Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Guidelines Writing Argumentative Essay
Guidelines Writing Argumentative Essay
Guidelines Writing Argumentative Essay
Writer should
Make sufficient research to support their claim and invalidate the opposite claim
Show that their claim is the only logical / correct conclusion about the issue
Basic outline
Present the writer’s point of view regarding an issue > logical reasoning > evidence
Structure
1st Paragraph. INTRODUCTION
Present the topic
Provide some background information (what, when, where) about the topic
Thesis statement. One-sentence summary of your claim / stand on the topic
More and more countries and cities around the world are banning smoking in
public places. According to numerous medical studies, smoking not only causes
innumerable health problems for a person but also for every single non-smoker close by.
Even though people carry on debating the pros and cons of smoking, the reality is that a
ban is the most fitting and logical decision in the case of smoking in public areas.
Even though there are some arguments on both sides, there are reasons why the
smoking ban is essential. First of all, smoking, even outside, can cause many health
problems, such as bronchial infections and asthmatic attacks even in non-smokers. This
point is predominantly crucial for nearly one million people in the US who suffer from
chronic sinusitis, asthma, bronchial infections, and additional conditions that have
something to do with breathing. Smoking harms our environment. That’s a fact. In
addition smoking is harmful to the smoker and their family members.
It damages damages ecosystem. All the plastic filters, cigarette butts, and other
elements of smoked cigarettes are most likely to pollute waterways, soil, and beaches.
The most recent lab studies demonstrate that such toxic compounds of cigarettes as
pesticide residues and nicotine are harmful to fish and other microorganisms.
People who smoke regularly are more likely to face early skin vagaries. As stated
by the scientists of the American Academy of Dermatology, regular smoking causes a
variety of biochemical changes that push the course of aging. For example, if you’re a
regular smoker, you contribute to depriving the living skin tissue of valuable oxygen.
Humans value the sanctity of life, and taking another's life is considered a grave
offense. However, capital punishment is a practice adopted in many parts of the world. It
is the process of sentencing convicted murders to death. Capital punishment is immoral
and a violation of human rights.
Capital punishment is morally wrong and violates natural rights. It harms the
innocent, criminals, victims' families, and our nation. Instead, we should replace it with
life imprisonment without parole, a safer and more cost-effective alternative. The death
penalty doesn't guarantee safety for the innocent, fails to align with our nation's values,
doesn't effectively deter crime, and denies closure to victims' families. Hate begets
nothing good, and capital punishment is fundamentally flawed.
Wrongful executions have occurred, casting doubt on the justice system. It's a
painful reality that evidence proving innocence often emerges after execution. This
uncertainty erodes trust in the justice system, especially for those in dire need. The
irreversible impact on families of the wrongfully executed is profound. We cannot bring
back innocent lives lost. The imperfect nature of courts makes it difficult to prevent
wrongful executions in death penalty-prone countries.
Capital punishment denies the wrongfully accused the due process they deserve to
prove their innocence, furthering injustice. Delays in gathering evidence can result in
execution before exoneration. This injustice could be prevented without capital
punishment.
Lastly, a society that values life should not endorse intentional killing by the state.
Capital punishment essentially sanctions government-approved homicide as a solution to
societal problems. This sends a disturbing message to the youth, undermining the
government's moral authority.
A society that values life does not intentionally kill people. The truth is that
capital punishment is a traumatic case of homicide that has been approved by the
government. This practically supports killing in order to impose a solution to the
problems that are being faced by society (Mandery 58). Capital punishment should be
abolished.
References:
Masterclass (2021). How to Write a Good Argumentative Essay: Easy Step-by-Step Guide.
https://www.masterclass.com/articles/how-to-write-a-good-argumentative-essay
https://www.turito.com