Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Document 9
Document 9
Document 9
PHILIPPINE HISTORY
MEMBERS:
o ALLAB JANELLE
o BUERGO, BERNARD
o DE GUZMAN CLARENCE
o GARCES MARK JAYSON
o LATOZA LYNMEL
o MADES GISELLE
o MANGUERRA ERICK
o PAMARAN MICHAEL
o REYES YVETTE
o VITTO RODOLFO III
The Scarborough Shoal, also known as Huangyan Island in China and Panatag Shoal in
the Philippines, is a small, triangular-shaped landmass situated in the South China Sea.
This disputed feature has gained international attention due to its strategic location and its
role in the territorial disputes between the Republic of the Philippines and the People's
Republic of China. The standoff between the Philippines and China over the Scarborough
Shoal began in 2012 when the Philippine Navy attempted to apprehend eight mainland
Chinese fishing vessels near the shoal. This incident marked the start of a prolonged and
complex dispute that remains unresolved to this day. One key element in this dispute is
the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). UNCLOS is a
critical international treaty that sets the legal framework for the use and management of
the world's oceans and their resources. It delineates maritime zones, defines the rights and
responsibilities of coastal states, and establishes guidelines for resolving conflicts related
to maritime boundaries. In the case of the Scarborough Shoal, the 1982 UNCLOS plays a
pivotal role. Both the Philippines and China have invoked UNCLOS in support of their
claims. The convention provides rules and principles regarding territorial waters,
exclusive economic zones, and the rights of states in these areas. These rules help define
the respective claims and rights of the disputing parties. China has asserted its historical
claims to virtually the entire South China Sea, including the Scarborough Shoal, based on
a "U-shaped line" drawn in 1947. This historical assertion aligns with China's
interpretation of its rights under UNCLOS. Conversely, the Philippines has argued for its
rights under UNCLOS, particularly emphasizing the principle of the exclusive economic
2
zone, which allows coastal states certain rights over the natural resources within 200
nautical miles of their coastlines. The standoff at Scarborough Shoal underscores the
complex interplay between historical claims, international law, and geopolitical interests
in the South China Sea. Both countries have engaged in diplomatic and legal processes to
disputed feature in the South China Sea that has been at the center of tensions between
the Philippines and China since 2012. The 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea is a
critical reference point in this dispute, as it provides the legal framework for
understanding the rights and claims of both parties in this complex and ongoing standoff.
The Scarborough Shoal, also known as Huangyan Island in China and Panatag Shoal in
the Philippines, is a small, triangular-shaped landmass situated in the South China Sea.
This disputed feature has gained international attention due to its strategic location and its
role in the territorial disputes between the Republic of the Philippines and the People's
Republic of China. The standoff between the Philippines and China over the Scarborough
Shoal began in 2012 when the Philippine Navy attempted to apprehend eight mainland
Chinese fishing vessels near the shoal. This incident marked the start of a prolonged and
complex dispute that remains unresolved to this day. One key element in this dispute is
the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). UNCLOS is a
critical international treaty that sets the legal framework for the use and management of
the world's oceans and their resources. It delineates maritime zones, defines the rights and
3
responsibilities of coastal states, and establishes guidelines for resolving conflicts related
to maritime boundaries. In the case of the Scarborough Shoal, the 1982 UNCLOS plays a
pivotal role. Both the Philippines and China have invoked UNCLOS in support of their
claims. The convention provides rules and principles regarding territorial waters,
exclusive economic zones , and the rights of states in these areas. These rules help define
the respective claims and rights of the disputing parties. China has asserted its historical
claims to virtually the entire South China Sea, including the Scarborough Shoal, based on
a "U-shaped line" drawn in 1947. This historical assertion aligns with China's
interpretation of its rights under UNCLOS. Conversely, the Philippines has argued for its
rights under UNCLOS, particularly emphasizing the principle of the exclusive economic
zone, which allows coastal states certain rights over the natural resources within 200
nautical miles of their coastlines. The standoff at Scarborough Shoal underscores the
complex interplay between historical claims, international law, and geopolitical interests
in the South China Sea. Both countries have engaged in diplomatic and legal processes to
disputed feature in the South China Sea that has been at the center of tensions between
the Philippines and China since 2012. The 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea is a
critical reference point in this dispute, as it provides the legal framework for
understanding the rights and claims of both parties in this complex and ongoing standoff
4
Both the Philippines and China have invoked historical documents, maps, and legal
principles to support their claims over the Scarborough Shoal (also known as Huangyan
Island in China and Panatag Shoal in the Philippines). Some of the common sources and
arguments include:
1.UNCLOS (United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea): The Philippines has
argued that the Scarborough Shoal is within its Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) as
defined by UNCLOS, which grants it certain rights over the waters and resources in the
region.
2. Historical Maps: The Philippines has pointed to historical maps and documents that it
its territory, specifically the island of Luzon, than to China's mainland, making it part of
For China:
1. *Historical Claims: China has cited historical records, such as ancient maps and
documents, to assert its historical claims over the Scarborough Shoal dating back
centuries.
5
2. *Nine-Dash Line: China has referred to the controversial "Nine-Dash Line," a
demarcation line that it uses to claim vast maritime territories in the South China Sea,
3. *Sovereignty Claims: China asserts that the Scarborough Shoal has been historically
under Chinese sovereignty and that it has exercised jurisdiction and control over the area.
Determining which sources are primary would require an in-depth analysis of the specific
documents and historical records each country has presented in their claims. Primary
sources would typically include original historical documents, maps, or legal treaties that
directly support their assertions. These primary sources can be subjected to legal and
References:
6
7