Early Onset of Drug and Polysubstance Use As Predictors of Injection Drug Use Among

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

Addictive Behaviors 37 (2012) 367–372

Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect

Addictive Behaviors

Early onset of drug and polysubstance use as predictors of injection drug use among
adult drug users
Rebecca C. Trenz ⁎, Michael Scherer, Paul Harrell, Julia Zur, Ashish Sinha, William Latimer
Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, United States

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Keywords: Early onset of alcohol, marijuana, and cigarette use is an indicator of later substance use problems in adult-
Early onset hood such as alcohol or other drug dependence. This paper seeks to address the association between early
Polysubstance use onset alcohol, marijuana, cigarette, and polysubstance use with injection drug use among recent illicit drug
Injection drug use
users. The current study used baseline data from the Baltimore site of the NEURO-HIV Epidemiologic
Non-injection drug use
Study, an investigation of neuropsychological and social–behavioral risk factors of HIV, hepatitis A, hepatitis
Heroin
B, and Hepatitis C among both injection and non-injection drug users in Baltimore, Maryland. The present
study used a subset (N = 651) of the larger parent study that identified as White or Black, and reported
any drug use in the past 6 months. In the full sample slightly more than half (52.5%) of study participants
were IDUs. IDUs differed from non-IDUs on age of initiation for cigarettes, marijuana, and alcohol, with
IDUs initiating the use of all three substances significantly earlier than non-IDUs. IDUs also had significantly
greater proportions of early onset of alcohol (χ 2 = 19.71, p b .01), cigarette (χ 2 = 11.05, p b .01), marijuana
(χ2 = 10.83, p b .01), and polysubstance use (χ2 = 23.48, p b .01) than non-IDUs. After adjusting for age,
gender, and race/ethnicity, only participants identified as early onset alcohol users (AOR = 1.47, 95% CI:
1.00–2.18) and early onset polysubstance users (AOR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.10–2.38) were more likely to have
IDU status than those who reported initiating substance use later. IDU status was then stratified by race/
ethnicity. After controlling for age and gender, only early polysubstance use was a significant predictor of
IDU status for Whites (AOR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.07–3.93). Consistent with literature on early substance initia-
tion and later illicit substance use, early onset of alcohol and polysubstance use is an important risk factor
for IDU in adulthood.
© 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction can be applied specifically to injection drug use (IDU), but remains
a developmental trajectory that is infrequently addressed. This may
Extant literature has investigated the epidemiologic trends and be partially due to the fact that early onset substance use and later
risk factors associated with adolescent exposure to alcohol, cigarettes, injection drug use are challenging to study in national data sets be-
and marijuana and the subsequent use of these substances beyond cause illicit drug use in these large samples is often small (Hedden
experimentation (For a review, see Latimer & Zur, 2010). In addition, et al., 2010). In addition, many urban areas such as Baltimore have
a substantial body of research has provided evidence that early onset high rates of reported past year illicit drug dependence or abuse
drug use has been associated with drug use problems in adulthood (SAMSHA, 2008) thereby increasing exposure to substance using
(Anthony & Petronis, 1995; Chen, Sorr, & Anthony, 2009; Kandel, environments.
Yamaguchi, & Chen, 1992); specifically, early onset of alcohol, mari- The current paper seeks to address the association between early
juana, and cigarette use are indicators of potential later adulthood onset drug use and early onset polysubstance use with injection
problems such as alcohol abuse and dependence or other drug depen- drug use, in particular, substance use at or before age 15 among a
dence (Dawson, Goldstein, Chou, Ruan, & Grant, 2008; Grant, 1998; population of recent illicit drug users. Indicators of early substance
Grant & Dawson, 1997; Grant, Stinson, & Harford, 2001; King & use among this population may give practitioners insight into initial
Chassin, 2007). It stands to reason that this same line of research exposure to drug using environments that may extend to the use of
injection drugs in adulthood. An investigation into this developmen-
tal trajectory of substance use has important public health concerns
given the link between IDU and the associated risk of HIV and
⁎ Corresponding author at: Mercy College, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences,
Mahoney Hall, 555 Broadway, Dobbs Ferry, NY 10522, United States. Tel.: 914 674 2327;
hepatitis C infection.
fax: 914 674 7413. Nationally, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
E-mail address: rtrenz@mercy.edu (R.C. Trenz). Administration (SAMSHA, 2009) has reported an annual average

0306-4603/$ – see front matter © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.11.011
368 R.C. Trenz et al. / Addictive Behaviors 37 (2012) 367–372

rate of 425,000 IDUs over the age of 12 and a peak in IDU in young Early onset of substance use is of particular concern during adoles-
adults between the ages of 18 to 25. In addition, NIDA (2010) notes cence as research has begun to emerge which shows exposure to
that IDUs are the highest risk group for HCV and HIV infection. On a alcohol and/or marijuana has detrimental neurotoxic effects on
local level, injection drug use continues to be a public health brain chemistry and may interfere with neurodevelopment. This
concern in low-income, inner-city neighborhoods such as Baltimore, may result in difficulties with higher executive functions such as
Maryland, particularly with regard to HIV risk (Mitchell & Latimer, problem-solving, planning, decision-making, judgment, and selective
2009) and infection (Fuller et al., 2005; Sherman et al., 2005). attention, as well as the development of reward systems and self-
Research focusing on IDU in Baltimore has identified many factors control (Brown et al., 2008; Chassin et al., 2009; Lezak, 1995). Further,
contributing to IDU in this urban setting, including dropping out of the early onset of substances may have continuing detriments to
high school, homelessness, physical violence (Fuller et al., 2002), executive functioning such as self-regulation which is crucial in
and childhood sexual abuse (Ompad et al., 2005). Further, environ- later adolescence – particularly for those who have drug-using
mental factors such as low education levels, racial segregation and peers – when they may be more likely to be confronted with having
poverty (Fuller et al., 2005), co-occurring disorders of dependence to make decisions in risky situations such as driving while intoxicated,
(Arria, Fuller, Strathdee, Latkin, & Vlahov, 2002), race, sexual practices, having unsafe sex, or escalating drug use (Brown et al., 2008). Though
smoking crack and marijuana (Fuller et al., 2001), and being younger much literature has been devoted to exploring and understanding
at age of first alcohol, marijuana, and inhalant drug use contribute to the many consequences associated with early initiation of substances
the initiation of IDU (Sherman et al., 2005). Although these studies and the resulting impact later in life, research has yet to address
provide a framework for correlates of IDU and factors that contribute the consequences of early onset of alcohol, cigarette, marijuana, both
to the transition to IDU, to our knowledge, no studies to date have individually or in conjunction with one another, as they specifically
investigated the early onset of alcohol, cigarette, marijuana and poly- relate to IDU in adulthood.
substance use prior to age 15 as a predictor of IDU in adulthood. As previous work has explored the correlates of early initiation
This appears to be a critical omission in the literature when we into IDU and the transition among substance users to IDU, to our
consider that alcohol is currently the most commonly used substance knowledge, no studies have specifically addressed early onset sub-
among adolescents in the United States followed by cigarettes and stance use and polysubstance use as a predictor of IDU among adult
marijuana (Johnston, O'Malley, Bachman, & Schulenberg, 2009). Pre- substance users. To date the majority of research investigating early
vious studies investigating the developmental trajectory of substance onset substance and subsequent illicit drug use has neglected to spec-
use behaviors have established that the early onset of alcohol for ify IDU as an outcome. Generally, when discussing outcomes of early
males and tobacco for females precedes marijuana use and, subse- onset of substance use, studies in this area have grouped all other
quently, the use of more deleterious substances such as crack cocaine substances together as “other illicit drugs.” In doing so, previous
or injection of heroin (Golub & Johnson, 2001; Kandel & Yamaguchi, research neglects differences between route of administration of illic-
1993; Yamaguchi & Kandel, 1984). In addition, early drug use has it drugs and overlooks subtle yet potentially vital nuances of early
been associated with increased odds of cannabis, stimulant, cocaine, substance use, singularly and in combination, as predictors of both in-
opioid, and hallucinogen dependence among individuals who reported jection and non-injection drug use. The current study seeks to explore
treatment for alcoholism (Sintov, Kendler, Walsh, Patterson, & Prescott, early onset alcohol, cigarette, marijuana, and polysubstance use at or
2009). The relationship between early drug use and later drug problems before age 15 and its association with injection drug use, specifically,
may be particularly viable in cases where adolescents engage in poly- in adulthood in an effort to begin to address this gap.
substance use (Weinberg, Rahdert, Colliver, & Glantz, 1998) and is an
area of research that needs additional consideration with regard to 2. Methods
early onset substance use and specific drug use outcomes in adulthood,
such as IDU. 2.1. Design and sample
In the substance abuse literature, early onset has been defined and
categorized in various ways. Often, the course of substance use is Data for this study were obtained from the Baltimore site of the
thought to adhere to a developmental trajectory that begins with NEURO-HIV Epidemiologic Study and has been described in detail in
experimentation in adolescence and evolves into abuse or depen- other publications (Mitchell & Latimer, 2009; Severtson, Mitchell,
dence in adulthood (Chassin, Hussong, & Beltran, 2009; Masten, Manch, & Latimer, 2009). This study was designed to examine neuro-
Faden, Zucker, & Spear, 2008). Research in this domain has highlight- psychological and social–behavioral risk factors of HIV, hepatitis A,
ed the importance of investigating the onset of substance use in early hepatitis B, and hepatitis C among both injection and non-injection
adolescence as indicator of risk for more illicit substance use later in drug users in Baltimore, Maryland. This study was approved by the
life. For example, in a study of the progression of drug use among Institutional Review Board at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School
young adults in New York state, Yu and Williford (1992), found of Public Health in 2001 and has received annual renewals. The
that the onset of substance use during the critical developmental design of this study is cross-sectional. Participants completed the
period between the ages of 13 and 16, particularly alcohol, had a HIV-Risk Behavior Inventory, a detailed behavioral assessment of
stronger impact on the current use of alcohol and other drugs than drug use and sexual practices. Inclusion criteria in the parent study,
the initiation of substances during any other age period. In addition, required participants to be between the ages of 15 and 50 years
adolescents who begin alcohol use before age 14 are more likely to old and had to report use of non-injection and/or injection drugs in
develop alcohol dependence in adulthood than those that begin the past 6 months. Recruitment strategies for participation included
drinking after 21 years of age (Grant & Dawson, 1997). Furthermore, advertisements in local papers, street outreach, and referrals from
in an analysis of the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, Lee and Abdel- local service agencies. Participants provided written informed con-
Ghany (2004) found that the most prevalent age for the onset of sent and completed a face-to-face HIV-Risk Behavior Interview. In
drinking alcohol and smoking cigarettes or marijuana is between 13 addition, participants completed a battery of neuropsychological
and 14 years old. Lastly, DeWit, Adlaf, Offord, and Ogborne (2000) tests that measured executive functioning and estimated general
found that adolescents who began to drink before age 15 had a 2 to intelligence. Blood and urine samples were obtained to test for the
3 times greater risk of developing alcohol dependence compared presence of drugs and STDs. Participants were remunerated $45 for
to youth who started drinking at age 19 or later. As such, exploring the baseline assessment.
the early onset of substance use at or prior to 15 years of age seems The present study used a subset (N = 651) of the parent study
particularly pertinent. that included participants who self-identified as White or Black.
R.C. Trenz et al. / Addictive Behaviors 37 (2012) 367–372 369

Participants who self-identified as “other,” were not included in the 2.3. Data analysis
current analyses due to their small number (n = 23). Overall, partici-
pants in the current study had a mean age of 32.34 (SD = 8.21) and The study data were summarized descriptively with frequency
were primarily Black (53.1%) and male (56.1%). The majority of par- distributions, means, and standard deviations. Chi-squares and
ticipants identified themselves as single (70.0%) and having achieved t-tests were used to identify significant differences between injection
a general education diploma (GED) or greater (55.0%). Forty-three and non-injection drug users on demographic variables and sub-
percent of the participants reported receiving money from regular stance use at or before age 15. Univariate correlates that achieved
employment and 42.0% reported receiving money from public assis- significance of less than .01 were retained for inclusion in the multi-
tance, while 18.0% reported homelessness in the 6 months prior to variable logistic analyses. Although there were no significant differ-
the study. Sample characteristics are also described in Table 2 by ences of age between groups on IDU status, this variable was
IDU status. retained in the logistic analyses as a control mechanism for duration
of substance use. The binary indicator for injection drug use status
(i.e. IDU versus non-IDU status) was the dependent variable in the
2.2. Measures
logistic regression models. Predictors included alcohol, cigarette,
marijuana, and polysubstance use prior to age 15, in addition to
2.2.1. Demographic variables
demographic variables. Separate binary logistic regression analyses
The demographic items included in the analyses were age, sex,
were used to assess the influence of substance use at or before age
and race/ethnicity. The two categories of race/ethnicity were White
15 on injection drug use status while controlling for age, sex, and
and Black. Age was used as a continuous variable.
race. Groups were then stratified by race and binary logistic analyses
were run for each predictor variable while controlling for age and
2.2.2. Drug use variables gender. All data analysis was performed using PASW Statistics 18
Participants were asked to report the first time they recalled using (SPSS, 2009).
each drug outlined in the HIV-Risk Behavior Inventory. Participants
also self-reported past 6 month use of these substances. A summary 3. Results
of the prevalence of recent substance use of the sample can be
found in Table 1. 3.1. Prevalence of recent drug use

2.2.3. Early onset substance use In the full sample slightly more than half (52.5%) of study partici-
Age of initiation of cigarette, marijuana, and alcohol use was pants reported IDU in some form in the past 6 months. A summary of
assessed with items: “How old were you when you first used ciga- past 6 month drug use can be found in Table 1. The majority of the
rettes?,” “How old were you when you first used marijuana?,” and participants drank alcohol (71.1%), smoked cigarettes (89.2%), and/
“How old were you when you first used alcohol?” Participants or smoked marijuana (52.4%) in the past 6 months. The prevalence
responded to these questions with age in years. These continuous of IDU took several forms including injecting speedball (30.9%),
age variables were transformed into dichotomous variables where heroin (49%), and cocaine (31.4%). The prevalence of non-injection
early onset substance use was categorized as ≤15 (coded as 1) and drug use in the past 6 months included snorting speedball (9.8%),
>15 (coded as 0) for the descriptive and logistic regression analyses. heroin (43.0%), cocaine (20.6%), and smoking crack (46.0%).

3.2. Demographic characteristics stratified by injection drug use status


2.2.4. Early onset polysubstance use
Polysubstance use was defined as the use of any two or all three Frequency distributions for each of the demographic and study
substances (alcohol, cigarettes, marijuana) at or before age 15. Use variables were determined for the entire sample of recent substance
of any two or more substances was coded as a 1 and less than the users and were stratified by IDU status (Table 2). Of IDUs, 62% were
use of any two substances was coded as 0 in the logistic regression male and 38% were female. Of non-IDUs there was a fairly even split
analyses. by gender where 49.5% were male and 50.5% were female. The IDU
group was primarily White (67.8%) while the majority of the non-
2.2.5. Injection drug use
Current IDU status was determined with the question: “Have
Table 2
you injected any drugs in the past 6 months?” Participants who
Demographic and drug use variables for injection and non-injection drug users
responded yes to this question were coded with a 1 and those who (N = 651).
responded no were coded as a 0 in the logistic regression analyses.
Injectors Non-injectors

n = 342 n = 309 t/χ2 p


Table 1 Demographic variables M/N SD/% M/N SD/%
Summary of past 6 month drug use among the study sample Age 32.70 8.63 32.01 7.81 1.06 .289
(N = 651). Sex: male 212 32.6 153 23.5 9.75 .002
Female 130 20 156 24.0
Drug type and method of use %
Ethnicity: White 232 35.6 73 11.2 125.66 b.001
Drank alcohol 71.1 Black 110 16.9 236 36.3
Smoked cigarettes 89.2 Age of initiation
Smoked marijuana 52.4 Alcohol 13.38 3.18 14.56 3.73 3.56 b.001
Injected speedball 30.9 Cigarettes 13.71 4.14 15.01 4.31 3.71 b.001
Snorted speedball 9.8 Marijuana 13.94 3.07 15.01 3.13 4.71 b.001
Injected heroin 49.0 Substance use ≤ 15
Snorted heroin 43.0 Alcohol 253 40.2 175 27.8 19.71 b.001
Injected cocaine 31.4 Cigarettes 244 40.9 167 28.0 11.05 b.001
Snorted cocaine 20.6 Marijuana 244 39.3 181 29.1 10.83 b.001
Smoked crack 46.0 Polysubstance use 257 39.7 176 27.2 23.48 b.001

Note. Less than 2% missing data. Note. Less than 2% missing data.
370 R.C. Trenz et al. / Addictive Behaviors 37 (2012) 367–372

IDU group was primarily Black (76.3%). The mean age did not differ Table 4
significantly between IDU (M = 32.70, SD = 8.63) and non-IDU Summary of adjusted odds ratios for logistic regression analyses using early onset
substance use as a predictor of injection drug use stratified by race.
(M = 32.01, SD = 7.81) groups. IDUs differed from non-IDUs on age
of initiation for cigarettes (t = 3.71, p b .001), marijuana (t = 4.71, White Black
p b .001), and alcohol (t = 3.56, p b .001), with IDUs initiating the AOR 95% CI AOR 95% CI
use of all three substances significantly earlier than non-IDUs. IDUs
Predictors
also had significantly greater proportions of early onset of alcohol Cigarette use ≤ 15
(χ 2 = 19.71, p b .001), cigarette (χ 2 = 11.05, p b .001), marijuana No 1.00 1.00
(χ 2 = 10.83, p b .001), and polysubstances (χ 2 = 23.48, p b .001) than Yes 1.59 .82–3.07 1.22 .74–2.00
non-IDUs. Marijuana use ≤ 15
No 1.00 1.00
Yes 1.89 .97–3.66 1.12 .69–1.82
Alcohol use ≤ 15
3.3. Predictors of injection drug use
No 1.00 1.00
Yes 1.59 .78–3.22 1.43 .89–2.30
The unadjusted and adjusted logistic models stratified by IDU Polysubstance use ≤ 15
status can be found in Table 3. After adjusting for age, sex, and race/ No 1.00 1.00
ethnicity, early onset of alcohol (AOR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.00–2.18) and Yes 2.06⁎ 1.07–3.93 1.43 .89–2.29
early onset polysubstance users (AOR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.10–2.38) Note. AOR are adjusted for age and sex.
were more likely to have IDU status than those who reported initiat- ⁎ p b .05.

ing substance use later. Table 4 shows the adjusted odds ratios
for early substance use as a predictor of IDU status stratified by
of IDU among adult substance users and substantially contributes to
race/ethnicity. After controlling for age and sex, only early polysub-
this growing body of research.
stance use was a significant predictor of IDU status for Whites
After stratifying by race/ethnicity, early onset polysubstance use
(AOR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.07–3.93).
was a risk factor of IDU among Whites, but not Blacks in this sample.
The lack of significance at the p b .05 for early polysubstance use onset
4. Discussion and IDU may be a function of differential patterns in substance initia-
tion between race/ethnicity. In fact, White, Jarrett, Valencia, Loeber,
The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship be- and Wei (2007) suggest different sequences of substance initiation
tween early onset of alcohol, cigarette, marijuana, and polysubstance between White and Black adolescent males. Specifically, Whites
use and injection drug use status among a sample of recent substance may be more likely to follow a typical initiation sequence of alcohol
users. Both early onset of alcohol use and polysubstance use were or tobacco to marijuana and then harder drugs (i.e. cocaine, crack,
risk factors for IDU, though polysubstance use was found to have a heroin). In contrast, a typical initiation sequence for Blacks may be
greater odds ratio of predicting IDU. The early onset of alcohol use alcohol, tobacco, marijuana, and then harder drugs. The null findings
is consistent with research that suggests alcohol may promote in- for Blacks in the stratified analysis may be a function of limited power
volvement in other illicit substance use such as IDU (Corsi, Winch, given the small cell size of Black IDUs, as per differences in develop-
Kwiatkowski, & Booth, 2007; Fergusson, Boden, & Horwood, 2008). mental sequences of substance initiation. As a result of these potential
Exploring polysubstance use in adolescence is a growing, yet still developmental differences in early onset of alcohol and polysub-
underdeveloped trend in substance use as it is an important risk fac- stance use should not be dismissed as a risk factor for this group,
tor for IDU in adulthood. In an early longitudinal study of adolescents, instead, further research is warranted to determine the impact on
Newcomb and Bentler (1988) investigated the effects of early early onset of alcohol and polysubstance use among Black popula-
substance use on seven problem domains in early adulthood. These tions in which larger sample sizes are available for sufficient power.
researchers found that polysubstance use in adolescence was predic- The significant finding of early onset polysubstance use and subse-
tive of increased problems with drugs in young adulthood, albeit not quent risk of IDU in adulthood should not overshadow the risk asso-
specifically IDU. To our knowledge, the present study is the first to ciated with early onset of other drug use, such as marijuana. For
identify early onset substance use (identified separately) and poly- example, Grant et al. (2010) found that among male twins, early
substance use (identified in combination) as a significant predictor onset users (use prior to age 18) of marijuana were 1.3 to 2.5 times
more likely to have tried other illegal drugs and were 1.0 to 1.2
times more likely to have illegal drug abuse/dependence than later
Table 3 users of marijuana. Similarly in another twin study, Lynskey, Vink,
Summary of unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios for logistic regression analyses using and Boomsma (2006) found that individuals who used marijuana
early onset substance use as a predictor of injection drug use.
prior to age 17 were 2.1 to 5.2 times more likely to have used other
OR 95% CI AOR 95% CI illicit drugs, have alcohol dependence, and drug abuse/dependence
Predictors than their co-twin. In addition, adolescents in a drug prevention pro-
Cigarette use ≤ 15 gram that reported earlier initiation of marijuana were more likely to
No 1.00 1.00 report other illicit drug use than those who reported later marijuana
Yes 1.84⁎⁎ 1.29–2.61 1.34 .90–1.99 initiation (Ellickson, D'Amico, Collins, & Klein, 2005). Moreover,
Marijuana use ≤ 15
No 1.00 1.00
Agrawal et al. (2006) found that among female twin pairs, other illicit
Yes 1.80⁎⁎ 1.28–2.53 1.34 .90–2.00 drug use was associated with the use of alcohol before 14 and the use
Alcohol use ≤ 15 of marijuana before 16, but not with early use of nicotine. Although
No 1.00 1.00 the present study did not demonstrate significance for early onset
Yes 2.19⁎⁎ 1.55–3.08 1.47⁎ 1.00–2.18
cigarette and marijuana use as a predictor of IDU, our study specifical-
Polysubstance use ≤ 15
No 1.00 1.00 ly indicates IDU as a substance use outcome and in this respect adds
Yes 2.31⁎⁎ 1.65–3.22 1.62⁎⁎ 1.10–2.38 to literature on early onset substance use and IDU in adulthood.
Note. AOR are adjusted for age, sex, and ethnicity.
One alternative explanation for harder drug use later in life is that
⁎ p b .05. the earlier exposure to alcohol, cigarettes, and marijuana equates to
⁎⁎ p b .01. a longer duration of risk (Degenhardt et al., 2009) and exposure to a
R.C. Trenz et al. / Addictive Behaviors 37 (2012) 367–372 371

range of family and individual factors (Fergusson et al., 2008). Early of HIV/AIDS, ranking the city second among metropolitan areas in the
access and exposure to drugs may eliminate obstacles in acceptance United States with upwards of 30% of cases attributable to IDU
of and access to harder drug use (Lynskey et al., 2003). Yu and (Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, 2008). More-
Williford (1992) identified between 13 and 16 years of age as a criti- over, substance use has a strong link to HIV/AIDS and it is estimated
cal period for substance exposure, as this developmental time frame that approximately 64% of individuals diagnosed with HIV/AIDS
is filled with social and cognitive changes as well as peer influences. have used a non-injection illicit drug and 17% have used an injection
These researchers theorized that alcohol use beginning within this drug in their lifetime (SAMHSA, 2010b). Interventions should target
developmental time frame has a large impact on future drug use the early onset of substance use and polysubstance use, as it is an im-
behavior. In addition, Sobeck, Abbey, et al. (2000) explained that in- portant risk factor for later substance use behaviors such as IDU. As
creased exposure to substance use allows for modeling and reinforce- both injection and non-injection drug use have a strong link to HIV,
ment to occur. The combination of reduced barriers and increased delaying the early onset of drug use until executive functioning is
exposure, observational learning, and relationships with peers is more fully developed, may help to avert illicit drug use exposure
one of the most common explanations for escalations in substance and high-risk environments. Although this study has shown that
use among young adults. early onset of alcohol and polysubstance use is an important predictor
Several studies focusing on substance use and neurocognitive of IDU in adulthood, researchers should continue to investigate
functioning in adolescence, have documented a variety of executive whether early onset substance use alters neuropsychological devel-
functioning deficits among adolescent substance users. For example, opment in a way that increases the risk for substance use in adult-
adolescent marijuana users showed greater effort to achieve inhibi- hood. Future research should seek to expand the literature on early
tion on an inhibition task than non-marijuana users (Tapert et al., onset polysubstance use and its effects on neurocognitive develop-
2007) and non-dependent substance using adolescents without a ment and executive functioning.
family history of substance use performed better on attention and
language tasks than substance dependent adolescents (Tapert & Role of funding sources
Brown, 2000). In addition, prolonged alcohol and other drug use Funding sources for this study had no role in the design of the study, data collection,
data analysis, data interpretation, writing of the manuscript, or decision to submit for
among adolescents resulted in poorer performance on executive
publication.
functioning tasks that measured attention, memory, and visuospatial
functioning (Brown, Tapert, Granholm, & Delis, 2000; Tapert &
Contributors
Brown, 1999; Tapert, Granholm, Leedy, & Brown, 2002). Poorer Rebecca Trenz designed the study, conducted the analysis, and led the writing of the
performance on executive functioning tasks among adolescent article. Michael Scherer, Paul Harrell, Julia Zur, and Ashish Sinha conducted literature
substance users suggest a reduced ability to control behavior and searches, provided summaries of previous research, and collaborated on the final presen-
attend to environmental stimuli which may put individuals at greater tation of the article. William Latimer was the principal investigator for this study. All
authors contributed to and have approved the final manuscript.
risk for substance use later in life.
While the findings presented here provide valuable contributions
Conflict of interest
to the literature, there are limitations in the cross-sectional design
None.
that reduce the ability to make causal inferences and to generalize
to other populations. These findings may be specific to heavy illicit
Acknowledgments
drug users in an urban setting and are not generalizable to larger, This study was supported by grants R01DA014498 and T32DA007292 from the
non-illicit drug using populations or to former illicit drug users who National Institute on Drug Abuse.
have periods of abstinence. Further, in retrospective studies, there
is great reliance on the self-report of drug use history. Specifically, References
participants may have over or under-reported their age of first use
and recent drug use. However, given these limitations, self-reports Agrawal, A., Grant, J. D., Waldron, M., Duncan, A. E., Scherrer, J. F., Lynskey, M. T.,
et al. (2006). Risk for initiation of substance use as a function of age of onset
of drug use history provide detailed information over longer periods
of cigarette, alcohol and cannabis use: Findings in a Midwestern female twin
of time compared to blood tests and urine analysis and, as such, cohort. Preventive Medicine, 43(2), 125–128 doi: S0091-7435(06)00147-2 [pii]
were appropriately used in this study. In a review of self-report of 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.03.022.
Anthony, J. C., & Petronis, K. R. (1995). Early-onset drug use and risk of later drug prob-
injection drug users, Darke (1998) concludes that using self-report
lems. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 40, 9–15.
is a reliable and valid method of describing drug use. Arria, A. M., Fuller, C. M., Strathdee, S. A., Latkin, C., & Vlahov, D. (2002). Drug depen-
Despite these limitations, this study adds to prior literature dence among young recently initiated injection drug users. Journal of Drug Issues,
(Guttmannova et al., 2011; Zamboanga, Ham, Van Tyne, & Pole, 32, 1089–1102.
Brown, S. A., McGue, M., Maggs, J., Schulenberg, J., Hingson, R., Swartzwelder, S., et al.
2011) suggesting that delaying drug use in adolescence may be pro- (2008). A developmental perspective on alcohol and youths 16 to 20 years of
tective against substance use in adulthood. However, further research age. Pediatrics, 121(Suppl 4), S290–S310 doi: 121/Supplement_4/S290 [pii]
is needed to rule out other potential explanations, such as genetics. 10.1542/peds.2007-2243D.
Brown, S. A., Tapert, S. F., Granholm, E., & Delis, D. C. (2000). Neurocognitive function-
Another strength of this study is that early onset drug use is often ing of adolescents: Effects of protracted alcohol use. Alcoholism, Clinical and Exper-
studied using adolescent participation in large scale, cross-sectional, imental Research, 24(2), 164–171.
national surveys such as Monitoring the Future (MTF; Johnston Chassin, L., Hussong, A., & Beltran, I. (2009). Adolescent drug use. In R. M. Lerner, & L.
Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 723–763). Hoboken, NJ:
et al., 2009) that investigate both individual and school-level use of Wiley.
illicit substances. One of the inherent drawbacks of MTF is that par- Chen, C. -Y., Sorr, C. L., & Anthony, J. C. (2009). Early-onset and risk for drug depen-
ticipants most at-risk are often missed in data collection due to dence problems. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 319–322.
Corsi, K. F., Winch, P. J., Kwiatkowski, C. F., & Booth, R. E. (2007). Childhood factors that
absenteeism and attrition. As a consequence, this method may
precede drug injection: Is there a link? Journal of Child and Family Studies, 16,
result in underreported illicit drug use in these samples due to 808–818, doi:10.1007/s10826-006-9127-9.
the fact that individuals at the highest risk are not included in Darke, S. (1998). Self-report among injection drug users: A review. Drug and Alcohol
Dependence, 51, 253–263.
the analyses. The current study investigates early onset of drug
Dawson, D. A., Goldstein, R. B., Chou, S. P., Ruan, W. J., & Grant, B. F. (2008). Age at
use among illicit drug users, the very sample that MTF is most first drink and the first incidence of adult-onset DSM-IV alcohol use disorders.
likely to miss. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 32(12), 2149–2160 doi:
The findings presented here have important implications for ACER80610.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00806.x.
Degenhardt, L., Chiu, W. T., Conway, K., Dierker, L., Glantz, M., Kalaydjian, A., et al.
urban areas such as Baltimore. In addition to a high prevalence of (2009). Does the ‘gateway’ matter? Associations between the order of drug
illicit drug use (SAMHSA, 2010a), Baltimore also has a high incidence use initiation and the development of drug dependence in the National
372 R.C. Trenz et al. / Addictive Behaviors 37 (2012) 367–372

Comorbidity Study Replication. Psychological Medicine, 39(1), 157–167 doi: Lynskey, M. T., Vink, J. M., & Boomsma, D. I. (2006). Early onset cannabis use and pro-
S003329170800342510.1017/S0033291708003425. gression to other drug use in a sample of Dutch twins. Behavior Genetics, 36(2),
DeWit, D. J., Adlaf, E. M., Offord, D. R., & Ogborne, A. C. (2000). Age at first alcohol use: A 195–200, doi:10.1007/s10519-005-9023-x.
risk factor for the development of alcohol disorders. The American Journal of Psychi- Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (2008). Baltimore City HIV/AIDS
atry, 157(5), 745–750. Statistics Fact Sheet. Retrieved from. www.vsa.maryland.gov
Ellickson, P. L., D'Amico, E. J., Collins, R. L., & Klein, D. J. (2005). Marijuana use and later Masten, A. S., Faden, V. B., Zucker, R. A., & Spear, L. P. (2008). Underage drinking:
problems: when frequency of recent use explains age of initiation effects (and A developmental framework. Pediatrics, 121(Suppl 4), S235–S251 doi: 121/
when it does not). Substance Use & Misuse, 40(3), 343–359. Supplement_4/S235 [pii] 10.1542/peds.2007-2243A.
Fergusson, D. M., Boden, J. M., & Horwood, L. J. (2008). The developmental ante- Mitchell, M. M., & Latimer, W. W. (2009). Gender differences in high risk sexual behav-
cedents of illicit drug use: Evidence from a 25-year longitudinal study. Drug iors and injection practices associated with perceived HIV risk among injection
and Alcohol Dependence, 96(1–2), 165–177 doi: S0376-8716(08)00095-1 [pii] drug users. AIDS Education and Prevention, 21(4), 384–394.
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.03.003. Newcomb, M. D., & Bentler, P. M. (1988). Impact of adolescent drug-use and social
Fuller, C. M., Borrell, L. N., Latkin, C. A., Galea, S., Ompad, D. C., Strathdee, S. A., et al. support on problems of young-adults—A longitudinal-study. Journal of Abnormal
(2005). Effects of race, neighborhood, and social network on age at initiation of Psychology, 97(1), 64–75.
injection drug use. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 689–695. Ompad, D. C., Ikeda, R. M., Shah, N., Fuller, C. M., Bailey, S., Morse, E., et al. (2005). Child-
Fuller, C. M., Vlahov, D., Arria, A. M., Ompad, D. C., Garfein, R., & Strathdee, S. A. (2001). hood sexual abuse and age at initiation of injection drug use. American Journal of
Factors associated with adolescent initiation of injection drug use. Public Health Public Health, 95(4), 703–709, doi:10.2105/ajph.2003.019372.
Reports, 116, 136–145. Severtson, S. J., Mitchell, M. M., Manch, B. E., & Latimer, W. W. (2009). The association
Fuller, C. M., Vlahov, D., Ompad, D. C., Shah, N., Arria, A., & Strathdee, S. A. (2002). High- between planning abilities and sharing injection drug use equipment among injec-
risk behaviors associated with transition from illicit non-injection to injection drug tion drug users in Baltimore, MD. Journal of Substance Use, 14(5), 325–333.
use among adolescent and young adult drug users: A case–control study. Drug and Sherman, S. G., Fuller, C. M., Shah, N., Ompad, D. V., Vlahov, D., & Strathdee, S. A. (2005).
Alcohol Dependence, 66, 189–198. Correlates of initiation of injection drug use among drug users in Baltimore, Mary-
Golub, A., & Johnson, B. D. (2001). Variation in youthful risks of progression from land: The need for early intervention. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 37, 437–443.
alcohol and tobacco to marijuana and to hard drugs across generations. American Sintov, N. D., Kendler, K. S., Walsh, D., Patterson, D. G., & Prescott, C. A. (2009). Predic-
Journal of Public Health, 91, 225–232. tors of illicit substance dependence among individuals with alcohol dependence.
Grant, B. F. (1998). Age of smoking onset and its association with alcohol consumption Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 70(2), 269–278.
and DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence: Results from the national longitudinal Sobeck, J., Abbey, A., et al. (2000). Predicting early adolescent substance use: Do risk
alcohol epidemiologic survey. Journal of Substance Abuse, 10, 59–73. factors differ depending on age of onset? Journal of Substance Abuse, 11, 89–102.
Grant, B. F., & Dawson, D. A. (1997). Age at onset of alcohol use and its association with SPSS (2009). PASW Statistics 17. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
DSM-IV alcohol use and dependence: Results from the national longitudinal alco- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2008). Results from the
hol epidemiologic survey. Journal of Substance Abuse, 9, 103–110. 2007 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National findings. Rockville, MD.
Grant, J. D., Lynskey, M. T., Scherrer, J. F., Agrawal, A., Heath, A. C., & Bucholz, K. K. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2010). National Survey
(2010). A cotwin-control analysis of drug use and abuse/dependence risk associat- on Drug Use and Health: National findings. Rockville, MD.
ed with early-onset cannabis use. Addictive Behaviors, 35(1), 35–41 doi: S0306- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2010). The NSDUH
4603(09)00211-1 10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.08.006. report: HIV/AIDS and substance use. Rockville, MD.
Grant, B. F., Stinson, F. S., & Harford, T. C. (2001). Age at onset of alcohol abuse and Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies
dependence: A 12-year follow-up. Journal of Substance Abuse, 13, 493–504. (2009, October 29). The NSDUH report: Injection drug use and related risk behaviors.
Guttmannova, K., Bailey, J. A., Hill, K. G., Lee, J., Hawkins, J., Woods, M., et al. (2011). Rockville, MD.
Sensitive periods for adolescent alcohol use initiation: Predicting the lifetime Tapert, S. F., & Brown, S. A. (1999). Neuropsychological correlates of adolescent sub-
occurrence and chronicity of alcohol problems in adulthood. Journal of Studies on stance abuse: Four-year outcomes. Journal of the International Neuropsychological
Alcohol and Drugs, 72(2), 221–231. Society, 5, 481–493.
Hedden, S. L., Martins, S. S., Malcolm, R. J., Floyd, L., Cavanaugh, C. E., & Latimer, W. W. Tapert, S. F., & Brown, S. A. (2000). Substance dependence, family history of alcohol
(2010). Patterns of illegal drug use among an adult alcohol dependent population: Re- dependence and neuropsychological functioning in adolescence. Addiction, 95(7),
sults from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 1043–1053.
106(2–3), 119–125 doi: S0376-8716(09)00319-6 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.08.002. Tapert, S. F., Granholm, E., Leedy, N. G., & Brown, S. A. (2002). Substance use and
Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2009). Secondary withdrawal: Neuropsychological functioning over 8 years in youth. Journal of the
school students (NIH Publication No. 09-7402). Monitoring the future national survey International Neuropsychological Society, 8(7), 873–883.
results on drug use, 1975–2008, Volume I, . Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Tapert, S. F., Schweinsburg, A. D., Drummond, S. P., Paulus, M. P., Brown, S. A., Yang, T. T.,
Abuse. et al. (2007). Functional MRI of inhibitory processing in abstinent adolescent marijua-
Kandel, D. B., & Yamaguchi, K. (1993). From beer to crack: Developmental patterns of na users. Psychopharmacology, 194(2), 173–183, doi:10.1007/s00213-007-0823-y.
drug involvement. American Journal of Public Health, 83, 851–855. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National
Kandel, D. B., Yamaguchi, K., & Chen, K. (1992). Stages of progression in drug involve- Institute on Drug Abuse (2010). NIDA InfoFacts: Heroin. Retrieved from. http://
ment from adolescence to adulthood: Further evidence for the gateway theory. www.nida.nih.gov/PDF/Infofacts/Heroin10.pdf
Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 53, 447–457. Weinberg, N. Z., Rahdert, E., Colliver, J. D., & Glantz, M. D. (1998). Adolescent substance
King, K. M., & Chassin, L. (2007). A prospective study of the effects of age of initiation of abuse: A review of the past 10 years. Journal of the American Academy of Child and
alcohol and drug use on young adult substance dependence. Journal of Studies on Adolescent Psychiatry, 37, 252–281.
Alcohol and Drugs, 68, 256–265. White, H. R., Jarrett, N., Valencia, E. Y., Loeber, R., & Wei, E. (2007). Stages and sequences of
Latimer, W., & Zur, J. (2010). Epidemiologic trends of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs. initiation and regular substance use in a longitudinal cohort of black and white male
Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 19, 451–464, doi: adolescents. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 68(2), 173–181.
10.1016/j.chc.2010.03.002. Yamaguchi, K., & Kandel, D. B. (1984). Patterns of drug use from adolescence to young
Lee, Y. G., & Abdel-Ghany (2004). American youth consumption of licit and illicit sub- adulthood: III. Predictors of progression. American Journal of Public Health, 74,
stances. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 28(5), 454–465. 673–681.
Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Yu, J., & Williford, W. R. (1992). The age of alcohol onset and alcohol, cigarette, and
Press. marijuana use patterns: An analysis of drug use progression of young adults in
Lynskey, M. T., Heath, A. C., Bucholz, K. K., Slutske, W. S., Madden, P. A., Nelson, E. C., New York State. International Journal of the Addictions, 27(11), 1313–1323.
et al. (2003). Escalation of drug use in early-onset cannabis users vs. co-twin Zamboanga, B. L., Ham, L. S., Van Tyne, K., & Pole, N. (2011). Alcohol expectancies
controls. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289(4), 427–433 doi: among adolescent nondrinkers: They may not be drinking now, but they're
joc21156 [pii]. “thinkin bout it”. Journal of Adolescent Health, 49(1), 105–107.

You might also like