Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SSRN Id3828353
SSRN Id3828353
SSRN Id3828353
By
Dr. Assan Jallow
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to provide a strategic report analysis and evaluation of PepsiCo in the
beverage industry. This includes the methods of analysis of PepsiCo’s external and internal analysis,
its marketing strategies, and SWOT analysis from the perspectives of value-chain, resource-based, and
3-circa analysis. The research draws attention to details on the competition of PepsiCo as a strategic
competitor against Coca-Cola in the beverage-cum-snacks industry. Despite being a competitive brand
that is being overshadowed by Coca-Cola regarding global marketing shares and growth, Pepsi has
become one of the world’s largest selling soft drink across national boundaries as it is liked and being
patronized by people of all ages, across the globe. Dozens of resources were cited to produce this
strategic report. In sum, the paper analyses PepsiCo’s strategic competitiveness against its rival – Coca-
Cola in the beverage and smacks industry. The paper concludes with summary of recommendations for
consideration by PepsiCo’s corporate and business level decision-makers on how well PepsiCo should
manage its strategic intent of its marketing and product diversification programs across the boundaries
of the global market to reposition itself as a global giant beverage and snack business player.
Keywords: PepsiCo, SWOT analysis, External and Internal Analysis, Competitive advantage and
analysis
PepsiCo Inc. is an international company that manufactures and distributes food and beverage products.
It owns several popular brands and products, including Pepsi Cola, Doritos, Lays, Mountain Dew, Pepsi
Diet, Cheetos, Mirinda, Ruffles, Aquafina, Quaker, and Tropicana among a list of other products. PepsiCo
was incorporated in 1919 and reincorporated in 1986 (PepsiCo 2018 Annual Report). The company is
conscious of the consumers' health and provides treats and products that are in line with consumers' tastes
and preferences. In over 200 countries, with 22 brands worth $1 billion each as well as other strong
The paper presents the historical developments and evolution of PepsiCo as the parent company. This
article provides an in-depth analysis and evaluation of the Marketing Plan for PepsiCo’s beverage products
and snacks. The discussions on the paper are centered on the company's (PepsiCo Inc.) description,
mission, and vision statements. The author also discusses on the internal and external environment of the
The report further highlights the fact that PepsiCo’s cola diet product has relatively good brand recognition
and reputation based on its parent company's footprint in the beverage industry. The findings of the
paper indicate that PepsiCo is one of the leading brands in the beverage industry. That PepsiCo uses the
four Ps (i.e., product, price, place, and promotion) of the Pepsi Diet.
PepsiCo, Inc. is an American multinational food, snack, and beverage corporation headquartered
in Harrison, New York. Pepsi was first introduced as "Brad's Drink" in 1893 by Caleb Bradham, who
made it at his drugstore where the drink was sold. It was later relabeled and subsequently renamed Pepsi-
Cola in 1898 after the digestive enzyme pepsin and kola nuts used in the recipe.
world's leading food and beverage companies. PepsiCo has expanded and later acquired both Tropicana
Products in 1998 and the Quaker Oats Company in 2001, thus adding the Gatorade brand to its portfolio.
PepsiCo is made up of the many division, which includes the PepsiCo Beverages ofNorth America, Frito-
Lay North America; Quaker Foods-North America; Latin America, Europe, Sub-Saharan
Africa; Asia, the Middle East, and North Africa, respectively. Each of these divisions has contributed to
PepsiCo concentrates efforts on the development and production of the Pepsi Diet in 1964 as a variant
Pepsi with no sugar. It was manufactured as a no-calorie carbonated cola soft drink targeting young people
from the ages of 14-35. The first test-marketed was done in 1963 under the name of Patio Diet
Cola. And, it was later rebranded as Pepsi Diet the following year, thus becoming the first diet cola that
was distributed on a massive national scale in the United States. The Tab, Diet Rite Cola, and Diet Coke
produced by the Coca-Cola Company, and RC Cola where Pepsi Diet's main competitors in the soda
manufacturing business. The Pepsi Diet was launched in 1983 in the U.K, and since then, it has become
available on a global scale, while the U.S. still maintains the largest single market for Pepsi Diet. The
beverage composition, flavor variations, and packaging on the Pepsi Diet vary based on the country-
specific production. It is sold under the name of Pepsi Light in other jurisdictions.
In December 2012, Pepsi Diet changed its sweetener to sucralose ahead of a major rebranding of the soft
drink set for January 2013 (AP News, 2012). In 2015, some people expressed their dissatisfaction with the
new formula through Facebook and Twitter. PepsiCo, in response, revived its aspartame formulation, as
"Diet Pepsi Classic Sweetener Blend" for US markets in September 2016, and it was sold alongside the
sweetener. The new formulation was released market-wide on February 25, 2018.
Organizations are best guided with a vision and a mission statement that spells out their desired objectives
and direction it wished to take in achieving its arduous and entrusted mandate. Besides, every organization
selects a unique path to achieve its long and short-term goals. PepsiCo ensures that its strategic mission
and vision statements are well-aligned with current global business realities. This is critical as
it highlights the continuous growth, diversification, and expansion of the company regarding
it product mix, test, and target marketing. PepsiCo's mission and vision statements lead the business to
develop products that suit the growing market demands of its valued clientele. With that been said, a firm's
PepsiCo Inc. has adopted the following to be its vision and mission statements that describe the goals that
it aspires to achieve in the future, with the intent to strategically position itself with the excellent pride of
exceeding customer expectations and meeting consumers' tastes despite changing needs and preferences,
The vision statement of the PepsiCo specifies the company's role in the global market. Therefore, a firm's
corporate vision statement indicates the direction of organizational development, growth, and
sustainability. PepsiCo's vision statement is "to deliver top-tier financial performance over the long term
by integrating sustainability into our business strategy, leaving a positive imprint on society and the
environment."
The vision and mission statements of PepsiCo complement each other to push the company toward the
The mentioned-above are critical components that PepsiCo takes pride in with a dedicated and robust
interest in giving back to communities through its corporate social responsibility. This factor is
A mission statement defines the means to achieve the vision, through consolidated & refined objective
settings to achieve the stated objectives of an organization. Besides, the mission statement gives real
meaning and a purposeful reflection on how an organization's vision can be attained within a specific set
time-limit. PepsiCo's mission statement reads "to provide consumers around the world with delicious,
affordable, convenient, and complementary foods and beverages from wholesome breakfasts to healthy
and fun daytime snacks and beverages to evening treats." This statement emphasizes the global nature of
Pepsi products. It also reflects the company's determination to have the best impacts on everyone,
PepsiCo's mission statement main points are centered on (i) Consumers around the world, (ii) Delicious,
healthy and fun products, (iii) Affordability, and (iv) Convenience. The mission statement of
PepsiCo defines the basic characteristics of its products. The point on affordability implies PepsiCo's
approach to pricing. Moreover, the convenience point is an affirmation of PepsiCo's marketing strategy
and positioning to make its products easily accessible, indicating the firm's market strategy. In this
context, the mission statement suggests that the company targets all consumers
worldwide. Besides, PepsiCo aims to provide products that appeal to its growing consumer base.
Reviewing the microeconomic factors that constantly change around the world, may help PepsiCo to take
advantage of the opportunities that are available to them and knowing the threats that they may face by
• Political factors are an important factor to consider since they define the legal and regulatory
limitations on how the company must operate, they can either benefit or limit a company (Pearce &
Robinson 2015). Currently, PepsiCo operates in over 200 countries and expose itself to different types
of political environment and political system risks, so to operate in each country, PepsiCo must
carefully analyze factors like price regulations, employee and regulation, and Tax regulation, as many
countries have soda taxes to reduce the consumption of sugary drinks (Taylor, 2016).
• Economic factors as inflation, cost increases, taxes, and exchange rates affect business and PepsiCo is
not an exception. In the second quarter of 2020 PepsiCo revenues when down 3% as cost increased
due to the pandemic, PepsiCo reported spending nearly $400 million on costs related to the pandemic,
• Social Factor. PepsiCo has seen the change in the preference of its customer so in order not to lose
them, they are reformulating their products to offer what the customer wants and keeping their image.
Over the years PepsiCo has worked on some advertising campaigns motivating people to improve
their health by not consuming carbonated beverages. Additionally, in 2020 they devoted more than 45
• PepsiCo is taking advantage of the current innovation in technologies and implementing them in
different departments of the company. PepsiCo has been using artificial intelligence (IA) and machine
learning to streamline their current process on production, sales, and even HR (Marr 2019)
sustainable practices that fulfill its corporate responsibility by decarbonizing its entire value chain by
• International/legal. Companies need to analyze the country they intend to do business to avoid
countries where legal frameworks and institutions do not protect the intellectual property rights of an
organization. There is a high risk of sanctions and penalties if PepsiCo fails to comply with rules and
By analyzing the five competitive forces PepsiCo can gain a complete picture of what impacts the
profitability of the company and the industry; they can identify trends and opportunities for the company.
• Threats of New Entrants -In the beverage industry has been shaped in such a way that new competitors
are unlikely to appeal. PepsiCo competes primarily on advertising and differentiation rather than
price; potential new competitors are uneven in size especially in local markets. In 2019 PepsiCo
expanded its advertising investment by 12%, making total annual investments considerably high and
making it very difficult for new competitors to fight in today's market (Williams 2019). The barriers
that PepsiCo has for new competitors are product differentiation and access to distribution channels
• Bargaining Power of Suppliers- Suppliers for a beverage company are quite important since they
provide raw materials such as flavorings, caffeine, sugar, and services such as packaging, to produce
the final product. PepsiCo requires of it supplies to meets the quality standards establish so that the
final product meets the quality standards and the respective health laws imposed by them (ESG
Topics). Therefore, PepsiCo has the bargaining power both in price and quality, since their ingredients
profitability of each of these segments shows that the business power of the buyers is high because the
buyers pay different prices since they buy in bulk. PepsiCo’s list of customers is supermarkets gas
stations even there is an agreement between restaurants like pizza hut, Burger King, Taco Bell, and
Kentucky. Similarly, PepsiCo products in vending machines can be found in various places.
• Threats of Substitute -There are several institutes of PepsiCo products among them are bottled water,
sports drinks, coffee, tea, and juice. PepsiCo's threat to substitute products is respectively high because
consumers are also concerned about consuming cheaper and much healthier beverages (Kim & Yoffie,
2011)
• Rivalry among the Existing Competitors -The rivalry PepsiCo has with its main competitor is
moderate as with the rest of the competitors, their market share is too low to encourage any price wars.
Coca-Cola may have a cola war with PepsiCo but is unlikely that the competition will affect the long-
term profitability of PepsiCo. Regardless of this PepsiCo should continue to build a sustainable
differentiation with their marketing innovation, alliances with smaller companies, and the
3.1.3 Competitive analysis The main rival for PepsiCo is Coca-Cola. These two companies have
PepsiCo has other competitors, but they are not as big; some of the other competitors are Keurig Dr.
Pepper, Monster Beverage Corp, General Mills, Conagra, Unilever, Nestlé, RedBull, Britvic, and Danone.
PepsiCo has two main divisions of revenue: Food, with a net revenue percentage of 54%, and Beverage,
with net revenue of 46%. Inside those two divisions, there are multiple divisions including Frito-Lay North
America, Quaker Foods North America, PepsiCo Beverages North America, Latin America, Europe,
Africa, the Middle East and South Asia, and the Asia Pacific, Australia, and New Zealand, and China
Region. Figure 2 below shows the Net Revenue Percentages of all the individual divisions for PepsiCo
(PepsiCo, 2020):
Figure 2: For 2019, PepsiCo had net revenue of $67,161 Million, an increase of 4% from 2018 (PepsiCo,
2020)
PepsiCo reports on two main divisions for profit: the U.S., with a net profit percentage of 58%, and Outside
the U.S., with a net profit percentage of 42%. Inside those two divisions, there are multiple divisions—
the same as listed above under Revenue Streams. Figure 3 below shows the Division Operating Profit
Percentages for all the individual divisions for PepsiCo (PepsiCo, 2020):
Figure 3: For 2019, PepsiCo had a Core Operating Profit of $10,602 Million, an increase of 2% from 2018
(PepsiCo, 2020)
• Before joining PepsiCo in 1996, Ramon worked for Chupa Chups, S.A. (A Spanish leading
confectionery company). He has held a variety of positions inside PepsiCo including leading
the acquisition and successful integration of the company’s dairy business in Russia. Between
2015-2017, Ramon was CEO of the Europe Sub-Saharan Africa sector (ESSA), then became
• Has served as CEO since October 2018 and Chairman of the Board since February 2019
▪ Prior to this, served as assistant controller of Altria Corporate Services, Inc. (Part of the team
• As Chief Accounting Officer, is responsible for PepsiCo’s global financial reporting and SOX
• “Assumed role of CFO in 2010 and is responsible for providing strategic financial leadership for
PepsiCo, including ensuring the company’s strategy creates shareholder value, communicating the
company’s strategies and performance to investors, and implementing a capital structure, financial
processes, and controls to support the company’s growth and return on investment goals” (Leadership,
n.d.).
• Also supported and lead the PepsiCo information technology function since 2015, global e-commerce
business from 2015-2019, and Quaker Foods North America division from 2014 to 2016 (Leadership,
n.d.)
• Silviu held positions in general management with Coca-Cola early in his career, followed by senior
leadership roles at Wimm-Bill-Dann. Once at PepsiCo, he spent three years as president, PepsiCo
Russia, followed by heading up the business in Russia, Ukraine, and CIS (The Commonwealth of
10
September 2017 to March 2019, before becoming Chief Executive Officer of PepsiCo Europe in
• Paula joined the Quaker Oats Company back in 1992. The Quaker Oats Company was acquired by
PepsiCo in 2001—starting her employment with PepsiCo. At PepsiCo, she was Vice President and
General Manager for their Savory business in Mexico. After that, she became the Chief Operating
Officer (COO) of all business units of PepsiCo Mexico Foods, followed by the President of PepsiCo
Mexico Foods. Paula became the Chief Executive Officer of PepsiCo Latin America in May 2019
(Leadership, n.d.).
Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer – Ronald Schellekens
• Ronald started his career working at AT&T, PepsiCo, Royal Dutch Shell, and Vodafone—all in
Human Resources roles. Ronald joined PepsiCo in 2018 and oversees the company’s global HR
• Kirk joined PepsiCo in 1992. He held roles as “Senior Vice President and General Manager of Frito-
Lay's West Business Division; Vice President of Sales at PepsiCo U.K. and Ireland; Vice President of
Frito-Lay North America’s Mountain Region; Vice President of Frito-Lay North America’s Mid-
American Region; and Vice President of Frito-Lay North America’s California Region” (Leadership,
n.d.). Kirk then served as President and Chief Operating Officer of North America Beverages, before
being named CEO of PepsiCo Beverages North America in 2019 (Leadership, n.d.).
Chief Executive Officer, Africa, Middle East, South Asia – Eugene Willemsen
11
Senior Vice President and General Manager, Commercial for PepsiCo Europe, as well as heading up
the company’s global tea joint venture with Unilever. Eugene became the Executive Vice President of
Global Categories & Franchise Management from 2015 to 2019, followed by Chief Executive Officer,
• Steven joined the Quaker Oats Company in 1997. He started his career at PepsiCo in 2001 with the
acquisition of the Quaker Oats Company. Early in his career with PepsiCo, Steven led the global
Walmart business, followed by Senior Vice President and General Manager for Frito-Lay's East
division. Steven then held the role of Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer for Frito-
Lay's U.S. organization, finally followed by Chief Executive Officer of PepsiCo Foods North America
Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary – Dave Yawman
• Dave Yawman started his career as a law clerk in the United States District Court for the law firm
Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson. Dave joined PepsiCo in 1998 and held multiple positions in
charge of global government affairs and public policy along with chief compliance and ethics officer.
Steve assumed his role as Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary in 2017
and leads the company’s worldwide legal and compliance and ethics functions (Leadership, n.d.).
The beverage business environment, despite the plethora of opportunities it provides, is competitive in
nature and requires organizations to be strategic in their decision-making, resource management, and
diversification programs. This is to avoid missed opportunities by capitalizing on the organization’s core
12
technology (Holbrook, 2005; Anderson and Narus, 1998; (Pearce & Robinson, 2015). Value is the
“combination of benefits received, and cost paid by customers” (Daft, 2018). To develop industry
foresight based on trends in technology, demographics, government regulations, values, and lifestyles and
identify new competitive advantages we’ve created a situational analysis through the adaptive sails of
SWOT analysis (i.e., strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats). It offers an organized review of
performance regarding strategic positioning, growth, and sustainability. Every organization is a part of an
industry, confronted with a myriad of challenges and opportunities on consumer changing preferences,
marketing competition, pricing, government regulations, and sales. These challenges and opportunities
are both internal and external. PepsiCo as a business uses the situation analysis to obtain external
information from a variety of sources, which includes and not limited to customers, government reports,
suppliers, and consultants to access current growth examine the internal strengths and weaknesses,
challenges, and future opportunities from sources such as budgets, financial ratios, profit-and-loss-
1. Strengths
a. Brand equity: ranked as the globe’s #29 most valuable brand worth $18.8 billion (Forbes, 2019)
as the company has not been found in any implicating scandals of compromising the standards and
b. A highly diversified portfolio: With more than 22 brands and selling both food and snacks (such
as Frito Lays, Cheetos, Doritos, Kurkure, etc.,) and beverages (such as Pepsi, Gatorade, Tropicana)
under one business chain of which its food business accounts for 54%, and beverages for 46%,
13
2. Weaknesses
a. Weak distribution channels, failure to match Coca-Cola’s target marketing, segmentation, sales,
and brand, unresponsiveness to changing consumer preference, and the inability of PepsiCo to
innovate, market, and distribute some of its products such as Pepsi has negatively impacted the
company’s brand.
b. Lacks strategic focus and marketing towards Pepsi soda and diet as these products sell at the same
price as that of Coke-Diet, and not being conscious of Coke’s strategic position, market
penetration, and market-base. This is caused by the company’s high production cost.
c. PepsiCo’s products are perceived as unhealthy by many health-conscious consumers. Most of its
carbonated soft drinks contain high sugar concentrates while its snacks are excessively salted with
3. Opportunities
a. Increasing demand for healthy products with the rapidly evolving tastes and preferences of its
valued and target customers (i.e., youth from 14 – 30 and the old, particularly those who are
affected by diabetes) opens the door for PepsiCo to introduce new healthy products such as milk
or vegetable-based shakes.
b. Expanding operations in emerging markets in Africa, Middle East, Asia, and South
America provide PepsiCo with an invaluable opportunity to expand its operations in these markets
4. Threats
14
changes in customers’ tastes and preferences create a factor of limitation on its value-proposition
b. Threats from substitutes such as bottled water, diet sodas, and fruit juices.
PepsiCo has an expansive VCA that supports its line of business and this includes but not limited to
inbound logistics, operations, outbound, sales, and marketing and services (Pratap, 2020).
The resources and capabilities of a firm play a critical role in directing and formulating its strategy to drive
growth and competitive advantage over its competitors in the same market segment or industry. In this
context, the individual resources of PepsiCo include its capital equipment, skills, and competence of its
employees, pricing, patents, brand, and financial resources. Grant (1991) indicates that “resources and
capabilities are the primary sources of the firm's profitability.” Therefore, the key to a resource-based
competitive advantage, and attractiveness of the industry, and how to best utilize it to one’s advantage to
15
Resource capability drives the outcome results of profitability earned higher than the cost of invested
capital, which is properly utilized and invested to profit the firm in its growth strategies for expansion and
competitiveness. The resource-based view (RBV) refers to the directional strategic resources firms use
and exploit to achieve a sustained competitive advantage against competitors in the same industry (Priem
and Butler, 2001; Valentine, 2001; Barney, 1991; Amit and Shoemaker, 1993). Resources that cannot be
easily transferred or purchased and require an extended learning curve or a major change in the
organization climate and culture, are more likely to be unique to the organization and, therefore, more
Row Labels Sum of Stock Price Sum of Book Value per Share Sum of Price to Book Ratio
2006 125.08 28.35 13.24
2007 188.18 40.03 18.78
600
2008 181.44 39.52 18.42
2009 161.71 38.31 17.02 500
2010 190.77 52.31 14.59
2011 199.77 59.02 13.59 400
2012 216.48 56.3 15.42
300 Sum of Stock Price
2013 260.89 59.79 17.47
2014 299.26 57.91 21.03 Sum of Book Value per Share
200
2015 327.1 39.59 33.65 Sum of Price to Book Ratio
2016 370.65 33.06 44.95 100
2017 414.6 34.11 48.97
0
2018 410.36 32.68 51.24
2019 507.16 41.09 49.37
2020 531.32 28.68 55.22
Grand Total 4384.77 640.75 432.96
Figure 7
1
16
To better understand the internal strategic motivations at PepsiCo, we will establish PepsiCo’s guiding
principles. Principles are the underpinnings of larger business strategy, and John Dudovskiy (2016),
outlines the 5C’s framework used by corporate managers to guide long-term business strategy planning.
PepsiCo’s 5C’s are: 1) Unified commercial agenda, 2) Building new capabilities, 3) Increasing focus on
costs, 4) Fostering a culture of collaboration, and 5) Exercising discipline with regards to capital returns
(Dudovskiy, 2016).
Those principles guide the implementation of intensive strategies to fulfill PepsiCo’s larger, grand
strategies. Using Porter’s Model to analyze PepsiCo’s competitive advantage strategy, PepsiCo uses Cost
Leadership and Broad Differentiation strategies to maintain and sustain its competitive advantage
(Ferguson, 2017). While Cost Leadership and Broad Differentiation are generic strategies, more intensive
Laguarta writes in his 2019 letter to shareholders that PepsiCo is on track to become “great in the
marketplace, great in (our) capabilities and talent, great for the sustainability of our planet and
communities” (PepsiCo, 2020). These aims rest under PepsiCo’s mission to Create more smiles with every
sip and every bite and vision to be the global leader in convenient foods and beverages by winning with
the purpose (PepsiCo, n.a.). Laguarta distills the company’s strategy into a set of “aspirations” he calls
Faster, Stronger, Better, which will serve as a framework to categorize PepsiCo’s strategies. Here and in
FASTER: Innovative advertising and marketing, improvements across the supply chains, and accelerated,
new product innovation and development are short-term strategies to accomplish the longer-term
17
steering the company towards its mission, directly and indirectly. Faster strategies also contribute to
STRONGER: Since PepsiCo is already present and visible in global markets, they aim to use data analytics
to target emerging markets at a more granular level. Implementing Stronger strategies also includes
continuous improvement of organizational culture and implementing unified cost management policies.
In 2019, PepsiCo saw $1 billion in savings due to cost management policies and plan to continue with that
same savings goal through 2023 (PepsiCo, 2020). Cost minimization will occur as PepsiCo moves into
new markets while gaining efficiencies across supply chains (Ferguson, 2017). The Stronger strategies fit
under the scope of PepsiCo’s vision, but it is mostly through indirect means that it moves them toward
their mission.
BETTER: PepsiCo’s Better strategies, both long and short term, speak to the company’s purpose and
methods as they aim for their vision. They plan to improve global and regional food systems by investing
in farmer education and resources. Better strategic initiatives include environmental conservation and
improvement programs that are also in step with PepsiCo’s vision win through purpose (PepsiCo, 2020).
A detailed table below, titled PepsiCo Strategy Analysis, outlines PepsiCo’s grand and intensive strategies
while indicating the corresponding hierarchy of objectives and strategy. The table also illustrates whether
the strategies contribute to PepsiCo’s competitive advantage and in what fashion each strategy is in
alignment with the mission or vision. Finally, the strategies are correlated with balanced scorecard
perspectives. The Faster, Stronger, Better framework is still used to categorize the grand and intensive
18
processes, two focus on financial perspectives, four reflect customer perspectives, and six address learning
and growth perspectives. Acknowledging that each strategy is not equally weighted, the heavy
consideration given to internal processes indicates that PepsiCo understands that organizational culture
After reviewing PepsiCo’s strategies, we find that PepsiCo balances its goal of profitability by paying
attention to all four balanced scorecard perspectives: Financial, Customer, Internal Process, and Learning
& Growth. Recommendations will focus on more specific strategic objectives to support their well-
19
1: Faster
grab market share √ √√ √√ √ √ direct direct customer
boost capabilities that will be
√ √√ √√ √ indirect direct customer
hard to match competitively
2: Stronger
continuous improvement of
organizational culture √ √√ √√ indirect direct internal
build a more sustainable food
√ √√ √√ indirect direct learn & grow
system
3: Better
integrate purpose into all
strategy and brands √ √√ √√ indirect direct internal
increase investment in global
√ √√ √√ √ direct direct customer
ads andmarket
expand marketing
presence by
making improvements across
√ √√ √√ √ indirect direct internal
1. Faster the supply chains
add manufacturing capacity √ √√ √√ √ direct direct internal
Short Term (Intensive Strategies)
20
Since 2004, PepsiCo has the second market leader behind Coca-Cola in the beverage and food industries,
according to Statista. Their strategic plans have proven to be solid and successful over the years. With
that, there are no fears that the management team of PepsiCo has what it takes to move the company to
the next level. Even though as a group does not see a need for change in their strategic plans, we would
The first recommended strategy is to intensify marketing efforts to increase sales of healthy snacks and
food items. The world’s population is drifting towards consuming more healthy options on snacks and
drinks. Developed markets like the carbonated drink market have not only stagnated, but their short and
long-term outlook is not looking good either (Industry Market Research, 2020). We believe that future
growth for PepsiCo will come from intensifying efforts to develop and promote healthy products.
Short-Term objectives
• Introduce healthier options of drinks and snacks into the market to cater to the ever-growing health-
conscious population.
• Brand repositioning to change consumer perspective of PepsiCo from a general unhealthy drink
• Sustainable Increase in both market share and profit from the healthy drink and snack market.
21
Such markets are not as saturated as it is in the United States giving PepsiCo an opportunity for future
growth. Even though PepsiCo has an international presence, it is not as much its major competitor Coca-
Cola who had taken advantage of building a global network for themselves. In 2005, PepsiCo’s
international sales spiked by 15% because of expanding the distribution of Gatorade sports drinks in China
coupled with increased promotions for their Mirinda brand in Argentina (PepsiCo Earnings Rise as
Overseas Sales Surge, 2005). Examples like this show that the international markets are growth drivers,
and how important it is to pursue merging and developing economies for sustainable growth.
Short-term objectives
• Launching a market campaign in unsaturated economies like countries in Africa and Asia and
other big emerging markets (BEM), to capture market share in those areas.
• Strengthen the distribution processes in the mentioned economies to increase both product
• PepsiCo should open research centers in identified regions to make snacks and drinks that suit the
local population of the region. This purposed at boosting regional sales, increase customer loyalty,
Increasing social Benefits by extending help to communities in need. Examples of the project may include
Thirdly, PepsiCo should encourage the initiation of new cost-saving efforts to make the company leaner
and more attractive to investors. For PepsiCo to increase its overall competitiveness in the beverage and
food industry it must find ways to reduce operational costs, reduce prices, and give promotion offers from
22
Short-Term Objectives
Long-Term Objectives
The world we live in today is characterized by strong competition. To be successful, an organization must
continually research and develop innovative products. In the case of PepsiCo, their strategy has and will
continue to increase the product value proposition. Benefits of pursuing our team’s recommendations
include Increased diversification which contributes to the company’s designation and power to meet the
always-changing customer needs by producing innovative products that differentiate it from traditional
drinks. It also contributes to long-term growth where the sales and consumption of carbonated drinks have
declined. With these recommended strategies, PepsiCo can also establish a presence in new regions,
penetrate the market, then innovate and introduce new products into these emerging markets. Furthermore,
they can increase sales, decrease prices through economies of scale, and attract more consumers because
With any strategy, there will be inherent and spontaneous risks. Recent trends in the consumer-spending
environment in the United States coupled with rising raw material costs raise concern. According to an
article on marketing charts, Half of US consumers are sending less money. Indeed, Covid 19 has not only
23
continuous implementation of a grand strategy. Besides, PepsiCo faces competition from Coca-Cola
Company that has the highest market share on Carbonated drinks in and outside the united states (Risk-
Reward Balanced at PepsiCo, 2012). In a competitive environment like the soft drink industry, many cost-
saving initiatives in alignment with a cost leadership strategy could easily be duplicated (Pearce, 2015).
Even though Cost-cutting initiatives are positive steps towards a company’s development, it does come
with its disadvantages. Sometimes, while companies are focused on cost reduction, they might be
shortsighted towards it affecting product quality and in turn affect the company’s brand value and long-
term vision (Bhasin, 2019). We warn against short-sightedness, becoming too busy chasing new markets
that it neglects its existing market. Such situating might lead to damaging brand name and reputation.
PepsiCo must continually uphold it standard both in existing and new markets in the areas of customer
24
Ahmed, F. (n.d). What competitive Advantages did PepsiCo develop over the years? Retrieved from:
https://www.thestrategywatch.com/competitive-advantages-pepsico/
Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management
Anderson, J. C., and Narus, J. A. (1998). Business Marketing: Understanding What Customers Value.
custoemrs-value.
Barney, J. B. (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management,
Bhasin, H. (2019, March 13). What is Cost Reduction? Advantages and Disadvantages. Retrieved
25
illustrative evidence from the pharmaceutical industry, In G. Hamel & Heene (Eds.), Competence-
based competition (pp. 111-147). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Dudovskiy, J. (2016, May 01). PepsiCo Business Strategy and Competitive Advantage [Online article].
Ciura, B. (2020, June 19). PepsiCo Brands: All 23 Billion Dollar Brands Examined [Online article].
Conway, P., & 26, N. (2020, November 26). Soft drink market share in the U.S. in 2018. Retrieved
drink-companies-in-the-us-since-2004/
Ferguson, E. (2017, February 06). PepsiCo’s Generic and Intensive Growth Strategies [Online article].
Grant, R. M. (1991). The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy
Half of US Consumers Are Spending Less Money - The Highest Rate in a Decade. (2020, June 04).
trends-113297
Holbrook, M. B. (2005). Customer Value and Autoethnography: Subjective Personal Introspection and
Industry Market Research, Reports, and Statistics. (n.d.). Retrieved December 03, 2020, from
https://www.ibisworld.com/united-states/market-research-reports/soda-production-industry/
26
Lekaj, D. (n.d.). Pepsi Co Case; Alternative Beverages. Retrieved December 04, 2020, from
https://www.academia.edu/8340944/Pepsi_Co_Case_Alternative_Beverages
Lucas, A. 2020, July 13. PepsiCo revenue falls 3% as pandemic hits beverage sales but boosts snacks
and Implications. KHOJ Journal of Indian Management Research and Practices, Vol. 1, No. 2.
Marr, B. 2019, April 5. The Fascinating Ways PepsiCo Uses Artificial Intelligence and Machine
https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2019/04/05/the-fascinating-ways-pepsico-uses-artificial-
intelligence-and-machine-learning-to-deliver-success/?sh=34a05192311e
Maverick J. 2020, May 16. Coca-Cola and Pepsi control the Global Beverage industry. Retrieved from:
https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/060415/how-much-global-beverage-industry-controlled-
coca-cola-and-pepsi.asp
Miguel, J. S. (2020, June 9). Pepsi SWOT Analysis. Access December 4, 2020, from
https://bstrategyhub.com/pepsico-swot-analysis/
Moss Kanter, R., Khurana, R., Lal, R., & Baldwin, E. (2012). PepsiCo, performance with purpose,
achieving the right global balance. Harvard Business School Organizational Behavior Unit Case,
(412-079).
27
https://www.pepsico.com/about/mission-and-vision
information/annual-reports-and-proxy-information
“PepsiCo Commits More than $45 Million to Combat the Impacts of COVID-19, Providing Vital Local
Humanitarian Support and Distributing More Than 50 Million Nutritious Meals Worldwide”. (2020,
commits-more-than-45-million-to-combat-the-impacts-of-covid-19-providing04022020
Pratap, A. (2019, August 01). Business Growth and Marketing Strategies of Pepsi: A Case Study.
strategies/
Pratap, A. (2020, March 9) Pepsi Value Chain Analysis. Accessed December 4, 2020, from
https://notesmatic.com/2020/03/pepsi-value-chain-analysis/
Pickton, D. W. & Wright, S. (1998). What's SWOT in the strategic analysis? Strategic Change, 7 (2)
101 -109.
Piercy, N., & Giles, W. (1989). Making SWOT analysis work. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 7
(5/6), 5 -7
Priem, R. L, & Butler, J. E. (2001). “Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic
28
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/risk-reward-balanced-pepsico-185906436.html
Taylor, K. 2016, June 11. Governments around the world are taxing soda — and it's forcing Coke and
globally-are-taxing-soda-2016-6
Urbany, J. E, and Davis, J. H. (2007). Strategic Insight in Three Circles. Accessed December 4, 2020,
from https://hbr.org/2007/11/strategic-insight-in-three-circles
Valentine, E. K. (2001). SWOT analysis from a resource-based view. Journal of Marketing Theory and
Williams R. 2019, October 4. PepsiCo's 12% increase in ad spending fuels sales growth, Retrieves from
https://www.marketingdive.com/news/pepsicos-12-increase-in-ad-spending-fuels-sales-
growth/564324/
(2005, July 12). PepsiCo Earnings Rise as Overseas Sales Surge. Retrieved December 03, 2020, from
https://csnews.com/pepsico-earnings-rise-overseas-sales-surge
29