Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 07 Inventories - Revised 2018 November
Chapter 07 Inventories - Revised 2018 November
Inventories
Table of contents
1. SCOPE
2. INTRODUCTION
2.1. What is included in inventories
2.2. Valuation principle
3. MEASUREMENT
3.1. Cost of inventories
3.1.1. Cost of purchase
3.1.2. Cost of conversion
a) Direct production costs
b) Indirect production costs
c) Manufacturing overhead
d) Economic depreciation charge
3.1.3. Other costs
3.2. Cost of inventories of a service provider
3.2.1. Direct costs
3.2.2. Initial costs
3.2.3. Indirect costs
3.2.4. Valuation method
3.3. First in, First out method (FIFO)
3.3.1. Definition
3.3.2. Standard costing: treatment of variances
a) Rate variances
b) Efficiency variances
Quarterly (including year-end) reporting
Year-end
c) Volume, manufacturing overhead and depreciation variances
d) Capitalization of variances
e) At the beginning of the new accounting year
3.4. Net realizable value (NRV)
3.5. Obsolete, slow moving and excess inventories
3.6. Spare parts
3.7. Customer spools
4. RECOGNITION AS AN EXPENSE
7. EXAMPLE
2. Introduction
Inventories must be valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value. IAS 2 §9
In determining cost, the First-In, First-Out (FIFO) formula will be used. Obsolete, damaged and non-
marketable inventories must be written down to estimated net realizable value. Such write-downs must
be recognized in cost of sales.
1 Please refer to the ‘Insurance’ document in the interpretations section of the Bekaert accounting manual for more
guidance on how to present various kinds of insurance charges in the income statement.
Chapter 7 – Inventories (revised December 2017) 5.
ACCOUNTING MANUAL BEKAERT
Other costs are included in the cost of inventories only to the extent that they are incurred in bringing the
inventories to their present location and condition. For example, it may be appropriate to include non-
IAS 2 §15
production overheads or the costs of designing products for specific customers in the cost of inventories.
Examples of costs excluded from the cost of inventories and recognized as expenses in the period in
which they are incurred are:
IAS 2 §16
• abnormal amounts of wasted materials, labor, or other production costs
• storage costs, unless those costs are necessary in the production process prior to a further
production stage
• administrative overheads that do not contribute to bringing inventories to their present location and
condition
• selling costs
Extraordinary production expenses and inefficiencies, such as costs of relocating from one plant site to
another, unusual repairs because of a catastrophe, costs incurred during a strike, obsolescence costs
and abnormal scrap losses, also should be excluded from inventory costs and should be recognized in
profit or loss when incurred.
Costs incurred in transporting an item from a warehouse to its initial point of sale should be capitalized to
inventories. However, costs associated with moving inventories from one point of sale to another (e.g.
transport of goods between stores) should not be included in the cost of inventories because the goods
were already in a condition and location for sale before the move.
In most Bekaert entities, the finished goods warehouse at the plant is in itself a point of sale, so freight
costs to transport the goods to another warehouse (point of sale) should not be capitalized to inventories.
Some entities (e.g. Prodalam) operate a distribution business model with a distribution center and own
local stores or branches. If the distribution center is in itself not a point of sale, because goods are only
sold from local branches, the freight cost to move the goods from the distribution center to the local
branches should be capitalized to inventories.
3.3.1. Definition
The FIFO cost method assumes that the first goods purchased are the first goods used or sold, regardless
of the actual physical flow. This method most clearly reflects periodic income by matching the first cost
incurred with the first revenue produced, and it approximates the results that would be obtained by the
specific identification method. Because the earliest goods purchased are the first ones removed from the
inventory account, the remaining balance is composed of items acquired at more recent costs.
Example: FIFO method
Given the above data, the cost of goods sold and the ending inventory balance are determined as
follows:
Note that the total of the units in cost of goods sold and ending inventory, as well as the sum of their total
costs, is equal to the goods available for sale and their respective total costs. When standard costing is
used, FIFO-adjustments are required in order to properly value inventory items at actual cost of goods
produced or acquired (see below). Standard costing is used by most Bekaert entities for raw materials,
work-in-process and finished goods. Other inventories (consumables, spare parts) are carried at moving
average cost by most Bekaert entities.
a) Rate variances
Rate variances on purchased raw materials, halfproducts and finished goods
When materials are purchased, the inventory is debited at the standard cost and any purchase
price variance (‘PPV’= the difference between standard and actual cost) is adjusted to cost of sales.
At quarter-end the purchased materials should be revalued at their deemed actual cost based on
the FIFO assumption that the ‘oldest’ materials (first-in) were the first ones to be processed and/or
shipped (first-out). The FIFO revaluation should be done for purchased materials both unprocessed
and processed in work in process and finished goods. When standard prices are updated
infrequently (e.g. on a quarterly basis), the FIFO revaluation usually consists in determining the
amount of PPVs that relates to the relevant purchase period (typically less than 3 months) for the
current inventories and capitalizing it by adjusting inventories against cost of sales. A more refined
approach should be used when standard costs are frequently updated (say on a monthly basis),
since the PPVs for the relevant period may have been derived from prior standard prices.
Additional guidance can be found in the FIFO adjustments on wire rod interpretation in the
Interpretations section of the Accounting Manual on Intranet. When standard prices of purchased
(raw) materials are updated, the revaluation effect is immediately recognized both in the balance
sheet (inventories) and in the income statement (cost of sales). To the extent that the standard
(raw) material cost included in the inventory value at the end of the period significantly varies from
its FIFO cost, FIFO adjustments are posted to correct the misstatement.
Other rate variances
FIFO adjustments for other rate variances (e.g. utilities, wages and salaries) are handled in the
same way as efficiency variances.
b) Efficiency variances
Quarterly (including year-end) reporting
At the end of each quarterly reporting period, at plant level, the capitalization of rate and efficiency
variances should be reviewed in accordance with the following guidelines:
• If the standard is not a realistic target (i.e. either obsolete or not currently attainable) and if the
variance is recurring (periodically in the same direction), which will lead to alteration of the
standard in the next planning period, then the variance is to be capitalized.
• If the variance is due to exceptional operational conditions, then the variance cannot be
capitalized.
• In case, for quarterly reporting purposes (1st, 2nd, 3rd quarter only), the difference between
the capitalizable variances of two consecutive quarterly reporting periods is immaterial (to be
determined on BU level), then no adjustment to the capitalized variance is to be made.
Year-end
If the efficiency variances of December are mostly attributable to the limited number of working
days and to year-end adjustments, they can be excluded. In this case, the efficiency variances of
November and of preceding months (depending upon the inventory turnover period) are to be used
for capitalization purposes. This rule only applies to efficiency variances.
At year-end, full application of the rules is required.
c) Volume, manufacturing overhead and depreciation variances
Capitalization of volume, manufacturing overhead and depreciation variances should only be
considered at year-end.
Negative volume variances should not be capitalized, except in very rare cases when structural
changes to the plant organization are made during the year leading to significant reductions in plant
IAS 2 §6
3.4. Net realizable value (NRV) (normal inventory items)
Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the
estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale.
The practice of writing down inventories below cost to net realizable value is consistent with the view that
assets should not be carried in excess of amounts expected to be realized from their sale or use.
Inventories are written down to net realizable value on an item by item basis. However, when the future
recoverability is assured (e.g. order based production), the cost is the basis for valuation at balance sheet
date.
Example
(1) (2) (3) (4) = (3) - (2) (4) - (1)
This example indicates that an NRV reserve is only recorded when the net realizable value is lower than
the cost (items B and D in this case). The write-down of the inventory (equal to the NRV reserve) is
Materials and other supplies held for use in the production of inventories are not written down below cost
if the finished products in which they will be incorporated are expected to be sold at or above cost.
However, when a decline in the price of materials indicates that the cost of the finished products will
exceed net realizable value, the materials are written down to net realizable value. In such circumstances,
the replacement cost of the materials may be the best available measure of their net realizable value. IAS 2 §33
A new assessment is made of net realizable value in each subsequent period. When the circumstances
which previously caused inventories to be written down below cost no longer exist, the amount of the
write-down is reversed so that the new carrying amount is the lower of the cost and the revised net
realizable value. This occurs, for example, when an item of inventory, which is carried at net realizable
value because its selling price has declined, is still on hand in a subsequent period and its selling price
has increased.
In case of a restructuring program, e.g. a plant close-down or a relocation of manufacturing operations,
the NRV of inventories will probably be lower than in a going concern. Therefore, a specific and detailed
assessment of the NRV of all inventories involved should be made when the restructuring becomes
probable, and any resulting write-downs to NRV should be recognized immediately.
IAS 2 §28
3.5. Obsolete, slow moving and excess inventories
The cost of inventories may not be recoverable if those inventories are damaged, if they have become
wholly or partially obsolete, or if the quantities of items exceed anticipated sales or usage for a reasonable
period. Such inventories should be carried at net realizable value. When individual batches of inventories
can be deemed unsaleable at their normal price for specific reasons, write-downs to their expected
recoverable amount should be recognized immediately. Conversely, when there is clear evidence that
individual batches of inventories will be sold in the near future at the normal price, no write-downs for
obsolescence should be recognized, even if ageing criteria for obsolescence write-downs are met.
Central store items
Historical consumption is the basis for write-down in all companies/entities of the Group (majority owned).
All inventories in excess of an average consumption of 36 months will be fully written off.
Example
100 bearings in inventory at December 31, 20X3
Consumption 20X1: 20
Consumption 20X2: 30
Consumption 20X3: 40
Total Consumption 90
Consumption last 36 months = 90
Value of 10 bearings will be written-off
New inventory items added to the central store during the last year are not written off in that year.
Inventory items not having a 36-month historical consumption record should be treated as follows:
expected 36 months consumption is calculated based on the consumption history already known.
Example
If 120 pieces in inventory at December 31, 20X3
Consumption 30.6.20X2 till 31.12.20X2 (=6 months) : 18
Consumption 01.1.20X3 till 31.12.20X3 (=12 months): 36
Total consumption 54
Average monthly consumption: 54/18 = 3
Calculated 36 months consumption: 3 x 36 = 108
Value of 12 pieces will be written off.
Rubber Reinforcement and Sawing Wire
Rod, WIP and finished products: 100% write-down (scrap value) when more than 1 year old..
The NRV for specific types of second choice material should be supplied by regional sales managers
responsible for second choice material sales. Controllers should check regularly with regional sales
management if applied NRV’s still represent market reality.
Stainless
The inventory write-off rule is based upon excess of stock and not on obsolete stock. Rule is as follows:
• The calculation is done on material/plant level. When the same material is defined in two or more
plants, each will have their own calculation without taking into account any figures from the other
plants.
IAS 16 §8
3.6. Spare parts
Spare parts, strategic and normal, irrespective of the moment of purchase, are generally considered and
booked as inventory items. At the moment of use, they are expensed.
In rare cases, spare parts are not booked as inventory items but directly expensed.
Strategic parts are kept in inventory to avoid the risk of production standstills. Until recently, strategic
parts with a value of 650 EUR and above were not written down. As from year-end 2009, this exception
has been eliminated and strategic parts are subject to the same generic write-down rules as normal
spare parts.
Bead wire spools (e.g. BS900) that are used as production and customer spools need to be treated as
customer spools.
4. Recognition as an expense
When inventories are sold, the carrying amount of those inventories should be recognized as an expense IAS 2 §34
in the period in which the related revenue is recognized. The amount of any write-down of inventories to
net realizable value and all losses of inventories should be recognized as an expense in the period the
write-down or loss occurs. The amount of any reversal of any write-down of inventories, arising from an
increase in net realizable value, should be recognized as a reduction in the cost of sales in the period in
which the reversal occurs.
The process of recognizing as an expense the carrying amount of inventories sold results in the matching
of costs and revenues.
5.1. General
IAS 11 ‘Construction contracts’ will be superseded by IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from Contracts with Customers’,
effective 1 January 2018.
For practical purposes, a construction contract is a contract specifically negotiated for the construction
of an asset (or closely related combination of assets) and in respect of which the date when the contract
activity is entered into and the date when the contract activity is completed fall into different accounting
periods.
When the outcome of a construction contract can be estimated reliably, contract revenue and contract IAS 11 §22
costs (and hence profits) associated with the construction contract have to be recognized as revenue and
expenses respectively by reference to the stage of completion of the contract activity (percentage of
completion method) at the balance sheet date. When the outcome of a construction contract cannot be IAS 11 §32
estimated reliably, revenue should be recognized only to the extent of contract costs incurred which will
probably be recoverable. An expected loss on the construction contract should be recognized as an
expense immediately.
The following elements should normally be considered when determining whether the outcome of a
construction project can be estimated reliably:
• the total amount of contract revenue (section 5.3);
• the total amount of contract costs (section 5.4); and
• the methodology of recognizing revenues and costs in the income statement (section 5.5).
5.2. Combining and segmenting construction contracts
IAS 11 §8
When a contract covers a number of assets, the construction of each asset should be treated as a
separate construction contract when:
• separate proposals have been submitted for each asset;
• each asset has been subject to separate negotiation and the contractor and customer have been able
to accept or reject that part of the contract relating to each asset; and
• the costs and revenues of each asset can be identified.
IAS 11 §9
A group of contracts, whether with a single customer or with several customers, should be treated as a
single construction contract when:
• the group of contracts is negotiated as a single package;
• the contracts are so closely interrelated that they are, in effect, part of a single project with an overall
profit margin; and
7. Example
Percentage of completion method
A construction contractor has a fixed price contract for 9,000 to build a bridge. The initial amount of
revenue agreed in the contract is 9,000. The contractor's initial estimate of contract costs is 8,000. It will
take 3 years to build the bridge.
By the end of year 1, the contractor's estimate of contract costs has increased to 8,050.
In year 2, the customer approves a variation resulting in an increase in contract revenue of 200 and
estimated additional contract costs of 150. At the end of year 2, costs incurred include 100 for standard
materials stored at the site to be used in year 3 to complete the project.
The contractor determines the stage of completion of the contract by calculating the proportion that
contract costs incurred for work performed to date bear to the latest estimated total contract costs. A
summary of the financial data during the construction period is as follows:
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Initial amount of revenue agreed in contract 9,000 9,000 9,000
Variation - 200 200
Total contract revenue 9,000 9,200 9,200
Contract costs incurred to date 2,093 6,168 8,200
Contract costs to complete 5,957 2,032 - -
Total estimated contract costs 8,050 8,200 8,200
Estimated profit 950 1,000 1,000
Stage of completion 26% 74% 100%
The stage of completion for year 2 (74%) is determined by excluding from contract costs incurred for
work performed to date the 100 of standard materials stored at the site for use in year 3.
The amounts of revenue, expenses and profit recognized in the income statement in the three years are
as follows:
To date Recognized in Recognized in
prior years current year
Year 1
Revenue (9,000 x .26) 2,340 2,340
Expenses (8,050 x .26) 2,093 2,093
Profit 247 247
Year 2
Revenue (9,000 x .74) 6,808 2,340 4,468
Expenses (8,200 x .74) 6,068 2,093 3,975
Profit 740 247 493
Year 3
Revenue (9,200 x 1.00) 9,200 6,808 2,392
Expenses 8,200 6,068 2,132
Profit 1,000 740 260