Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4 Dim
4 Dim
Bridges
TDV – Seminar 2003
TDV Ges.m.b.H
May 2003
1 General
A general bridge engineering tool must be suited to the several possible bridge types
and the many possible construction methods.
A general bridge engineering tool should also model the time dependent behaviour of
concrete, usually using CEB/FIP rules (and code specific derivatives).
These CEB/FIP rules require that during the structural analysis the used program
“remembers” the loads applied to each element. Each load application on a certain
element of the structural model will have its own creep coefficient: This coefficient will
change over time. It is no longer possible to assign one creep coefficient ϕ, but many
creep coefficients (one for each load for each element for each stage).
This extensive data storage is required to accurately model the “Construction Schedule”.
This construction schedule represents the link between the erection sequences on site
and the erection simulation in the program.
The consideration of the erection sequence and the simulation thereof in the
construction schedule requires a strict order for the actions to be analysed. Some
construction schedules even combine two or more erection methods and in many cases
the removal of temporarily necessary parts of the structure need to be modelled.
Figure 1: combination of Cable stay, incremental launching and removal of temporary piers in a
construction schedule.
Since the concrete has been poured a few days ago and the concrete could therfore
harden in the formwork, the user needs to specify this actual age of the concrete
elements when activating these elements into the construction stage.
14
14 14
101 113 114 128 129 135
ACTIVATION
1300+
1200+
42 42
ST 1 ST 2 ST 3
Note: The user can define creep and shrinkage ages independently from each other! The
shrinakge age is usually equal “0” since shrinkage starts immediately after pouring the
concrete whereas creep starts after load application.
The duration of the time gap is usually assigned to the time dependent effects (creep &
shrinkage, relaxation) only.
A second time for the period between 2 stages. This will be the time gap when nothing
but creep & shrinkage happens on site.
2) DURATION OF CREEP&SHRINKAGE + RELAXATION
A typical case is a free cantilever with several piers that are erected independently from
each other. Usually the free cantilevers are built one after the other since the number of
form travellers is usually limited. This means that once they will be connected with each
other they will have a different age.
To stop the time for a set of elements allows modelling the erection of all free
cantilevers parallel to each other and to “freeze” sets of elements before Creep &
Shrinkage will be calculated using the real different ages of the free cantilevers. The
user must be sure that all different ages are set correctly before the key segments
connecting the cantilevers.
30 m 60 m 60 m 30 m
The cantilevers of this structure are erected independent from each other at different
time. The actual erection schedule is presented below:
End of Creeping
Pier 2 finished
Pier 1 finished
Close Span 3
Close Span 2
Close Span 4
TIME
400
621
614
200
600
607
10000
days
Time Stop
400 Days TIME, Pier 3
0 200 200 days
TIME,
0 200 400 600 days GLOBAL
Pier 1 is the oldest part, pier 2 the middle and pier 3 the youngest part of the structure.
Pier 2 will be frozen for 200 days, pier 3 for 400 days. In this way the position on the
time axis will be as on site and the calculation can be continued in the usual way.
5 Conclusion
A structural model built up in 3D allows an accurate analysis and design for forces,
deflection, stresses, etc. The problem that must be handled in addition is the erection
procedure which leads to consideration of the time axis.
This fourth dimension needs to be considered with the same accuracy then as three
geometric dimensions by the engineer.