Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 21

Unit IG2: Risk assessment

Declaration: By submitting this assessment (Parts 1 – 4) for marking I declare that it is entirely my own work. I understand that falsely claiming that the work is
my own is malpractice and can lead to NEBOSH imposing severe penalties (see the NEBOSH Malpractice Policy for further information).

Important note: You must refer to the document ‘Unit IG2: risk assessment – Guidance and information for learners and Learning Partners’ while completing all
parts of this assessment. Your Learning Partner should provide you with a copy, but it can also be downloaded from the relevant resources section for this
qualification on the NEBOSH website.

Part 1: Background

You should aim to complete this section in 150 - 200 words.


Topic Comments
Name of organisation* SK Fabrications Pvt Ltd.
Site location* Navi Mumbai, Maharshtra, India.
The organizations consists of manager, Lead project Engineer, safety Supervisor, design engineer, fire
Number of workers Officer, Fabricator, fitter, helper, welder, crane and forklift operator,Other workers
and admin staffs which sumps upto strenght of 75 workers.
Date of inspection:- 12th June 2023.
Objective of this inspection:- The objective of this inspection is to inspect and identify the hazards and risk
associated with the work activities which are performed in the the oganisation so as to provide sufficient
and adequate control measures againts them in order to prevent and avoid any accidents or incidents in near
future simultaneously improving the safety standard of the company.

The organisation works in followig shift patterns:- 1.


06.00AM to 03.00PM
General description of the organisation 2. 02.00PM to 11.00PM

Description of SK Fabricatiions Pvt Ltd:- Sk Fabrications is a Leading manufacturer of steel structures


with ISO 9001:2007 . With a vast, spacious warehouse and a two-story building with a bottom level
designated for a fabrication yard, a store room, and a dining area, the property is
27,000 square feet. The design department is assigned to the first floor, while the administration and other
cabinets are on the second story. Being a 27-year-old company, They have extensive

Learner number: 00628068 Learner name: Faizan Abdul Aziz Page 1 of 21


knowledge in this industry, as well as the most cutting-edge facilities and room to handle any volume of
work. It performs steel structure canopy work, including I-beam, Angles, Channels, Flat Bars, etc., for
various kinds of factories and buildings. The organization produces roughly 150 structural canopies per
month and consumes 20 tons of steel per month.

Major Activities Performed are as follows

WELDING: Steel fabrication is a whole of welding, Used for joining two elements together with a strong
connection.
GRINDING:-Grinding process is an abrasive machining process that uses a grinding wheel as the cutting
tool to get high quality surface finish, accuracy in the dimension and shape of the workpiece.
SHOT BLASTING: Steel sections are blasted with shots in order to prepare them for fabrication and
provide clean finish.
COATING/PAINTING: It is carried out towards the end of the fabrication process to protect the steel
against corrosion and fire.
BENDING: Bending process is carried out by a press brake machine to get the specified radius required for
work.
CUTTING: Steel sections are easier to work with when they are cut to length prior to fabrication which is
done here by using a power hacksaw.
CRANE OPERATION: Cranes are used for lifting equipment for overhead works. FORKLIFT
OPERATION: forklift are used for loading and unloading of the metal parts.

Equipments which are used in the organisation are:- Press brake machine, Power Hacksaw,Flux core
welding machine, Power drill press, Grinding machine, Lathe machine, Crane and forklift.

I have covered the following site for my risk assessment.

Fabrication yard
Work at height site
Description of the area to be included in the risk
Grinding cutting site
assessment Crane operaitng site
Welfare area.
Kitchen area.

Learner number: 00628068 Learner name: Faizan Abdul Aziz Page 2 of 21


The company is particularly dedicated to ensuring client happiness. where productivity and quality
Any other relevant information are never compromised. The firm places a high priority on employee health and safety. Regular health
checks are performed with associated labs.
* If you’re worried about confidentiality, you can invent a false name and location for your organisation but, all other information provided must be factual.

You should aim to complete this section in 100 - 200 words.


Note: this section can be completed after you have competed your risk assessment.
To carry out the risk assessment I have gone through the below website
https://www.hse.gov.uk/simple-health-safety/risk/steps-needed-to-manage-risk.htm

Steps for the risk assessment:-


1. Identify the hazards
2. Who might be harmed
3. Evaluate the risk
4. Record the findings
Outline how the risk assessment was
5. Review
carried out this should include:
 sources of information Before physically inspecting the workplace, I spoke with the manager, design engineers, and safety supervisor to
consulted; learn more about the work activities and their procedures. I also looked through the organization's safety manual,
 who you spoke to; and which contains previous risk assessments, SOPs, and PtWs, as well as accident and illness records.
 how you identified:
- the hazards; In order to establish appropriate control measures, I have also spoken with the workers who are executing their
- what is already being individual responsibilities to learn about the genuine difficulties and worries they are experiencing.
done; and
- any additional I have looked to the following websites to determine the best controls for the occupational hazards that have been
identified:
controls/actions that may
be required. FIRE HAZARD CONTROL MEASURES
https://www.hseblog.com/control-measures-to-minimize-the-risk-of-fire-in-a-workplace/

HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE CONTROL MEASURES


https://www.hse.gov.uk/coshh/basics/control.htm

Learner number: 00628068 Learner name: Faizan Abdul Aziz Page 3 of 21


ELECTRIC HAZARD CONTROL MEASURES
https://www.safetynotes.net/electrical-hazards-and-control-measures/ NOISE
HAZARD CONTROL MEASURES
https://www.osha.gov/noise/exposure- controls#:~:text=Choose%20low%2Dnoise%20tools%20and,or%20isolate
%20the%20noise%20source.

VIBRATION HAZARD CONTROL MEASURES


https://www.hse.gov.uk/vibration/hav/advicetoemployers/controlrisks.htm

SLIP AND TRIP CONTROL MEASURES


https://www.highspeedtraining.co.uk/hub/preventing-slips-trips-falls/

HEALTH HAZARD CONTROL MEASURES


https://nchh.org/information-and-evidence/learn-about-healthy-housing/health-hazards-prevention-and- solutions/

WORK EQUIPMENT HAZARD CONTROL MEASURES


https://www.hseblog.com/the-mechanical-machinery-hazards/

MSD HAZARD CONTROL MEASURES


https://www.msdprevention.com/MSD-Hazards-and-Controls/

Already applied control measures are as follows

Fire extinguisher and fire watcher are availible


Banks man and riggers are available
Restriction to authorized entried for dangerous equipments.
Sufficient PPE are provided
Trainings are given to the workers regarding their respective task Break
and job rotation system implemented

Additional control measures are as follows

1. Repairing the pipeline leak in the hydrant system

Learner number: Learner Faizan Abdul Page 4 of


Supplying double insulation wire for welding equipment
Providing soundproof chambers where employees can unwind during breaks

Ensuring that roads are in good shape 5.Installation of a suitable ventilation system
Health examinations will be conducted every two months.

Instead of the fixed chairs, use moving, arm, and footrest chairs that may be adjusted in height

Switching to disposable glasses from steel ones

Installing interlocking systems, including laser safety equipment.

Learner number: Learner Faizan Abdul Page 5 of


Part 2: Risk Assessment

Organisation name: SK Fabrications Pvt Ltd.


Date of assessment: 12th June 2023
Scope of risk assessment: Fabrication Area,Work at height site,Grinding cutting site,Crane operaitng site,Welfare area and Kitchen area.

Hazard Who might be harmed and What are you already What further controls/actions Timescales
category and how? doing? are required? for further Responsible
hazard actions to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
1. Hazard Who might be harmed? 1. Fire extinguishers are 1. Repairing the leakage in the 25 Days Manager
category: installed at appropriate areas hydrant system’s pipeline
Nearly all of the employees in
the company, including the 2. Fire watchers are 2. Providing fire hose at the missing 7 Days Manager
management, the safety appointed at hot work area that is store room site
Fire Hazard:
members, the staff, and all other activitie
employees, are affected when a 3. Scheduled checklist to be
fire spreads accidentally. 3. Safe instructions and training maintain for checking electricity, 7 Days Fire Officer
It was discovered given to the workers. pressure and water level in the tank
that the fire hose How: Due to a leak in the for hydrant system.
is missing from pipeline of the hydrant system,
the store site and there is a possibility of a fire 4. Scheduled inspection of auto
that there is a leak danger at work since it will not start control of Hydrant Fire 7 Days Fire Officer
in the pipeline of function in an emergency, which Fighting system
the hydrant fire could result in a serious fire that
results in injuries or fatalities.
fighting system,
which is
preventing the
maintenance of

Learner number: Learner Faizan Abdul Page 6 of


Hazard Who might be harmed and What are you already What further controls/actions Timescales
category and how? doing? are required? for further Responsible
hazard actions to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
the required
pressure.

2. Hazard Who might be harmed? 1. Appropriate PPE’S are 1. Maintenance and repair of the 15 Days Project
Category: been provided to the dustsuction pipe Engineer
operator such as
Hazardous respiratory mask, safety 2. Provision of proper Manager
1. Shotblasting machine 25 Days
Substance goggle,apron and hand ventilationsystem
hazard operator
gloves
3. Scheduled inspection for Safety
2. Otherworkers working themachine to be organized 1 Week Supervisor
I checked it out around the machine 2. Frequent breaks and
and discovered jobrotation to be Safety
that the shot scheduled 4. Safe training and instructions to 20 Days Supervisor
blasting How :As the dust leakage has begiven
machine's dust been observed from the
suction hose has machineit might cause Safety
5. Health checks should be 2 Months
a defect, which inhalation of dust resulting in Supervisor
health issues to the workers arrangedonce in a two month
has caused dust
leakage to be exposed to it such as lungs
seen. problem, Eye problem and skin
problem

3.Hazard Who might be harmed? 1. Stop the welding 1. Competent welder to be 15 Days Manager
Category: activityimmediately appointed
1. Welder
Electricity 2. Supervisor 2. Discussing the issue with 2. Provision of double insulation 10 Days Manager
Hazard thesupervisor wireof welding machine
3. Other Workers

Learner number: Learner Faizan Abdul Page 7 of


Hazard Who might be harmed and What are you already What further controls/actions Timescales
category and how? doing? are required? for further Responsible
hazard actions to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
At the welding 3.Monthly inspection of 1 Month Safety
site, it was noticed weldingmachine by Supervisor
that the insulation How: There is a danger of 3.Fire watch appointed authorized Person
on the welding electrocution because the live 4.Appropriate PPE are 15 Days Safety
4.Providing proper training
wire had been cut, component is exposed as a result provided to the welder such Supervisor
of the wire's insulation being andcommunication to the
exposing the live asrubber gloves and safety welder
part of the wire. severed, which can result in goggle
shock, paralysis, and even
fatality.
4.Hazard Who might be harmed? 1. Grinding workers are 1. Provision of sound proof 45 Days Manager
Category: beenprovided with PPE cabinswhere workers can rest
1. Grinding machine
Such as earplug or ear when on breaks
Noise Hazrad operator muffs
2. Regular inspection and
During the maintenance to be carried out 10 Days Safety
2. Other workers
examination, it 2. Individual dosimeter forgrinding machine Supervisor
was discovered working around. given tothe workers to
that the grinding detect the abnormal
area's machine 3. Clients and visitors 3. Provide safety training and
noise in case
was producing instructions to the workers 20 Days Safety
noise that was How: The grinding 3. Frequent breaks to be regardingnoise hazard. Supervisor
over 85 dB. machine is making an scheduled for workers
abnormally high amount 4. Health examniation to be
of noise—more than 85 done once in every three
dB. month. 3 Months Safety
Above persons Supervisor
exposed to this noise
may experience
temporary and
permanent hearing

Learner number: 00628068 Learner name: Faizan Abdul Aziz Page 8 of 21


Hazard Who might be harmed and What are you already What further controls/actions Timescales
category and how? doing? are required? for further Responsible
hazard actions to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
loss, ringing in the
ears, tinnitus, and
stress.

5.Hazard Who Might be harmed? 1. Providing appropriate PPE 1. Maintenance of the drill 1 Week Safety
Category suchas vibration absorption machineto be done periodically Supervisor
1. Drill machine workers
gloves, safety shoes and safety
Vibration Safety
goggles 15 Days
hazard 2. Providing training to the Supervisor
How::Workers exposure to workersregarding vibration risk
I saw that the
excessive vibration brought on
power drill 2. Vibration meters provided
by constant usage of a drill 2 Months Safety
machine at the to theoperator for safe 3. Health checks to be
machine may cause a number Supervisor
fabrication yard working organizedonce in two month
of health problems, including
had considerable
joint discomfort, soft tissue
vibration and that 4. Providing job rotation and 1 Day
damage to the whites of the
the workers were frequentbreaks to the workers Manager
fingers from vibration,
working
shoulder pain, and nerve
nonstop..
damage.

6.Hazard Who Might be harmed? 1. Barricading and putting 1. Spillage plan to be properly 10 Days Safety
Category signage around the area where implemented Supervisor
1. Machine
cables andmetal parts are lying
operators Safety
2. Regular and proper Daily
2. Providing information housekeepingto be maintained Supervisor
Slip trip 2. Supervisor
and safetraining to the
hazard Safety
3.pedestrians
Daily Supervisor

Learner number: 00628068 Learner name: Faizan Abdul Aziz Page 9 of 21


Hazard Who might be harmed and What are you already What further controls/actions Timescales
category and how? doing? are required? for further Responsible
hazard actions to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
During the workers before entering 3. Restrict unauthorized entries at
inspection, it was the site thesite.
found that some How :Workers may become Daily Safety
scrap metal parts caught in the trailing cables and Supervisor
were left in the metal components and trip or 3.Providing appropriate 4. Supervision to be ensured that
walkways and fall, which could result in PPE to theworkers like theproper housekeeping is been 10 Days
that the drill and fractures, sprains, and bruises.. antiskid shoes done Manager.
grinding
machine's cable 5. Provision of Sufficient
wires were Illuminationin the walkways
trailing in the
walkways.

7. Hazard Who might be harmed? 1. Properly housekeeping to 1. Replacing steel glasses 10 Days Manager
category: be doneproperly of the with disposable glasses
1.All the workers in the eating utensils
organization
10 Days Manager
2. Provision of sufficient number
Health hazard
2. Instructions given to the of dustbin
During my How : Due to an outdated workersregarding personal
hygiene like washing and 1 Week Manager
inspection, I water filter, water is not 3. New and proper standard filter
discovered that appropriately filtered and may sanitizing hand properly
tobe installed in the water purifier
the water cause health problems like
purifier's filter diarrhea, cholera, and typhoid.
life had expired Viruses or diseases may spread 4. Monthly water testing to
25 Days Safety
and steel drinking through steel drinking glasses. beorganized by affiliated supervisor
glasses were labs
being

Learner number: 00628068 Learner name: Faizan Abdul Aziz Page 10 of 21


Hazard Who might be harmed and What are you already What further controls/actions Timescales
category and how? doing? are required? for further Responsible
hazard actions to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
utilized in the Safety
dining room. supervisor
5. Sanitizing and cleaning of Daily
theeating area to be done on
dailybasis
Safety
4 Months supervisor
6. Pest control to be done
twice ayear

7 Days Safety
7. Proper instruction and training supervisor
tobe provided to the workers and
theeating area staff.
8. Hazard Who might be harmed? 1. Competent crane 1. Fixing and repairing outriggers 7 Days Safety
category: operator isappointed properly Supervisor
1.Crane Operator
Work Safety
Equipment 2.Riggers Daily
2. Informed the 2. To organize weekly inspection Superviso
Hazard supervisor about the of the crane
3.Other workers
workingaround the issue
crane Crane
3. Proper supervision during the Operator
Daily
3. Banks man and activity should be provided
During the How:Due to the crane's riggers areprovided
inspection at the instability, it is possible for
crane operation 4. Barricading the area when crane Daily Safety
it to topple over and for Superviso
site, it was 4. Safe training and operations are carried out
cargo or objects to fall on
discovered that workers, inflicting severe instructions aregiven to Crane
one of the injuries such fractures and the operator Daily Operator
four outriggers is
not extending

Learner number: 00628068 Learner name: Faizan Abdul Aziz Page 11 of 21


Hazard Who might be harmed and What are you already What further controls/actions Timescales
category and how? doing? are required? for further Responsible
hazard actions to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
and is not crushing, as well as maybe 5.Pre use inspection of the crane
functioning fatalities. to be done before the use of the
properly, which crane Safety
could impair the Supervisor
Dialy
stability of the
crane. 3.Removing unnecessary people
from the site during the operation
9. Hazard Who might be harmed? 1. Stop the continuous DSE 1. Replace the fixed chairs with height 15 Days Manager
Category: activities adjusting, revolving and arm and
1.Admin Staff footrest chairs
MSD Hazard 2. Give frequent breaks
2.Design Engineer
2. Provision of met finish on desk 10 Days Manager
It had been noted 3. Train the workers
that the DSE regarding MSD’S 3. Scheduled breaks to be
stations' seats How: The utilization of fixed organizedfor workers 5 Days Safety
were not seats that cannot be adjusted in Supervisor
ergonomically height or rotated can lead to 4. Health checks to be organized
designed, which MSDs like back discomfort, once in a two month for the 3 Months Safety
made it neck pain, eye strain, shoulder workers Supervisor
uncomfortable for pain, slide discs, and weariness.
the staff members
working there
without regular
breaks.

10. Hazard Who might be harmed? 1. Stop the forklift activity 7 Days Safety
1. Provision of safety speed limit
Category: Supervisor
1. Forklift Operator signs indicating 5km/hr at
Vehicle vehiclepathways
Movement 2. Pedestrian 2. Appoint a competent driver
Hazard Manager

Learner number: 00628068 Learner name: Faizan Abdul Aziz Page 12 of 21


Hazard Who might be harmed and What are you already What further controls/actions Timescales
category and how? doing? are required? for further Responsible
hazard actions to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
3. Visitors and Clients 2. Providing proper condition of 15 Days
road
It was noted that 3.Training and instructions Safety
the routes are aboutsafe driving is given. Supervisor
slightly uneven 3. Maintenance of the forklift 8 Days
and the forklift How:The forklift may periodically
was driven down overturn or it may strike a Forklift
them at a high pedestrian or fixed structure, Operator
rate of speed. inflicting injuries and 4. Pre use checks to be carried
Daily
property damage because the outbefore use Manager
pathways where it was 5. Ensuring proper illumination in 10 Days
driven are uneven and it was thepathways
moving at an irregular pace.

11. Hazard Who might be harmed? Manager


1. Stop the press brake 1. Installins interlocking device
Category: 1 Month
1. Press Brake machine machineoperation such as laser system device
operator 2. Regular inspection and
Work Safety
2. supervisor 2. Appoint a competent maintenance of the machine to Supervisor
Equipment 7 Days
operator bedone by authorized person
Hazard
3. Making SOP for press
How:Unintentional movement brakemachine operation Safety
3. Provison of adequate 7 Days
During the can lead to serious injuries, Supervisor
PPE
examination, I including crushing, nipping,
and amputation, if the 4. Proper illumination to be
saw that the
operator's hand or loose ensuredaround the working site for
press brake 4. Instruction and safe 10 Days Manager
clothing safe working condition
equipment at the training to beprovided
cutting area

Learner number: 00628068 Learner name: Faizan Abdul Aziz Page 13 of 21


Hazard Who might be harmed and What are you already What further controls/actions Timescales
category and how? doing? are required? for further Responsible
hazard actions to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
had no safety become caught in the press
devices fitted. brake machine's teeth.
5.Restricting the use of the 5.Maintaining procedure for Safety
15 Days
machineonly for the reporting and replacing Supervisor
authorized person only damagedtools

Learner number: Learner Faizan Abdul Page 14 of


Part 3: Prioritise 3 actions with justification for the selection
Suggested word counts
Moral, general legal and financial arguments for all actions: 300 to 350 words
For EACH action:
Specific legal arguments: 100 to 150 words
Likelihood AND severity: 75 to 150 words
How effective the action is likely to be in controlling the risk: 100 to 150 words

Moral, general legal and financial arguments for ALL actions

Moral, general legal and financial Moral Arguments: It is critical for a organization to guarantee that its employees have adequate health and
arguments safety protections. As whoever joins the organization hopes for a safe and secured workplace to work with.
Employers, on the other hand, the organization have a moral obligation to offer health and safety precautions
in the workplace, as well as to provide adequate working conditions for their employees. Workers in the
company feel comfortable when they work in a safe environment. They will eventually want to work in such
setting and will contribute to the organization's increased performance as well as improved safety culture.
Moral justifications are one reason a business should implement a workplace health and safety policy.
Accidents at work could result in fatalities or very serious injuries. Furthermore, disregarding a worker's life
for any organizational purposes is immoral. Employees are entitled to a safe workplace, but it is also their
responsibility to act in a safe manner while at work. Due to a pipeline failure in the hydrant system, there is
inadequate pressure for the three priorities indicated. It could fail to put out the fire in the event of an
emergency at work, leaving practically all employees with severe burns or even death. Second, a cut in the
insulation of the welding wire may result in fatalities or serious shocks for the operator or any nearby
workers. The third priority mentioned in which the safety device is missing in the press brake machine, In
case of any any unintentional movement it may result in a severe accident where the operator may lose his
hand, may suffer fractures or amputation due to which he will no longer be able to work in the future, Thus
all these factors are not morally correct as per safety perspective and humanity ground.
Legal Arguments: According to a legal argument, if safety regulations are not observed while executing
work-related tasks that could cause serious injuries, illness, loss of life, and property loss, certain laws may
be imposed on the organization. Additionally, the company could be subject to harsh legal penalties like
fines, prohibitions, or jail time, as well as enforcement visits where the

Learner number: Learner Faizan Abdul Page 15 of


authorities could issue a notice of improvement or a warning, which would have an effect on the company's
reputation in the market. Therefore, following the law should be seen as one of the organization's top
priorities in order to avoid legal disputes.
Financial Arguments: Workplace accidents cost the company money in the form of medical and hospital
bills, insurance, compensation, fines, and other expenses. Organizations must invest in putting control
systems in place to prevent such mishaps in order to prevent severe financial damage.
Fixing the hose at the store room location and maintaining the pipelines in the hydrant system will cost
25,000 INR. While a significant fire mishap at work might cause the company to lose 55 lakhs inr in
revenue
The organization will spend 40k INR to install the laser safety device in the press brake machine, which is 60
times less than the expense the organization would incur in the event of an accident while using the press
brake machine.
Providing double insulating wire for a welding machine will only cost 6k inr, but an accident caused by a
live part that was exposed in the wire will cost more than 40 times as much.
In addition to the fees listed above, the Organization would also be required to pay fines as required by law.
coverage for the employees, compensation for the employee, Paid overtime, incentives for
employees to meet goals, and legal representation for cases involving workplace accidents

Justification for action 1

Action Make plans to fix the fire hose at the storage room site and the leak in the hydrant fire fighting system's
pipeline.(Hazard Category 1)
Specific legal arguments The organization is required to ensure that all protective and control measures are taken and maintained in
accordance with ILO recommendation R164 and Section 38 of the 1948 Factory Act in order to control and
prevent the outbreak and spread of fire at the workplace and to provide safe working conditions for the
employees. The employer is legally required to ensure that all corrective and comprehensive measures are
taken at the workplace to control the fire hazard if there is a major fire at work as a result of negligence in the
control measures. These strict actions by the legal
authorities may include fines, imprisonment, and prohibition.
Consideration of likelihood AND severity LIKELIHOOD: Due to a leak in the hydrant fire fighting system's pipeline and the absence of a fire hose at
the store room site, it is possible that a major fire outbreak and spread would occur at the

Learner number: Learner Faizan Abdul Page 16 of


workplace. In this case, the organization might be unable to put out the fire because it lacks the pressure and
force needed to do so, and the fire at the store room site would not be contained because the fire hose was
missing.

SEVERITY: The severity of the fire hazard is also high because a malfunctioning fire hydrant system might
result in a fire outbreak and large explosions as the required pressure is not maintained as well as missing fire
hose the fire outbreak will not be controlled leading to a fire
accident which might result into serious injuries, burns, property damage and even fatalities.
How effective the action is likely to be in
1. By repairing and fixing the leaks in the fire hose and hydrant pipelines at the store room site, respectively,
controlling the risk. This should include:
the firefighting system will perform better and be more effective. In the event of a major fire or explosion,
 the intended impact of the action; the pipeline will maintain the necessary pressure and force, allowing the fire to be easily controlled and
 justification for the timescale that you prevented.
indicated in your risk assessment; and 2. Taking into account the possibility and seriousness of the hazard, a 25-day timeframe is recommended for
 whether you think the action will fully repairing the pipeline leak and repairing the fire hose. As it would also require purchase department
control the risk. approval as well as it will take time to find a competent contractor to perform the task.
3. By repairing the leakage in the hydrant fire fighting system pipeline and fixing the hose, It will help to
control the fire at the workplace and will control the risk fully.

Justification for action 2

Action Action of installing the press brake machine with a interlocking device such as laser safety device.( Hazard
Category 11)
Specific legal arguments According to the DANGEROUS MACHINE ACT 1983 and the DRAFT OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY
AND WORKING CONDITION CODE OF 2019, the employer has a responsibility to make sure that no
employee hired to work at their place of business suffers harm. They should also make sure that any
dangerous machines used at the workplace have all necessary safeguards and safety measures in place to
prevent this. Therefore, installing a laser safety device in the press brake
machine will protect the worker from suffering severe injuries like crushing and amputation, and it

Learner number: Learner Faizan Abdul Page 17 of


will also provide safe working conditions so as to avoid any legal strict actions such as penalties,
Prohibition and imprisonment
Consideration of likelihood AND severity Likelihood:- Since there are no safety devices put in the press brake machine, the likelihood of this accident
is very high. There is no restriction for the inadvertent movement of the machine, thus the worker could
damage himself by catching his hand or a piece of loose cloth between the teeth. This could cause crushing
injuries or even an amputation.
Severity:- The severity of this risk is very high because any unintentional movement while operating the
press brake machine could result in the operator injuring himself by catching his hands or loose clothing in
the machine, which could crush the operator's hand and require an
amputation. Additionally, workers who are injured in this accident may never again be able to use their hands
for work.
How effective the action is likely to be in
1. The intended impact of installing a laser safety device in the press brake machine will ensure the safety of
controlling the risk. This should include:
the operator operating the press brake machine from an accident which may cause severe injuries, crushing
 the intended impact of the action; and amputation due to any unintentional movement of the machine.
 justification for the timescale that you
2. The timescale suggested for installing a laser safety device in the press brake machine is 1 month as it
indicated in your risk assessment; and
needs approval from the manager and also from other departments for purchasing and installing it.
 whether you think the action will fully
control the risk. 3. The action of installing the laser safety device in the press brake machine will fully control the risk to the
operator against trapping his hand or loose clothes in the machine and causing severe injuries.

Justification for action 3

Action Making the arrangement for double insulating wire of welding machine .( Hazard Category 3)

Specific legal arguments According to ILO Convention C155 and Recommendation R164, it is the responsibility of the employer to
provide the safe working conditions to the employees and ensure their safety. ICE 61140 applies to the
protection of people and animals against electric shock and provides fundamental principles and safety
requirements to the worker against electric hazards. If a workplace accident occurs as a result of a live part
being exposed in the welding machine's wire, it
means that the employer failed to take the necessary safety precautions, which is a violation for which the
organization risked harsh penalties like suspension, fines, and imprisonment.

Learner number: Learner Faizan Abdul Page 18 of


Consideration of likelihood AND severity Likelihood:- Since welding is the most frequent activity at the workplace, the likelihood of the hazard is very
significant. The operator and other workers around may come into contact with the live part of the welding
machine wire, which could cause a serious accident. The live component of the welding machine's wire,
which is exposed owing to a cut in the insulation, could hurt the operator and other nearby workers and result
in serious injuries like shock and electrocution as well as fatalities if the wire is not replaced with double
insulating wire.
Severity:- The severity of this hazard is very high because the operator and other nearby workers could be
exposed to the welding machine's live wire, which could cause serious health problems
like shock, electrocution, and paralysis, which could permanently damage a worker's body parts or even
cause death.
How effective the action is likely to be in
1. By providing the double insulating wire for the welding machine will prevent the operator and other
controlling the risk. This should include:
workers working around from getting electric shock, paralysis and also loss of life as there will be no live
 the intended impact of the action; part exposed in the wire of the welding machine.
 justification for the timescale that you
2. This action should be done on immediate basworker is as it is highly dangerous and life threatening
indicated in your risk assessment; and
to the operator and the workers working around the welding machine, So the time scale suggested for
 whether you think the action will fully
control the risk. the same is of 10 days.
3. The action of providing the double insulating wire for the welding machine will fully control the risk to
operator and other workers working around the welding machine from getting electrocution as there will be
no live part exposed in wire, Thus will save from severe injuries and major accident

Part 4: Review, communicate and check


Suggested word counts for each section:
 Planned review date or period and reasoning for this: 50 - 100 words
 How the risk assessment findings will be communicated and who needs to know the information: 100 - 150 words
 Follow up on the risk assessment: 100 - 150 words.

Planned review date/period with By reviewing the risk assessment, it is possible to determine the success and shortcomings of the hazards
reasoning control measures provided to the organization. The review period schedule for this organization would be 8
months considering the high-risk activities, so the review will be done on 11th February 2024 to see if the
control measures are adequate to prevent the accident. This is
because the workforce and equipment at the organization change as per the requirement.

Learner number: Learner Faizan Abdul Page 19 of


I will make sure that the risk assessment is assessed before the review date, though, if certain occurrences
take place before that time.

1. Increase in the number of accidents and incidents


2. Installation of new machinery and equipments
3. Changes in the rules and regulations.
4. Change in working pattern
5. Too much hiring of new employees.
How the risk assessment findings will be The risk assessment will be communicated in three ways
communicated AND who you need to tell
Verbally:-

I will personally meet with the production manager to discuss the key findings of my risk assessment.
During this meeting, I will go over the risk assessment and the necessary control measures that must be put
in place to lower the risk. I will also recommend that they give the employees who will be implementing the
control measures the task specified in the risk assessment.

In order to explain and summarize the risk assessment to the workers who will start the tasks in person, I will
also hold a toolbox talk for them. I will invite feedback from the workers during the talk to make sure that
everyone is aware of the key findings of the risk assessment.

Written:-

1.I will give the designated team hard and digital copies of the risk assessment during the team meeting, and
meeting minutes will be taken.

2. The organization's workers will receive a summary of the risk assessment, and the full report will be
made available upon request and on the intranet of the business.

3. The main findings of the risk assessment will, if necessary, be sent to the employees' individual email
addresses.

Visually:-

Learner number: Learner Faizan Abdul Page 20 of


1. To ensure that employees can see the risk assessment summary every day, I will display it on the
organization's notice board.

2. During the team meeting, I will make a PowerPoint presentation to the specified team members.
How you will follow up on the risk The organization's risk assessment will be followed up on by maintaining a checklist for each specific task to
assessment to check that the actions determine whether management and employees are putting control measures into place. Examples of items
have been carried out on the checklist include PPEs, PTWs, barricades, defects, etc.

By examining task sites and speaking with the workers, the suggested steps would determine whether the
necessary resources and financial aid from the respective departments have been provided to do the
assignment before the time period ends.

If the task is going to be delayed from the due date, I will investigate the reason for the delay, ask the
designated person why it has been delayed, and determine whether additional resources are
required to do it on time.

Learner number: 00628068 Learner name: Faizan Abdul Aziz Page 21 of 21

You might also like