Directions: Below is a rubric for assessing the group presentation.

Assess the output by putting the score on the last column of the rubric opposite the stated criterion. Then write your
comment about the output that will justify the score that you have given.

Criteria/ Dimension Excellent Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Fair Poor

Score
5 4 3 2 1
Content (Congruence The content of the entire at least 80% of the content of the entire at least 60 % of the content of the At least 60 % of the content of the less than 40% of the content of the
with the intended presentation output is aligned to presentation output is aligned to the ILO entire presentation output is aligned entire presentation output is aligned to entire presentation output is aligned 5
learning outcomes) the ILO to the ILO the ILO to the ILO

Content (Accuracy) All informations are accurate.
There is an in-depth discussion &
elaboration about the activity in all
sections of the presentation.
free from any grammatical erros
at least 80% of the information at least 60% of the information at least 40% of the information less than 40% of the information
presented is accurate. There is an in- presented is accurate. There is an in- presented is accurate. The presented presented is accurate. No in-depth
depth discussion & elaboration about depth discussion and elaboration dicussions are not clearly elaborated. discussion and elabotation of the
the activity in almost all sections of the about the activity in some sections of content.
presentation. the presentation. 5
1-3 errors are commited in spelling, 4-6 errors are commited in spelling, 7-9 errors are commited in spelling, 10 or more errors are commited in
punctuation and grammar punctuation and grammar punctuation and grammar spelling, punctuation and grammar

Contetnt (References) Presented more than two Presented at least two referecnes and all Presented at least one reference and Presented refernces but are not No reference was cited
referecnes and all are reliable and are reliable and well cited is reliable and well cited reliable and not well-cited 5
well cited
Use of ICT ( Usefulness All media/app used (graphics, at least 80% of the media/app used at least 60% of the media/app used at least 40% of the media/app used less than 40% of the media/app used
of the chosen media) video, sounds, text) reinforce (graphics, video, sounds, text) reinforce (graphics, video, sounds, text) (graphics, video, sounds, text) reinforce (graphics, video, sounds, text)
content content reinforce content content reinforce content 5

USe of ICT (Design and Layout makes the entire Layout makes the entire presentation of Layout is pleasing but the design is Layout is somewhat pleasing. The Layout makes more that 40% of
layout of Presentation) presentation of the content easy to the content easy to read but fails to somewhat inapproprite to the design in some part of the presentation presentation of the content difficult
read and captures attention of the capture the attention of the audience content is distructive. to read. Design is inconsistent and
audience. throughout the viewing process. inapproprite to the ontent
5
Design is consistent and approprite Design is consistent and approprite to
to the content the content

Time Submitted the group presentation submitted the group presentation submitted the group presentation submitted the group presentation submitted the group presentation
output on of before the deadline output a day ater the deadline output 2 days after the deadline output 3 days after the deadline output more than 3 days after the
deadline.
5

Cooperation all members of the group at least 80% of the members of the at least 60 % of the members of the at least 40% members of the group less than 40% of the members of the
participated in the development group participated in the development group participated in the participated in the development and group participated in the
and presentation of group output and presentation of group output development and presentation of presentation of group output development and presentation of 5
group output group output

Average Score 5
Equivalent Excelent
 Group No. 3 Course/Yr. & Sec. BSEd Science IV-3

Leader Latoja, John Paul S.

Members Agbuya, Krizza Mae P.

Cantor, Dhenzel S.
Carza, Aljay C.
De Vera, Crisanta R.
Mosada, Jersey O.

Comment:

We hope that you will like our video presentation because we did our very best to produce a beautiful video presentation for you guys.

Name of Assessor: Latoja, John Paul S. Year & Section: (for student) BSEd Science IV-3
Designation Students