Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Expectations in Physics
Expectations in Physics
Introduction
development of modern technological gadgets such as smart phones, tablets, etc; however, only a
few really appreciate the subject. It is quite ironic how something vital is hated, feared and
If issues regarding students’ attitude and anxiety in Physics are left unattended, colleges
and universities shall generates who are unprepared to join the world of business that is highly
dependent on technology that necessitates comprehension of Physics and its applications. Thus,
this study looked into the students’ perceptions about Physics that gathered baseline data that led
to understand their attitudes and anxiety in Physics providing the necessary remediation to the
There was a significant relationship between students’ study habits in Physics and their
attitude towards the subject. Borro (2007) found that students’ study habits when they were taken
as a whole group was fairly good and when they were classified according to categories of
variable such as gender and type of school, it was found fairly good.
Pintrich and Schunk (2002) as cited by Kahyaoglu (2011), task difficulty is a common
accepted attribution about failure of students in the subject. Validity of attributions in reflecting
the real situation becomes not important when their motivational effects are considered because,
not the real situation affect one’s affective characteristics and behaviors but the believed
situation that the individual is in. Asking high school students for their achievement and failure
in Physics would be meaningful to provide basis for real working solutions for the problem of
Physics is perceived as a course which students fear. This fear or anxiety is heightened
even more in a testing situation in which the scores students receive have the most tangible
impact on their academic career. Additionally, added anxiety and fear can often prohibited
This study aims to determine the expectations and achievement of the fourth year
a. age,
b. sex,
c. place of residence,
e. parents’ occupation?
2. What is the level of expectation of fourth year students of St. William’s Institute in
Physics?
3. What is the level of Physics achievement of the respondents along the following content
areas:
a. Mechanics,
b. Thermodynamics,
c. Electromagnetism,
e. Modern Physics?
Conceptual Framework
Independent Dependent
The paradigm shows that the Physics achievement of the respondents maybe affected by their
profile, classroom learning environment that exist in the classroom and their attitudes towards Physics.
Hypothesis
of the respondents.
Methodology
describe the profile, expectations and the Physics achievement of the fourth year high school
students of St. William’s institute during the school year 2013-2014. The profile and
Population. The data that will be needed in this study will be gathered from the 96 fourth
year high school students of the St. William’s Institute. The two sections are considered in the
IV - SFA 20 28 48
IV - SIL 23 25 48
Total 43 53 96
Data Gathering Instrument. The researcher will use adopted instruments in gathering the
data for this study: the Maryland Physics Expectations Survey and Physics Achievement Test.
The Maryland Physics Expectations Survey will be used to gather the different views of
students in Physics. This was adopted by the researcher from the work of Alegre (2010).The
circling a number between 1 and 4 where the numbers mean the following:
1 - Strongly Agree
2 - Agree
3 - Disagree
4 - Strongly Disagree
The Physics Achievement Test (PAT) will be used to assess students’ achievement in
Physics. The researcher adopted the Physics achievement test developed by Ragonton (2004). It
The following norms will be used for the interpretation after transforming the scores to
will ask permission from the principal of the school covered by this study. When permission will
be granted the researcher will personally administer the questionnaire to the 96 student-
Statistical Treatment of Data. This study will utilize several statistical procedures
1. Frequency distribution and percentages. These will be used to describe the profile of
the respondents.
2. Mean. This will be used to describe the expectations and Physics achievement of the
respondents.
3. Simple Correlation Analysis. This will be used to determine the significant
relationship between the Physics achievement of the respondents and their profile and
expectations in Physics.
STUDENTS’ EXPECTATIONS AND ACHIEVEMENT IN PHYSICS
A Title Proposal
In Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for the Subject
RS 299b: Research Methodology
Presented to:
Dr. Evangeline Solita Bañez
Professor
Presented by:
Edward Henry Caoile
MST Physics Student
October, 2013