Analysis of the accidents

Assignment: Industrial Psychology and Sociology

Submitted to:
Mam Naumana Amjad
Group 2
Submitted by:
Muhammad Zubair RP19-EE-420
Muhammad Hamza RP19-EE-417
Abu huraira RP19-EE-406
Ali Jaan RP19-EE-412
 Case 2
“The soft agricultural land at site did not allow MTL to be positioned on exact location of work;
therefore, the lineman while climbing the HT lattice pole slipped from the pole at about 15 feet height.
He was wearing uniform, shoes and as per his colleague statement he was also wearing helmet and full
body harness belt which he didn’t hook in the process of climbing. He suffered neck and shoulder pains
due to sudden the sudden impact.”

Analysis based on questions:

Which of the following reasons you think it was due to:

a. Unstable ground
b. Improper use of safety equipment
c. Lack of training or experience
d. Human error
e. Environmental factors
f. Overconfidence
g. Hasty work
h. Inattention
The most likely reason for the lineman's fall from the HT lattice pole at a height of 15 feet could be:

a. Unstable ground: The soft agricultural land at the site may not have provided a stable
footing for the Mobile Telescopic Ladder (MTL) to be positioned securely, causing the
lineman to lose balance and slip while climbing.
b. Improper use of safety equipment: Although the lineman was wearing a helmet,
uniform, shoes, and a full body harness belt, his colleague stated that he did not hook
the harness belt during the climbing process. This failure to properly use the safety
equipment could have resulted in the lineman losing his balance and falling.
c. Lack of training or experience: The lineman may not have been adequately trained or
experienced in climbing HT lattice poles, which are complex and high-risk tasks. This could have
contributed to his fall.
d. Human error: Mistakes or lapses in judgment by the lineman, such as misjudging the
stability of the pole or not following proper safety procedures, could have led to his fall.
e. Environmental factors: Other environmental factors such as weather conditions (e.g.,
rain, wind), poor visibility, or other site-specific conditions may have played a role in the
lineman’s fall.
 e. Lack of technical equipment: The lineman was wearing a helmet and full body harness belt but
failed to hook it in the process of climbing. This indicates a lack of proper use of technical
equipment, which could have prevented the fall if used correctly.

f. Inattention: The lineman may have been distracted or not paying full attention to the task of
climbing the pole, leading to a slip and fall.

g. Hasty work: The lineman may have been rushing or working too quickly without taking
appropriate precautions, resulting in a slip and fall.

Was there something missing in safety protocol /steps to be taken in this particular situation?

Yes No not enough information to comment

Yes, there were missing steps in the safety protocol, including site assessment, proper use of
technical equipment, vigilance, regular safety reminders, and review and improvement of safety
protocols.

Was there a factor or happening in this situation that was unpredictable/unknown?

Yes NO Don’t know

Yes, based on the information provided, it seems that the soft agricultural land at the site was
an unpredictable or unknown factor that affected the positioning of the MTL and ultimately led to the
lineman slipping from the pole. The unstable ground condition may not have been foreseen during the
planning and preparation for the work, resulting in an unforeseen situation.

How often do unpredictable or chance factors happen?

less than 1 in hundred 1-2 % 10% more than 10%

Based on the information provided, it is difficult to accurately estimate the frequency of

unpredictable or chance factors without specific data on similar situations. However, based on the given
scenario, it is important to conduct a thorough risk assessment and implement appropriate safety
measures to mitigate the impact of unpredictable or chance factors in any situation.

What was the negligence committed on the part of;

I. Victim

II. Any other member of the gang

III. Supervisor

IV. Assistant manager

V. Manager

VI. organization
VII. Anyone else you can think of

Based on the information provided, the negligence committed on the part of individuals involved in
the scenario could be as follows:

I. Victim (lineman):

a. Failure to properly hook the full body harness belt while climbing the HT lattice pole, which could
have prevented the fall or mitigated the impact.

II. Any other member of the gang (colleague):

a. Failure to ensure that the victim properly hooked the full body harness belt and followed the safety
protocols.

III. Supervisor:

a. Failure to provide adequate supervision and ensure that the victim followed the safety protocols,
including hooking the full body harness belt.

IV. Assistant manager:

a. Failure to provide proper guidance and oversight to the supervisor and the team, ensuring that all
safety protocols are followed.

V. Manager:

a. Failure to establish and enforce proper safety procedures and protocols, including adequate training
and supervision of the team.

VI. Organization:

a. Failure to provide appropriate resources, training, and supervision to ensure the safety of employees
while performing their duties.

VII. Anyone else you can think of:

a. Any other individual who had a responsibility to ensure the safety of the victim and failed to fulfill that
duty.

Who was supposed to check it?

The lineman is responsible for checking and securing his own safety equipment, including the full
body harness belt, before climbing the pole. The employer or contractor is responsible for providing
proper training, supervision, and ensuring compliance with safety protocols to prevent accidents and
injuries. Both the lineman and the employer or contractor have a role to play in maintaining a safe
working environment.
The colleagues/team members that were present, what should they have done?

In such a situation, the colleagues/team members should have:

1. Reminded and encouraged the lineman to properly hook and secure his full body harness belt before
climbing the HT lattice pole, in accordance with safety protocols.

2. Checked and confirmed that the lineman had properly secured his safety equipment, including the full
body harness belt, before allowing him to proceed with climbing the pole.

3. Raised any concerns or issues related to safety with the lineman, the employer or contractor
overseeing the work, or other relevant authorities, to prevent the incident from occurring.

If you were in his place, what would you do?

If I were a lineman in a similar situation, I would ensure that I follow proper safety protocols,
including wearing and properly securing my full body harness belt before climbing the HT lattice pole. I
would conduct pre-climbing checks, seek assistance if unsure, and be proactive in identifying and
addressing any safety risks or concerns. I would also report any issues to the appropriate authority and
prioritize the safety of myself and my colleagues at all times.

What steps should the manager take now after the accident to;

a) Investigate

b) To deal with victim

To avoid future accidents like that.

a) Investigation steps for the manager:

Conduct a thorough investigation: The manager should initiate a comprehensive investigation into the
accident, including collecting information about the incident, interviewing witnesses, and examining
relevant documents or records.

Identify root causes: The manager should determine the root causes of the accident, such as the reason
for the lineman's failure to hook his full body harness belt and identify any underlying issues or
deficiencies in safety protocols, training, or equipment.

Review safety procedures: The manager should review and assess the existing safety procedures and
protocols to identify any gaps or areas for improvement and make necessary updates or revisions to
prevent similar accidents in the future.
Document findings: The manager should document the findings of the investigation, including the root
causes, recommendations for corrective actions, and any changes made to safety procedures or
protocols.

b) Steps to deal with the victim for the manager:

Provide medical assistance: The manager should ensure that the victim receives appropriate medical
attention, including arranging for immediate medical treatment or transportation to a medical facility, as
needed.

Show empathy and support: The manager should provide emotional support to the victim, showing
empathy and understanding for their situation, and offering assistance in accessing any necessary
resources or support services.

Document and report: The manager should document the details of the accident, including the extent
of the victim's injuries, and report it to the appropriate authorities, such as HR or safety personnel, as
required by company policy or local regulations.

Conduct follow-up: The manager should follow up with the victim during their recovery process, provide
any necessary assistance, and ensure that the victim's needs are addressed.

Review safety measures: The manager should review and reinforce safety measures with the victim and
other team members to prevent similar incidents in the future and emphasize the importance of
following proper safety protocols at all times.