Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Creative Deviance
Creative Deviance
Problem Definition:
Hierarchy boundaries kills innovation, too many layers and top-down structure might cause loss of innovation
opportunities.
Dependency on the leadership vision and underestimating creative alternatives stemming from lower
levels, that is lack of trust in those calibers to take the business to new horizons.
Example: WhatsApp was originally founded in 2009 by Brian Acton and Jan Koum. Acton applied for jobs at
both Twitter and Facebook way before WhatsApp became a widely popular mobile app. Both times he was
rejected. In 2014, Facebook announced a $19 billion deal to acquire the mobile messaging app, WhatsApp 1.
It cost Facebook billions to acquire the new product, while they could have saved much money in 2009 when
Acton was applying for a job and proposing the WhatsApp project2.
Alternatives:
Alternatives Evaluation:
1
WhatsApp story
2
WhatsApp Acquisition
Encourage brainstorming and teamwork that could result in substantial innovation.
Organize innovation competitions.
Interpret motivation into tangible rewards.
Recognition is an important motivation tool.
Give credit to the intellectual property owner(s).
Involve lower-level employees in decision making.
When approving an idea, seek all possible ways to implement it and remove obstacles.
Creating an organic organizational structure adapt with rapid changes of the disruptive technology.
Free flow of information and low formalization would help create an innovation-striving atmosphere.
Flexibility doesn’t negatively impact accountability and ownership, both advantages can be met in a
well-tailored organizational design.
Recommendations:
I recommend “innovation motivation” and “tendency to organic structure” alternatives, they are what a
company needs to stay creative, that’s what mega companies like Apple and Google do.
3
Side Project time