Unit IG2: Risk assessment

Declaration: By submitting this assessment (Parts 1 – 4) for marking I declare that it is entirely my own work. I understand that falsely claiming that
the work is my own is malpractice and can lead to NEBOSH imposing severe penalties (see the NEBOSH Malpractice Policy for further information).

Important note: You must refer to the document ‘Unit IG2: risk assessment – Guidance and information for learners and Learning Partners’ while
completing all parts of this assessment. Your Learning Partner should provide you with a copy, but it can also be downloaded from the relevant
resources section for this qualification on the NEBOSH website.

Part 1: Background

You should aim to complete this section in 150 - 200 words.

Topic Comments
Name of organisation* Fujitec India Pvt Ltd.
Site location* Nahur - Mulund
Fujitec appoints total of 545 employees all over India among which each workplace of
Fujitec consists of 1 Site Manager, 1 Site Supervisor, 1 Safety Officer and 1 Store
Number of workers Manager.
Labours on each site include Scaffolders, Technicians, Fitter, Erector and Manual
Handling workers.

General description of the organisation
Description of the area to be included in the Among 65 projects of Fujitec across India I have inspected the one in Nahur – Mulund
risk assessment
Fujitec India Pvt Ltd is an elevator company which provide installation and servicing of
elevators all over the world, spread across 5 continents established in 1948 they also
have presence in installing escalators. Fujitec provides free of cost after sales services to
their customers in India for a year and have technicians appointed full time at their
workplace as per customers requirements. Their main activities involves sales of their
product, installation after the sales, servicing and maintenance after installation. Fujitecs
employees report to their assigned workplace at 9am in the morning until 5pm in the
evening.
which is 47 floor residential building ‘Ozone Valley’ having 2 wings A – B and 5 elevators

Learner number: Learner name: Page 1 of 22

 in each wing. The building structure is completed till 45 floor and the elevators installation
work has started in all the lift shafts which involves scaffold erection in lift shafts, fixing of
brackets and rail guards, shifting of counter weight and counter frame inside lift shafts
and fixing of lift motor. At present scaffold erection work is carried out among 10 lift shafts
simultaneously, the lift shafts are identified as A1 to A5 in A wing and B1 to B5 in B wing
respectively.
The lift shafts A3 and B3 has scaffold erection clearance till 38 th floor only due to tower
crane being at work in those lift shafts. The scaffolds have breaks at every 10 floors for
more strength and rigidity with the help of iron beams installed at every 10 floors interval.
The workplace has have other activities related to construction of the building like block
work, interior, concreting, shuttering, material shifting, etc.

Major activities of Fujitec are as follows:

Scaffold erection work
Lift material unloading from truck
Material shifting from ground to store
Use of hand tools like pallet trucks
Any other relevant information
Electrical work inside the shafts for scaffold earthing
Rail Hoisting through winch machine

Workplace areas of Fujitec are as follows:

Site office
Store room
Lift shafts
Induction room
* If you’re worried about confidentiality, you can invent a false name and location for your organisation but, all other information provided must be
factual.

You should aim to complete this section in 100 - 200 words.

Note: this section can be completed after you have competed your risk assessment.
Outline how the risk assessment was Following are the ways in which the risk assessment is carried out:
carried out this should include: The risk assessment was carried out with the help of five elements of the risk assessment
 sources of information consulted; which are to identify the hazards, determine who might be harmed and how, calculate the

Learner number: Learner name: Page 2 of 22

 likelihood and severity of the risk, record the finding of the risk assessment and review
the risk assessment for necessary update in it after a frequent interval of time.

 Sources of information consulted

https://www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/docs/ELECTRONIC/51502/128994/F602195904/AUS51502%202017.pdf
https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_INSTRUMENT_ID:312513
https://www.ilo.org/safework/info/standards-and-instruments/codes/WCMS_164653/lang--en/index.htm
https://www.hse.gov.uk/simple-health-safety/risk/steps-needed-to-manage-risk.htm
https://www.hse.gov.uk/search/search-results.htm?gsc.q=work%20at%20height
%20#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=work%20at%20height%20&gsc.page=1
https://www.hse.gov.uk/search/search-results.htm?gsc.q=scaffold#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=scaffold&gsc.page=1
 who you spoke to; and
 Who I spoke to
 how you identified:
Site Manager
- the hazards;
Site Supervisor
- what is already being done; and
Safety Officer
- any additional controls/actions
Store Manager
that may be required.
Scaffolders
Technicians
Fitter/Erector
Manual Handling Labours

 How I identified the hazard

The hazards on the site were identified by the visual inspection I did on the workplace and after
talking to the workers and staff of the company. The hazards were also identified after looking at
some of the old accident, incident and first aid records.

Learner number: Learner name: Page 3 of 22

 Part 2: Risk Assessment

Organisation name: Fujitec India Pvt Ltd

Date of assessment: 5th Aug 2022
Scope of risk assessment: lift installation work in A and B wing of Ozone Valley

Hazard category Who might be harmed What are you already doing? What further controls/actions are Timescales for
and hazard and how? required? further actions Responsible
to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
1. Work The rail hoisting The damaged winch Replace the damaged winch 2 days Site
Equipment workers and the machine is stopped from machine with a new one having Supervisor
and operator of the winch being used in that condition third party certification of fitness
Machinery
machine. for rail hoisting work to avoid fatal
Damaged winch The workers are asked injury of workers.
machine found The damaged winch about any near miss
machine will cause the incident if occurred while Regular inspection and Daily Site
being used in lift
shaft A1 for rail machine to fail while using the damaged supervision should be maintained supervisor
hoisting work lifting heavy guide rails machine
and the guide rails
might fall on the The damaged machine is
workers below and the discarded from use and
winch machine removed from site
operator causing them
crush injuries, cut
injury, fracture and
wounds.

Learner number: Learner name: Page 4 of 22

Hazard category Who might be harmed What are you already doing? What further controls/actions are Timescales for
and hazard and how? required? further actions Responsible
to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)

2. Work at The scaffold erector The scaffold erector using Check the fall arrestors before 2 days Safety
Height and other workers loose fall arrestor is called taking them into use by the safety officer
nearby him out of the lift shaft officer.
Fall arrestor
used to hook
the full body The fall arrestor being The loose fall arrestor is Replace the loose fall arrestor
loose will cause the discarded and removed with a new one with proper locking Week Safety
harness is
found loose on scaffold erector fall from the site. system and assign competent officer
the life line in lift from height injuries in person for the work.
shaft A5 which case he falls due slip The workers are made
may cause fall 3 days Safety
or trip, as the fall aware about the risk of fall Refresher training for the workers
of scaffold from height and their working on height officer
arrestor won’t catch
erector in case
him, other workers injuries due to faulty tools.
of slip or trip
nearby might also get
hit while the worker is
falling.

3. Electricity The workers working All the electrical Reconnect the earthing wire 2 days Electrician
on the scaffold connections in the lift shafts between 19th and 20th floor by
Earthing wire between 19th and 20th like switch board, tube replacing the broken one and
used to provide
floor. lights, etc. are switched off. inspect all the other connections
earthing to the
scaffold is found for the same.
The earthing wire The workers are removed Ensure supervision of the earthing Daily Electrician
broken in B2 lift
shaft on the 20th being damaged will not from the lift shaft until the before commencing the work.
floor between prevent the flow of earthing wire is
the scaffold current through the

Learner number: Learner name: Page 5 of 22

Hazard category Who might be harmed What are you already doing? What further controls/actions are Timescales for
and hazard and how? required? further actions Responsible
to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
interval from workers body and the reconnected. Daily earthing maintenance and Daily Electrician
19th to 20th floor. current will not be inspection should be conducted.
flown into the earth Reconnect the damaged
leading to the workers earthing wire between 19th
electrocution, shock and 20th floor with a
and electrical burn temporary joint.
injuries.
4. Load The manual handling The unloading work is The damaged pallet truck is sent 7 days Site
handling workers and helpers paused for a while to make for repair and maintenance. An manager
Equipment around them. the workers aware about inspection of manual handling
the risk they are in tools and tackles is conducted to
Pallet truck
used by workers The workers manually ensure further safety of workers.
near store room putting the heavy The pallet truck is replaced
to unload lift material on the pallet by a new one with proper Health surveillance should be
1 month Site
materials is truck might get injuries features of lifting, shifting conducted on monthly basis to
found damaged while lifting or shifting and moving the heavy load ensure that workers are fir to manager
and the workers the material from work.
have to The workers are made
vehicle to the pallet
manually put
truck like cut, bruise, aware about the safe Training for workers on how to 5 days
material on it to Site
move. crush injury and hit by. working load of machine use the pallet and manual
manager
The long term effect and man. handling training should be given.
include body pain,
torned muscle, etc.

5. Work The workers working The workers inside the lift The water leakage from the top 5 days Site

Learner number: Learner name: Page 6 of 22

Hazard category Who might be harmed What are you already doing? What further controls/actions are Timescales for
and hazard and how? required? further actions Responsible
to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
environmen inside the lift shaft B3 shaft are removed from the shed is stopped by replacing the supervisor
t lift shaft to avoid slip and fall shed with a new one.
The accumulated water
Water 10 days Safety
on the ground will give The accumulated water is The workers are sent for their
accumulation is
rise to mosquito removed from the ground health check-up to avoid any officer
found in lift B3
at the ground breeding leading to floor to avoid any health risk spread of diseases among them.
floor due to several malarial health to the workers
leakage from effects on workers and
the top floor the water coming from The water leakage is found
shed due to the top shed will make on the top shed and the
heavy rain. leakage is stopped
the scaffold structure
slippery and lead to temporarily to start the
slip and fall of the work.
workers while they are
working.

6. Fire The welder, welding The welder is told to report The used fire extinguisher is sent 7 days Safety
helper and the people the site manager and the for refilling and hydro testing for officer
The welder nearby. extinguisher is removed reuse on the site.
working in lift
from site.
shaft B4 for 10 days
bracket welding The welder working Safety tagging system is used for
without welding apron Strict action against the high-risk activities which will Safety
work is found
without welding may get burn injuries if welder is taken to work ensure safety of the worker and officer
apron and used the welding arc fall on without following safety prevent property damage.
fire extinguisher him as he is not norms and avoid them.

Learner number: Learner name: Page 7 of 22

Hazard category Who might be harmed What are you already doing? What further controls/actions are Timescales for
and hazard and how? required? further actions Responsible
to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
wearing welding apron Follow work permit system before 1 day Safety
and the helper might The welder is sent back to assigning the task of welding to a officer
get caught in fire in work after a refresher worker
case of one due to the training from the safety
extinguisher being officer.
empty leading to him
having burn injuries or
fatal injuries too.

7. Slip and fall Store manager and the Water spill ahead sign is Arrange a vacuum cleaner to clear 15 days Store
manual handling fixed near the store area to the accumulated ran water until manager
Water leftovers workers. avoid people falling the monsoon is there.
found in store
room after
cleaning the The leftover water at The water spill is cleared
accumulated store will cause the from the store area by the
water caused people inside slip and housekeeping team.
due to rain. fall causing them
injuries like back injury, Water spill assign is
head injury, sprain, removed from near the
wounds and fracture. store area.

8. Welfare Almost every Arranged to conduct the The testing certificate for drinking 3 days Safety
employee. water test. water must be stuck in drinking officer
Drinking water water area and a record in file
is not tested Workers drinking must be maintained
and inspected
contaminated water will

Learner number: Learner name: Page 8 of 22

Hazard category Who might be harmed What are you already doing? What further controls/actions are Timescales for
and hazard and how? required? further actions Responsible
to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
regularly to suffer health issues
ensure safety. and illness.
9. Substance Workers nearby the The workers under the The workers before entering the 5 days Site
abuse at drugged workers and influence of drugs are site are checked by the guard for manager
work drugged workers removed from site. any drugs and alcohol or tobacco.
themselves
The workers
working in lift Their site entry card is Substance abuse policy of the site 7 days
The drugged workers discarded and a huge fine is and company are stuck on the Safety
shaft A4 found
to be in working in lift shaft A4 imposed on their contractor entrance gate with punishment too officer
possession of will not have any sense if found under any influence.
drugs while at of what they doing All the other workers of the
workplace. while working with same contractors and other
work at height tools are checked for any similar
and tackle which will substance abuse.
lead to them causing
injuries to themselves
and the people nearby
them

10. Hazardous The workers working The unknown chemical Check for any similar chemicals 7 days Site
Substance on the 10th floor in lift bottle is removed from the being kept near the lift shafts and supervisor
shaft B2 site remove them by informing their
Unknown
supervisors.
chemical bottle
is found kept The unknown chemical The owner of the chemical
bottle kept near the bottle is found and the MSDS should be placed overall 2 days Safety
near lift shafts

Learner number: Learner name: Page 9 of 22

Hazard category Who might be harmed What are you already doing? What further controls/actions are Timescales for
and hazard and how? required? further actions Responsible
to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
B2 10th floor barricade may be bottle is returned to him. the organisation. officer
door barricade. anything that can
cause skin damage, Workers at the site are Daily supervision should be done 1 day
can have a bad smell instructed to fix a tag with to ensure this never happens Site
or the workers might the chemicals name on the again. supervisor
drink it without knowing bottle to identify it.
it Is a chemical leading
to several injuries and
sickness of the workers

11. Work The scaffolder and lift The workers in the lift shafts The loose cup locks of the 3 days Safety
equipment erectors working in the are removed and immediate scaffold is tightened by extra officer
lift shafts on the inspection is done material being fixed between the
The scaffold
scaffold cup lock and pipe.
cup locks is
found to be Scaffold checklist is made
The loose cup lock on with all the defects identified A new scaffold checklist to be 3 days Safety
loose after the
ledges is fixed scaffolds will cause the mentioned in the checklist made after rectification before Officer
on it in A wing ledger to move while resuming the work
lift shafts the workers move on it The checklist is used to
to work and may get make a full maintenance
dismantled while in use report and plan scaffold
leading to scaffold work accordingly after
structure collapse or rectification.
the workers fall from
height, resulting in fatal

Learner number: Learner name: Page 10 of 22

Hazard category Who might be harmed What are you already doing? What further controls/actions are Timescales for
and hazard and how? required? further actions Responsible
to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
injuries to them.

Learner number: Learner name: Page 11 of 22

Part 3: Prioritise 3 actions with justification for the selection
Suggested word counts
Moral and financial arguments for all actions: 300 to 350 words
For EACH action:
Specific legal arguments: 100 to 150 words
Likelihood AND severity: 75 to 150 words
How effective the action is likely to be in controlling the risk: 100 to 150 words

Moral and financial arguments for ALL actions

Moral, general legal and financial Moral Arguments:

arguments
1. Replacing the Damaged Winch Machine: From a moral standpoint, it is imperative to
replace the damaged winch machine with a new one that holds third-party certification for
rail hoisting work. Failure to do so could result in catastrophic consequences, including the
loss of human lives. If the winch machine were to fail during its operation, heavy rails could
fall onto workers, causing fatal injuries such as head trauma, crushing, fractures, and more.

2. Replacing the Loose Fall Arrestor: Morally, replacing the loose fall arrestor with a
properly functioning one and assigning a competent person for this task is crucial. This
action is necessary to prevent scaffold erectors from falling from heights, especially when
working above the 20th floor. The potential loss of life in such incidents not only impacts
the individual worker but also has far-reaching effects, causing emotional distress and
panic among co-workers and family members.

3. Reconnecting the Earthing Wire: On a moral level, reconnecting the earthing wire
between the 19th and 20th floors is essential. Failure to do so could result in electrocution
or electric shocks to workers operating in this area, leading to life-altering injuries or even
fatalities. This situation places an undue burden of financial damage and mental stress on
the affected workers and their families.

General Legal Arguments:

Learner number: Learner name: Page 12 of 22

 The legal arguments supporting the prioritized actions are firmly grounded in a framework
of international and national regulations designed to safeguard the well-being of workers in
hazardous working environments. Specifically, these actions align with the guidelines set
forth by respected organizations like the International Labour Organization (ILO) and
national legislation such as the Building and Other Constructions Workers Act 1996.
The ILO, a United Nations agency, plays a pivotal role in shaping global labor standards
and promoting occupational safety and health. Its recommendations carry significant weight
in shaping the legal framework in many countries. In the context of these prioritized actions,
the ILO's regulations underscore the paramount importance of ensuring the safety of
workers operating at heights and using heavy load-lifting machinery.
One of the key tenets emphasized by the ILO is the provision of proper safety equipment to
workers exposed to elevated risks, such as those working at significant heights. This
includes fall arrestors and other safety measures that act as a vital lifeline for workers,
preventing potentially life-threatening falls. The legal obligation to provide such safety
equipment stems from the ILO's commitment to protecting workers from harm and ensuring
their well-being while on the job.
Moreover, the ILO's guidelines also stress the necessity of third-party certification for
machinery and equipment used in high-risk operations. This certification process involves
rigorous assessment and testing by independent experts to ensure that machinery meets
stringent safety standards. By mandating third-party certification, the ILO aims to guarantee
the integrity and reliability of equipment, thereby reducing the likelihood of accidents and
injuries.

In a parallel vein, the Building and Other Constructions Workers Act 1996, which is a
national legislative instrument, reinforces these safety principles and translates them into
binding legal obligations within the country. This act places the responsibility squarely on
employers and organizations to adhere to safety protocols, provide adequate safety
equipment, and ensure that all machinery used in construction and related activities meets
specified safety criteria.
In essence, the legal arguments for these prioritized actions are not only in compliance with
international norms and standards but are also firmly rooted in national legislation. They
reflect a commitment to upholding the rights and safety of workers, ensuring that they are
provided with the necessary safeguards and equipment to perform their jobs safely in

Learner number: Learner name: Page 13 of 22

 hazardous environments. Failure to adhere to these legal requirements can have serious
legal consequences, making compliance imperative for both moral and legal reasons.

Financial Arguments:
From a financial standpoint, the initial investment required to implement these safety
measures may seem substantial. However, it is essential to recognize that this expenditure
pales in comparison to the potentially catastrophic financial consequences that could arise
from neglecting these critical safety issues. Let's delve further into this financial
perspective:

First and foremost, the costs associated with replacing the damaged winch machine with a
new one featuring third-party certification are a prudent investment in worker safety. While
acquiring a certified winch machine incurs an upfront expense, it's crucial to acknowledge
that this cost serves as an insurance policy against potential accidents. Accidents
stemming from equipment failure could result in not only significant medical expenses but
also potential legal liabilities, which may include compensation for injured workers, fines,
and litigation costs. These financial ramifications far surpass the cost of replacing the winch
machine and ensuring its certification.

Similarly, addressing the loose fall arrestor by procuring a new one with a proper locking
system is an expenditure that, when viewed through a financial lens, pales in comparison
to the potential consequences of a fall from height. In the event of an accident due to
inadequate fall protection, the financial toll could encompass medical bills, workers'
compensation claims, legal fees, and potential damage to the organization's reputation.
The cost of a new fall arrestor is a fraction of the potential financial liabilities.

Lastly, the financial outlay required to reconnect the earthing wire between the 19th and
20th floors, along with inspecting and possibly replacing other connections, is a preventive
measure against potentially devastating consequences. Electrical accidents resulting from
inadequate grounding can lead to severe injuries, disabilities, and even fatalities. The
financial costs associated with such accidents include medical care, compensation claims,
legal expenses, and potential fines for noncompliance with safety regulations.

In essence, while implementing these safety measures does entail an initial financial

Learner number: Learner name: Page 14 of 22

 investment, it serves as a prudent and cost-effective strategy in mitigating the far more
substantial financial repercussions that could arise from accidents, injuries, and legal
liabilities. By prioritizing safety through these actions, organizations not only protect their
most valuable asset—their workforce—but also shield themselves from potentially ruinous
financial consequences.

Learner number: Learner name: Page 15 of 22

Justification for action 1
Action
Specific legal arguments
Consideration of likelihood AND severity
How effective the action is likely to be in
controlling the risk. This should include:
 the intended impact of the action;
 justification for the timescale that you
Learner number: Learner name:
Replace the damaged winch machine with a new one having third party certification of
fitness for rail hoisting work to avoid fatal injury of workers.
The legal requirements involving damaged machine being used at workplace is explained
in the ILO Convention for ‘Safety and Health in the use of Machinery’, the convention states
that the machineries must have a third party certification before initiating the work.
The machines must be checked visually by a competent person daily before use.
The workers operating the machine must be competent enough to highlight any damage in
the machine and a damaged machine must not be in operation
The following legal requirements if not fulfilled before initiating the work, the employer will
be held responsible for the injuries faced by the workers and the local authority near the
workplace will have the right to investigate the accident and prosecute.
Likelihood – High
The likelihood of the workers suffering fatal injuries due to damaged winch machine will be
high because the machine is used for a whole day and the workers will be frequently
exposed to the damaged part of the machine, the workers being the competent person will
also seem to avoid the problems as it is his daily job.
Severity – High
The severity of the workers injuries will be high as the winch machine have only one task of
lifting the load from ground the desired location and the damage in machine will affect the
heavy lifting process, the workers whole body will be exposed to the injury if occurred and
the force of heavy machine part falling on the worker will the severity of injuries definitely
high.
The newly replaced winch machine will come equipped with a third-party certification,
providing assurance of its safety and reliability. Furthermore, in light of the previous
machine's damage, workers themselves will conduct checks on the replacement unit before
use to maintain a proactive approach to accident prevention.
Page 16 of 22
 indicated in your risk assessment;
and
 whether you think the action will fully
control the risk.
Justification for action 2
Action
Specific legal arguments
Consideration of likelihood AND severity
Learner number: Learner name:
To execute the provided recommendation, the risk assessment designates a timeframe of
2 days. The first day encompasses the replacement of the machine, while the second day
is allocated for the completion of the third-party certification process. This timeline ensures
both the swift replacement of the machine and its subsequent verification for safety
compliance.
The action outlined in the risk assessment pertaining to the damaged winch machine is a
comprehensive approach to guaranteeing its safety and suitability. The inclusion of third-
party certification serves as an additional layer of assurance, ultimately resulting in full
control of the associated risks.
Replace the loose fall arrestor with a new one with proper locking system and assign
competent person for the work.
The legal requirement involving work at height risk is explained in the ILO Convention 167
for ‘Safety And Health In Construction’ 1988, the ILO Convention states that the workers
working on a scaffold structure must have competency and experience.
Scaffolders must be certified with height test and physical fitness before initiating work on
the scaffold
The scaffolders must use some mandatory personal protective equipment like full body
harness, fall arrestors and life line, the fall arrestors and life line must have proper test
certificates, and full body harness must have shock absorber fixed in it.
The scaffold workers if work without any of these rules being implied, they will suffer major
injuries and the employer will face consequence for not implementing the safety norms on
his site.
Likelihood – High
The likelihood of the scaffolder suffering injury due to loose fall arrestor will be high as the
worker will be continuously exposed to the loose fall arrestor and a loose fall arrestor is not
Page 17 of 22

How effective the action is likely to be in
controlling the risk. This should include:
 the intended impact of the action;
 justification for the timescale that you
indicated in your risk assessment;
and
 whether you think the action will fully
control the risk.
Justification for action 3
Action
Specific legal arguments
Learner number: Learner name:
highlighted while working which increases the likelihood even more as the perception of
worker is that he is safe while working.
Severity – High
The severity of the workers injury will be high as the fall arrestor is being used in a lift shaft,
if the accident occurs the worker will fall down on the ground from working at height without
any stoppage in between and fall from height has high potential of major injury
The installation of the new fall arrestor will eliminate any potential risks of worker injuries or
accidents, thereby enhancing safety and instilling confidence among workers when working
on the scaffold. This proactive measure significantly reduces the likelihood of accidents
occurring.
To adhere to the provided recommendation, the risk assessment designates a timeframe of
2 days. Within this period, the loose fall arrestor will be safely discarded, and a new,
properly functioning one will be procured for use by workers. This timeline ensures a
seamless transition to enhanced safety measures.
The action outlined in the risk assessment, which involves replacing the loose fall arrestor,
serves as a comprehensive strategy for eradicating the risk of worker injuries resulting from
slips or trips on the scaffold. This action guarantees full safety and represents a thorough
risk control measure.
Reconnect the earthing wire between 19th and 20th floor by replacing the broken one and
inspect all the other connections for the same.
The legal requirement involving electrical risk due to broken earthing wire is explained in
‘Electrical Safety Act’ 1998, the act states that the electrical connections fixed at the
workplace for safety reasons must be inspected and maintained at regular intervals
The earthing connection provided must be fixed by a competent person and must be
Page 18 of 22

Consideration of likelihood AND severity
How effective the action is likely to be in
controlling the risk. This should include:
 the intended impact of the action;
 justification for the timescale that you
indicated in your risk assessment;
and
 whether you think the action will fully
control the risk.
Learner number: Learner name:
checked with a testing machine regularly.
The wires and cables used at workplace must be routed from the side walls to avoid its
damage and entanglement.
The earthing connections if not rectified and the workers suffer injuries due to it, the
employer will face charges against himself and his company to put the workers life at risk
and will have to pay huge fine or compensation to the injured.
Likelihood – High
The likelihood of the workers suffering an electric shock due to broken earthing wire will be
high because the current flowing through the scaffold in case of any electrical failure in lift
shaft will not be transferred to the earth and the workers working on scaffold will
continuously be exposed to the risk
Severity – High
The severity of the workers injury will be high as the workers both hands and both legs are
in contact with the scaffold while working with them and the current will flow through their
body from all sides causing more damage than normal electrical shock.
Rectifying the broken earthing wire is essential to prevent electrical currents from passing
through a worker's body and redirect them directly to the ground. This measure serves as a
robust preventive action against serious worker injuries caused by electrical accidents.
To address the broken earthing wire, the risk assessment allocates a timeframe of 2 days.
This duration encompasses the activities required to remove the damaged earthing wire,
halt ongoing work temporarily, and establish a new earthing connection. This
comprehensive approach is aimed at averting potential electrical accidents effectively.
Earthing connections are deliberately installed to ensure that electrical current doesn't
traverse through an individual's body but instead follows a path to the ground. The
replacement of the damaged earthing wire is a critical step in fully mitigating this risk,
ensuring complete control over the potential hazards associated with electrical currents.
Page 19 of 22
Learner number: Learner name: Page 20 of 22
Part 4: Review, communicate and check
Suggested word counts for each section:
 Planned review date or period and reasoning for this: 50 - 100 words
 How the risk assessment findings will be communicated and who needs to know the information: 100 - 150 words
 Follow up on the risk assessment: 100 - 150 words.

Planned review date/period with

reasoning
How the risk assessment findings will be
communicated AND who you need to tell
How you will follow up on the risk
assessment to check that the actions
have been carried out
The inspection took place on 5th August 2022 and the work is scheduled to be finished by
December 2022. The review date depending on the work will be after 3 months on 4 th
November 2022. The date is set because the installation of lift will be 90 percent completed
by then only major electrical connections will be left to made to start the lift where a review
of safety norms and risk assessment will help to work safely.
The risk assessment findings will be communicated in the following ways:
1. Verbal. Visual, and through Audio
2. The workers will be spoken to about the findings of risk assessment in the daily tool box
talk meeting and weekly training session to keep their mind wake about the risk present
around them while they are working
3. The management including the engineers and technicians will be spoken to in a meeting
conducted after the risk assessment to discuss the findings of risk assessment, the
engineers and technicians will be given responsibilities to implement safety measures in
their work locations.
4. The workers or the engineers who could not attend the meeting and training programme
will be given an audio visual recording of the meeting conducted to keep them aware of
the risks of the workplace.
5. Hand written and printed sheets with minutes of the meeting and risks controlled at
workplace will be stuck on the site to highlight the risks for new workers and engineers.
To follow up the risk assessment the management will be given a follow up plan, this will
include the risks and hazards of workplace with locations and the responsible person to

Learner number: Learner name: Page 21 of 22

 rectify them before any serious damage.
The management can follow up with the help of that plan if the recommendations have
been implemented on site by conducting a site inspection or internal audit with the follow
up plan in consideration.
The engineers and workers must be asked verbally if the actions have been implemented,
if not then why they haven’t been implemented, what are the reasons to not comply must
be asked.

Learner number: Learner name: Page 22 of 22