1) The document presents results from pre-tests and post-tests of experimental and control groups in an experiment.
2) The pre-test scores of the experimental and control groups were similar, with no statistically significant differences.
3) The post-test scores of the experimental group were significantly higher than the control group, suggesting the intervention had a positive effect.
1) The document presents results from pre-tests and post-tests of experimental and control groups in an experiment.
2) The pre-test scores of the experimental and control groups were similar, with no statistically significant differences.
3) The post-test scores of the experimental group were significantly higher than the control group, suggesting the intervention had a positive effect.
1) The document presents results from pre-tests and post-tests of experimental and control groups in an experiment.
2) The pre-test scores of the experimental and control groups were similar, with no statistically significant differences.
3) The post-test scores of the experimental group were significantly higher than the control group, suggesting the intervention had a positive effect.
Control 113.13 4.257 .165 .866 Table 1 : Pre Test Experimental and Control Table 1 presents the results of a pre-test conducted on both the experimental group and the control group in an experiment. The experimental group has a mean (M) score of 113.31, with a standard deviation (Sd) of 4.306. The t-value for the experimental group is 0.165, and the p-value is 0.866. The control group, on the other hand, has a mean score of 113.13, with a standard deviation of 4.257. The t- value for the control group is also 0.165, and the p-value is also 0.866. In this case, the t-values and p-values for both groups are the same, indicating that there is no statistically significant difference between the pre-test scores of the experimental group and the control group. Overall, Table 1 suggests that the two groups are relatively similar in terms of their pre- test scores, which is important for ensuring that any differences observed in the post-test can be attributed to the intervention and not to pre-existing differences between the groups.
Table 2 : Post Test Experimental and Control
Group M Sd t p Experimental 113.31 4.306 .165 .866 Control 113.13 4.257 .165 .866 Group M Sd t p Experimental 116.16 4.356 2.278 0.028 Control 113.70 4.120 2.282 0.028 Table 2 presents the results of a post-test conducted on both the experimental and control groups in an experiment. The p-value for both groups is 0.028, which means that there is less than a 3% chance that the observed difference in scores could have occurred by chance alone. This is a statistically significant result and suggests that the intervention had a significant impact on the post-test scores of the experimental group. Overall, Table 2 suggests that the intervention had a positive effect on the experimental group's post-test scores, as evidenced by the statistically significant difference between the post-test scores of the experimental and control groups. Table 3 : Pre and Post Test Control Group Control M Sd t p Post -Test 113.70 4.120 2.282 0.028 Pre - Test 113.13 4.257 .165 .866 Table 3 presents the results of the pre-test and post-test conducted on the control group in an experiment. The t-value for the post-test is relatively high (2.282) compared to the pre-test (0.165), indicating that there is a statistically significant difference between the pre-test and post-test scores of the control group. The p-value for the post-test is 0.028, which means that there is less than a 3% chance that the observed difference in scores could have occurred by chance alone. This is a statistically significant result and suggests that there may have been some external factors that influenced the post-test scores of the control group. Overall, Table 3 suggests that the control group did show some improvement in their post-test scores, but it is not clear whether this improvement was due to the intervention or to other external factors. It is also worth noting that the experimental group showed a statistically significant improvement in their post-test scores, which suggests that the intervention was effective in improving their performance.
Table 4 : Pre and Post Test Experimental Group
Experimental M Sd t p Post -Test 116.16 4.356 2.278 0.028 Pre -Test 113.31 4.306 .165 .866 Table 4 presents the results of the pre-test and post-test conducted on the experimental group in an experiment. The t-value for the post-test is relatively high (2.278) compared to the pre-test (0.165), indicating that there is a statistically significant difference between the pre-test and post-test scores of the experimental group. The p-value for the post-test is 0.028, which means that there is less than a 3% chance that the observed difference in scores could have occurred by chance alone. This is a statistically significant result and suggests that the intervention was effective in improving the post-test scores of the experimental group. Overall, Table 4 suggests that the intervention had a positive impact on the experimental group's post-test scores, as evidenced by the statistically significant difference between the pre-test and post-test scores of the experimental group.