Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dynamic and Collaborative Teams
Dynamic and Collaborative Teams
Learning Outcome 3
Activity 1 (management theories and approaches)
Advantages Disadvantages
1. Increased efficiency 1. Monotony and Boredom
By breaking sown tasks into smaller, The highly specialized and repetitive nature
specialized components and optimizing of tasks can lead to employee monotony and
workflows, Scientific Management can boredom. This can result in reduced job
lead to significant increases in satisfaction, motivation, and even burnout.
productivity and efficiency. This can result
in faste4r completion and higher output 2. Lack of Creativity
levels. Strict adherence to standardized procedures
may discourage employees from thinking
2. Clear instructions creatively or suggesting improvements. This
Detailed procedures and standardized can stifle innovation and the potential for
processes provide clear instructions for process optimization.
employees. This reduces ambiguity and
the potential for misunderstanding, leading 3. Employee Disempowerment
to more consistent and reliable work Employees may feel like they have little
outcomes. control over their work, leading to a sense
of disempowerment. This can negatively
3. Skill Specialization impact morale and job satisfaction.
Employees become highly skilled in
performing specific tasks due to repetitive 4. Overemphasis on Quantity
practice. This specialization can lead to Scientific Management tends to prioritize
expertise and mastery, resulting in output quantity over other important factors
higher-quality outputs. like quality, worker well-being, and holistic
problem-solving. This can lead to rushed or
4. Reduced Training Time suboptimal outcomes.
Since tasks are broken down into simple,
standardized steps, training new 5. Resistance to Change
employees becomes faster and more Employees may resist the implementation of
straightforward, allowing them to become Scientific Management due to concerns
productive more quickly. about job security, changes to their roles,
and the potential loss of autonomy.
5. Predictable Outcomes
The standardized processes and 6. Neglect of Human Factors
procedures of Scientific Management Taylorism and Fordism often ignore the
make outcomes more predictable, which psychological and social aspects of work,
can be valuable in situations where focusing primarily on the technical aspects.
consistency is crucial. This can lead to a lack of attention to
factors that contribute to employee
satisfaction and well-being.
Activity 2 (bureaucratic management)
Weber used the metaphor “the iron cage” to describe the constraints that the rules and
disciplinary control of the bureaucratic approach imposes on a system.
In group, discuss whether there are any organizational settings where you could argue
that bureaucratic management would be necessary.
1. High-Risk Environments
Industries dealing with high risks, such as nuclear power plants, chemical
factories, or biohazard research labs, require strict adherence to safety protocols.
Bureaucratic structures ensure that procedures are followed meticulously, minimizing
the potential for accidents and catastrophic events.
2. Emergency Response
5. Educational Standards
View the 14 Principles of Management. Which of these principles would you argue are out
of touch with the needs of modern organization structures? Provide reasons for your
answer.
• Division of work
• Discipline
• Unity of command
• Unity of direction
• Scalar chain
• Equity
• Initiative
• Esprit de corps
Unity of Command
This principle suggests that employees should receive orders form only one manager
to avoid confusion. In modern organizations, matrix structures and cross-functional
teams are common, where employees often report to multiple managers based on
different projects. This principle can hinder flexibility and collaboration in such
scenarios.