Name: Abadilla, Mesja Annika A.
Section: D- 1st year BSBIO (Block B)
Case Study: Heinz’s Dilemma
Stage of Development
Stage 1: Preconventional
Morality - Obedience and
Punishment
Stage 2: Preconventional
Morality - Naively egotistical
Stage 3: Conventional
Morality - "good boy-good girl" chemist or seek help from
orientation
Stage 4: Conventional
Morality - Law and Social
Order
Stage 5: Postconventional
Morality - Legalistic Social
Contract
Stage 6: Postconventional
Morality - Universal ethical
Principles
Probable Decision
Likely to steal the drug
without considering the
consequences
Might steal the drug, but may
also try to negotiate or find
alternative solutions
Tends to negotiate with the
authorities
May try legal avenues or
follow established procedures
to obtain the drug
Likely to explore the ethical
principles involved and
consider the greater good
May not necessarily steal the
drug but could engage in civil
disobedience or seek to
change the system
Reason for the Decision
The decision is based on self-
interest and avoiding
punishment. Morality is
guided by the fear of getting
caught.
The decision is influenced by
self-interest but may show
some awareness of social
norms and the need for
reciprocity.
The decision is influenced by
social approval and
maintaining good
relationships. Concerned
about what others would think
of their actions.
The decision is driven by a
sense of duty, respect for
authority, and adherence to
societal rules and laws.
The decision is based on
personal moral principles and
societal values, weighing the
importance of saving a life
against property rights.
The decision is based on a
deep commitment to justice,
human rights, and universal
ethical principles, even if it
means challenging existing
laws and systems.