Lesson Plan

Project Based-learning
Student
School Leve: Secondary 13-14 years old
s Age:

Problem: Cyberbullying Date:

Session
Project length: 4 weeks 50 minutes
time:
Students of this age commonly are very
active using social networks, and not well
prepared to face certain problems such as Final Public Service
Context:
cyberbullying which is increasing rapidly as Product: Announcement (PSA)
technology is becoming essential in their
everyday life.

Students plan, perform, and record a 30-60 seconds video called PSA to help
Main aim:
people from their community who suffer Cyberbullying.

Project’s name: “Raising awareness about cyberbullying on social networks.”

Session 1: The project is launched

Stage: Activities: Time: Materials/ resources/

technology:

1. Contextualize
● T asks Ss about how much time they
the topic
spend checking social networks and
which are the most common ones.
Whiteboard
● T asks Ss if they know what is
5 min. Markers
Cyberbullying and if they have known
any cases.

● T writes on WB the definition of

Cyberbullying.

2. Reflect on the
● T gives Ss 2 minutes to discuss in
topic
pairs why Cyberbullying is bad for the
Notebook
community. 5 min.
Pencil
● Ss write down their answers and
comment aloud to the group.

3. Introduce the 10 min. Media projector

● T presents some PSA related to the
project
topic. Speakers
(Links below)
● Ss are asked to define PSA.
 ● T presents the project’s name and
elicits the assignment activities.

4. Present the
● T mention the criteria to evaluate it:
assessment
criteria Timing, Content, Script, Originality/ Whiteboard
Creativity, and Collaboration.
5 min. Markers
● Ss take notes.

● T answers any doubts.

5. Brainstorming
● T asks Ss to imagine how a teenager
ideas for the
topic can be exposed to social networks Whiteboard
and the negative consequences of
that. 5 min. Markers

● Ss comment aloud their ideas and T

writes on WB.

6. Make teams
● T randomly gives each S a previously
prepared card with the name of
different social networks.
Card with the name of
● Ss get up from their seats and walk
different social networks
around to find out their partners in 10 min.
based on the number of
order to form teams of 4, the name of students in each team.
their team is the one on the card.

● Ss get together in teams and choose

the director of the project.

7. Set delivery 5 min. Whiteboard

● T asks Ss to respect the project
dates
calendar: Markers

a) Week 1: Research Cyberbullying

in their community and the
characteristics of PSA’s.
b) Week 2: Write the first draft of the
Script and correct it by the
teacher.
c) Week 3: Write the final script and
rehearse it. Record the video.
d) Week 4: Edit video. Present the
final product (PSA) and get peers
 and teacher’s feedback.

8. Use of 5 min. 3. Devices:

● T asks Ss to use apps, websites,
technology a) Smartphones.
virtual tools, and devices to work
better in teams, and also to edit their b) Video editor
videos. (MovieMaker, Clipchamp,
Flexclip, PowerDirector,
etc.)

c) PC or laptop.

d) Wi-Fi

e) Media projector.

f) Speakers.

4. Online tools:

https://
www.bookwidgets.com/

https://docs.google.com/
https://www.pblworks.org/

https://www.lucidchart.com/

https://padlet.com/

https://storybird.com/

https://zoom.us/es

Types of evaluation Evaluation Instrument

1. Self-evaluation 1. Self-check Box (appendix 1)
2. Peer evaluation 2. Peer Evaluation Questionnaire (appendix 2)
3. Teacher evaluation 3. Rubric (appendix 3)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_65PSRrSww

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ho-MoPkIF4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yq5w9D94vWQ

APPENDIX 1:

SELF-ASSESSMENT CHECK BOX

A) I wrote a message appropriate to the intended audience.

B) I included examples of my ideas.

 C) I gave advice using suitable ideas.

D) I provided a call to action.

E) I actively participated in working with my team.

F) I used language appropriate for giving advice.

G) I used prosodic features appropriately.

H) I helped to record/edit the video.

I) I gave constructive feedback to my classmates.

APPENDIX 2:

PEER ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE

1. Did all the team members present their project? Yes No

2. Were all the PSA elements included in their presentation? Yes No

3. Did all the team members use prosodic features in their presentations? Yes No

4. Did the group include relevant information? Yes No

5. Was the final product convincing or shocking? yes No

 APPENDIX 3:

RUBRIC

Student’s name:
Date: ______________________
_______________________________________________

Project’s Name: Public Service Announcement (PSA)

Topic: Cyberbullying

Criteria Excellent (10) Good (9-8) Adequate (6-7) Inadequate (5)

1. Timing The PSA is between 30- The PSA is less than The PSA is less The PSA is less than
60 seconds in length. 25 seconds or more than 20 seconds or 15 seconds or more
than 1 min. 15 sec in more than 1 min. than 1 min. 45 sec in
length. 30 sec in length. length.

2. Content Student demonstrates full Student is at ease Student is Student does not
grasp of the topic, with topic and uncomfortable with have grasp of
presenting complete and presents accurate information, leaves information. Many
accurate information. information. out important statements are
details and/or incorrect and
presents inaccurate unsupported.
information.

3. Script Script is appropriate and Script is mostly Script is somewhat Script is incomplete
detailed. Script shows appropriate and appropriate and and lacks detail.
clear and logical flow and detailed. Script detailed. Script Script shows little
includes detailed shows mostly clear shows somewhat sense of direction,
dialogue of the PSA. and logical flow and logical flow, but is the flow is confusing
includes most sometimes and missing much
dialogue of the PSA. confusion or dialogue from PSA.
missing dialogue
from PSA.

4. Originality/ The PSA reflect an The PSA reflects The PSA reflects The PSA reflects a
Creativity exceptional degree of student creativity and some creativity, but lack of creativity and
student creativity and use the use of some it lacks originality. originality.
of original ideas. original ideas.

5. Collaboration Partners show respect Partners get along Partners need One partner does
for one another, get well and share constant reminders most of the work.
along especially well, and equally in to stay on task and Partners do not
work together on all responsibilities. complete aspects share responsibilities
aspects of the project. Students stay on task of the project. and argue in creating
Students show respect for the most part and Students talk to PSA. Students cause
for one another. share equally in their group, but disruptions in the
group responsibilities. need more classroom.
communication.
TOTAL SCORE: ___________ / 50