Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Stripe A Born Global Payment Processor
Stripe A Born Global Payment Processor
net/publication/322509224
CITATIONS READS
0 2,745
1 author:
Acauan Matias
SOAS, University of London
3 PUBLICATIONS 1 CITATION
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Acauan Matias on 23 January 2018.
Abstract ..................................................................................................................................................................... 2
References ............................................................................................................................................................ 15
This paper analyses the marketing determinants that drove Stripe’s early
The first section introduces Born Global firms and explains some of the main
The second part presents the firm, with brief historic facts, telling how it was founded
and with which purposes. It collocates Stripe inside the born global framework.
The following sections span through the marketing characteristics that helped the
firm to rapidly internationalize and define its presence in the market, with a brief
analysis of the current competitiveness and some obstacles that may arise.
To define born global firms (BGs), we can rely on Cavusgil and Knight, proficient
researchers over BGs’ field. In their 2009 book they find that BGs’ push to grow is so
massive that the domestic market isn’t enough to nurture their scope, thus they’re
seeking comparative advantages on the global market, mostly within 2 years from
foundation.
Rennie (1993) recognises that BGs, even if small-in-size and typically SMEs, are
important because are increasingly and aggressively more competitive with big,
To give a temporal dimension, they suggest that exporting of products should start
within 3 or fewer years from founding. Taven (2012) argues that this criterium
includes also some become-global companies, thus suggest defining BGs as firms
which management purses FDI since its inception, incapsulating it in the business
plan. Even with such purpose, the firm must actually internationalize within 6 years
from founding and 3 from the launch of a public product (Gleason et al., 2006).
BGs are primarily found in small-domesticity countries, but recently boomed in all
the economies and in all the industries, even declining ones (Knight and Cavusgil,
evolution. It is believed that the cloud architecture is playing a key role in defining
systems that characterizes BGs, agreeing to Cavusgil and Knight (2009) and Tanev
(2012).
The Cloud
The technological advance is paramount to the rapid expansion of the BGs (Rennie,
1993). Rennie believes that big MNE had a competitive advantage when the access to
the tech was slow and costly, allowing just few wealthy firms to access it. Using the
size to manage business systems that extend beyond their own boundaries
While the fax machine “was paramount” in allowing firms to carry fast relationships
and sales abroad (Rennie, 1993), now the cloud offers the edge in IT architecture that
While different authors, including Cavusgil and Knight (2009), see the intangibility of
the assets a key feature of most BGs, the cloud becomes the home of those intangible
assets. Software firms are perfect candidates to be BGs as they can widely exploit to
In an article (Kashyap, 2016), Janakiram MSV, cloud computing expert, explains why
cloud computing strictly pairs with start-ups. Among the others, the two main are
versatility and cheap pricing, very customizable and scalable to fit the needs of the
BGs.
Essentially, “In these cases, start-ups can focus on their core-competency while still
accessing a supercomputer that only Fortune 100s could build and operate before”
(McKendrick, 2011).
The importance of the BGs in driving the growth of entire countries, is also tangible
looking at the ecosystem of “facilitators” that boomed with the rise of BGs, which is of
Institutions dedicated to ease the development and decrease the cost of grasping the
On one hand, private sector’s firms bet big on start-up following the BGs model, given
the higher growth rate and market capitalization value compared to non-BGs
(Gleason et al., 2006). They provide education camps that condense in few-months
courses the internationalization knowledge that is taught to BGs’ CEO and founders.
They offer seed and angel capital, and all the support the firm may need (Hathaway,
2016).
On the other hand, Rennie (1993) highlights that BGs are lately the major drive of
single countries exporting growth by MNEs, which has been recognized and
Institutions strive to facilitate and invite local SME to internationalize, seen as main
2009, with product launch in 2011, after an extensive private beta. It expanded to
Canada in 2012, just one year after product launch and three after foundation (Weisul,
2014).
It is based in SoMa, San Francisco, and now has 900+ employees. Had raised a total of
It provides the software to embed in client firm’s IT (SaaS) via APIs that enable to
collect payment over the internet, linking the clients’ virtual commerce to their actual
bank accounts.
It operates a B2B model. It actually serves more than 100 thousand business over 25
As internal distinctive factors, on the guidelines of Cavusgil and Knight (2009), surely
the main would be the strong and global leadership that the company had from the
Collison brothers.
The two brothers, born and grown in Ireland to educated parents, shown early sign
of entrepreneurship, which got them admission to top notch US Universities (MIT and
brother Patrick was only 19, for a value of 5M$. They have always seen the world as
their marketplace because the solutions they engineered where there for the problem
The development of a high tech but simply usable product posed Stripe to a pull to
export its services. The competitive advantage of its technology pushed Stripe to the
top of its industry, shouldering the giants. The superior quality of the product is a
The firm has mostly intangible assets, that is the cloud infrastructure that powers the
payments processed) and must rely on economy of scale to reach handsome upkeeps.
Its financial precariousness is shared with most of the other BGs, that need some time
to reach profitability and reduce the debt gearing. This risk acceptance is paramount
An important external factor that poses Stripe as a global player is the nature of its
the way of which every country approaches payment is different (possibly reflecting
different stages of money-tech evolution). An example is the wide spread among cash
and cashless transactions operated in Asia. It also suffers from different banking
frameworks and legislations (Russell, 2016). Here the firms must find way to work-
around and exploit different business environments, herald the case of Uber
need for accepting payments is vertical to any business, giving to it the breadth of a
global market. This global demand pulls the exports and forces the firm to engage
early FDI.
Arguably, marketing is the projection to the values and the vision inherent in the firm.
To effectively communicate with costumers and market own products, a firm should
first identify what its purpose is and what is the value to be passed onto the clients.
Following this logic, the success of marketing is sourced from a clear vision and
The founder brothers, respectively director and CEO of Stripe, have a clear idea of
what Stripe wanted to be since its launch (Carr, 2012). They wanted to be a sleek
payment platform that could accommodate horizontally any business need, offering
a clear plan and straightforward pricing. Re-iterating their essence, they developed a
very effective and reliable system that does exactly what it says (Carr, 2012) (Vance,
2017).
Stripe can highlight some big companies in its portfolio, including many from the
Fortune 500 (Stripe.com, 2017). Its funding by the likes of Visa, Y Combinator,
their credibility and competency on the eyes of the potential customers (Vance, 2017).
Stripe poses itself as a direct competitor to payment giant of the like of PayPal and
things”, gives them a sustained advantage over the difficult-to-digest systems of the
competitors. It took away from its competitors the customers tired of receiving an
Stripe benefits both from B2B and B2C ecosystems, as grasping profits in the dense
transactions that occurs among those entities (mobile payments accounts for 1.4B$ a
day)(Vance, 2017).
The use of the cloud architecture enabled Stripe not only to benefit to the advantages
intrinsic, but more importantly the firm turned itself in a core provider of a key service
of such cloud ecosystem. It is the cloud payment service of choice for startups (it
serves two thirds of venture-backed business in Singapore; see Russell, 2016). Stripe
poses itself as industry standard for payments, as Google Analytics, Dropbox and
Quickbooks are paramount for analysis, storage and accounting contracted services
Stripes offer a very differentiated product, covering a very specific process of a much
bigger business. The Collison brothers wrote only seven lines of code that enables
Patrick Collison, CEO, says: “Any website is ultimately built by a developer” so that’s
why their focus is differentiation to cover the (not small at all) “niche” of web-
developers.
Their marketing is totally oriented to the costumer, where they listen to the client and
strive to build the product that most simply addresses and robustly solves the
problem. Rumors (Vance, 2017) suggest that Amazon is pondering to use Stripe as its
payment backbone; this fact inherently avails the success that Stripe achieved in
Stripe does offer a global product highly standardized, but it still has to localize the
marketing and the product features to accommodate different markets. Though the
online payment process is almost universal, the banking and taxation systems across
the globe differ and some extent of customization is necessary. One example, in Brazil
The success in this market is subordinate to the ability to meet this consumers’ habit
The success of the firm is achieved through attentive actuation of marketing practices.
Firstly, Stripe built a strong brand, behind which consumers see ease of payment
It is possible to describe this using the Four-P framework (McCarthy, 1960). The
product offer is very clear: a simple, elegant, and sleek way of accepting payments on
any online medium. The simplicity is in the installation process, where the account
signup takes minutes, ant the facility is straightaway operative (Andersen, 2011).
Although very simple, it is tailored to developers (the first name for the service was
This kind of users are also willing and enabled to personalize and enhance Stripe’s
The product is also very secure, where a window of seven days delays the income of
the collected money to make sure the transactions are made with no irregularity. This
timeframe is vital to perform the security checks. The company recently released the
Radar service (free-of-charge) that uses AI and machine learning to detect with
efficacy fraud patterns (Vance, 2017). The customer is paramount, and everything is
proceeds as the system’s fee. The target is to offer the more value possible out of this
cut, but is mandatory to scrap any additional or hidden fee. By example, refused
transaction don’t incur in any charge, because Stripe wants to be sure to “make money
which enables to distribute the product wherever the internet is. However, to be able
to collect the revenues from Stripe, the client has to control a bank account in one of
this limitation that Stripe has launched Atlas, an incorporation platform that allows
anybody from any country to launch a start-up residing in the Delaware State. It’s a
one-off shopping point where the start-up founder can overcome the bureaucratic
burden of opening the financial and legal entity of its limited liability company. It
Atlas is the projection and continuation of the one-off approach that Stripes purposes
companies within the Y Combinator network that really were fed up by PayPal and
similar, they were simply excited and impatient to try any valid alternative that
“didn’t suck” (Brown, 2017). Stripe exploited the momentum, and incentivized what
developers do best: gather in communities and share the actual improvements that
at the end of the day make their difficult job easier. Stripe sent gadget packs to the
Making the life easy to its customers, Stripe secured their loyalty. It has revolutionized
the approach to online payments, and the developers just must stick with the most
As mentioned before, the powerful partnerships with top-level companies also fuels
the propagation of the firm’s brand. Seeing Stripe along the brands of the likes of
Amazon, Visa, Kickstarter, Lyft could just increase the prestige and the market
position.
STRIPE’S COMPETITIVENESS
Stripe still accounts for 10% of the mobile payments market share, being second only
to PayPal, which boast 71% (Datanyze.com, 2017). Even being this significant gap,
Stripe is recently stripping clients away from PayPal itself, which has seen a decline
possible to observe that its sustained competitive advantage resides firstly in the
technology used. Although the technology is of high value, and at this stage quite rare,
the payment processing isn’t carrying any big functional breakthrough per se.
That’s why to keep its innovating position is believed that Stripe should keep
generating highly efficient code that enhances its whole customers’ environment. An
The actual big sustained advantage of many BGs is its user base, which has to be
nurtured and taken care of, anticipating their needs, and offering solutions to their
It is not hard to imagine that, given that Stripe keeps its customer values, it will be a
significant player in the industry, probably the most influential, which could justify
Andersen, D. (2011). The Collison Brothers and Story Behind the Founding Of Stripe. [online]
Startupgrind.com. Available at: https://www.startupgrind.com/blog/the-collison-
brothers-and-story-behind-the-founding-of-Stripe/ [Accessed 15 Dec. 2017].
Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of
Management, 17(1), pp.99-120.
Brown, M. (2017). How Stripe Marketed to Developers So Effectively. [online]
GrowthHackers. Available at: https://growthhackers.com/growth-studies/how-Stripe-
marketed-to-developers-so-effectively [Accessed 15 Dec. 2017].
Carr, A. (2012). Inside Stripe, The PayPal Competitor Backed By PayPal Founders Peter Thiel,
Elon Musk. [online] Fast Company. Available at:
https://www.fastcompany.com/1813087/inside-Stripe-paypal-competitor-backed-
paypal-founders-peter-thiel-elon-musk [Accessed 15 Dec. 2017].
Cavusgil, S. and Knight, G. (2009). Born global firms: A New International Enterprise. New
York, N.Y: Business Expert Press.
Datanyze.com. (2017). Payment Processing Market Share Report | Competitor Analysis |
PayPal, Stripe, CCBill | Datanyze. [online] Available at:
https://www.datanyze.com/market-share/payment-processing/ [Accessed 15 Dec.
2017].
Gleason, K., Madura, J. and Wiggenhorn, J. (2006). Operating characteristics, risk, and
performance of born‐global firms. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 2(2),
pp.96-120.
Gleason, K., Madura, J. and Wiggenhorn, J. (2006). Operating characteristics, risk, and
performance of born‐global firms. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 2(2),
pp.96-120.
Gov.uk. (2017). Entrepreneurs setting up in the UK - GOV.UK. [online] Available at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/entrepreneurs-setting-up-in-the-
uk/entrepreneurs-setting-up-in-the-uk#help-for-start-ups-and-entrepreneurs
[Accessed 15 Dec. 2017].
Haar, J. (2012). More and more, companies born to be global | The Starting Gate. [online]
MiamiHerald. Available at: http://miamiherald.typepad.com/the-starting-
gate/2012/12/more-and-more-companies-born-to-be-global.html [Accessed 15 Dec.
2017].
Hathaway, I. (2016). What Startup Accelerators Really Do. [online] Harvard Business
Review. Available at: https://hbr.org/2016/03/what-startup-accelerators-really-do
[Accessed 15 Dec. 2017].