The document discusses the importance of researching alternative planets for human habitation but argues that financial resources would be better spent improving people's lives on Earth. It acknowledges overpopulation and limited resources as reasons for off-planet research but contends that reducing poverty, unemployment, and funding medical research to address diseases like Ebola would have a greater positive impact.
The document discusses the importance of researching alternative planets for human habitation but argues that financial resources would be better spent improving people's lives on Earth. It acknowledges overpopulation and limited resources as reasons for off-planet research but contends that reducing poverty, unemployment, and funding medical research to address diseases like Ebola would have a greater positive impact.
The document discusses the importance of researching alternative planets for human habitation but argues that financial resources would be better spent improving people's lives on Earth. It acknowledges overpopulation and limited resources as reasons for off-planet research but contends that reducing poverty, unemployment, and funding medical research to address diseases like Ebola would have a greater positive impact.
accept that it is important to research on alternative planets to live, I believe that money should be better spent on other essential aspects of life.
For a variety of reasons, I agree that it is
reasonable and necessary to do carry out scientific research on other places for people to live. Firstly, the world is facing a population explosion while the amount of land remains unchanged, so increases in population are likely to exceed the capacity of the Earth. This means that at a particular point in time, people might be unable to have accommodation. Secondly, the natural resources in the world tend to run out due to excessive use of human beings, which means that people will find it very difficult to meet their basic needs in the future. For example, the scarcity of fresh water in Third World countries has resulted in a lack of water for drinking and cooking.
However, I would argue that financial
resources should be better used to improve people’s quality of life. The first reason is that unemployment and poverty rates in developing countries are extremely high, so the governments of wealthy nations should spend some of their tax revenues on helping these poor countries. Financial support from affluent nations can significantly contribute to the improvement in the lives of impoverished people. additionally, it would be more important to spend money on doing medical research on dangerous diseases. Ebola, for example, is a fatal disease that has recently killed many people in Africa, and therefore scientists should make effort to create a vaccine against this disease.
In conclusion, while I agree that
conducting research on alternative human habitats is necessary, it seems to me that it is more important to improve people’s living standard.
1. Quality of life 2. Living standards 3. The standard of living