Professional Documents
Culture Documents
#101wednesdays - Vertical Opening Protection in NFPA 101 - NFPA
#101wednesdays - Vertical Opening Protection in NFPA 101 - NFPA
2019 Email
Partial enclosure: Where a vertical opening occurs in one floor only (i.e.,
only two stories are exposed to the opening), 8.6.8 permits the opening
to be enclosed on one story or the other leaving one of the stories
exposed to the opening. The required rating of the enclosing barriers is
covered by 8.6.5 (1-hr for new, ½-hr for existing). No special occupancy
chapter permission is required and there are no restrictions on what the
opening can be used for. If the opening is used for a stair, the stair
could be used as part of a required exit access, but it does not qualfiy
as an exit since 7.1.3.2 and 7.2.2.5 require exit stairs to enclosed on
every story (there is an exemption for some existing two-story exit
stairs in 7.2.2.5.1.3).
Convenience opening: Where a vertical opening occurs in one floor only
(i.e., two stories are exposed to the opening), the opening might be
permitted to be unenclosed on both stories if it meets the requirements
of 8.6.9.1. These unenclosed openings require permission in the X.3.1
subsection of the applicable occupancy chapters, where X is the
chapter number (e.g., 38.3.1 for new business occupancies. Some of
the key requirements of 8.6.9.1 include: the opening can't communicate
with openings to other stories; new openings must be separated from
any corridors (these convenience openings are sometimes found in
office building tenant spaces); if the opening is used for a stair, the stair
does not get any credit as a means of egress.
Communicating space: These are sometimes referred to as “mini-
atriums.” Unlike a convenience opening, a communicating space can
expose up to three stories to each other. With the increased exposure
comes additional requirements and limitations in 8.6.6. Communicating
spaces are permitted unless prohibited by the X.3.1 subsection of the
applicable occupancy chapters; for an example, see 18.3.1.5, which
prohibits communicating spaces in new health care occupancies.
Portions of stories that are exposed to the communicating space must
be separated from the remainder of the building by fire or smoke
barriers depending on whether the building is protected by automatic
sprinklers. Areas outside the communicating space need access to an
exit without passing through the communicating space, and the
communicating space needs to be open and unobstructed so a fire on
any story within the communicating space will be readily apparent.
Contents within the communicating spaces are restricted to low hazard
(essentially noncombustible) unless the space has automatic
sprinklers. By meeting all the criteria in 8.6.6, the unenclosed floor are
openings are protected.
Atrium: Whereas a communicating space is limited to exposing not
more than three contiguous stories, an atrium can expose any number
of stories because it is subject to the stringent requirements of 8.6.7,
which include automatic sprinkler protection throughout the building.
New atriums must be provided with an engineering analysis to show
that smoke from a fire in the atrium will not prevent the use of the
highest exit access path exposed to the atrium for the time needed to
evacuate; this frequently necessitates an engineered smoke control
system. Think of a Hyatt or Embassy Suites hotel in which, upon leaving
your guest room, you're immediately in the atrium space. This exit
access path needs to be maintained relatively smoke free to allow
occupants to reach the enclosed exit stairs. The design of atrium
buildings is largely performance-based and frequently involves
computer fire and egress modeling.
jurisdiction has adopted both NFPA 101 and the IBC, designers will likely
need to comply with the more restrictive provisions so as to meet the
requirements of both.
Did you know NFPA 101 is available to review online for free? Head over
to www.nfpa.org/101 and click on “FREE ACCESS.”
Important Notice: Any opinion expressed in this column (blog, article) is the opinion of the author and
does not necessarily represent the official position of NFPA or its Technical Committees. In addition,
this piece is neither intended, nor should it be relied upon, to provide professional consultation or
services.
GREG HARRINGTON
Principal Engineer, Staff Liaison to the Life Safety
Code and Health Care Facilities Code technical
committee projects.
NFPA uses Hyvor Talk to enable you to make comments on NFPA's blog posts. For more
information about the information Hyvor collects and how they use it, please see
Hyvor's privacy policy.
RELATED ARTICLES
CIUDAD JUÁREZ BLAZE THAT KILLED 39 ‘SHOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED,’ FIRE SAFETY EXPERT
SAYS
HOME SECURITY VIDEO REVEALS HOW FAST A HOUSE FIRE CAN BECOME DEADLY AND WHY
HOME FIRE SPRINKLERS ARE SO IMPORTANT
FIRE PROTECTION RESEARCH FOUNDATION ANNOUNCES 2022 SUPDET BEST PAPER AWARDS
AS EGG PRICES CONTINUE TO SOAR, ENSURE DIY CHICKEN COOP PROJECTS ARE DONE SAFELY
About NFPA
Overview
Leadership
Careers
International
Offices
Directions
Quick Links
Help
Customer Support
Accessibility
Contact Us