Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bryan Final
Bryan Final
An Undergraduate Thesis
In Partial Fulfillment
By:
March 2015
THESIS ABSTRACT
his gratitude to all those people who have supported him and
adviser.
this study.
semester.
Acknowledgment
7
information.
this study.
B. R. A.
DEDICATION
research study.
First and above all, to our Almighty God who gives him
good examples have taught him to work hard for the things
Adam
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page
Title page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Approval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Thesis abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Acknowledgement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Dedication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
List of Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
List of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Chapter
1 The problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
14
31
31
Theoretical framework . . . . . . . . . .
32
Conceptual framework . . . . . . . . . . .
34
Definition of terms . . . . . . . . . . . 38
Research paradigm . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
Table of Contents
11
2 Research methodology . . . . . . . . . . . 44
Research design . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
46
Treatment of data . . . . . . . . . .. . . 46
in terms of Age . . . . . . . . . . . 50
in terms of
Gender . . . . . . . . . . . . .51
52
in terms of Educational
Attainment . . . .52
in terms of Occupation . . . . . . . . . .
53
54
59
65
73
Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
73
Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
74
Table of Contents
13
REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
77
APPENDICES
78
respondent . . . . . . . . . . .79
D. Questionnaire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
Indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
95
F. Anova Single
Factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . .97
CURRICULUM VITAE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
LIST OF TABLES
45
family issues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
Economic Abuse. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
Social Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .52
Attainment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .52
THE PROBLEM
100-300 years the changes that women have seen and been
modern time there are more than one woman running in the
have a hard
The Problem
17
2006).
society.
between men and women runs deep, and it will take many years
2011).
(Broussard 2013).
limited power to negotiate safe sex and that the main reason
(Brickell, 2008).
2004, VAW cases dropped by 13% from the previous year. The
work opportunities.
(the 3rd and 4th forms of VAW were grouped together in the
(Lagunda, 2008).
one in twenty five women age 15-49 who have ever had sex
VAW incidence in the country since not all VAW cases are
percent within the ten year period of 2004 and 2013. There
accumulating trend.
agents arrested Mari Gemar and may charge him with violation
The Problem
30
She said he tried to convince her to join the cult but she
refused. One night, she said she woke to see the suspect
setting fire to the mattress she was lying on. Gemar showed
violence against women. This study can also open the minds
Theoretical Framework
2005).
Bronfenbrenner, 2005).
Conceptual Framework
against Women.
Family Issues
(Canberra, 2009).
that “at least 102 of the 192 Member States have no specific
Economic Abuse
2005).
financial capability.
(Brown, D. 2006).
Social Status
Definition of Terms
perpetrator financially.
consumption.
discussion.
Research Paradigm
Calauan, Laguna.
Moderating
Variables
Resident of
Barangay Dayap,
Calauan, Laguna
in terms of:
1.1 Age;
1.2 Gender;
1.3 Civil Status;
1.4 Educational Attainment; and
1.5 Occupation?
2. What are the determining factors of Violence against
Research Design
were
Design and Methodology
48
Table 1
Treatment of Data
interpretation
(SA)
(MA)
(SD)
indicator questions.
A. Age;
B. Gender;
C. Civil Status;
Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation of Data
53
D. Educational Attainment;
E. Occupation;
A. Age
brackets, and the remaining 22% belongs to the old 41-50 age
years of age.
Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation of Data
54
B. Gender
C. Civil Status
married.
Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation of Data
55
75%
D. Educational Attainment
secondary level, 20% are under graduate and 17% are college
level.
Attainment
Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation of Data
56
E. Occupation
respondents, 25% are Driver, 34% are house wife, 12% are
a. Family Issues
b. Economic Abuse
c. Social Status
A. Family Issues
Family Issues
food for his family, his wife always say bad words to him
that having a partner who has bad vices is one of the family
bolts his wife inside the room and keeps his wife from going
wife because he know that there are some instances that will
physically,
oppressed by society.
Economic Abuse
Economic Abuse.
enough.
Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation of Data
66
that when her husband has problem or when they are arguing,
she always follows what her husband wants whether she likes
support from her husband. She does not have choice but to
Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation of Data
67
conducted last November 2015 with Mrs. Gomez, she said that
established it.
wife to use all his property because we have a law that says
when they married his wife have the rights to use the
that she is too bored for being a wife because all day long
all she does is take care of their house and do house work.
especially foods because her husband does not give her money
that she only eats once a day and sometimes goes to sleep at
shelter but if she do not quit, time will come that she will
Social Status
social status.
that they are dirty women and they are devalued because of
2015 with Mrs. Amparo, she told that her husband was too
the one who works for them and when they are having conflict
have a work and also do not do his part inside the house or
Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation of Data
74
violence problem.
November 2015 with Mrs. Arban, she narrated that her husband
the dress she will wear, whether she likes it or not. She is
mentally disabled was one of the major factors that can lead
Laguna but he did not mention the name because he was afraid
Status
ANOVA
Variation
of work they chosen. Like being sex workers who are most
the people around her, sometimes people think that they are
Conclusions
as follows:
violence
Conclusions and Recommendations
80
Recommendations
pageant for the women in their barangay. All women can join
Publish Materials
Books
42).
Inquirer
Inquirer
BRYAN R. AQUINO
Researcher
Approved by:
Crmgst. JENNIFER M. NAYOYOS
Adviser
Noted by:
Crmgst. MARLON M. WANKEY, MSCJ
Associate Dean, CCJE
Appendix B
Republic of the Philippines
Laguna State Polytechnic University
San Pablo City Campus
College of Criminal Justice Education
BRYAN R. AQUINO
Researcher
Approved by:
Crmgst. JENNIFER M. NAYOYOS
Adviser
Noted by:
Crmgst. MARLON M. WANKEY, MSCJ
Associate Dean, CCJE
Appendix C
Metro Manila
Twelfth Congress
2004".
that the State values the dignity of women and children and
following acts:
the abuser;
coercion;
following:
money or properties.
child.
care.
physical harm;
harm;
physical harm;
conduct:
family;
Appendices
96
or decisions;
her/his will;
violence;
child/children.
Appendices
98
Appendix D
QUESTIONNAIRE
This is an assessment on the “DETERMINANTS OF VIOLENCE
AGAINST WOMEN IN BARANGAY DAYAP, CALAUAN, LAGUNA”.
Profile of respondent
Direction: please fill in the necessary information or put a
check mark (√) on the option provided that gives your
personal information.
Name: (Optional)
Age:
Educational Attainment:
( ) Elementary
( ) Secondary
( ) Under Graduate
( ) College level
Occupation:
DETERMINANTS OF VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN IN BARANGAY DAYAP,
CALAUAN, LAGUNA
Direction
Please read each item carefully and put a check mark
(√) in the appropriate column that corresponds to your
answer. Please do not leave any single item unanswered
(Unless it is not appropriate to you). Kindly rank the
different variables below about the determinant of violence
against women in Barangay Dayap, Calauan, Laguna. Thank you
so much to your honesty and patience in answering the item
below.
Numerical Rating Statistical Limit Descriptive
interpretation
4 3.26 - 4.00 Strongly Agree
(SA)
3 2.51 – 3.25 Agree (A)
2 1.76 – 2.50 Moderately Agree
Appendices
99
(MA)
1 1.00 – 1.75 Strongly
Disagree(SD)
Family Problems
Economic Abuse
Appendices
100
Social Status
Sub-indicators (SA) (A) (NA) (D)
4 3 2 1
3.1 Being a female is a factor leading
to Violence Against Women.
3.2 Being young is a factor leading to
Violence Against Women.
3.3 Being mentally disabled is a
component prompting Violence Against
Women.
3.4 Alcohol abuse or other substance
abuseis a component prompting Violence
Against Women.
3.5 Having many sexual partners is a
component prompting Violence Against
Women.
3.6 Being a sex worker is a component
prompting Violence Against Women.
3.7 Physical attractiveness is a
factor leading to Violence Against
Women.
3.8 Being incarcerated is a factor
leading to Violence Against Women.
3.9 Being previously raped or sexually
abuse is a factor leading to Violence
Against Women.
3.10 Becoming more educated and
economically empowered, at least were
sexual violence perpetrated by an
intimate partner is concerned is a
component prompting Violence Against
Women.
Appendix E
Respon Age Gen Civi Educat Occupa Famil Econo Soc tot
dents der l ional tion y mic ial al
Stat Attain Issue Abuse Sta
us ment s tus
R1 18 1 S E D 29 33 34 96
R2 39 2 M E HW 31 30 36 97
R3 35 1 M S D 30 29 36 95
R4 44 2 M S FW 28 31 36 95
R5 31 2 M E HW 29 30 33 92
R6 20 1 S S D 33 29 32 94
R7 46 1 M E D 33 28 34 95
R8 25 2 M U HW 33 29 34 96
R9 43 2 M E HW 30 29 35 94
R10 22 1 M U FW 31 30 34 95
R11 34 2 S S V 30 30 34 94
R12 38 2 M E HW 33 29 39 101
R13 30 1 M S D 32 29 32 93
R14 35 2 M S HW 27 28 35 90
R15 41 1 M E D 32 25 33 90
R16 19 1 S C SC 35 27 34 96
R17 49 1 M S D 31 28 33 92
R18 38 2 S E V 30 31 36 97
R19 39 2 M S HW 28 30 34 92
R20 25 1 S E D 31 32 36 99
R21 28 2 M S HW 31 29 34 94
R22 38 1 M E D 30 31 34 95
R23 43 2 M U HW 34 30 33 97
R24 18 1 S E D 30 28 34 92
R25 37 1 M U F 28 33 32 93
R26 23 2 M E HW 32 30 34 96
R27 33 1 M C SR 34 30 35 99
R28 21 2 S S FW 30 30 34 94
R29 45 1 M E D 29 33 36 98
R30 21 2 S E V 34 29 38 101
R31 20 1 S U SC 36 30 33 99
R32 33 2 M E HW 31 29 32 92
R33 29 2 S C SR 28 31 32 91
R34 48 1 M C SR 30 32 35 97
R35 29 1 M E D 32 28 33 93
R36 48 2 M C HW 32 28 31 91
R37 32 1 M U SR 35 30 32 97
R38 27 2 S E V 31 30 34 95
R39 32 1 M U F 33 28 37 98
R40 50 2 M S HW 35 32 34 101
R41 30 2 M E HW 32 29 32 93
R42 47 2 M C SR 36 31 35 102
R43 23 1 M E D 30 27 32 89
R44 35 1 M U SC 33 29 32 94
R45 20 2 M E HW 33 31 34 98
R46 36 1 M S FW 31 31 33 95
R47 28 1 M E D 31 31 32 94
R48 24 2 M E HW 33 28 33 94
R49 21 2 S S FW 33 31 35 99
R50 40 1 M E D 34 27 35 96
R51 19 1 S S FW 32 28 35 95
R52 38 2 M S HW 37 28 32 97
R53 23 2 M E HW 32 30 34 96
R54 50 1 M U FW 31 31 32 94
R55 21 2 M E HW 30 29 34 93
R56 37 1 M U F 34 28 36 98
R57 27 1 M E V 31 34 34 99
R58 49 1 M U SC 32 32 34 98
R59 40 2 M E HW 30 29 32 91
R60 30 2 S U SC 36 29 35 100
Appendix F
Anova: Single Factor
SUMMARY
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Column 1 60 213 3.55 0.25
Column 2 60 227 3.78 0.17
Column 3 60 208 3.47 0.25
Column 4 60 192 3.20 0.50
Column 5 60 170 2.83 0.48
Column 6 60 158 2.63 0.34
Column 7 60 163 2.72 0.38
Column 8 60 211 3.52 0.25
Column 9 60 169 2.82 0.32
Column 10 60 191 3.18 0.46
Column 11 60 176 2.93 0.37
Column 12 60 179 2.98 0.42
Column 13 60 167 2.78 0.31
Column 14 60 174 2.90 0.43
Column 15 60 178 2.97 0.41
Column 16 60 191 3.18 0.42
Column 17 60 175 2.92 0.48
Column 18 60 173 2.88 0.41
Column 19 60 190 3.17 0.48
Column 20 60 178 2.97 0.47
Column 21 60 220 3.67 0.23
Column 22 60 210 3.50 0.25
Column 23 60 189 3.15 0.37
Column 24 60 215 3.58 0.25
Column 25 60 212 3.53 0.25
Column 26 60 224 3.73 0.20
Column 27 60 188 3.13 0.39
Column 28 60 193 3.22 0.44
Column 29 60 219 3.65 0.23
Column 30 60 168 2.80 0.26
ANOVA
Source of SS df MS F P- F
Variation value crit
Between 200.94 29 6.93 19.82 0.00 1.47
Groups
Within 618.82 1770 0.35
Groups
Secondary: (2002-2006)
(Dayap National High School)
(DayapCalauan Laguna)
Primary: (1996-2002)
(Mabacan Elementary School)
Curriculum Vitae
106
TRAININGS/SEMINARS ATTENDED
Drug Education and Vice Control held on October 5, 2015 at the
LSPU-SPCC San Pablo City Campus Laguna
I hereby certify that the above information are true and correct
to the best of my knowledge.
Bryan R. Aquino