THE RIZAL MEMORIAL COLLEGES, INC.

SCHOOL OF LAW

CIVIL PROCEDURE II
First Semester, AY 2023-2024

Prof. Maria Veronica M. Manalo

v.manalo16@gmail.com
vmmanalo@penncareylaw.upenn.edu

BASIS FOR EVALUATION

Recitation / Reporting: Thirty Percent (30%)

Final Examination: Sixty Percent (60%)
Attendance: Ten Percent (10%)

Total: One Hundred Percent (100%)

COURSE OUTLINE

I. JUDGMENTS AND FINAL ORDERS

A. Post-Judgment Remedies

Rule 37
Rules 40-45

1. Motion for new trial or reconsideration

a. Grounds

Sections 1, 3, 5, 6, Rule 37

b. When to file

Sections 1 and 2, Rule 37

c. Denial of the motion; effect

Section 9, Rule 37

d. Grant of the motion; effect

1
 Sections 3, 6,7, 8, Rule 37

e. Remedy when motion is denied, fresh 15-day period rule

Neypes v. CA, G.R. No. 141524 (2005)

Section 9, Rule 37

2. Appeals in general

Yu v. Samson-Tatad, 642 SCRA 421 (2011)

Landbank of the Philippines v. CA, G.R. No. 221636 (2016)
Section 6, Rule 51
People. V. Teehankee, G.R. Nos. 111206-08 (1995)

a. Judgments and final orders subject to appeal

Section 1, Rule 41

b. Matters not appealable

Section 1, Rule 31, as amended by A.M. No. 07-7-12-SC

c. Remedy against judgments and orders which are not

appealable

Section 1, Rule 41

d. Modes of appeal

i. Ordinary appeal

Rules 40 and 41

ii. Petition for review

Rule 42

iii. Appeal from quasi-judicial agencies to the CA

Rule 43

iv. Petition for review on certiorari

2
 Rule 45

e. Issues to be raised on appeal

Spouses Erorita v. Spouses Dumlao, G.R. No. 195477 (2016)

Section 8, Rule 51
Republic v. Bermudez-Lorino, G.R. No. 160258 (2005)

f. Period of appeal

Rules 40, 31, 42, 43, and 45

Neypes v. CA, G.R. No. 141524 (2005)

g. Perfection of appeal

Balgami v. CA, G.R. No. 131287 (2004)

h. Appeal from judgments or final orders of the Metropolitan

Trial Courts/Municipal Trial Courts/Municipal Trial Courts
in Cities/Municipal Circuit Trial Courts

Rule 40

i. Appeal from judgments or final orders of the Regional Trial

Courts

Rules 41 and 42

j. Appeal from judgments or final orders of the Court of

Appeals

Chuidian v. Sandiganbayan (Fifth Division), G.R. No. 139941

(2001)
Fortune Guarantee and Insurance Corporation v. CA, G.R. No.
110701 (2002)
Rule 45 vis-à-vis Rule 65

k. Appeal from judgments or final orders of the Sandiganbayan

Section 7, P.D. 1606, as amended

Section 1, Rule 45

l. Appeal from judgments or final orders of the Court of Tax

Appeals

3
 Section 11, R.A. 9282 and A.M. No. 07-7-12-SC

m. Review of final judgments or final orders of the Commission

on Audit

Section 2, Rule 64
Section 3, Rule 45
Section 8, Rule 64
Section 1, Rule XII, 2009 Revised Rules of Procedure of the
Commission on Audit

n. Review of final judgments or final orders of the Commission

on Elections

Section 2, Rule 64
Section 1, Rule 37, COMELEC Rules of Procedure

o. Review of final judgments or final orders of the Civil Service

Commission

Rule 43

p. Review of final judgments or final orders of the

Ombudsman

Rule 7, Rule III, Admin Order No. 7

q. Review of final judgments or final orders of the National

Labor Relations Commission

Section 2, Rule 43
St. Martin Funeral Homes v. NLRC, G.R. No. 130866 (1998)
Dongon v. Rapid Movers and Forwarders, G.R. No. 163431
(2013)

r. Review of final judgments or final orders of quasi-judicial

agencies

Rule 43
United Coconut Planters Bank v. E. Ganzon, Inc., G.R. No.
168859 (2009)

3. Relief from judgments, order and other proceedings

4
 Rule 38

a. Grounds for availing of the remedy

b. Time to file petition

c. Contents of petition

4. Annulment of Judgments or final orders and resolutions

Rule 47

a. Grounds for annulment

b. Period to file action

c. Effects of judgment of annulment

5. Collateral attack of judgments

B. Execution, Satisfaction, and Effect of Judgments

1. Difference between finality of judgment for purposes of appeal; for

purposes of execution

Heirs of Dimaampao v. Alug, G.R. No. 198223 (2015)

Perez v. Zulueta, G.R. No. L-10374 (1959)
Prieto v. Alpadi Development Corporation, G.R. No. 191025 (2013)

2. When execution shall issue

Rule 39

a. Execution as a matter of right

b. Discretionary execution

3. How judgment is executed

Section 6, Rule 39

a. Execution by motion or by independent action

5
 b. Issuance and contents of a writ of execution

c. Execution of judgments for money

d. Execution of judgments for specific acts

e. Execution of special judgments

f. Effect of levy on third persons

4. Properties exempt from execution

Section 13, Rule 39

5. Proceedings where property is claimed by third persons; in relation

to third party claim in attachment and replevin

6. Rules on redemption

Sections 27-34, Rule 39

7. Examination of judgment obligor when judgment is unsatisfied

Section 36, Rule 39

Umali v. Coquia, G.R. No. L-46303 (1988)
Section 40, Rule 39

8. Examination of obligor of judgment obligor

Section 37, Rule 39

PCIB v. CA, G.R. No. 84526 (1991)
Section 43, Rule 39
Phil. Transmarine Carriers v. CA, G.R. No. 122346 (2000)
Section 40, Rule 39
Section 41, Rule 39
Section 42, Rule 39

9. Effect of judgment or final orders

PNB v. Spouses Maranon, G.R. No. 189316 (2013)

PCI Leasing and Finance, Inc. v. Milan, G.R. No. 151215 (2010)
Machoca v. Cariaga, G.R. No. 75109-10 (1989)

6
 10. Enforcement and effect of foreign judgments or final orders

Philippine Aluminum v. Fasgi Enterprises, G.R. No. 137378 (2000)

Section 2, Article II, 1987 Constitution
Section 48, Rule 39
Asiavest Merchant Bankers v. CA, G.R. No. 110263 (2001)

II. PROVISIONAL REMEDIES

A. Nature and Purpose

Pahila-Garrido v. Tortogo, et al., G.R. No. 156358 (2002)

Rule 57
Rule 58
Rule 59
Rule 60
Rule 61
Reyes v. Lim, G.R. No. 134241 (2003)

B. Jurisdiction over Provisional Remedies

Section 33(1), B.P. 129

C. Preliminary Attachment

Northern Islands v. Garcia, G.R. No. 203240 (2015)

PCIV v. Alejandro, G.R. No. 175587 (2007)

1. Grounds for issuance of writ of attachment

2. Requisites

3. Issuance and contents of order of attachment; affidavit and bond

4. Rule on prior or contemporaneous service of summons

5. Manner of attaching real and personal property; when property

attached is claimed by third person

6. Discharge of attachment and the counter-bond

7. Satisfaction of judgment out of property attached

7
 8. Compared with garnishment and levy on execution

D. Preliminary Injunction

Dela Rosa v. Heirs of Valdez, 654 SCRA 467 (2015)

Rule 58
Manila International v. Rivera, 471 SCRA 358 (2005)
Sps. Nisce v. Equitable, G.R. No. 170038 (2012)
Recto v. Escaler, 634 SCRA 180 (2010)
Bacolod Water v. Labayen, 446 SCRA 11 (2004)
Oca v. Custodio, G.R. No. 174996 (2014)
UCPB v. United Alloy Phils. Corp., G.R. No. 152238 (2005)

1. Definitions and differences: preliminary injunction, temporary

restraining order, and status quo ante order

2. Requisites

3. Kinds of injunctions; kinds of temporary restraining orders

4. When writ may be issues, when writ may not be issued

5. Grounds for issuance of preliminary injunction

6. Grounds for objection to, or for the dissolution of injunction or

restraining order

7. Duration of temporary restraining orders

8. Rule on prior or contemporaneous service of summons in relation

to attachment

E. Receivership

Normandy v. Duque, G.R. No. L-25407 (1969)

Ysasi v. Fernandez, G.R. No. L-28593 (1968)
Commodities Storage v. CA, G.R. No. 125008 (1997)
Rule 59

1. Cases when receiver may be appointed

2. Requisites

8
 3. Requirements before issuance of an order

4. General powers of a receiver

5. Two kinds of bonds

6. Termination of receivership

F. Replevin

BA Finance Corp. v. CA, G.R. No. 102998 (1996)

Chiao Liong v. CA, G.R. No. 106251 (1993)
Siy v. Tomlin, G.R. No. 205998 (2017)
Rivera v. Vargas, G.R. No. 165895 (2009)
Rule 60

1. When may writ be issued

2. Requisites

3. Affidavit and bond; redelivery bond

4. Sheriff’s duty in the implementation of the writ; when property is

claimed by third party

G. Provisional Remedies and Interim Reliefs under Special Laws and Rules

1. Provisional remedies of the Family Courts

2. Human Security Act

3. Anti-Violence against Women and Children Act

4. Anti-Money Laundering Act

5. Financial Rehabilitation and Insolvency Act

6. Precautionary Hold Departure Orders

III. Special Civil Actions

A. Nature of Special Civil Actions

9
 Section 3(a), Rule 1

B. Distinguish: Ordinary Civil Actions and Special Civil Actions

C. Jurisdiction and Venue

Section 5, Article VIII, 1987 Constitution

BP 129

D. Interpleader

Rule 62
Beltran v. PHHC, G.R> No. L-25138 (1969)
Wack Wack Golf & Country Club v. Lee Won, G.R. No. L-23851 (1976)

1. Requisites for interpleader

2. When to file

3. Dismissal

E. Declaratory Reliefs and Similar Remedies

Rule 63
Jumamil v. Café, G.R. No. 144570 (2005)

1. Who may file action

2. Requisites of action for declaratory relief

3. When court may refuse to make judicial declaration

4. Conversion to ordinary action

5. Proceedings considered as similar remedies

a. Reformation of an instrument

b. Consolidation of ownership

c. Quieting of title to real property

10
F. Review of Judgments and Final Orders or Resolution of the Commission
on Elections and the Commission on Audit and the application of Rule 65
to other tribunals

Rule 64

1. Distinctions in the application of Rule 65 to judgments of the

Commission on Elections and Commission on Audit and the
application of Rule 65 to other tribunals, persons and officers

G. Certiorari, Prohibition, and Mandamus

Rule 65
Barbers v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 165691 (2005)
Roble Arrastre, Inc. v. Villaflor, G.R. No. 128509 (2006)
Suarez v. NLRC, G.R. No. 124723 (1998)
Jose v. Zulueta, G.R. No. L-16598 (1961)
Villarica Pawnshop v. Gernale, G.R. No. 163344 (2009)
Cabanero and Mangornong v. Torres, G.R. No. L-43352 (1935)
Tan v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 73155 (1986)
Province of Pangasinan v. Reparations Commission, G.R. No. L-27448 (1977)
Association of Small Landowners in the Philippines, Inc. v. Sec. of Agrarian
Reform, G.R. No. 78742 (1989)
Republic v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 166859 (2006)
Villareal-Sandoval v. Cailipan, G.R. No. 200727 (2013)
Araullo v. Aquino, G.R. No. 209287 (2014)
Thenamaris Philippines, Inc. v. CA, G.R. No. 191215 (2014)
Teng v. Pahagac, G.R. No. 169704 (2010)
Ombudsman v. Laja, G.R. No. 169241 (2006)

1. Definitions and distinctions

2. Requisites

3. When petition for certiorari, prohibition and mandamus is proper

4. Injunctive relief

5. Distinguish: certiorari, appeal by certiorari, and Article VIII, Section

1 of the Constitution

6. Distinguish: prohibition, mandamus, and injunction

7. When and where to file petition

11
 8. Exceptions to filing of motion for reconsideration before filing
petition

9. Reliefs petitioner is entitled to

10. Acts or omissions of first-level/Regional Trial Courts in election

cases

11. Where to file petition

12. Effects of filing of an unmeritorious petition

H. Quo Warranto

Defensor-Santiago v. Guingona, Jr., G.R. No. 134577 (1998)

Tecson v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 161434 (2004)
Unilongo v. CA, G.R. No. 123910 (1999)
Calleja v. Panday, G.R. No. 168696 (2006)
General v. Urro, G.R. No. 191560 (2011)
Cui v. Cui, G.R. No. 39773 (1934)
Villegas v. De la Cruz, G.R. No. L-23752 (1965)
Romualdez-Yap v. CSC, et. al., G.R. No. 104226 (1993)
Torres v. Quintos, G.R. No. L-3304 (1951)

1. Distinguish: quo warranto under the Rules of Court and quo warranto
under the Omnibus Election Code

2. When government commences an action against individuals or

associations

3. When individual may commence an action

4. Judgment in quo warranto action

5. Rights of a person adjudged entitled to public office

6. Limitations

I. Expropriation

Manapat v. CA, G.R. No. 110478 (2007)

Republic v. Sarabia, G.R. No. 157847 (2005)
Reyes v. National Housing Authority, G.R. No. 147511 (2003)

12
 Barangay San Roque v. Heirs of Pastor, G.R. No. 138816 (2000)
National Power Corporation v. Posada, G.R. No. 191945 (2015)
Robern Development Corp. v. Quitain, G.R. No. 135042 (1999)
Heirs of Alberto v. City of Mandaluyong, G.R. No. 135087 (2000)

1. Matters to allege in complaint for expropriation

2. Two stages in every action for expropriation

3. When plaintiff can immediately enter into possession of the real

property

4. New system of immediate payment of initial just compensation

5. Defensed and objections

6. Order of expropriation

7. Ascertainment of just compensation

8. Appointment of commissioners; commissioner’s report; court

action upon commissioner’s report

9. Rights of plaintiff upon judgment and payment

10. Effect of recording of judgment

J. Foreclosure of Real Estate Mortgage

Benedicto v. Yulo, G.R. No. L-8106 (1913)

Producers Bank v. CA, G.R. No. 126908 (2003)
PNB v. CA, G.R. No. 126908 (2003)
Huerta Alba Resort v. CA, G.R. No. 128567 (2000)
Monte de Piedad v. Rodrigo, G.R. No. L-42928 (1936)
DBP v. Aguirre, G.R. No. 144877 (2001)
Metrobank v. Nikko, G.R. No. 178479 (2009)
Paradigm v. BPI, G.R. No. 191174 (2017)
Rosales v. Alfonso, G.R. No. 137792 (2003)

1. Kinds of foreclosure

a. Judicial foreclosure

b. Extrajudicial foreclosure

13
2. Need for special power of attorney

3. Authority to foreclose extrajudicially

4. Procedure

a. Where to file

b. Where to sell

c. Posting requirement

d. Publication requirement

i. Sufficiency of newspaper publication

ii. Need for republication in case of postponement

iii. Personal notice to the mortgagor when and when not

needed

5. Possession by purchaser of foreclosed property

6. Remedy of debtor if foreclosure is not proper

7. Redemption

a. Who may redeem

b. Amount of redemption price

c. Period for redemption

d. Effect of pendency of action for annulment of sale

8. Writ of possession

a. Ministerial duty of the court

b. Enforcement against third parties

c. Pendency of action for annulment of sale

14
 9. Annulment of sale

K. Partition

Marcos v. Heirs of Isidro Bangi, G.R. No. 185745 (2014)

Valmonte v. CA, G.R. No. 108538 (1996)
De Castro v. Echarri, G.R. No. 5609 (1911)
Lacbayan v. Samoy, G.R. No. 165427 (2011)
Miranda v. CA, G.R. No. L-33007 (1976)
Noceda v. CA, G.R. No. 119730 (1999)
Roman Catholic Archbishop of Manila v. CA, G.R. No. 77425 (1991)
Cordova v. Cordova, G.R. No. L-9936 (1958)

1. Who may file complaint; who should be made defendants

2. Matters to allege in the complaint for partition

3. Two stages in every action for partition

4. Order of partition and partition by agreement

5. Partition by commissioners; appointment of commissioners,

commissioner’s report; court action upon commissioner’s report

6. Judgment and its effects

7. Partition of personal property

8. Prescription of action

9. When partition is not allowed

L. Forcible Entry and Unlawful Detainer

Tubiano v. Razo, G.R. No. 132598 (2000)

Francisco Realty and Development Corp. v. CA, G.R. No. 125055 (1988)
Dikit v. Ycasiano, G.R. No. L-3621 (1951)
Medel v. Militante, G.R. No. 16096 (1921)
Pharma Industries v. Pajarillaga, G.R. No. 53788 (1980)
DBP v. Canonoy, G.R. No. L-29422 (1970)
Dela Cruz v. CA, G.R. No. 139442 (2006)

1. Definitions and distinction

15
 2. Distinguish: forcible entry, unlawful detainer, accion publiciana, and
accion reinvindicatoria

3. Jurisdiction in accion publiciana and accion reinvindicatoria

4. Who may institute the action and when; against whom the action
may be maintained

5. Pleadings allowed

6. Action on the complaint

7. When demand is necessary

8. Preliminary injunction and preliminary mandatory injunction

9. Resolving defense of ownership

10. How to stay the immediate execution of judgment

11. Prohibited pleadings and motions

M. Contempt

Siy v. NLRC, G.R. No. 158971 (2012)

Montenegro v. Montenegro, G.R. No. 156829 (2004)
Desa Enterprises Inc. v. SEC, G.R. No. L-45430 (1982)
Lorenzo Shipping v. Distribution Management, G.R. No. 155849 (2011)
SBMA v. Rodriguez, G.R. No. 160270 (2010)
Santiago v. Anunciacion, G.R. No. 89318 (1990)
People v. Godoy, G.R. Nos. 115908-09 (1995)
Galvez v. Republic Surety & Insurance Co., Inc., G.R. No. L-12581 (1959)
Land Bank v. Listana, G.R. No. 152611 (2003)

1. Kinds of contempt

2. Purpose and nature of each

3. Remedy against direct contempt; penalty

4. Remedy against indirect contempt; penalty

5. How contempt proceedings are commenced

16
6. Acts deemed punishable as indirect contempt

7. When imprisonment shall be imposed

8. Contempt against quasi-judicial bodies

***

17