only given at

bearings of rollers that are far Y N Y Y Y
Machine away from grinding and
lubricant may product is not contact with
Grinding/ contact with lubricant. Miller ensure that
Absence and
Milling C:Machine product, before installing roller in
1 3 3 S moisture less than CCP-2
5. process in lubricant during machine all lubrication is
13 %
Body Khatta grinding removed from roller except
(B1 & S1) moisture is > bearing. Machine setting is
13% changed to adjust moisture
and wheat is stored in silo till
moisture reduce
Magnets are installed before
Metallic
P:Metal grinding process in roll patti to Y N Y Y Y
particle grind 1 3 3 S Absence CCP-2
particles ensure that no particles may
with wheat
passed into grinding process.

Page 3 of 5
 HALAL AND FOOD SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FORM FOR FLOUR MILL

DOC #: FRM-12.03 REV # : 01 ISSUE DATE: Sep 08, 2018

Hazard Risk Significance Decision Tree Questions

Biologica

Likelihood (O)

Severity (S)
Process l Hazard Acceptable CCP/

R= (O*S)
S# Significant Control Measures
Step Chemical Detail / Non- Level Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 OPRP
Physical Significant /HCP
Halal
Magnets are installed before
Metallic
H: Metal grinding process in roll patti to
particle grind 1 3 3 S Absence HCP-2
particles ensure that no particles may
with wheat
passed into grinding process
Micro-
organisms may Packing person medical test
transfer are conducted on annual basis.
B:Mico-
through 1 3 3 S Absence Furthermore mask, hair net PRP
organisms
packing and gloves are also worn by
person worker
sneezing etc.
Packing of
Moisture level Moisture level Machine settings are changed
product into C:Moisture 2 3 6 S Y N Y Y Y CCP-3
6. < 13 % should < 13 % to adjust moisture
PP bags
(Petti) Metal particles
Magnets are installed in
P:Metal may packed Y N Y Y Y
1 3 3 S Absence packing area to prevent metal CCP-3
Particles with product
particle
in PP bags
Metal particles
Magnets are installed in
H:Metal may packed
1 3 3 S Absence packing area to prevent metal HCP-3
Particles with product
particle
in PP bags
Rodent or pest Bait stations are installed at
B: may storage area furthermore it is
1 3 3 S Absence PRP
Rodent/pests sneeze/grazing closed and on daily basis
7. Storage the product housekeeping is maintained

C:

Page 4 of 5
 HALAL AND FOOD SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT FORM FOR FLOUR MILL

DOC #: FRM-12.03 REV # : 01 ISSUE DATE: Sep 08, 2018

Hazard Risk Significance Decision Tree Questions

Biologica

Likelihood (O)

Severity (S)
Process l Hazard Acceptable CCP/

R= (O*S)
S# Significant Control Measures
Step Chemical Detail / Non- Level Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 OPRP
Physical Significant /HCP
Halal

P:

H:

B:

Vehicle use for

chemical
C:Chemical
delivery Vehicle is inspected before
Contaminatio 1 3 3 S Clean PRP
before loading product in it
Transportati n
8. transporting
on
flour
P:Dust
Vehicle is inspected before
particles/ Dusty vehicles 1 3 3 S Clean Vehicle PRP
loading product in it
mud

H:

Prepared By (FSTL): __________________________ Approved By (CEO): _________________________

Page 5 of 5

View publication stats