Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 s2.0 S030438942202009X mmc1
1 s2.0 S030438942202009X mmc1
1 s2.0 S030438942202009X mmc1
Figure S1. Electrochemical adsorption and desorption capacity of the prepared samples (a)
C-NiFe-10, (b) C-cPB-10, (c) C-FeFe-10, (d) F-NiFe-10, (e) F-PB-10, (f) F-FeFe-10, and (g)
F-CoFe-10. [Cs+]0 = 1 mM, applied potential for adsorption and desorption reactions: -1 V
and +1 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) for 30 min, respectively.
Figure S2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of (a) C-NiFe-1 (red box) and (b)
CNF (blue box).
Figure S3. Pictures of flexible (a) CNF and (b) C-NiFe-2
Figure S4. Electrochemical adsorbed and desorbed amount of Cs + on C-NiFe-1, 2, 5, and 10.
[Cs+]0 = 1 mM; applied potential for adsorption and desorption reactions: -1 V and +1 V (vs.
Ag/AgCl) for 30 min, respectively.
Figure S5. Competing ion effect of Cs+ adsorption on C-NiFe as a function of seawater major
cations. [Cs+]0 = [K+]0 = [Na+]0 = [Mg2+]0 = [Ca2+]0 = 1 mM, applied potential for adsorption
and desorption reactions: -1 V and +1 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) for 30 min, respectively.
Figure S6. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of C-NiFe-2 (a-c) before and
(d-f) after all the experiments (after EA subsequently ED
Figure S7. XPS Ni 2p spectra of C-NiFe-2 before electrochemical adsorption/ desorption of
Cs+ ion, after ED (only after ED experiment at +1V), after EA (only after EA experiment at -
1V), and after all the experiments (after EA subsequently ED experiment for over 10 times
cycles)
Table S1. Cs adsorption capacity of PBA based adsorbents
C-NiFe-10 54.79
PB-CNF-30µA ≒ 75
PB-CNF-90µA ≒ 200
NiHCF 235.25
[2]
NiHCF/RGO hybrids 320.31
PB 201.9 [9]
References
[1] J.-H. Park, H. Kim, M. Kim, J.-M. Lim, J. Ryu, S. Kim, Sequential removal of radioactive
Cs by electrochemical adsorption and desorption reaction using core-shell structured carbon
nanofiber–Prussian blue composites, Chem. Eng. J. 399 (2020) 125817.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.125817.
[2] X. Jin, L. Huang, S. Yu, M. Ye, J. Yuan, J. Shen, K. Fang, X. Weng, Selective
electrochemical removal of cesium ion based on nickel hexacyanoferrate/reduced graphene
oxide hybrids, Sep. Purif. Technol. 209 (2019) 65-72.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.07.019.
[3] R. Chen, H. Tanaka, T. Kawamoto, M. Asai, C. Fukushima, H. Na, M. Kurihara, M.
Watanabe, M. Arisaka, T. Nankawa, Selective removal of cesium ions from wastewater using
copper hexacyanoferrate nanofilms in an electrochemical system, Electrochim. Acta 87
(2013) 119-125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2012.08.124.
[4] H. Kim, H.H. Eom, Y. Kim, D. Harbottle, J.W. Lee, Reversible electro-mediated cesium
ion removal using a zeolitic imidazolate framework derived zinc hexacyanoferrate composite,
Chem. Eng. J. 450 (2022) 138029. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.138029.
[5] P. Jain, H. Devnani, N. Sandal, S. Nabi, M.A. Bhat, P.P. Ingole, Copper
hexacyanoferrate/carbon nanostructure hybrids: electrochemically switched ion-exchange
electrodes for the sustainable removal of cesium from water, J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 10(1)
(2022) 106918. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.106918.
[6] M. Kim, J.-H. Park, J.-M. Lim, H. Kim, S. Kim, Conventional and photoinduced
radioactive 137Cs removal by adsorption on FeFe, CoFe, and NiFe Prussian blue analogues,
Chem. Eng. J. 405 (2021) 126568. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126568.
[7] M. Ishizaki, S. Akiba, A. Ohtani, Y. Hoshi, K. Ono, M. Matsuba, T. Togashi, K.
Kananizuka, M. Sakamoto, A. Takahashi, T. Kawamoto, H. Tanaka, M. Watanabe, M.
Arisaka, T. Nankawa, M. Kurihara, Proton-exchange mechanism of specific Cs+ adsorption
via lattice defect sites of Prussian blue filled with coordination and crystallization water
molecules, Dalton Trans. 42(45) (2013) 16049-16055. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3dt51637g.
[8] J.Y. Liu, X.N. Li, A.I. Rykov, Q.H. Fan, W. Xu, W.M. Cong, C.Z. Jin, H.L. Tang, K.X.
Zhu, A.S. Ganeshraja, R.L. Ge, X.D. Wang, J.H. Wang, Zinc-modulated Fe-Co Prussian blue
analogues with well-controlled morphologies for the efficient sorption of cesium, J. Mater.
Chem. A 5(7) (2017) 3284-3292. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ta10016c.
[9] L. Chang, S.Q. Chang, W. Chen, W. Han, Z. Li, Z. Zhang, Y.D. Dai, D. Chen, Facile one-
pot synthesis of magnetic Prussian blue core/shell nanoparticles for radioactive cesium
removal, RSC Adv. 6(98) (2016) 96223-96228. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra17525b.
[10] D. Parajuli, A. Takahashi, H. Noguchi, A. Kitajima, H. Tanaka, M. Takasaki, K.
Yoshino, T. Kawamoto, Comparative study of the factors associated with the application of
metal hexacyanoferrates for environmental Cs decontamination, Chem. Eng. J. 283 (2016)
1322-1328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.08.076.
[11] S. Eun, H.J. Hong, H. Kim, H.S. Jeong, S. Kim, J. Jung, J. Ryu, Prussian blue-embedded
carboxymethyl cellulose nanofibril membranes for removing radioactive cesium from
aqueous solution, Carbohydr. Polym. 235 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.115984.
[12] Y. Bondar, S. Kuzenko, D.H. Han, H.K. Cho, Development of novel nanocomposite
adsorbent based on potassium nickel hexacyanoferrate-loaded polypropylene fabric,
Nanoscale Res. Lett. 9 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-9-180.
[13] H. Kim, M. Kim, W. Lee, S. Kim, Rapid removal of radioactive cesium by
polyacrylonitrile nanofibers containing Prussian blue, J. Hazard. Mater. 347 (2018) 106-113.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.12.050.