Professional Documents
Culture Documents
APT 2013 - T4 - Opportunity Identification Skilss
APT 2013 - T4 - Opportunity Identification Skilss
SKILLS
2
DEFINITION OF OPPORTUNITY
• A possibility to meet the needs and wants of a
market through combining resources and delivering
superior value (Schumpeter, 1934; Kirzner, 1973).
• A situation in which new goods, services, raw
materials, markets and organizing methods can be
introduced through the formation of new means,
ends or means-ends relationships (Eckhardt &
Shane, 2003).
• An opportunity is a chance to meet a market need by
using a creative combination of resources (Ardichvili
et al., 2003).
3
ENTREPRENEURIAL OPPORTUNITY
ENTREPRENEURIAL OPPORTUNITY
• An entrepreneurial opportunity as “a situation
in which a person can create a new means-ends
framework for recombining resources that the
entrepreneur believes will yield a profit”
(Shane, 2003) .
6
THEORY OF ENTREPRENEURIAL
OPPORTUNITY
• Opportunity-Based Theory
• Entrepreneurs excel at seeing and taking advantage
of possibilities created by social, technological and
cultural changes
(Peter Drucker, 1985) .
ROLES OF OPPORTUNITY IN
ENTERPRENEURSHIP
Organizations - To reap
extraordinary profits
Communities/ Society -
Societal Responsibility
and Recognition
Individual/
Entrepreneur- To engage
in work of their choice
SYAMSURIANA SIDEK,
MUNIRAH MAHSHAR,
SOURCES OF OPPORTURNITY
• Drucker’s Seven Sources of Innovative Opportunity
• The first four sources lie in the organization and
they are therefore visible primary to the people
involved:-
1. The Unexpected - composed of three types of
unexpected events: unexpected success, unexpected
failure, unexpected outside event.
2. Incongruities - between reality as it actually is and
reality as it is assumed to be
3. Process Need - innovation based on process need
4. Industry and Market Structures - changes in the
industry structure or market structure that catch
everyone unawares
SYAMSURIANA SIDEK,
MUNIRAH MAHSHAR,
RAJA ROSNAH RAJA
DAUD
SOURCES OF OPPORTURNITY
• The second set of three sources for innovative
opportunities are changes outside the
organization or the industry:-
4. Demographics;
5. Changes in perception, mood and meaning;
6. New knowledge, both scientific and non-
scientific.
OPPORTUNITY IDENTIFICATION
PROCESS
• The core of the opportunity identification
process is made up of the following stages: being
alert (which has been studied under the concept
of entrepreneurial alertness), search for
information and evaluation, and construction of
the opportunity (Mary George et al., 2016).
• These three main stages are conducted by
entrepreneurs in order to develop/exploit an
opportunity (Oyson & Whittaker, 2015).
SYAMSURIANA SIDEK,
MUNIRAH MAHSHAR,
RAJA ROSNAH RAJA
DAUD
1. Entrepreneurial alertness
- More sensitive to the needs that a market can offer
(Gaglio & Katz, 2001).
- Individuals sense the needs of the market and
propose new ways to satisfy those needs by creating
value (Mary George et al., 2016)
- In identifying and exploiting an opportunity, an
individual's capabilities, as well as personal
characteristics, such as entrepreneurial alertness,
make the difference between those alert and non-
alert individuals.
SYAMSURIANA SIDEK,
MUNIRAH MAHSHAR,
RAJA ROSNAH RAJA
DAUD
OPPORTUNITY IDENTIFICATION
PROCESS
2. Search for information
- Once an individual observes and understands the
opportunity and the chance that they possess to
exploit it, they continue with the search of
information.
- This is the search, which allows entrepreneurs to use
all their sources of knowledge.
- Systematic search gives the occasion for individuals
to assess the scope of the opportunity and the
capacity of their proposed venture to fit that
opportunity. (Cuero Acosta, Adu-Gyamfi, Nabi &
Dornberger, 2017)
SYAMSURIANA SIDEK,
MUNIRAH MAHSHAR,
RAJA ROSNAH RAJA
DAUD
OPPORTUNITY IDENTIFICATION
PROCESS
3. Evaluation of the information
- This is an important part of the opportunity
identification process (Ardichvili et al., 2003).
- This evaluation can be applied in a formal,
systematic, or an informal way.
- It implies how the identified opportunity has been
located into the business concept, how the value
offered through the business model is going to be
assessed by the customer, and how the new product
or the new processes are conceived.
SYAMSURIANA SIDEK,
MUNIRAH MAHSHAR,
RAJA ROSNAH RAJA
DAUD
OPPORTUNITY IDENTIFICATION
PROCESS
• The evaluation within the stages is important in
order to continue developing the business idea.
• In order to recognize an opportunity and
develop it into a business concept, the evaluation
of the feasibility of that opportunity-focused
business model is required.
• This business model serves as a guide for the
exploitation of entrepreneurial opportunity in
the subsequent phases (Chandra et al., 2015).
SYAMSURIANA SIDEK,
MUNIRAH MAHSHAR,
RAJA ROSNAH RAJA
DAUD
OPPORTUNITY IDENTIFICATION
PROCESS
4. Construction of the opportunity
- In this stage the entrepreneur first senses the
needs that exist within a market or identifies
resources that have not been used yet (Ardichvili
et al., 2003)
- Secondly, the entrepreneur visualises the fit
among market needs and resources deployed to
satisfy those needs.
- Third, the entrepreneur converts that fit into a
business concept.
SYAMSURIANA SIDEK,
MUNIRAH MAHSHAR,
RAJA ROSNAH RAJA
DAUD
OPPORTUNITY IDENTIFICATION
PROCESS
5. Exploitation
- This stage consists of various processes which
entrepreneurs can develop to materialise business
ideas including the development of new products,
new processes, the proposal of a new business
model, and the creation of a business organisation
(Short et al., 2010; Vaghely & Julien, 2010).
- This requires proactive, risk-taking, and innovative
entrepreneur's characteristics which entrepreneurs
can exert through their entrepreneurial orientation
(Anderson, Kreiser, Kuratko, Hornsby, & Eshima,
2015).
SYAMSURIANA SIDEK,
MUNIRAH MAHSHAR,
RAJA ROSNAH RAJA
DAUD
OPPORTUNITY IDENTIFICATION
PROCESS
- The exploitation can be conceptualized at this
stage implies how the entrepreneurs are going to
make the identified opportunity and its
development profitable (Oyson & Whittaker,
2015) and how the business model created to fit
market needs and resources is going to offer a
value for customers.
SYAMSURIANA SIDEK,
MUNIRAH MAHSHAR,
RAJA ROSNAH RAJA
DAUD
ENTREPRENEUR BEHAVIORS IN
IDENTIFIYING OPPORTUNITY
• Commitment - theory of planned behaviour have pointed
that the entrepreneur's intention which is her degree of
commitment to identify opportunity recognition and
exploitation is important.
• Knowledgeable – entrepreneur must have knowledge to
perceived feasibility and desirability of the opportunity
and relate to decision making under risk and uncertainty
• Experience - cognitive structures, generated from past
experiences, that entrepreneur use to interpret new
information can give opportunity to them
SYAMSURIANA SIDEK,
SYAMSURIANA SIDEK,
RAJA ROSNAH RAJA DAUD,
MUNIRAH MAHSHAR
SYAMSURIANA SIDEK,
MUNIRAH MAHSHAR,
RAJA ROSNAH RAJA
OPPORTUNITY
NEW VENTURE
NEW VENTURE IDEA OPPORTUNITY
• new product development through
research and development or improving • The entrepreneur is able to
existing services. describe the valuable and
• Innovation can be the central focus of contributions of a venture and
a business and this can help them to create the design of a business
grow and become a market leader if they model that can. be sustained by a
execute their ideas properly. competitive advantage.
• Eg : the individual has yet to understand
• venture opportunity emphasizes
how value can be created and how the
that prospective entrepreneurs
commercial potential of the initial idea
can be exploited.
will act based on their beliefs of
what can be accomplished in the
• an unmet customer need (e.g., long
future.
battery life in smart phones), a particular
customer segment (e.g., senior citizens), a • At some point, the individual will
resource or capability (e.g., new type of evaluate whether it is worthwhile
water absorbing material), or a to move to exploitation.
combination of these elements.
23
SYAMSURIANA SIDEK,
RAJA ROSNAH RAJA DAUD,
MUNIRAH MAHSHAR
TAXONOMY OF OPPORTUNITY
GENERATION PROCESSES
TAXONOMY OF OPPORTUNITY
GENERATION PROCESSES
• Opportunities might be a result of a process of deliberate
search or serendipity and the opportunities may be
objectively discovered or subjectively created.
• The way entrepreneurs have recognized opportunities is
related to their former experiences and their social
networks.
(Alsos & Kaikkonen 2006)
25
TAXONOMY OF OPPORTUNITY
GENERATION PROCESSES
• Opportunity discovery (passive-objective)
➢Takes place when the opportunity objectively exists
➢It can be recognized by the entrepreneur even though
(s)he is not actively searching.
• Opportunity search (active-objective)
➢Supposes for more active search for finding a business
opportunity, considering that the opportunity can be
objectively recognized.
26
TAXONOMY OF OPPORTUNITY
GENERATION PROCESSES
• Opportunity creation (active-subjective)
➢Opportunity generation processes in which the
entrepreneur’s (subjective) abilities, experiences, prior
knowledge and actions make the opportunities to come
into existence.
• Opportunity occurrence (passive-subjective)
➢Not include search activities.
➢It is mostly a result of the entrepreneur’s own special
skills and/or resources. The opportunities occur from the
knowledge about a specific industry, market, customers
or a variation of skills.
27
SYAMSURIANA SIDEK,
RAJA ROSNAH RAJA
DAUD, MUNIRAH
MAHSHAR
28
OPPORTUNITY DISCOVERY VS
OPPORTUNITY CREATION
• Opportunity Discovery
• Assumption that opportunities exist as objective phenomena,
waiting to be discovered by unusually alert people who, once they
decide to exploit an opportunity, called as entrepreneurs.
• Entrepreneurs discover and then exploit these opportunities.
• Opportunity Creation
• takes place when the entrepreneur actively searches for a business
opportunity and uses her subjective capacity and resources to create
the opportunity.
• In some cases the opportunity can occur due to entrepreneur’s
special skills and resources, even though (s)he is not actively looking
for (this particular) opportunity, i.e. opportunity occurrence.
29
CONCLUSION
• In an age of rapid change, entrepreneurs who can
recognize and leverage new opportunities bring
enormous value to their organizations.
• The opportunities are therefore formed rather than
recognized. The difference between these two
categories lies in the extent of active search.
• When entrepreneurs have the ability to recognize
opportunity, they know how to identify promising
changes unfolding around them, and act to take
advantage of these opportunities.
33
SYAMSURIANA SIDEK,
RAJA ROSNAH RAJA DAUD,
MUNIRAH MAHSHAR
REFERENCES
• Schumpeter, J. (1934) Theory of Economic Development: An
inquiry into profits, capital credit, interest and the business cycle.
Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
• Kirzner, I. (1973) Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago:
University of Chicago press.
• Eckhardt, J. T. – Shane, S. A. (2003) Opportunities and
Entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29 (3), 333–349.
• Ardichvili, A. – Cardozo, R. – Ray, S. (2003) A theory of
entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development.
Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 105–123.
• Shane, S. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The
individual-opportunity nexus. New horizons in entrepreneurship
series. Eward Elgar Publishing Limited, UK.
• Shane, S. – Venkataraman, S. (2000) The promise of
entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management
Review, 25 (1), 217–226.
SYAMSURIANA SIDEK,
MUNIRAH MAHSHAR,
RAJA ROSNAH RAJA
DAUD
REFERENCES
• Acosta, Y. A. C., Adu-Gyamfi, R., Nabi, M. N. U., & Dornberger, U. (2017).
Analysing the role of framework conditions influencing international
entrepreneurial opportunity identification process. Entrepreneurial Business
and Economics Review, 5(3), 9-29. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2017.050301
• Anderson, B.S., Kreiser, P.M., Kuratko, D.F., Hornsby, J.S., & Eshima, Y. (2015).
Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial orientation. Strategic Management Journal,
36(10), 1579-1596. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2298
• Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray, S. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial
opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business Venturing,
18(1), 105-123. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00068-4
• Chandra, Y., Styles, C., & Wilkinson, I.F. (2015). Opportunity portfolio: Moving
beyond single opportunity explanations in international entrepreneurship
research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(1), 199-228. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-014-9400-1
• Drucker, P.F. (1995) Innovation and Entrepreneurship. London: Harper Collins.
• Gaglio, C.M., & Katz, J.A. (2001). The Psychological Basis of Opportunity
Identification: Entrepreneurial Alertness. Small Business Economics, 16(2), 95-
111. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011132102464
SYAMSURIANA SIDEK,
MUNIRAH MAHSHAR,
REFERENCES
RAJA ROSNAH RAJA
DAUD
• Mary George, N., Parida, V., Lahti, T., & Wincent, J. (2016). A systematic literature
review of entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: Insights on influencing factors.
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(2), 309-350. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0347-y
• Oyson, M.J., & Whittaker, H. (2015). Entrepreneurial cognition and behavior in the
discovery and creation of international opportunities. Journal of International
Entrepreneurship, 13(3), 303-336. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-015-0156-6
• Short, J.C., Ketchen, D.J., Shook, C.L., & Ireland, R.D. (2010). The Concept of
"Opportunity" in Entrepreneurship Research: Past Accomplishments and Future
Challenges. Journal of Management, 36(1), 40-65. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309342746
• Garg, A. K., Matshediso, I. B., & Garg, D. (2011). An individual’s motivation to
become entrepreneur: evidences from a mineral based economy. International
Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 12(1), 109–127.
• Fiet, J. O., Piskounov, A., & Patel, P. C. (2005). Still searching (systematically) for
entrepreneurial discoveries. Small Business Economics, 25(5), 489–504.
• Schumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard
University Press.
• Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of
research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.
REFERENCES
SYAMSURIANA SIDEK,
MUNIRAH MAHSHAR,
RAJA ROSNAH RAJA
DAUD
• Vaghely, I.P., & Julien, P.A. (2010). Are opportunities recognized or constructed?. Journal of
Business Venturing, 25(1), 73-86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/jjbusvent.2008.06.004
• Kourilsky, M. L., & Walstad, W. B. (1998). Entrepreneurship and female youth: knowledge,
attitudes, gender differences, and educational practices. Journal of Business Venturing,
13(1), 77–88.
• Fuentes, M. D. M. F., Arroyo, M. R., Bojica, A. M., & Pérez, V. F. (2010). Prior knowledge and
social networks in the exploitation of entrepreneurial opportunities. International
Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 6(4), 481–501. Abuzuhri, Nidal & Bint,
Norashidah. (2017). The Role of Entrepreneurial Opportunity Recognition on Relationship
among Entrepreneurship Education and Entrepreneurial Career Option.
• Dawn R. DeTienne and Gaylen N. Chandler. Academy of Management Learning & Education
vol. 3, No. 3 (Sep., 2004), pp. 242-257
• Jarvis, L. C. (2016). Identification, intentions and entrepreneurial opportunities: An
integrative process model. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour &
Research, 22(2), 182-198. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-02-2015-004.
• Liñán, Francisco; Fayolle, Alain.International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal;
New York Vol. 11, Iss. 4, (Dec 2015): 907-933.
• Lortie, J., & Castogiovanni, G. (2015). The theory of planned behavior in entrepreneurship
research: What we know and future directions. International Entrepreneurship and
Management Journal, 11(4), 935-957. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11365-015-0358-3