Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 s2.0 S1015958422008909 Main
1 s2.0 S1015958422008909 Main
Original Article
a r t i c l e i n f o s u m m a r y
Article history: Introduction: Although the advantages of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in the general population
Received 8 April 2021 have been reported, its role in octogenarians has yet to be elucidated. This retrospective study was
Received in revised form designed to compare the outcomes of open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs in octogenarians.
17 July 2021
Materials and methods: The data of octogenarians who underwent laparoscopic (n ¼ 81) or open
Accepted 28 June 2022
Available online 14 July 2022
(n ¼ 121) inguinal hernia repair were collected from January 2017 to December 2019. Statistical analysis
variables included basic epidemiological data of patients, surgical procedures, comorbidities, post-
operative pain, complications, recurrence, and other data.
Keywords:
Inguinal hernia
Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of sex, body mass index,
Repair recurrent hernias, comorbidities, postoperative complications, and recurrence. The American Society of
Octogenarian Anesthesiologists (ASA) class and the proportion of scrotal hernias in the open group were higher than
Laparoscopic those of the laparoscopic group, whereas the proportion of bilateral hernias in the laparoscopic group
Open was higher than that in the open group. The postoperative pain scores of the laparoscopic group were
lower than those of the open group.
Conclusions: In octogenarians, both laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repairs are safe and feasible,
but an appropriate surgical plan is crucial for obtaining better treatment effect.
© 2023 Asian Surgical Association and Taiwan Robotic Surgery Association. Publishing services by
Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.06.149
1015-9584/© 2023 Asian Surgical Association and Taiwan Robotic Surgery Association. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-
ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
X. Zhu, Z. Liu, J. Shen et al. Asian Journal of Surgery 46 (2023) 738e741
2. Materials and methods 11 patients and the TEP approach in 70 patients. The technique for
open inguinal hernia repair was Lichtenstein repair in 23 patients
A retrospective chart review was performed of patients who and modified Kugel repair in 98 patients. There were no
underwent elective inguinal hernia repair at the Department of conversions.
Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, from The patients’ demographics and hernia characteristics are
January 2017 to December 2019. Patients younger than 80 years old shown in Table 1. There were no statistically significant differences
were excluded. Emergency cases with incarcerated or strangulated in sex, BMI class, recurrent hernia, chronic obstructive pulmonary
hernias were also excluded. The diagnosis and repair of the inguinal disease, coronary heart disease, or diabetes, histories of lower
hernia were confirmed by the operative notes. abdominal surgery, stroke, or malignant tumor, or use of anti-
The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of platelet therapy between the open and laparoscopic groups.
Shanghai East Hospital (No. 2017e024) and was conducted in The mean age of the patients in the open group was higher than
accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Owing to the retro- that of the laparoscopic group (p < 0.01). There were significantly
spective nature of the study, written informed consents from the more ASA class IIIeIV cases in the open group than in the laparo-
enrolled patients was not required. scopic group (p < 0.05). The proportion of bilateral hernias was
higher in the laparoscopic group than that in the open group
2.1. Data collection (p < 0.01), whereas the proportion of scrotal hernias was higher in
the open group than that in the laparoscopic group (p < 0.01). In the
The medical records were reviewed for the patients’ age, sex, laparoscopic group, there were four cases of recurrent hernia, and
body mass index (BMI), hernia characteristics, history of lower the TAPP repair was used in all of them. In the open group, there
abdominal surgery, and concomitant diseases. The operative re- were eight females, and the modified Kugel repair was used in all of
cords were reviewed for the operative approach, American Society them.
of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class. Perioperative observation in- The operative variables, postoperative pain, and complications
dicators included hematoma, seroma, surgical site infection, and in the two patient groups were shown in Table 2. There was no
venous thromboembolism (VTE). The patients were asked to return significant difference in the operative time between the two
to the outpatient clinic at two and eight weeks after discharge. After groups. The length of stay of patients in the laparoscopic group was
eight weeks, the patients were contacted by telephone and asked to shorter than that in the open group (p ¼ 0.01). Both the VAS-24h
respond to a questionnaire. If there were any abnormalities, the and VAS-48h scores were significantly lower in the laparoscopic
patient was instructed to return to the clinic. Postoperative pain group than those in the open group (p < 0.05), but there was no
was assessed according to the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from 0 (no significant difference in the incidence of chronic pain between the
pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain) at 24 h (VAS-24h) and 48 h two groups. A total of 10 patients were observed to have chronic
(VAS-48h) after surgery. Chronic pain was defined as groin pain pain that persisted for more than three months after surgery. Ac-
that persisted for more than three months after surgery and was cording to the patient's own description and physical examination,
indicated by a response of “yes” or “no.” A seroma or hematoma 7 patients had nociceptive pain and 3 had neuropathic pain.
was screened by physical examination and confirmed by B-scan Because all pains were not severe, after excluding recurrence using
ultrasonography. All patients were followed up for at least 6 ultrasonography, all patients refused analgesics and other treat-
months. ments. There was no significant difference in the incidence of he-
matoma and seroma between the two groups. Only one patient in
2.2. Surgical technique the laparoscopic group, who underwent the TEP procedure,
developed an infraumbilical trocar site infection; it did not affect
The open procedures involved Lichtenstein and modified Kugel the mesh and was cured after drainage. Because many elderly pa-
repairs. The laparoscopic procedures were performed by the stan- tients reported serious symptoms of prostate hyperplasia, some of
dard totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and transabdominal preper- them were given a preventive urethral catheterization before the
itoneal (TAPP) approaches. The type of repair, operative technique, operation. Therefore, this study did not compare the incidence of
and use of mesh were left to the discretion of the surgeon. General postoperative urinary retention. There were no cases of VTE in the
anesthesia or spinal anesthesia was administered by the anesthe- two groups. No recurrence was observed in either group during the
siologist and local anesthesia was administered by the surgeon. All follow-up period. There was no significant difference in the inci-
inguinal hernia repairs were carried out by hernia surgeons with dence of any adverse event between the two groups. The mean
expertise in both open and laparoscopic approaches. follow-up time was 27.00 ± 9.59 months. There was no significant
difference in mean follow-up time between the two groups.
2.3. Statistical analysis
4. Discussion
All data analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics for
Windows, version 23.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). Uni- Inguinal hernia is a growing health care issue in rapidly aging
variate exploratory analysis was performed using Person's chi- societies. Although guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of
squared test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and T inguinal hernia have been established, there are no specific
test for continuous variables. The rank data were calculated with guidelines for octogenarians yet. We believe that selecting an
the rank-sum test. A probability value of 0.05 was considered appropriate surgical plan in accordance with the patient's physical
statistically significant. condition is essential for achieving effective minimally invasive
treatment and reducing local and systemic complications.
3. Results A series of studies have confirmed that laparoscopic inguinal
hernia repair can be safely performed in octogenarians with an ASA
A total of 202 patients who underwent elective inguinal hernia class of IeII, and that it will not significantly increase the incidence
repair were enrolled in this study. Laparoscopic repairs were per- of complications and mortality.3,4,9,10 In our study, although the age
formed in 81 patients and open repairs in 121 patients. The tech- difference between the laparoscopic group and the open group was
nique for laparoscopic hernia repair included the TAPP approach in significant, the difference between the mean ages was only 2.26
739
X. Zhu, Z. Liu, J. Shen et al. Asian Journal of Surgery 46 (2023) 738e741
Table 1
Patients’ demographics.
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
BMI class:I: <18.5; II: 18.5e24.9; III: 25e29.9; IV: 30.
Acknowledgments rate on groin hernia in the adults. J Surg Concepts Pract. 2002;7:421e422.
8. Sen L, Qiankun Z, Sugang S, Huiming Y. Epidemiology and risk factors analysis
of adults inguinal hernia, a survey in Pianguang county, Shanxi Province. Chin J
The authors would like to thank Enago (www.enago.cn) for the Hernia Abdom Wall Surg (Electron Version). 2015;9:83e85.
English language review. 9. Hope WW, Bools L, Menon A, Scott CM, Adams A, Hooks WB. Comparing
laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair in octogenarians. Hernia.
2013;17:719e722.
References 10. Payiziwula J, Zhao PJ, Aierken A, et al. Laparoscopy versus open incarcerated
inguinal hernia repair in octogenarians: single-Center Experience with World
1. Wu JJ, Baldwin BC, Goldwater E, Counihan TC. Should we perform elective review. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech. 2019;29:138e140.
inguinal hernia repair in the elderly? Hernia. 2017;21:51e57. 11. Ko€ ckerling F, Roessing C, Adolf D, Schug-Pass C, Jacob D. Has endoscopic (TEP,
2. Burcharth J, Pedersen M, Bisgaard T, Pedersen C, Rosenberg J. Nationwide TAPP) or open inguinal hernia repair a higher risk of bleeding in patients with
prevalence of groin hernia repair. PLoS One. 2013;8, e54367. coagulopathy or antithrombotic therapy? Data from the Herniamed Registry.
3. Pallati PK, Gupta PK, Bichala S, Gupta H, Fang X, Forse RA. Short-term outcomes Surg Endosc. 2016;30:2073e2081.
of inguinal hernia repair in octogenarians and nonagenarians. Hernia. 2013;17: 12. Li J, Wang M, Cheng T. The safe and risk assessment of perioperative anti-
723e727. platelet and anticoagulation therapy in inguinal hernia repair, a systematic
4. Dallas KB, Froylich D, Choi JJ, et al. Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia review. Surg Endosc. 2019;33:3165e3176.
repair in octogenarians: a follow-up study. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2013;13: 13. Chung SD, Huang CY, Chueh SC, Tsai YC, Yu HJ. Feasibility and safety of total
329e333. extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair after previous lower abdominal surgery:
5. Rogers FB, Guzman EA. Inguinal hernia repair in a community setting: impli- a case-control study. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:3353e3356.
cations for the elderly. Hernia. 2011;15:37e42. 14. Zuiki T, Ohki J, Ochi M, Lefor AK. Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP)
6. Department of Economic and Social Affairs population division. World Popu- inguinal hernia repair in patients with previous lower abdominal surgery. Surg
lation Prospects. 2019 Revision, Highlights. New York: United Nations; 2019: Endosc. 2018;32:4757e4762.
1e39 [R].
7. Jianxiong T, Lei H, Ti Z, et al. The multiple epidemiological study of prevalence
741