Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Calculus Larson 10th Edition Test Bank
Calculus Larson 10th Edition Test Bank
1. Find the slope of the line tangent to the graph of the function at the point .
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
OBJ: Calculate the slope of a line tangent to the graph of a function at a specified point
MSC: Skill
ANS: A PTS: 1 DIF: Easy REF: Section 2.1
2. Find the slope of the line tangent to the graph of the function at the point .
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
ANS: C PTS: 1 DIF: Medium REF: Section 2.1
OBJ: Calculate the slope of a line tangent to the graph of a function at a specified point
MSC: Skill
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
ANS: D PTS: 1 DIF: Easy REF: Section 2.1
OBJ: Calculate the derivative of a function by the limit process MSC: Skill
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
ANS: C PTS: 1 DIF: Easy REF: Section 2.1
OBJ: Calculate the derivative of a function by the limit process MSC: Skill
5. Find the derivative of the following function using the limiting process.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
ANS: A PTS: 1 DIF: Easy REF: Section 2.1
OBJ: Calculate the derivative of a function by the limit process MSC: Skill
6. Find the derivative of the following function using the limiting process.
a. –4
b.
c.
d.
e.
ANS: E PTS: 1 DIF: Easy REF: Section 2.1
OBJ: Calculate the derivative of a function by the limit process MSC: Skill
7. Find the derivative of the following function using the limiting process.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
8. Find the derivative of the following function using the limiting process.
a.
b.
Another random document
un-related content on Scribd:
member of DIE SCHUTZSTAFFELN DER NATIONAL
SOZIALISTISCHEN DEUTSCHEN ARBEITERPARTEI (commonly
known as the “SS”) after 1 September 1939.
33. The defendants Cuhorst, Oeschey, Nebelung, and Rothaug are guilty
of membership in an organization declared to be criminal by the
International Military Tribunal in Case 1, in that Cuhorst, Oeschey, and
Rothaug were members of the Leadership Corps of the Nazi Party at Gau
level after 1 September 1939, and in that Nebelung was an
Ortsgruppenleiter of the Leadership Corps of the Nazi Party after 1
September 1939.
34. The defendant Joel is guilty of membership in an organization
declared to be criminal by the International Military Tribunal in Case 1, in
that the said defendant was a member of DER SICHERHEITSDIENST
DES REICHSFUEHRER SS (commonly known as the “SD”) after 1
September 1939.
Such memberships are in violation of paragraph 1 (d), article II of
Control Council Law No. 10.
Wherefore, this indictment is filed with the Secretary General of the
Military Tribunals and the charges herein made against the above-named
defendants are hereby presented to the Military Tribunals.
Acting on Behalf of the United States of America
T T
Brigadier General, U. S. Army
Chief of Counsel for War Crimes
There are fifteen defendants in the box, all of whom held high judicial
office, and all but one of whom are trained lawyers. To understand this case,
it is necessary to understand the general structure of the German judicial
system and the places occupied by the several defendants within that
system.
To assist the Court in this regard, the prosecution has prepared a short
expository brief which is already in the hands of the Court and which has
been made available to defense counsel in German and English. The brief
includes a glossary of the more frequent German words or expressions
which will occur during the trial—most of them from the vocabulary of
governmental and judicial affairs. It includes a table of equivalent ranks
between the American Army and the German Army and SS, and a table of
the civilian ranks used in the German judicial system. It also includes two
charts, showing respectively the structure of the Reich Ministry of Justice,
and the hierarchy of German courts.[11] Finally, it includes a copy of the
composite chart now displayed on the wall of the courtroom, which shows
the positions occupied by the defendants in the general scheme of things.
This chart has been certified by the defendant Schlegelberger, and will be
introduced as an exhibit in this case when Mr. LaFollette commences the
presentation of evidence. It is being displayed at this time as a convenient
guide to the Court and to defense counsel, to enable them more easily to
follow the opening statement.
COUNT ONE
THE DESTRUCTION OF LAW AND JUSTICE IN GERMANY
And the defendant Schlegelberger expressed the same thought in 1936 (NG-
538, Pros. Ex. 21)—
“Accordingly there can be no doubt that now the moral order and ideology [Weltanschauung], as
recognized in the Party program, has to be taken into consideration in the interpretation and
application of every norm of the existing law.”[17]
We may now retrace some of the steps which the law lords of the Third
Reich took to turn the judicial system into a subservient but effective agent
of the regime. Some of these we have already noted. The centralization of
the administration of justice in the Reich government, the vesting of over-
all authority in the Reich Ministry of Justice, and the creation of
extraordinary courts were essential steps in the process. Standing alone,
these acts might have been unobjectionable, though the creation of special
courts was expressly prohibited by article 105 of the Weimar constitution.
But these first moves were but the prelude to a series of deadly thrusts at the
vitals of the judicial system. The early history of this organized attack on
the fundamentals of law is summarized in the decision of the International
Military Tribunal—
“Similarly, the judiciary was subjected to control. Judges were removed from the bench for
political or racial reasons. They were spied upon and made subject to the strongest pressure to join