Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Brown Et Al 1959
Brown Et Al 1959
"CaO+"pl0i + 3
"H20="0Ca<H2P04>2-H20 ^
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY PROCEEDINGS 1959
where the terms on the left are the chemical potentials precipitation of anhydrous dicalcium phosphate.
of the components in the solutions and those on the right Equilibration mixtures were prepared with recrystallized
are the standard free energies of formation of the solids. monocalcium phosphate monohydrate and dicalcium phosphate
Measurements in the metastable region may be compli- dihydrate (both acetone-washed) that contained traces of
anhydrous dicalcium phosphate as the only contaminative phase
cated by supersaturation phenomena that cause no diffi- detectable by petrographic examination.
culty in the stable region. For the 25° C. isotherm, bottles containing the mixtures
When monocalcium phosphate monohydrate is hydro- were almost completely submerged in a water bath at 24.98
lyzed in pure water, the fraction, f, of the phosphorus left ± 0.01° C. The charges were agitated by stirring or tapping
in the residue of dicalcium phosphate depends solely on every few hours and prior to each sampling the first day—twice
the mole ratio CaO/P2O5 in the solution formed in the a day thereafter. Continuous stirring was avoided lest it en-
hydrolysis. The hydrolysis reaction may be written hance formation of anhydrous dicalcium phosphate seeds.
Upon equilibration of a mixture, about 5 g. of the liquid
1/2 Ca(H2 PO 4 ) 2 • H2 O + water = f CaHPO4 4- phase was drawn through a fritted glass funnel (at room tem-
erature) into a weighing bottle. Suction of air through the
(1/2 - f) CaO (in sol.) + (1 - f )/2 P2 Oj (in sol.)
[4]
E Iter was avoided. Solid phases were identified and their rel-
ative amounts estimated petrographically. The liquid phase
With the mole ratio CaO/P2O6 in the solution defined as was analyzed for calcium gravimetrically (22) and for P by
R, equation [4] yields the AOAC alkalimetric titration method (1).
In locating the metastable invariant point at 0° C., con-
R = 2(1/2 - f ) / ( l - f) version of dicalcuim phosphate dihydrate to the anhydrous
salt was so much slower than at 25° C. that the procedure was
from which simplified through use of a lower solid/liquid ratio and
through preparation of only 1 mixture from which several
f = (1 - R)/(2 - R) (1>R> 0) [5] samples were removed. The bottle of mixture was rotated con-
In soil systems, R may be evaluated from phase-rule tinuously in a water-ice mixture through the first 3 samplings,
data, provided the mechanism of dissolution is such that then was rotated for 30 minutes before each later sampling.
the solution leaving the granule to enter the soil is con- The fritted funnel was packed in ice.
tinually saturated with respect to monocalcium phosphate Initial compositions of the mixtures are shown in table 1.
Series A and B were designed to establish the composition
monohydrate and a dicalcium phosphate. This assumption at the metastable invariant point through respective approaches
is supported by observations described in the companion to equilibrium from supersaturation and undersaturation with
paper (17) and by several other points. respect to dicalcium phosphate dihydrate. The composition of
1. The solution within the granule rapidly reaches an the solution used in preparing series B was too close to that at
equilibrium composition. In an exploratory equilibration the metastable invariant point, however, to provide a good
experiment, the solution reached a constant composition test. Series C and D were respective approaches to points on
in less than 6 minutes. In contrast, several days were re- the metastable isotherm from supersaturation and undersatura-
tion with respect to dicalcium phosphate dihydrate. Series E
quired for dissolution of the monocalcium phosphate mono- was a determination of the metastable invariant-point com-
hydrate from tablets in soil (17). position at 0° C.
2. The actively dissolving part of the granule is fairly
well isolated from the soil, because (a) the outer shell of RESULTS OF EQUILIBRATION EXPERIMENTS
the granule soon becomes a coarsely porous structure of
drained dicalcium phosphate, and (b) granule-soil contact The results are summarized in table 2 and plotted in
usually is limited to a relatively small area. figure 1. The average of series A and B compositions is
3. The outward capillary flow of solution sweeps back plotted as point M in figure 1, and the average composi-
materials that otherwise would diffuse into the granule tions of the other series are plotted as points C, D, and E,
through liquid bridges. respectively.
4. Water entering the granule through vapor transport An examination of table 2 shows that the compositions
does not bring in impurities. of nearly all the solutions were constant by the time of the
5. Concentrations in the solution within the granule first sampling. Exceptions are the 144-hour sample of
are high in comparison with those in the soil solution. series A and the 460-hour samples of series C and D. The
These factors combine to limit entry of ions from the composition of the 144-hour sample of series A falls on
soil which might alter the conditions of hydrolysis of the stable invariant point S, figure 1, in accord with the petro-
monocalcium phosphate monohydrate. The effects of some graphic observation that the preponderant dicalcium phos-
of these factors are nullified, however, in water-saturated phate was the anhydrous salt. A linear extrapolation of the
soils where blotting is impeded and diffusion of ions into stable portion of the solubility isotherm for monocalcium
and out of the granule is promoted. phosphate monohydrate passes through point M. This fact,
The hydrolysis process may be visualized as one in along with the reproducibility and constancy of the com-
which a small amount of water enters the granule and positions in series A and B equilibrations, leads to the
quickly establishes an invariant-point composition, the conclusion that point M is the metastable invariant point.
solution is blotted from the granule, another increment of The average compositions in series C and D equili-
water enters the granule, and so on until all the mono- brations (excluding the 460-hour data) fall exactly on a
calcium phosphate monohydrate is dissolved. Dissolution smooth curve drawn between the origin and point M with
of the granule then almost ceases because of the low solu- about the same curvature as the stable isotherm—a signifi-
bility of the residue of dicalcium phosphate. The value cant fact in that opposite approaches to equilibrium are
of R to be used in equation [5] under these circumstances represented.
can be calculated from the invariant-point composition for
the dicalcium phosphate that has formed in the residual Table 1—Initial composition of equilibration mixtures.
phase.
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS Series Salt Liquid phase
Ca(H2 PO4 )2 • H2 O CaHPO4 • 2HZ O Cao Pj O5 Volume
Since compositions along line OM in figure 1 are metastable % % ml.
g. g.
with respect to anhydrous dicalcium phosphate, conditions were 0 15
A 30 10 0
selected that would minimize the effects of its precipitation. B 10 30 6.25 22.15 15
High solid/liquid ratios (thick slurries) speeded attainment C 4.052 35 0 0 15
of the metastable equilibrium, and a large excess of dicalcium D 0 35 0 8.47 15
E 100 10 0 0 70
phosphate dihydrate rapidly replaced the ions removed by any
BROWN AND LEHR: APPLICATION OF PHASE RULE TO BEHAVIOR OF MCP IN SOILS
ture levels (table 2 of ref. 17) are compared in table 4 Table 5—Residues from pure monocalcium phosphate
with the amounts predicted. Predictions were based upon monohydrate after 7 months.*
the major residual phase (table 3 of ref. 17), although the
presence of a considerable amount of the other dicalcium Temperature Moisture Fraction of P left at tablet site, %
phosphate made arbitrary some of the choices between •C. equivalent Observed Predicted
redicted values. Observations and predictions agree excel- value t
E ;ntly at 0.5 ME, whereas the observations at 1.0 ME
exceed the predictions by some 9% of the P.
11 1.0
1.8
Humus (-)
25
21
Humus (+ )
27
31
19.9
19.9
30 1.0 29 31 28.9
The proportion of the P left in the residue from tablets 1.8 19 33 21.7
containing gypsum in addition to monocalcium phosphate *From table 6, companion paper (17).
monohydrate in soils at 0.5 ME (exp. 2 of ref. 17) was tFrom table 5t companion paper (17). and table 3, this paper.
Hartsells 22.8, Ruston 23.1, Carrington 25.9, Webster 23.9,
and Dewey 25.2%. The average of these values, 24.2%, Table 6—Compositions of solutions saturated with respect
is 3.7% lower than the prediction of 27.9%, as derived to monocalcium and dicalcium phosphates
from a report (4) that a solution in equilibrium at 25° C. for several systems.
with monocalcium phosphate monohydrate, dicalcium
phosphate (probably anhydrous), and gypsum contains Composition of solution, g. -moles
77 g. CaO, 317 g. P2O5, and 0.6 g. SO3 per liter. (This com- NHt P04'- NO,-
position, with allowance for the gypsum-derived calcium, 8.57 4.04 __ 33.3 __ 298 29 (12)
yields a value of 0.612 for R.) The agreement between 8.95 2.70 -—— 33.3 —— 342 29 (12)
8.05 ——• 6.6 ——
observation and prediction is fairly good; the spread 47.5 —— —
33.3
2.1 93.7
260
317
28
30
(10)
(14)
includes experimental error as well as possible soil 18.3 —— — 26.3 21.0 446 29 (15)
10.1 — 33.3 344 28
interactions. —— —— (H)
The results of the factorial experiment (expt. 4 of ref. 17)
are rearranged in table 5 and compared with predictions soil-granule interaction and the reasons for residues in ex-
for the amounts of residue as listed in table 3. Despite cess of the predictions are not known. Diffusion of calcium
the high levels of moisture, observations and predictions and phosphate ions from the granule at rates somewhat
agree quite well for experiments at the low (—) humus disproportionate to their concentrations would explain the
level, the average difference being 2.1%. Only one of the discrepancies. Such differences would be related to the
predictions at the high (-J-) humus level is in fair agree- specific mobilities of the ions or to distortions of concen-
ment with observation. tration gradients caused by reactions of the ions with con-
To summarize the comparisons, predictions and obser- stituents of the soil.
vations agreed fairly well for experiments at 0.5 ME and A high level of moisture favors entry of foreign ions into
for about one-third of the experiments at 1.0 or higher the granule, with possible shift of the equilibrium compo-
ME. In two-thirds of the experiments at the high moisture sition to a lower value of R, but the low ionic concentra-
levels, particularly when the soils contained about 10% tions in the soil solution make unlikely an effect as large
leaf mold, the values observed were considerably higher as the one observed. In some of the comparisons where
than those predicted. dicalcium phosphate dihydrate was the residual phase,
The highly significant effects of humus and of the agreement between observation and prediction would have
second-order interaction humus-moisture on the amount been better had the anhydrous salt been the residual phase
of residue (17) constitute, in themselves, sufficient evidence that controlled the composition of the solution. It might
that the granule system cannot be considered as isolated be argued that the original residue was the anhydrous salt
from the soil under all conditions. The exact nature of the —that it hydrated before the petrographic examination
was made. Even when the humidity is near 100%, how-
Table 3—Invariant-point compositions at ever, as in these experiments, the anhydrous salt was more
various temperatures. stable than the dihydrate, possible exceptions being the
experiments at 11° C., where the relative stabilities are
Temperature Stable Metastable not known.
CaO P!OS f CaO P,0S f
•c. % %
SALT EFFECTS
% % % %
0 __ __ .__ 6.07
——
20.0
——
18.7
——
Phase rule can be applied in an analysis of the effects
5 5.86 21.54 23.7
11 —— —— 26.3* —— —— 19.9* of other salts on the uptake of phosphorus by plants from
25 5.79
——
24.3
——
28.4 6.30
——
22.0
——
21.5
21.7*
superphosphate to the extent that the effects are related to
30 28.9*
40 5.79 26.47 30.9 —— —— —— the amount of residue and the composition of the solution
'Estimated from values at other temperatures.
entering the soil. Ideally, the dissolution process for the
mixture in question is examined in detail to determine
Table 4—Residues from pure monocalcium phosphate which phase-rule data are needed, then the composition
monohydrate. of the solution in equilibrium with monocalcium phosphate
monohydrate and the appropriate dicalcium phosphate is
Fraction of P left at tablet site, % established through a phase-rule study of the system. The
Moisture Moisture examinations reported here for tablets containing gypsum
equivalent, 0,5 equivalent, 1.0
Observed*
appear to be the only such studies that have been made
Hartsells 28 30
of salt effects. Speculation about certain salt effects is
Ruston
Carrington
27 28 warranted, however, in the light of chemical considerations
28 31
Webster 40J 34 and some phase-rule data that are available.
Dewey 30 30
Average 28 30 The CaO/P2OB ratio of the solution in equilibrium with
Predictedt monocalcium phosphate monohydrate and a dicalcium
28.4 21.5 phosphate generally should be affected little by a salt,
*Room temperature. such as KC1, that neither hydrolyzes strongly nor introduces
T25' C. a common ion. A salt such as Ca(NO3)2, NH4H2PO4, or
{High result caused by dicalcium phosphate in soil fragments adhering to tablet
residue; this value was omitted in the comparison. KH2PO4 may introduce a considerable common-ion ef-
BROWN AND LEHR: APPLICATION OF PHASE RULE TO BEHAVIOR OF MCP IN SOILS 11
feet, whereas materials such as calcite will dominate the downward shift of the isotherms (figure 1) will cause some
situation. of the dicalcium phosphate to dissolve.
Some representative compositions are listed in table 6 More information is needed on the rates at which the
for solutions reported (10 to 12, 14, 15) to be saturated invariant-point solutions react with constituents of soils
with respect to monocalcium phosphate monohydrate and and on the kinds of crystalline materials that may be
a dicalcium phosphate (presumably CaHPO4) at 25° G. formed. The work of Lindsay and Stephenson (18) pro-
in 4-component systems comprising CaO, PaOs, and H2O, vides valuable information of this type.
together with ammonium, potassium, or nitrate. The calcu-
lated values of f for the 4-component systems are surpris-
ingly close to that for the ternary system CaO-P2Og-H2O
(at bottom of table). Here, the effects of the fourth-
component ions are so small that an examination of the
details of the dissolution process may not be important.
The values of f in table 6 were calculated on the
assumptions that the nitrate, potassium, and ammonium
were derived from Ca(NO3)2, KH2PO4, and NH4H2PO4,
respectively. The secondary salts of potassium and ammo-
nium would yield slightly higher values of f—for example,
31% instead of 29% for the first entry.
POSSIBLE PRECIPITATION REACTIONS IN SOIL
The solution leaving a source of monocalcium phosphate
monohydrate may encounter additional Ca++ ions in the
soil, with resultant precipitation of dicalcium phosphate,
but an external source of Ca is not essential to the precipi-
tation. At least three other processes may contribute.
1. As it enters the soil, solution of composition M, fig-
ure 1, is supersaturated with respect to anhydrous dical-
cium phosphate. Aside from reactions with the soil, which
perhaps will occur faster, anhydrous dicalcium phosphate
can precipitate from the solution until the composition
intersects the isotherm for the anhydrous salt. About 8%
of the P originally in the granule can be precipitated
in this way.
2. A partial precipitation through direct reaction with
soil-derived Ca entails the precipitation of additional di-
calcium phosphate. Assume that soil-derived Ca shifts the
composition from Q! to Q2 in figure 1. Dicalcium phos-
phate dihydrate will precipitate until composition Q3 is
reached. Since the Ca content at Q3 is less than at Qi, the
precipitation of Ca exceeds the addition from the soil.
3. Removal of P from the solution through reaction
with ions foreign to the system CaO-P2O5-H2O to change
the composition, say, from Pj to P2 in figure 1 will lead to
precipitation of dicalcium phosphate until the composition
reaches P3. Cations such as Fe+ + + and A1+ + + might
lead to this situation. Their principal sources (oxides, hy-
droxides, carbonates, silicates, and exchangeable combina-
tions) introduce impurities also, but the amounts probably
are small compared with the concentrations of Ca and P.
We have observed a precipitation of anhydrous dicalcium
phosphate in a few soils high in iron oxides and purported
to have high P-fixing capacity.
Since metastable equilibrium along the dicalcium phos-
phate dihydrate isotherm is reached quickly, the composi-
tion of the solution may follow the isotherm as the solution
reacts with the soil. The fraction of the P that would be
precipitated as dicalcium phosphate in process 3 is esti-
mated, through graphical integration, at 21% along the
stable isotherm or 25% along the metastable isotherm.
These proportions, together with the dicalcium phosphate
left at the site of the granule, can account for nearly half
the P applied as monocalcium phosphate monohydrate.
Inorganic and organic materials which do not dissolve
can provide exchange sites capable of removing Ca+ +
ions and displacing the composition to the left of the iso-
therm, thus decreasing the amount of dicalcium phosphate
that may precipitate. The amounts of dicalcium phosphates
that may precipitate are influenced also by shifts in the
positions of the isotherms caused by materials dissolved
from the soil. A material, for example, which causes a
12 SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY PROCEEDINGS 1959