This document presents the Heinz dilemma moral case study. It describes a situation where a man named Heinz's wife is dying from an illness and there is a drug that could potentially save her life. However, the druggist who produced the drug is charging 10 times the production cost of $200, demanding $2,000 for a small dose. Heinz is only able to raise half the money needed at $1,000 from friends and family. When he asks the druggist to lower the price or allow delayed payment due to the urgency to save his wife's life, the druggist refuses. Desperate, Heinz considers stealing the drug. The document asks for an analysis of whether Heinz should have broken
This document presents the Heinz dilemma moral case study. It describes a situation where a man named Heinz's wife is dying from an illness and there is a drug that could potentially save her life. However, the druggist who produced the drug is charging 10 times the production cost of $200, demanding $2,000 for a small dose. Heinz is only able to raise half the money needed at $1,000 from friends and family. When he asks the druggist to lower the price or allow delayed payment due to the urgency to save his wife's life, the druggist refuses. Desperate, Heinz considers stealing the drug. The document asks for an analysis of whether Heinz should have broken
This document presents the Heinz dilemma moral case study. It describes a situation where a man named Heinz's wife is dying from an illness and there is a drug that could potentially save her life. However, the druggist who produced the drug is charging 10 times the production cost of $200, demanding $2,000 for a small dose. Heinz is only able to raise half the money needed at $1,000 from friends and family. When he asks the druggist to lower the price or allow delayed payment due to the urgency to save his wife's life, the druggist refuses. Desperate, Heinz considers stealing the drug. The document asks for an analysis of whether Heinz should have broken
This document presents the Heinz dilemma moral case study. It describes a situation where a man named Heinz's wife is dying from an illness and there is a drug that could potentially save her life. However, the druggist who produced the drug is charging 10 times the production cost of $200, demanding $2,000 for a small dose. Heinz is only able to raise half the money needed at $1,000 from friends and family. When he asks the druggist to lower the price or allow delayed payment due to the urgency to save his wife's life, the druggist refuses. Desperate, Heinz considers stealing the drug. The document asks for an analysis of whether Heinz should have broken
A woman was on her deathbed. There was one drug that the doctors thought might save her. It was a form of radium that a druggist in the same town had recently discovered. The drug was expensive to make, but the druggist was charging ten times what the drug cost him to produce. He paid $200 for the radium and charged $2,000 for a small dose of the drug. The sick woman's husband, Heinz, went to everyone he knew to borrow the money, but he could only get together about $1,000 which is half of what it cost. He told the druggist that his wife was dying and asked him to sell it cheaper or let him pay later. But the druggist said: “No, I discovered the drug and I'm going to make money from it.” So Heinz got desperate and broke into the man's laboratory to steal the drug for his wife. Moral Question: Should Heinz have broken into the laboratory to steal the drug for his wife? Why or why not? Individual Moral Decision: (Please elaborate your moral justification by applying Kohlberg’s Stages of Moral Development principles. Using the succeeding space below, you may use a maximum of two pages including this page. Your answer must be reasonable, clear in explanation and coherent in flow of thoughts. This task is equivalent to 20 points plus 5 points for submitting on time.)