Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 s2.0 S0261306999000357 Main
1 s2.0 S0261306999000357 Main
1 s2.0 S0261306999000357 Main
303]309
Abstract
Erosion of the die material during die filling has long been regarded as a possible damage mechanism of dies in high pressure
die casting ŽHPDC. of aluminium alloys. Melt impingement and erosion have also been proposed to be an important step leading
to die soldering. However, there is little information in the literature on the direct measurement of any kind of die erosion in
HPDC. The present analysis, based on existing erosion theories, has shown that liquid impingement and solid particle erosion is
not likely to occur in HPDC in the short-term while soldering does. There is a paucity of data indicating how cavitation erosion
may occur in HPDC in the short-term. Pins were examined that were used as soldering targets in specially designed dies during
soldering trails using a semi-industrial HPDC machine. Although these pins were subjected to severe melt impingement during
the trails, very little erosion occurred before the formation of soldered layers. Q 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
0261-3069r99r$ - see front matter Q 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 2 6 1 - 3 0 6 9 Ž 9 9 . 0 0 0 3 5 - 7
304 Z.W. Chen, M.Z. Jahedi r Materials and Design 20 (1999) 303]309
to melt impingement are traditionally considered prone impact speeds ) 50 mrs. In a number of reviews on
to both erosion and soldering, and yet, the nature of the subject w20]22x, it can be seen that most research
erosion in HPDC has not been understood. has been conducted using liquid impact velocities many
While erosion by itself is purely the result of me- times higher than the upper end of the filling velocities
chanical impact, soldering is metallurgical in nature. usually used in HPDC of aluminium alloys. Hence, in
Hence, preventive measures for reducing erosion may the context of liquid impingement erosion, die filling
be different from those for reducing soldering. The during HPDC of aluminium alloys may be seen to be at
aims of our on-going research are to understand the relatively low velocities.
mechanisms of soldering in order to find effective ways The most important theory for understanding the
of reducing or eliminating it. It is thus necessary to basic mechanics of liquid impact erosion is the theory
understand erosion on die materials and the influence of guided acoustic shock ŽGAS. w19]22x. This theory
of erosion on the formation of the soldering layer. In describes the impact of a high-velocity liquid drop
this paper the existing data and theories on erosion are against a solid plane surface and the resulting two
analysed. As will be shown, the existing literature does effects: the impact pressure and the subsequent lateral
not directly describe erosion in HPDC. In the absence jetting flow along the surface. This is illustrated in Fig.
of reliable erosion data, experimental evidence from 1. For ductile materials, as a result of both impact
our research on soldering are presented in the later pressure and high-velocity lateral jets, erosion takes
part of this paper with an attempt to relate erosion and place through depression, plastic deformation and tear-
soldering in HPDC. ing action. These damage mechanisms create pits on
the eroded sample surfaces.
The average impact pressure of a liquid drop against
2. Existing data and theories a solid plane is the so-called water hammer pressure:
There appears to be a strong belief that the rela- where Pavg is the average pressure, r is the liquid
tively high velocity of the molten metal during filling density, C is the acoustic velocity of the liquid, Vi is the
causes erosion of the die material w1,4,18x. An extensive impact velocity. Referring to Fig. 1b, the highest impact
search on literature by the authors has failed to find pressure Ž Pmax . is found at the growing contact perime-
HPDC experiments that validate this belief. However, ter. However, the value of PmaxrPavg seems to be
there has been research conducted by Venkatesan, uncertain. Two experimentally determined values of
Shivpuri and their co-workers w1,6]11x evaluating the PmaxrPavg from two studies were 1.5 and 1.8, and two
effect of erosion together with soldering, which will be values predicted by finite difference computations from
discussed in the next section. different authors were approximately 1.1 and 2.8 w20x.
Research on liquid impingement erosion has been These data suggest that PmaxrPavg f 2 may be reason-
quite extensive, primarily relating to steam turbine able, which is slightly higher than the experimental
blade erosion and rain erosion of aircraftrmissiles, values and is the average of the two computed values.
where the impact reached transonic and higher speeds. The acoustic velocities of most alloy melts seem not
In a recent review on liquid impact erosion research, to have been determined. The available data for mol-
Lesse w19x pointed out that the subject deals with ten metals suggest that C liq.Metals may range from ap-
Fig. 1. Schematic of a liquid drop impacting a solid surface: Ža. initial contact, Žb. compressible stage with attached shock front, Žc. detached
shock and jetting stage w21x. P is pressure, r liquid density, C acoustic velocity of the liquid, Vi impact velocity and Vl j velocity of the lateral jet.
Z.W. Chen, M.Z. Jahedi r Materials and Design 20 (1999) 303]309 305
proximately 1000]2800 mrs w23x. For a typical filling target w21x. In summary of the above analysis, it may be
velocity during HPDC of aluminium alloys and if we reasonable to suggest that, for the normal filling condi-
take C as 2500 mrs: tions, the severe form of liquid impingement erosion
through depression, plastic deformation and tearing is
Pavg s r CVi s 2700 kgr m3 = 2500 mr s = 50 mr s not likely to occur before soldering which occurs in a
short period of time. Repeated impacts may result in
s 338 MPa
erosion in a long-term through fatigue-like processes
but this may require a lengthy incubation stage w21x.
Pmax s 2 Pavg s 676 MPa
2.2. Solid particle erosion
The response of die materials to the impact pressure
depends on the strength of the die materials. Data of Venkatesan, Shivpuri et al. w1,6]11x have published
short-time yield stress of H13 are plotted in Fig. 2. It widely in the last few years on their HPDC experiments
has been shown that the temperature of the metal to evaluate erosion. The primarily conclusion they
entering into the die cavity during HPDC of Al-11.5Si- reached was that erosion was caused by the impact of
3Cu-1Fe alloy is approximately 5708C w25x. Die temper- solidified particles during die filling. Their erosion rate
ature is normally lower than 3008C just before die measurements were based on the weight loss of core
filling and is likely to remain considerably lower than pins, measured after a pre-set number of casting shots
5708C within a fraction of 1 s Ž0.1]0.2 s. during filling. and subsequent cleaning the pins with KOH solution
Hence, from Fig. 2, the yield stress of H13 is expected apparently to remove soldering on the pins w9x. It thus
to be significantly higher than 800 MPa during melt appears uncertain whether the observed loss of die
filling and likely to be higher than the possible Pmax materials was the result of mechanical impact, hence
due to liquid impingement. erosion, or soldering reaction. Most of the work from
It has been shown w25x that, severe soldering oc- Venkatesan, Shivpuri et al. was based on A390 Ž17%
curred in a matter of 130 cycles in the locations of the Si. alloy. They argued that the silicon particles that
die cavity where they were exposed to 5708C for ap- solidified in the shot sleeve before die filling were hard
proximately 1 s every cycle. This means an exposure and hence erosive w6]10x. They suggested that a lower
time of 130 s to that temperature. Within this short superheat of the melt would result in a higher fraction
period of time the decrease in mechanical properties is of solidified particles in the shot sleeve, and hence in a
unlikely. Therefore, it appears that severe soldering higher erosion rate.
would develop before liquid impingement erosion oc- In considering the impact of solidified particles, it is
curs. useful to examine the hardness of H13 and silicon
It should be pointed out that the analysis based on particles at temperatures relevant to die filling. Fig. 3
impact of discrete droplets may represent the upper and Fig. 4 give the available hot hardness values for
bound condition for erosion. Erosion rate due to a H13 and silicon respectively. Fig. 4 shows that at 6508C,
continuous jet can be from one to five orders of magni- which is close to the liquidus temperature of A390 alloy
tude lower than that due to the same quantity of liquid and the highest possible temperature during die filling,
impinging at the same velocity but in the form of silicon particles should have a hardness value of ap-
droplets, as it only produces stagnation pressure on the proximately 200 HV or 95 HRb ŽŽ20 HRc.. The realis-
tic filling temperature should be between the liquidus
Ž6508C. and eutectic temperature Ž; 5708C. depending
on superheat of the melt and cooling conditions in shot
sleeve. Therefore the hardness of silicon particles will
range between - 20 HRc at 6508C to 30 HRc at 5708C.
From Fig. 3, the hardness of H13 will be from 22 HRc
at 6508C to approximately 35 HRc at 5708C. Hence, the
solidified silicon particles are softer than H13 during
filling.
Recently, Chu et al. extended their assumption on
solid particle erosion to HPDC of hypoeutectic A380
alloy w11x, the most common HPDC alloy which con-
tains silicon ranged from 7.5 to 9.5. For this alloy, a-Al
solidifies before the eutectic reaction. Chu et al. rea-
soned that the pre-solidified a-Al would cause plastic
Fig. 2. Short-time yield stress plotted as a function of testing temper- deformation of the die material and hence the forma-
ature w24x. tion of craters and platelets leading to material re-
306 Z.W. Chen, M.Z. Jahedi r Materials and Design 20 (1999) 303]309
metal was fed from shot sleeve through the runner, and
part of the molten metal impacted directly onto these
targets. These experiments represent the common melt
impingement conditions which are believed to promote
erosion and soldering. As shown in Fig. 5, Die 2 differs
considerably from Die 1 in the thickness of the section
around the core pin. A thicker section in Die 2 resulted
in a longer solidification time of the cast metal sur-
rounding the pin.
Casting was conducted using a Toshiba 250 ton
HPDC machine housed in the CSIRO Melbourne
foundry. The aluminium alloy was ADC12 and the
composition range used is given in Table 1. Melt tem-
perature in the holding furnace was maintained at
6808C. For Die 1, the plunger velocity was set at 1.2
mrs Ž40 mrs gate velocity. and a casting cycle took
approximately 41 s. For Die 2, the plunger velocity was
set at 2 mrs, giving approximately 50 mrs gate velocity
and the cycle time was approximately 72 s. More details
of the experimental procedures have been given else-
where w25x.
Fig. 5. Dies used in HPDC soldering experiments, Ža. Die 1 and Žb.
Die 2. Fig. 6 presents two SEM fractographs of the selected
core pins after 94 and 50 HPDC shots using Dies 1 and
into die cavities, as shown in Fig. 5 Ža. and Žb.. They 2, respectively. The locations where the fractographs
were located close to and were positioned directly in were taken from the pins are shown on the pins by
front of the gates. During die cavity filling, molten arrows in Fig. 5, where impingement of the melt during
Table 1
Chemical composition Žweight %. of the cast alloy used in the present study
Al Si Cu Fe Mn Mg Zn Pb Ni Others
Bal 10.5]11.5 2]3 1.0 0.2]0.3 0.1]0.2 0.5]1.0 - 0.1 - 0.1 - 0.03
308 Z.W. Chen, M.Z. Jahedi r Materials and Design 20 (1999) 303]309