Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pub 02
Pub 02
Pub 02
From the tree level study of the SU (3) X SU (2) X U (1) model arising as the flat limit of a spontaneously broken N = 1 super-
gravity, via the super Higgs mechanism, we find particular directions of minima which lead to upper bound for the top-quark
mass. These bounds on m t can also be of relevance to superstring-inspired low-energy models.
Table 1
.Q (3, 2, 1/6)
V~ (3, 1, - 2 / 3 )
D¢ (3, l, 1/3)
£ (1, 2, - 1/2)
E¢ (I, I, I)
//2 (1, 2, 1/2)
HI (1, 2, - 1/2)
is well known at scales ~Mp which is assumed to be the flat limit of the broken N= 1 supergravity (SUGRA)
the effective potential has a form [ 1,2 ]
Of ~.2
Veff=~]-~+m3/2Z +(A-3)m3/2(f+f*)+D-terms. (2)
- (QQ + )(H~ H~- ) + 2 (H2H ~-)(H, H~- ) + 2(QH~- )(HI Q + ) + 2 ( Q H ~ )(HE Q + ) ] , (4b)
D 2 = ]g][ ] (QQ + )2 + ~ ( V + V¢)Z + ~(QQ+)( v + v¢) - 2 (QV¢)( V+ Q+ ) ] . (4c)
Searching for minima of Vefr we can choose, without loss of generality, particular directions due to the
SU(3) × S U ( 2 ) x U ( 1 ) invariance of Veff, so that,
Q,,j=83~2;IQIe iq .
For the remaining fields we use the following parametrization:
H l V = IIHI II(e ih'' c o s x i , e ih'2 sin xl) , H2V= IIn21l(e ih~' cosx2, e ih:: sin x2) ,
where IlZ/ll2=~j IZf[ 2 and 0~<0, ¢~, Xl, x2<~n/2. Rescaling the fields (Zr-,m3/zZ~) and using the above par-
ametrization Vefrcan be cast into the form Veer=m ,I3/217~fr, with P dimensionless, as given by the following
expression:
56
Volume 193, number I PHYSICS LETTERS B 9 July 1987
"'*,n,- q g . , . "%,
"%. \
I ' i i ~ l l I
-10 -II -S -4 -Z 4 6 $ 10
A
Fig. 1. The dashed line is the curve A 2= 3 ( 3 +/z 2). The region A 2> 3 ( 3 +/z 2) in the (A,/z ) plane is the region of false color minima ( case
(A)). The solid line is the curve IA - 11 = I# [ + 1/ [/zl. The region IA - 1 [ > [# I + 1/ i# [ is the region where the potential becomes unbounded
from below (case (B)).
57
Volume 193, number 1 PHYSICS LETTERSB 9 July 1987
We consider now the particular direction for which the D-terms ~ 0, 0 =x2 = 0 and x~ = n/2. This can be seen
to be a solution of the minimization equations for the Verrand hence this minimum should be taken into account.
In this direction V~frbecomes
V~=m']/2 [(1 +/x2)( IIH, IIz + 11/-/2II~) + ( I QI 2 + IIvii 2)
- 2 IAlht I QI IIVIIIIH~IIcos(q+ v3 + h2, ) + h,Z( IIH2 II2 IIVIi2 + IIVIi2 I QI 2 + i Qi 2 IIH2112)]+D-terms, (8)
where
a 2 = ½g21(~ [Q[ 2 _ ][I VII2 + ½[[H2 [[2 _ 2)2,
½ [IH~ [[ a 2 = ~g2( ]Q[ 2 + [[H~ l[2 _ [[H2[[2 ) 2 ,
D32 =~g]([QI2-[]VI[2)2.
Without loss of generality we a s s u m e ht > 0. Also, being at scales Mp we set ~ g~ =g2 =g3 =g'. When the
ratio g'/ht is not large enough, undesired minima, lying lower than the symmetric one, appear for the values
of A and g in the allowed region coming from conditions (6), (7). To avoid these minima a condition of the
form
g' /2h, >~Jo( A, /.t)
must be satisfied. This condition is equivalent to Veff>~0 preventing therefore the appearance of a minimum
lying lower than the symmetric one. The function Jo(A, p) which appears in the inequality above is a function
of the parameters A and/a whose explicit form we do not give. The condition above provides the following
upper bound for the Yukawa coupling ht at Mx
ht I~, <~g'/2Jo(A, lt) . (9)
The minima considered so far are also local minima in the case of nonvanishing Yukawa couplings hb, fL,
provided that the fields E, L, D have vanishing VEV's.
The evolution of the Yuakwa coupling ht at any scale is given by the expression [ 3,5,6]
hZ,(t)=h2, fg~E(t)/[l+(3/8n2)hZt [MxF(t)] , t-lnMZx/Q z (10)
where E(t), F(t) are positive functions of t depending on the running coupling constants only. As one can see
the expression (10) is a monotonically increasing function of hZtMx. From this expression and the following
relation [ 3 ]:
mE hZt(Q) 0 M,
mE--~z---~= w, (ll)
The above bound of the Yukawa coupling becomes an upper bound for the top-quark mass for given values
of A and/1. Alternatively by fixing the upper bound (mr)max for rnt the allowed values of A and/t parameters
are restricted to be within a certain domain. In fig. 2 we have drawn the allowed region in the (A,/t) plane
for (mr)max=30 GeV and (mt)m~x= 100 GeV. Notice that the (m0m~x=30 GeV and (mt)m~x=100 GeV
boundaries are very close to each other. Any point in the excluded region in fig. 2 gives a tree level breaking
of the SU(3) × SU(2) × U(1 ) to minima breaking color and electromagnetism. For comparison we have also
drawn the A,/z domain allowed when the conditions (6), (7) are imposed, showing that the bounds stemming
from the minima we have considered are more restrictive. We observe that for values of A in the range - 1 < A < 2
the local minima we have investigated lie higher than the symmetric one for any value of ht providing no upper
bound for rot.
The SU(3) × SU(2) X U(1 ) symmetry should remain unbroken not only at large scales but also at any scale
58
Volume 193, number 1 PHYSICS LETTERS B 9 July 1987
X'X'N\ , / ///
(rnt)mox 100 G~v / '
\\ \(mt)max=lO0 Ge~
///////
//
///
unstable
minimum
\\, minimum
I I I
-.1 -2 -I 2 3 &
A
Fig. 2. Permitted A,/~ values for a given maximum tdp<luark mass (mt)m,~ = 100 GeV (solid line) and (mr) max= 30 GeV (dashed line).
The allowed region for the A, # parameters stand to the fight (left) of the (mt ) maxboundaries when A > 0 (A < 0).
Q in the region/14, < Q < Mp. At scales lower than the Planck scale and with the parametrization (5) the Veff
is written as a function of running parameters.
f'(t) =m~/2trh2QlQI2+ rh2vI VI 2 +rhl2 In~ 12 + m ] I//212 + 2Btrh4 In111/-/2 Isin(x~ --x2)
+ 2Atht I VI IQI I//2 Icosxz+2h, m41 VI [QI IH~ Isin x I +ht( IQI21 v I 2 + I vI 2 Ia212 + I//212 IQI2)]
+D-terms. (12)
The running parameters of the above expression are the solutions of the renormalization group equations which
have been taken from ref. [ 7 ] with the following initial Conditions:
rh2(gx)=# 2 , At(gx)=A, Bt(gx)=A-1,
rh2(Mx) =rh2(Mx)= 1 +/z 2 , rh~=rh 2 = 1 , rh,=mi/m3/2 •
We have minimized the f'(t) (eq. (12)) numerically at any scale t. By the requirement that
SU ( 3 ) × S U ( 2 ) × U(I ) vacuum remains stable against tunneling into the fals vacua we considered here, that
is the vacua in the direction x~ = n/2, Z2 = 0 = 0, we get an upper bound for the running Yukawa coupling of
the form
ht(t) ~<G(A, #, t),
which results to an upper bound for the top-quark mass. The bounds obtained for Q < Mx are more stringent
than those obtained for Q=Mx. The results are shown in fig. 3, where this upper bound for mt, (rot) . . . . is
drawn as function of t for various values of A and #. Choosing for instance A = 3, # = 3 we see that in order
for SU( 3 ) × S U ( 2 ) × U(I ) to remain unbroken at M~, m~ must be less than 95 GeV but this bound becomes
stronger, mr< 55 GeV, when the same stability condition is imposed at scales Mw that is (mr)max is reduced
from its value at Mx by about 40%. Reductions of this size to (mr) maxas one moves from Mx to Mw are obtained
for the other combinations of A and/z.
The above analysis can be carded over almost intact to the superstring inspired models in which the group
E6 breaks down to S U ( 3 ) × S U ( 2 ) × U ( 1 ) × U ' ( 1 ) [8] by the Hosotani mechanism [9]. In these models the
superpotential has the form
f= ht EijH2iQ=j~ + 2~ijNH2iHv + .... (13)
59
Volume 193, number I PHYSICS LETTERS B 9 July 1987
IO0
X
0
E eo
E 5o
~,0
ZO , _ _ _ - - - -
Fig. 3. Upper bound for the top-quark mass versus t-= In M ~ / Q 2 .
0i 110 I I I I I I
The solid line corresponds to A = 3,/z = 3, the dashed dotted line
ZO 30 40 50 60 70 corresponds to A = 4 , / t = 4 and the dashed line corresponds to
t = In PlxZ/QZ A=-3,#=4.
References
60