Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Group M Sd t p

Experimental 113.31 4.306 .165 .866


Control 113.13 4.257 .165 .866
Table 1 : Pre Test Experimental and Control
Table 1 presents the results of a pre-test conducted on both the experimental group and
the control group in an experiment.
The experimental group has a mean (M) score of 113.31, with a standard deviation (Sd)
of 4.306. The t-value for the experimental group is 0.165, and the p-value is 0.866. The control
group, on the other hand, has a mean score of 113.13, with a standard deviation of 4.257. The t-
value for the control group is also 0.165, and the p-value is also 0.866.
In this case, the t-values and p-values for both groups are the same, indicating that there
is no statistically significant difference between the pre-test scores of the experimental group and
the control group.
Overall, Table 1 suggests that the two groups are relatively similar in terms of their pre-
test scores, which is important for ensuring that any differences observed in the post-test can be
attributed to the intervention and not to pre-existing differences between the groups.

Table 2 : Post Test Experimental and Control


Group M Sd t p
Experimental 113.31 4.306 .165 .866
Control 113.13 4.257 .165 .866
Group M Sd t p
Experimental 116.16 4.356 2.278 0.028
Control 113.70 4.120 2.282 0.028
Table 2 presents the results of a post-test conducted on both the experimental and control
groups in an experiment.
The p-value for both groups is 0.028, which means that there is less than a 3% chance
that the observed difference in scores could have occurred by chance alone. This is a statistically
significant result and suggests that the intervention had a significant impact on the post-test
scores of the experimental group. Overall, Table 2 suggests that the intervention had a positive
effect on the experimental group's post-test scores, as evidenced by the statistically significant
difference between the post-test scores of the experimental and control groups.
Table 3 : Pre and Post Test Control Group
Control M Sd t p
Post -Test 113.70 4.120 2.282 0.028
Pre - Test 113.13 4.257 .165 .866
Table 3 presents the results of the pre-test and post-test conducted on the control group in
an experiment.
The t-value for the post-test is relatively high (2.282) compared to the pre-test (0.165),
indicating that there is a statistically significant difference between the pre-test and post-test
scores of the control group.
The p-value for the post-test is 0.028, which means that there is less than a 3% chance
that the observed difference in scores could have occurred by chance alone. This is a statistically
significant result and suggests that there may have been some external factors that influenced the
post-test scores of the control group.
Overall, Table 3 suggests that the control group did show some improvement in their
post-test scores, but it is not clear whether this improvement was due to the intervention or to
other external factors. It is also worth noting that the experimental group showed a statistically
significant improvement in their post-test scores, which suggests that the intervention was
effective in improving their performance.

Table 4 : Pre and Post Test Experimental Group


Experimental M Sd t p
Post -Test 116.16 4.356 2.278 0.028
Pre -Test 113.31 4.306 .165 .866
Table 4 presents the results of the pre-test and post-test conducted on the experimental
group in an experiment.
The t-value for the post-test is relatively high (2.278) compared to the pre-test (0.165),
indicating that there is a statistically significant difference between the pre-test and post-test
scores of the experimental group. The p-value for the post-test is 0.028, which means that there is
less than a 3% chance that the observed difference in scores could have occurred by chance
alone. This is a statistically significant result and suggests that the intervention was effective in
improving the post-test scores of the experimental group. Overall, Table 4 suggests that the
intervention had a positive impact on the experimental group's post-test scores, as evidenced by
the statistically significant difference between the pre-test and post-test scores of the
experimental group.

You might also like