Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AOM 2023-001 San Juan
AOM 2023-001 San Juan
AOM 2023-001 San Juan
COMMISSION ON AUDIT
REGIONAL OFFICE NO. VIII
LGAS C – Leyte II and Biliran Province
Provincial Satellite Auditing Office (PSAO)
Baybay City, Leyte
Rodulfo S. Loreto
Municipal Accountant
We have audited some of the Barangay transactions for Calendar Years 2019,
2020 and 2021 and 2022 and observed the following deficiencies:
1. The accuracy, existence and valuation of all properties of the barangay under
Property, Plant and Equipment (PPE) amounting ₱3,600,871.43 as of
December 31, 2022, continued to be unconfirmed due to a) non-conduct of
physical count of its properties for the past 10 years; b) not detailed PPE
Ledger Cards; c) non-maintenance of Property Cards by the Designated
Property Custodian,contrary to Item 7.2.5, Chapter VII of Manual on the
Financial Management of Barangays and other pertinent COA rules and
regulations.
1.2. Likewise, Item 2.1.6 of COA Circular No. 2010-001 requires the Accountants to
submit subsidiary schedules of general ledger accounts, on or before February 14
of each year.
1.3. The Statement of Financial Position for CY 2022 of Barangay San Juan reflected
a total amount of ₱3,600,871.43 properties under Property, Plant and Equipment
(PPE) account. The details are shown in Table 1.
1.4. However, an inventory report has not been provided to the Audit Team, and the
Barangay has consistently failed to submit one over the last decade.
Consequently, the accuracy of all the listed Barangay properties in Table 1
remains uncertain.
1.5. The Audit Team was not able to confirm the recorded PPE because, though the
Municipal Accountant had already maintained the PPE Ledger Cards (PPELC),
there is no detailed description of the property such as the brand, size, color, etc.
and the properties were just lumped per major account in the property ledger card
1.6. During the audit, the Barangay Treasurer informed the Audit Team that no Report
on Inventory of Property and Equipment (RIPE) has been prepared due to the
absence of an Inventory Team to conduct the physical count of barangay
properties and Property Custodian to maintain property records. Also, it was
disclosed that their equipment were not labeled with Property Tags, hence, some
procured equipment were difficult to trace.
1.7. This observation was consistently included in the Audit Report on Barangay
(ARB) San Juan since CY 2013 or for the past 10 years. The continued failure of
the barangay officials to implement the audit recommendations manifests a
complete disregard of the rules on property management and other relevant laws
and regulations. This is despite the seminar conducted by COA to all barangay
officials on the adoption of the Barangay Financial Management Manual wherein
the RIPE was first introduced.
1.8. The RIPE is intended to confirm the existence of the reported assets in the books
of the Barangay and validate whether these assets are within the vicinity of the
same or in its designated location. Without the RIPE, the amount in the books
cannot be substantiated while the existence of the properties cannot be confirmed.
Losses, damages or unserviceable properties will not be detected and the persons
liable for such losses may not be held accountable thereof.
1.9. Due to the above mentioned deficiencies, the accuracy, existence and reliability of
the PPE accounts cannot be confirmed which will affect the fair presentation of the
Barangay’s assets in its Financial Statements.
1.11. We also recommend that the Barangay Treasurer as the Property Officer
Designate to:
a. Provide Property Tags for each equipment with complete labels;
b. Update the PAR of each employee every three years;
c. Provide adequate storage for Unserviceable Equipment;
d. Request for disposal of unserviceable properties, and
e. Maintain Property Cards for all properties of the Barangay
1.13. Lastly, we recommend that the Barangay Treasurer as the Property Officer-
Designate and the Municipal Accountant should periodically reconcile their
respective records so as to establish a more reliable PPE balance.
2.1 Section 4.2 of COA Circular 2020-006 provides that the cost of an item of PPE
shall be recognized as an asset if, and only if:
2.2 For CY 2020, Barangay San Juan received financial assistance from the LGU
Mahaplag and Provincial Government of Leyte totaling ₱150,000.00 which were
correctly recorded as Due to LGUs in the books.
Table 2. Financial Assistance –CY 2022
Date Project Amount
December 2022 Rehabilitation of Load Road 150,000.00
Total ₱150,000.00
2.3 Audit of disbursements for the said financial assistance revealed that a total of
₱149,890.00 were disbursed and the project was already completed as shown in
Table 3.
2.4 However, review on the entries made on the above disbursements totaling
₱149,890.00 revealed that these were not recorded to their proper PPE account but
were erroneously directly recorded as debit to Due to LGUs upon disbursement,
even before preparation and submission of utilization report to source agency.
2.5 The projects should have been recorded as PPE in the books as the barangay owns
these properties and is responsible for their maintenance. Also, they qualify with
section 4.2 of COA Circular 2020-006 on when a PPE should be recognized as an
asset.
2.6 The correct recording upon receipt of FA, completion of the project and submission
of Fund Utilization Report to the source agency should be the following:
Table 5. Misstatements
Account Understatement
Road Network 149,890.00
Government Equity 149,890.00
TOTAL 299,780.00
Cash in Bank
3.1. Section 111 (2) of PD 1445 provides that the highest standards of honesty,
objectivity and consistency shall be observed in the keeping of accounts to
safeguard against inaccurate or misleading information.
3.2. Pertinent provision of COA Circular No. 96-011 dated October 2, 1996, provide:
Section 3.2 The Local Accountants shall within ten (10) days from
receipt of the Bank Statements (BS), reconcile the same BS with
the General Ledgers (GL) and prepare the BRS in five (5) copies.
3.3. The Financial Statements of the Barangay showed that the Cash in Bank-LCCA
has a total balance of ₱834,137.95 as of yearend. However, no Bank
Reconciliation Statements were prepared and submitted by the Municipal
Accountant for the CY 2022.
3.4. The failure to submit the BRS resulted to difficulty in ascertaining the accuracy
and correctness of the funds Cash in Bank Balance at yearend. Further, errors
committed by the bank cannot be promptly corrected.
3.6. We also recommend that the Municipal Accountant prepare and submit the
BRS of the Barangay within 10 days from receipt of Bank Statements in
order to have a reliable Cash in Bank Balance
AOM No. 2023-001 Brgy. San Juan, Mahaplag, Leyte Page 6 of 22
Lacking Details or Supporting Documents for Distribution of Relief/Welfare Goods
“It is the declared policy of the State that all resources of the government
shall be managed, expended or utilized in accordance with law and
regulations, and safeguard against loss or wastage through illegal or
improper disposition, with a view to ensuring efficiency, economy and
effectiveness in the operations of government. The responsibility to take
care that such policy is faithfully adhered to rests directly with the chief
or head of the government agency concerned.”
4.2. While Section 4 of P.D. 1445 provides, that financial transactions and operations
of any government agency shall be governed by certain fundamental principles.
Paragraph 6, thereof, states that claims against government funds shall be
supported with complete documentation.
4.3. Moreover, COA Circular No. 2015-009 dated December 1, 2015 prescribed the
Revised Chart of Accounts for LGUs to conform with the adoption of the Phil.
Public Sector Accounting Standard (PPSAS). On recording of expenses, the
following accounts were prescribed to be used by LGUs:
This account is used to record the cost of goods for distribution to people affected
by calamities/disasters/ground conflicts such as canned goods, blankets, mats,
kitchen utensils, flashlights and other similar items. Credit this account for
issuance to end-users, transfers or write-down.
Welfare Goods Expenses
5-02-03-060
Debit
7 pcs of bathing
soap- P336.00
28 Sacks of Rice-
P61,600;
12 pcs of noodles-
P1,344.00
15 sacks of Rice-
P29,250.00;
5 boxes of sardines-
no
Jeffrey M. P9,000.00;
distribution
11/24/2021 583712 Revelo 45,000.00 44,100.00
Sheet
Store 5 boxes of noodles-
submitted
P4,050.00; &
30 ties of Top
Coffee-P2,700.00
12/27/2021 583724 Jeffrey M. 14 sacks of Rice- 41,800.00 40,964.00 no
AOM No. 2023-001 Brgy. San Juan, Mahaplag, Leyte Page 8 of 22
Check Check Gross Check
Payee Particulars Remarks
Date No. Amount Amount
P29,400.00;
distribution
Revelo 4 boxes of sardines-
Sheet
Store P7,600.00; &
submitted
6 boxes of noodles-
P4,800.00
18 Sacks of Rice-
With
P37,800;
distribution
Jeffrey M. sheet
5 boxes of sardines-
12/28/2022 583799 Revelo 49,475.00 48,485.50 submitted
P9,100.00; &
Store but lacks
information
3 boxes of noodles-
on quantity
P2,575.00
4.5. Perusal of the submitted documents related to the distribution of the purchased
relief goods revealed that no distribution reports was submitted for the
procurement totaling ₱187,330.00 while the distribution reports submitted for the
procured goods totaling ₱49,475.00 do not contain information as to the quantity
of such goods received by the affected beneficiaries.
4.6. Moreover, it was also disclosed that the issuances of the above transactions were
erroneously recorded as Food Supplies Expense instead of Welfare Goods for
Distribution upon initial recording and Welfare Goods Expense upon distribution.
4.8. We recommended that the Punong Barangay submit to the Audit Team for
review and evaluation the lacking reports on the distribution of relief goods
with complete details such as the name of the beneficiary, signature and the
items and quantity received.
4.9. We also recommended that the Bookkeeper record issuances of relief goods
not as Food Supplies Expense but as Welfare Goods Expense.
5.1. COA Circular 2012-002 dated September 12, 2012 was issued to prescribe
accounting and reporting guidelines for the LDRRMF of LGUs (including
BLGUs) and NDRRMF given to LGUs and Receipts from other sources.
5.2. Whereas, Section 5.1.16 of the same Circular states “The amount and details of
the unexpended balance of LDRRMF shall be discussed in the Notes to Financial
Statements”. A sample of disclosure was attached as Annex D of the same
circular as shown below:
Annex D
Notes to the Financial Statements
The LDRRMF represents the amount set aside by the LGU to support its
disaster risk management activities pursuant to R.A No.10121, otherwise known
as the Philippine Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Act of 2010.The
amount available and utilized during the year totaled ₱_________ and
₱_________ , respectively, broken down as follows:
5.4. As can be seen in Table 7, the Barangay Local Government Unit of San Juan,
Mahaplag, Leyte has still a significant amount of BDDRMF balance of
₱259,927.00 as of December 31, 2022. However, review of the Notes to
Financial Statements disclosed that the amount and details of the unexpended
balance of LDRRMF were not discussed.
5.5. The Notes failed to disclose the amount available, utilized and balances during the
four- year period under audit, CYs 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022. The balance
should have been discussed in a detailed manner so as to give additional value to
the financial statements.
Utilization of BDRRMF
6.1. Section 5.1.2 of COA Circular 2012-002 states that, a Local Disaster Risk
Reduction and Management Fund Investment Plan (LDRRMFIP) for the DRRM
program shall be prepared annually. It shall present the 30% allocation for QRF in
lump sum and the allocation for disaster mitigation, prevention and preparedness
with details as to projects and activities to be funded. The LDRRMFIP shall also
include under a separate caption, the list of projects and activities charged to the
unexpended LDRRMF of previous years.
6.2. Section 5.1.3.2 of the same circular states that the release and use of LDRRMF
shall be supported by LDRRMFIP for projects and activities listed in the
approved plan as incorporated in the local development plan and annual work and
financial plan.
6.3. For CY 2019-2022, the Barangay has a total appropriation of ₱359,442.00 (see
details in table 7, finding no. 5) for its BDRRMF including previous years
balance. It was, however, noted that a Work and Financial Plan was prepared
annually and not the prescribed BDRRMFIP. The said document lacks
information on the Functional Classification (Gen. Public Services, Health,
H o u s i n g , Community Development); Schedule of Implementation (Starting
Date & Completion Date); Amount of Appropriation and classification whether
MOOE or Capital Outlay
6.6. We recommend that the BDRRMO, through the Punong Barangay, convene
the LDRRM Council and prepare the LDRRMFIP which also includes PPAs
to be paid from previous years unexpended DRRMF annually as basis for the
use of the LDRRMF based on the priority programs, projects and activities
included in COA Circular 2012-002.
7.2. Evaluation of the Annual and Supplemental Budgets of Barangay San Juan,
Mahaplag, Leyte disclosed that the Barangay appropriated the total amount of
₱1,431,314.00 as 20% Development Fund for CYs 2019-2022. Breakdown of the
appropriation is shown in Table 9.
Table 9. 20% DF Appropriation for CYs 2019-2022
Appropriation
Calendar Program/ Project Activity/
Year Description Supplemental
Annual Budget Total
Budget
Rehabilitation of Multi-
₱ 40,000.00 ₱ 40,000.00
Purpose Hall
Rehabilitation of Streetlight 30,000.00 30,000.00
Rehabilitation of Water
95,000.00 95,000.00
2019 System
Continuation of Construction 80,700.0 80,700.0
of Local Road 0 0
Rehabilitation of Health 40,000.0 40,000.0
Center 0 0
Sub-Total (2019) 285,700.00 0.00 285,700.00
Rehabilitation of Multi- 170,000.0
170,000.00
Purpose Hall 0
Rehabilitation of Streetlight 30,000.00 30,000.00
2020 rehabilitation of Water
60,000.00 60,000.00
System
Continuation of Construction
64,634.00 64,634.00
of Local Road
Sub-Total (2020) 324,634.00 0.00 324,634.00
Streetlight rehabilitated 47,157.00 47,157.00
2021 Water rehabilitated 100,000.00 100,000.00
Local road constructed 200,000.00 200,000.00
Sub-Total (2021) 347,157.00 0.00 347,157.00
Construction of Drainage
253,823.00 253,823.00
Canal
2022 Rehabilitation of Water
150,000.00 150,000.00
System
Installation of Streetlight 70,000.00 70,000.00
Sub-Total (2022) 473,823.00 0.00 473,823.00
Total Savings ₱1,431,314.00 ₱0.00 ₱1,431,314.00
7.3. Further, review of the project implementation and utilization of the same fund, the
Audit Team positively noted that all identified projects of the barangay as priority
projects for CYs 2019-2022 were all implemented as of December 31, 2022. Out
of the ₱1,431,314.00 appropriation, only ₱1,418,196.00 was utilized hence,
leaving a savings of ₱13,118.00 out of the 15 projects. Details of utilization and
AOM No. 2023-001 Brgy. San Juan, Mahaplag, Leyte Page 14 of 22
implementation are shown in Table 10 while comparison of appropriation and
disbursements are shown in Table 11.
7.4. As can be seen in Table 11, savings totaling ₱11,560.00 was made out of the
implementation of the two completed priority projects under 20% Development
Fund as of December 31, 2021. Since the projects are already completed, the
amount of ₱11,560.00 could have been reverted/re-appropriated in CY 2022 to
other 20% DF PPAs.
7.5. Since balances from previously completed projects was not re-appropriated and
remained unutilized, the Barangay was deprived of additional funding for other
important PPAs while constituents were deprived of the benefits that could have
been derived had the amount was appropriated.
7.6. We recommend that the Punong Barangay and Barangay Treasurer re-
appropriate the balances of completed projects amounting ₱13,118.00 as of
December 31, 2022, to other PPAs so that funds are optimally utilized to help
achieve the desirable socio-economic development and environmental
outcomes of the LGU.
8.2. Moreover, section 5.1.4 of the same handbook provides that upon receipt of the
monthly internal revenue allotment (IRA) of the barangay, the Punong Barangay
shall automatically release not later than five (5) working days without further
delay the share of the SK equivalent to ten percent of the general fund of the
barangay by issuing check in the name of the SK for deposit to the latter’s bank
account.
8.3. In addition, section 4.6 of P.D.1445 states that Claims against government funds
shall be supported with complete documentation.
8.4. For CY 2019-2022, the Barangay has released a total of ₱306,897.00 of the 10%
SK share. However, as of to date, shares totaling ₱410,218.20 were still not
released to the SK as required by the Department of Budget and Management
(DBM), Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG) and National
Youth Commission (NYC) Joint Memorandum Circular (JMC) No. 1, s. 2019
dated January 23, 2019). Details are shown in tables 12 and 13.
Table 12. Release of 10% SK share
Date Check # Particulars Amount
9/9/2020 530421 10% SK Shares 122,427.00
12/28/2020 530443 10% SK Shares 184,452.00
Total 306,879.00
8.5. Moreover, it was disclosed that though the barangay has released some of the SK
shares for 2019 and 2021, it was not made monthly or within the prescribed
period which is not later than five (5) working days upon receipt of the monthly
8.6. Furthermore, the said releases were not supported with Official Receipts issued by
the Sangguniang Kabataan Treasurer. In an interview with the Municipal
Accountant, the SK officials may not still be aware that their receipts of 10%
shares should be supported with official receipts and that they are yet to attended
the seminar on the Handbook on the Financial Transactions of the Sangguniang
Kabataan conducted by the Commission in which such policy is one of the
highlights to be discussed.
8.7. The delayed and non-release of SK shares exposes the risk of the fund being used
for other purposes while the Official Receipts issued by the SK Treasurer would
have supported the disbursements made by the barangay as proof of receipt by the
SK.
8.8. We recommend that the Barangay release the unreleased SK shares totaling
₱410,218.20 and ask for Official Receipt from SK Treasurer as their proof of
receipt and for future SK shares to be automatically released not later than
five (5) working days without further delay upon receipt of the monthly IRA
of the.
9. No funds were appropriated for programs and projects for Senior Citizens
and Persons with Disabilities (PWD) in CY 2019 to 2022 which should be 1%
of the barangay’s IRA, contrary to DBM and DSWD Joint Circular No.
2003-01 dated April 28, 2003, thus depriving the elderly citizens in the
barangay the full benefits of the programs due them.
9.1. DBM-DSWD Joint Circular No. 2003-001 dated April 28, 2003 was issued to
prescribe guidelines for the implementation of Section 29 of the General
Appropriations Act of 2003 which states that the plans, programs and projects
intended to address the concerns of senior citizens and persons with disability
shall be integrated in the regular activities of the agencies. Sections 4.2 and 4.3
thereof directs all government agencies, departments, bureaus, offices,
commissions and state universities and colleges to allocate at least one percent
(1%) of their respective budget to be utilized in the implementation of
9.2 Our perusal of the Annual Budgets of the barangay disclosed that no funds were
appropriated for Senior Citizens and PWDs programs and activities for the
periods CY 2019, CY 2020, 2021 & CY 2022 as shown in Table 14.
9.3. Without the necessary appropriation sanctioned by law, the elderly citizens and
PWDs of the barangay are deprived of the benefits of the programs which could
have been financed from the said amount.
9.4. We recommend that the Punong Barangay and its Council appropriate funds
in its annual budget for programs and projects benefitting Senior Citizens
and Persons with Disabilities (PWD) at an amount of no less than 1% of the
annual IRA as required by the Expanded Senior Citizen Act, R.A. No. 9994.
10. No funds were appropriated in the CY 2019 to 2022 budget of the barangay
for the implementation of programs, projects and activities for the protection
of children, contrary to Republic Act No. 9344, thus protection of children’s
rights within the barangay is not strengthened.
10.1 Republic Act No. 9344 (Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006) adopts as a
policy the protection of the interests of children and promotes their physical,
moral, spiritual, intellectual and social well-being. The Act also recognizes the
rights of children to assistance, proper care and nutrition and special protection
from all forms of neglect, abuse, cruelty and exploitation, and other conditions
prejudicial to their development.
10.2 Section 15 of the said Act mandates the creation of Local Councils for the
Protection of Children (LCPC) in all levels of local government. It provides
further that 1% of the internal revenue allotment (IRA) of barangays,
municipalities and cities, shall be allocated for the strengthening and
implementation of the LCPC.
AOM No. 2023-001 Brgy. San Juan, Mahaplag, Leyte Page 21 of 22
10.3 Our perusal of the Annual Budget of the barangay disclosed that no funds were
appropriated for the implementation of programs, projects and activities (PPA)
intended for the Council for the protection and well-being of children although the
barangay has established and created their own LCPC. Based on the estimated
IRA for the noted budget years, the following could have been appropriated for
LCPC programs and activities:
10.4 Without the necessary budget and plan, the rights, interest and well-being of the
children in the barangay will not be protected, established and strengthened.
10.5 We recommend that the Punong Barangay include in its annual budget an
appropriation equivalent to 1% of its IRA intended for the protection and
welfare of the children in the barangay, identify and implement the
programs, projects and activities using the said fund pursuant to RA 9344.
May we have your comments on the foregoing audit observations within five (5)
calendar days from receipt hereof.
SANTIAGO P. SEÑASE
State Auditor IV
OIC-Supervising Auditor