Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Essentials of Corporate Finance Ross 8th Edition Solutions Manual
Essentials of Corporate Finance Ross 8th Edition Solutions Manual
Solutions Manual
Chapter 10
SOME LESSONS FROM CAPITAL MARKET
HISTORY
Some Lessons from Capital Market history
10 Chapter Organization Slide Slide Title
Introduction 10.2 Key Concepts and Skills
10.3 Chapter Outline
10.4 Risk-Return Tradeoff
10.1 Returns
Dollar Returns 10.5 Dollar and Percent Returns
Percentage Returns 10.6 Percent Return
10.7 Example: Calculating Total Dollar and Total Percent Returns
10.2 The Historical Record
A First Look 10.8 U.S. Financial Markets: The Historical Record 1925-2011
A Closer Look 10.9 Year-to-Year Total Returns
10.10 Year-to-Year Total Returns
10.11 Year-to-Year Total Returns
10.12 Year-to-Year Inflation
10.3 Average Returns: The First Lesson
Calculating Average Returns 10.13 Average Returns: The First Lesson 1925-2008
Average Returns: The Historical Record 10.14 Historical Average Returns
Risk Premiums 10.15 Risk Premiums
10.16 Historical Risk Premiums
The Variability of Returns: The Second
10.4
Lesson
10.17 Risk - Figure 10.9
10.18 Return Variability Review
Historical Variance & Standard Deviation 10.19 Return Variability: The Statistical Tools of Historical Returns
10.20 Example: Calculating Historical Variance & Standard Deviation
10.21 Example: Work the Web
The Historical Record 10.22 Historical Average Returns & Standard Deviation:Table 10.10
10.23 Return Variability Review and Concepts
Normal Distribution 10.24 The Normal Distribution - Figure 10.11
10.25 Record One-Day Losses
10.26 2008: The Bear Growled and Investors Howled
10.27 2008: S&P 500 Monthly Returns - Figure 10.12
10.5 More on Average Returns
Arithmetic vs. Geometric Mean 10.28 Arithmetic vs. Geometric Mean
10.29 Geometric Average Return: Formula
Calculating Geometric Average Returns 10.30 Geometric Average Return
10.31 Example 10.4: Calculating a Geometric Average Return
10.32 Geometric Average Return
10.33 Historical Geometric vs. Arithmetic Average Returns
Arithmetic or Geometric Average Return 10.34 Arithmetic vs. Geometric Mean: Which is better?
10.6 Capital Market Efficiency
10.35 Efficient Capital Markets
Price Behavior in an Efficient Market 10.36 Reaction of stock price to new information - Figure 10.14
The Efficient Market Hypothesis 10.37 Forms of Market Efficiency
10.38 Strong Form Efficiency
10.39 Semistrong Form Efficiency
10.40 Weak Form Efficiency
10.41 Efficient market Hypothesis
Some Common Misconceptions about EMH 10.42 Common Misconceptions about EMH
10.43 Chapter 10 END
10-1
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in any
manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
Ethics Note (at end of Chapter Outline): Discussion of problems in determining insider trading.
CHAPTER WEBSITES
Websites may be referenced more than once in a chapter. This table just includes the section for the
first reference.
Note that these calculations yield Holding Period Return and would need to be annualized for
correct comparison with other investment opportunities.
Emphasize that you do not have to actually sell the stock for you to earn the dollar return on
paper. The point is that you could.
10-2
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in any
manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
Chapter 10 – Some Lessons from Capital Market History
Slide 10.7 Example: Calculating Total Dollar and Total Percent Returns
A numerical example of return computation.
• Large-company stocks—S&P 500 index, which contains 500 of the largest companies in
terms of total market value in the U.S.
• Small-company stocks—smallest 20% of stocks listed on the New York Stock Exchange
based on market value of outstanding stock.
• Long-term corporate bonds—high-quality corporate bonds with 20 years to maturity.
• Long-term government bonds—portfolio of U.S. government bonds with 20 years to
maturity.
• U.S. Treasury bills—portfolio of T-bills with a three-month maturity.
10-3
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in any
manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
Chapter 10 – Some Lessons from Capital Market History
Risk premium—reward for bearing risk, the difference between a risky investment return and the
risk-free rate.
Figure 10.9 graphically represents the dispersion of returns for common stocks for the period
1926–2011. The curve is skewed slightly to the right (>0) but centered about 11.8%.
While both measure dispersion, standard deviation is more frequently used because it is
presented in the same units as the average, making it more intuitive to interpret.
Slide 10.19 Return Variability: The Statistical Tools for Historical Returns
A review of the formulas for variance and standard deviation.
Emphasize that these formulas are for historical returns, not expectational.
Clicking on the Excel icon brings up a spreadsheet that performs the computations.
10-4
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in any
manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
Chapter 10 – Some Lessons from Capital Market History
With the added information on risk, we can now see that while small-cap stocks provided the
highest average return, they also had the highest risk metric.
Historical returns on securities have probability distributions that are approximately normal.
(Figure 10.10 versus Figure 10.11 on the next slide.)
10-5
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in any
manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
Chapter 10 – Some Lessons from Capital Market History
Slide 10.32 uses the TVM keys on the BAII+ to find the GAR.
Key insight: competition among investors and traders makes a market efficient.
Noted finance academician, Eugene Fama, defined the three forms of market efficiency relative
to the information incorporated into the stock price:
• Strong form efficiency—all information, both public and private.
• Semistrong form efficiency—all public information.
• Weak form efficiency—all market information, including prices and volume.
Empirical evidence indicates that this form of efficiency does NOT hold.
See Ethics Note at end of Chapter Outline for discussion of Insider Trading.
10-6
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in any
manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
Chapter 10 – Some Lessons from Capital Market History
You cannot consistently earn excess returns using available information to do fundamental
analysis.
Evidence is mixed, but suggests that it holds for widely held firms.
• Empirical evidence suggests that some stocks are semistrong form efficient, but not all.
• Larger, more closely followed stocks are more likely to be semistrong form efficient.
• Small, more thinly traded stocks may not be semistrong form efficient, but liquidity costs
may wipe out any abnormal returns that are available.
You cannot consistently earn excess returns by looking for patterns in past price and volume
information, such as is done by technical analysts.
• Evidence suggests that markets are weak form efficient based on the trading rules that we
have been able to test.
• Emphasize that, while technical analysis shouldn’t lead to abnormal returns, that doesn’t
mean that you won’t earn fair returns using it—efficient markets imply that you will.
• You might also want to point out that there are many technical trading rules that have
never been empirically tested, so it is possible that one of them might lead to abnormal
returns. But if it is well publicized, then any abnormal returns that were available will
soon evaporate.
Stock price fluctuations are evidence that the market is efficient because new information is
constantly arriving—prices that don’t change are evidence of inefficiency.
10-7
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in any
manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
Essentials of Corporate Finance Ross 8th Edition Solutions Manual
Additionally, several court cases have sought to more clearly define insider trading. For insider
trading to exist, there must be a fiduciary relationship between the parties. Actions of the inside
trader do not have to meet the legal requirements of fraud; they merely have to have the
appearance of acting as a fraud or deceit. Accidental discovery does not constitute a fiduciary
relationship.
The court decided in Chiarella v. United States that an employee of a printing firm, who was
requested to proofread proxies that contained unannounced tender offers (and unnamed targets)
was not guilty of insider trading because the employee determined the identity of the target
through his own expertise.
However, a member of a company’s board of directors, who has knowledge of the company’s
future prospects, may not individually trade on this information prior to public disclosure. The
details of the case may be found in SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulfur, 401 F.2d 833 (2d Cir. 1968).
Despite the passage of increasingly severe penalties for insider trading (see the Insider Trading
Sanctions Act of 1984 and the Insider Trading and Securities Fraud Enforcement Act of 1988),
the evidence suggests that the practice persists in one form or another. One of the more recent
cases deals with Martha Stewart, who recently completed a five-month prison sentence for
obstruction of justice for allegedly lying to investigators during the investigation into violations
of insider trading laws. The investigation stems from a sale of 4,000 shares of Imclone stock a
day before it announced that the FDA rejected the company’s application for a proposed cancer
drug. Stewart and Imclone’s then-CEO, Samuel Waksal, were friends and shared the same stock
broker. Waksal pleaded guilty to insider trading and was sentenced to seven years in prison and
was fined $4.3 million.
10-8
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in any
manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.