Escp Report

LAND DISTURBANCE POLLUTION PREVENTION
AND MITIGATION MEASURES (LD-P2M2)
for
“PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF CLINICAL WASTE

THERMAL TREATMENT PLANT
AT PTD 4865, JALAN NIBONG 3,
KAWASAN PERINDUSTRIAN TANJUNG LANGSAT,
IN MUKIM SG. TIRAM, JOHOR DARUL TAKZIM”
APRIL 2018
Prepared for:
AMR ENVIRONMENTAL SDN. BHD.

Email : syahidah@amr.com.my
Contact : +60 75 20 8334
(Attention: Cik Syahidah Ibrahim)
LAND DISTURBANCE – POLLUTION PREVENTION AND MITIGATION MEASURES (LDP2M2) FOR
APR
THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF CLINICAL WASTE THERMAL TREATMENT PLANT AT PTD 4865,
KAWASAN PERINDUSTRIAN TANJUNG LANGSAT, MUKIM SG. TIRAM, JOHOR DARUL TAKZIM. 2018
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CONTENT PAGE
CERTIFICATION 4
PROJECT SUMMARY 5
LDP2M2 SUBMISSION CHECKLIST 6
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 12
1.1 Introduction 12
CHAPTER 2: SITE DESCRIPTION 14
2.1 Site Description 14
CHAPTER 3: EROSION RISK AND ENGINEERING ANALYSIS 16
3.1 Erosion Risk and Engineering Analysis 16
3.2 Hydrological Assessment 16
3.3 Criteria Selection of Method Application 17
3.4 Soil Loss Estimation 19
3.4.1 Rainfall Erosivity, R Factor 19

3.4.2 Soil Erodibility, K Factor 21
3.4.3 Length of Slope, LS Factor 21
3.4.4 Cover Management, C Factor 22
3.4.5 Management Support, P Factor 22
3.4.6 Conclusion 23
3.5 Sediment Yield Estimation 24
3.5.1 Determination of Runoff Parameters 24

3.5.2 Conclusion 24
Page 1
APR
CHAPTER 4: POLLUTION PREVENTION AND MITIGATION MEASURES (P2M2) 26
4.1 Schedule of Phasing, Staging and Sequencing 26
4.2 Schedule Site Meeting 26
4.3 Construction Marker 26
4.4 Stabilized Construction Entrance 27
4.5 Stream / Drainage Way / Waterway / Watercourse Buffers 27
4.6 Perimeter Control 27
4.7 Sediment Trap 28
4.8 Runoff Management 28
4.9 Temporary or Permanent Watercourse Crossing 28
4.10 Temporary or Permanent Roadways 29
4.11 Stockpile Soil Management 29
4.12 Spoil Management Area 29
4.13 Dewatering Practices 29
4.14 Discharge 30
4.15 Corrective Action 30
4.16 Site Inspection 30
4.17 Maintenance 31
CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION 32
REFERENCES 33
Page 2
APR
APPENDIX A Tanjung Langsat Project Site Work Programme and Schedule
APPENDIX B Tanjung Langsat Clinical Waste Plant Project Site Development Layout
APPENDIX C LDP2M2 Best Management Practices (BMP’s) Proposed Installation for Tanjung
Langsat Project Site
APPENDIX D LDP2M2 Best Management Practices (BMP’s) Specification for Tanjung Langsat
Project Site
APPENDIX E Hydrological Assessment Calculation
APPENDIX F Rainfall Erositivity Map for Johor State
APPENDIX G Reconnaissance Soil Map for Johor State
APPENDIX H Soil Loss Estimation Calculation
APPENDIX I Sediment Yield Estimation Calculation
APPENDIX J Best Management Practices (BMP’s) Site Inspection Form
APPENDIX K Tanjung Langsat Plant Project Site Topography Layout Map
Page 3
APR
CERTIFICATION
NAME OF REPORT: LAND DISTURBANCE - POLLUTION PREVENTION AND MITIGATION MEASURES FOR
KAWASAN PERINDUSTRIAN TANJUNG LANGSAT, MUKIM SG. TIRAM, JOHOR DARUL TAKZIM.
I, the undersigned, acknowledge by signature that these documents meet or exceed the design
standards of the Department of Environment, Malaysia and that they were prepared under my
supervision. I, the undersigned, further acknowledge that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the
products resulting from these documents will function as intended.
VERIFIED BY:
_______________________ (CPESC)
(Signature)
Name : MOHD JOHARI BIN ABDUL MALIK
NRIC No. : 810929-04-5203
CPESC No. : 7218
Date : 21 APRIL 2018
FOR AMR ENVIRONMENTAL SDN. BHD.
___________________________
(Signature)
Name :
NRIC No. :
Date :
Page 4
APR
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name:
LAND DISTURBANCE - POLLUTION PREVENTION AND MITIGATION MEASURES FOR THE

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF CLINICAL WASTE THERMAL TREATMENT PLANT AT PTD 4865,
KAWASAN PERINDUSTRIAN TANJUNG LANGSAT, MUKIM SG. TIRAM, JOHOR DARUL TAKZIM.
Scope:
a) Planning of general pollution control and mitigation measures to be implemented.

b) Recommendations of Best Management Practices (BMP’s) such as erosion control,
runoff management and sediment controls.
c) Site assessment (hydrological assessment, soil loss assessment and sediment yield
estimation).
d) Engineering design and calculation for sediment basin
e) Inspection and maintenance plan.
Team Member:
a) Mohd Johari Bin Abdul Malik (CPESC)
Page 5
APR
LDP2M2 SUBMISSION CHECKLIST (ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES FOR MALAYSIA, 2016)
ITEMS PAGE MARK REMARKS
√ - Yes
× - No
NA - Not Applicable
1.1 PROJECT ACTIVITIY AND IMPLEMENTATION
(a) Phasing plan if relevant 14 √ Table 2.1
(b) Project implementation schedule √ Appendix A
(c) Description of the construction activity 14 √ Table 2.1
(d) Construction scheduled for each major land disturbance complete with timeline or chart for the √ Appendix A
installations of P2M2s
(e) Typical method statement for site site clearing, cut and fill, excavation of foundation, drilling of 26 - 31 √ Chapter 4
borehole, instream works and construction of temporary / permanent stream / river crossing and
diversion that incorporate the significance elements of pollution prevention and mitigation measures
(f) Estimated start date, completion date and stabilization scheduled for each major land-disturbing √ Appendix A
activities or construction activities phases, stages and sequences
Page 6
APR

√ - Yes
× - No
NA - Not Applicable
1.2. INFORMATION AND ANALYSIS ON PROJECT DEVELOPMENT. THESE INFORMATION AND ANALYSIS
SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING:
(a) Weather and rainfall data. √ Refer EIA Report
(b) Site runoff velocity and flow rate, both pre and during development 18 √  Chapter 3
 Appendix E
(c) Description of site soil characteristics: 21 √ Chapter 3
i. Soil types
ii. Soil test erodibility
iii. Soil hydrologic group
iv. Dispersible fine clay: Percentage of dispersible material
v. Anticipated excavation depth for the proposed land disturbing activity
(d) Description of adjacent areas, such as streams, lakes, residential areas, and roads that might be √ Refer EIA Report
affected by the land disturbance.
(e) List of streams and rivers identified on-site. (Use coding for unnamed streams and rivers). √ Refer EIA Report
(f) List of receiving streams and rivers. (Use coding for unnamed streams and rivers). √ Refer EIA Report
(g) List of existing drainage identified on-site. √ Road drainage of industrial area
(h) List of P2M2s proposed also make reference to P2M2s description can be accessed. 26 - 31 √  Chapter 4
 Appendix D
(i) Identify access roads and other outsourced components (such as mobile batching or premix plant) √ Refer EIA Report
that are located outside the proximity of the project boundary.
(j) Earthworks cut and fill volume. x
(k) Availability of rocks material NA No rock material were observed
(l) Biomass management x
Page 7
APR

√ - Yes
× - No
NA - Not Applicable
(m) Solid (construction waste) and domestic waste management. √ Appendix C
(n) Spill Prevention and Control from fuel and chemical use or storage. √ Refer EIA Report
(o) Hazardous Waste Management √ Refer EIA Report
(p) Soil loss prediction using the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE), sediment yield calculation using 19 - 25 √  Chapter 3
Modified Universal Soil Loss Equation (MUSLE) and runoff estimation for pre, during and post  Appendix H
development accounted for both with and without the implementation of LDP2M2s. All of the data and  Appendix I
parameters used in the calculations shall be measured or rationally determined, and identified. If
secondary sources are used, they shall be clearly identified.
(q) Calculation of proposed sediment trap/basin based on drainage area disturbed and projected runoff √ Appendix D
flow direction from each disturbed land segment that will drain into the proposed sediment trap/basin.
1.3. MAP OF SITE PLAN WITH THE EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS (PREDEVELOPMENT)
(I) Site Map Which Refers To:

(a) Topography survey map showing: √ Appendix K
i. Contours
ii. Elevation
iii. Slopes
(b) Geological Terrain Mapping (if relevant). NA
(c) Erosion risk map NA
(d) Drainage pattern showing: √ Appendix B

i. Delineation of watercourses.
ii. Delineation of natural drainage depression.
iii. Flow path and direction for the different drainage areas.
iv. Marks and labels of drainage area(s) or drainage divides.
Page 8
APR

√ - Yes
× - No
NA - Not Applicable
(II) Land use showing: √ Refer EIA Report
i. Trees.
ii. Vegetation area.
iii. Roads and infra-structures (inclusive of drainage system).
iv. Buildings.
v. Utilities
(III) Adjacent within 150 metres from project site: √ Appendix B

i. Watercourses (Flowing into or from site).
ii. Roads and infra-structures (inclusive of drainage system).
iii. Buildings and utilities.
iv. Vegetation area
(IV) Use map scale and size of: √ Appendix B

i. 1:500 for area less than 20 hectares;
ii. 1: 1000 for area more than 20 hectares
iii. Size: A3 or A1.
1.4. MAP OF SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
(a) Depict the existing contour and proposed level. √  Appendix B

 Appendix C
(b) Indicate the total site area. √  Appendix B
 Appendix C
(c) Indicate the total disturbance area with line showing the area to be disturbed. √  Appendix B
 Appendix C
(d) Show the cut and fill area. X
(e) Show the direction of the proposed earthwork movement. √  Appendix B

 Appendix C
(f) Mark the limit of disturbance of each of the phase construction. √  Appendix B
 Appendix C
(g) Identify and mark the temporary or permanent stream or river crossing. X
Page 9
APR

√ - Yes
× - No
NA - Not Applicable
(h) Identify and mark the temporary or permanent stream or river diversion. X
(i) Identify and mark on-site temporary access or construction or haul road √  Appendix B
 Appendix C
(j) Identify and mark site office area. √  Appendix B
 Appendix C
(k) Identify and mark stockpile areas. √  Appendix B
 Appendix C
(l) Identify and mark temporary preservation of existing vegetation. X
(m) Identify and mark permanent preservation of existing vegetation. X
(n) Identify and mark material staging area or equipment storage area. √  Appendix B
 Appendix C
(o) Identify and mark workshop / maintenance or engineering work √  Appendix B
area.  Appendix C
(p) Identify and mark generators set and/or motorized equipment area. X
(q) Identify and mark Vehicle and Equipment Washing Facility. √  Appendix B
 Appendix C
(r) Identify and mark petroleum based material/refueling, chemicals and skid tank area. X
(s) Identify and mark schedule waste storage area. √  Appendix B

 Appendix C
(t) Identify and mark workers camp location. X NA
(u) Identify and mark sanitary facilities location. √  Appendix B

 Appendix C
(v) Identify and mark batching plant location. X
(w) Identify and mark concrete wash P2M2 location. X
(x) Identify and mark spoil (unsuitable material) area or disposal area. √  Appendix B
 Appendix C
Page 10
APR

√ - Yes
× - No
NA - Not Applicable
(y) Identify and mark borrow area. NA
(z) Identify and mark the location(s) of all proposed P2M2s application. √ Appendix C
(aa) Identify and mark all of the designated point(s) of water discharge and also any other potential √ Appendix C
point(s) of water discharge to off-site drainage ways.
(bb) Provide the GPS location of the construction ingress/egress and all designated point(s) of water 14 √ Chapter 2, Item 2.1
discharge for the site.
(cc)Use map scale and size of: √  Appendix B

 Appendix C
1:500 for area less than 20 hectares;  Appendix K
1: 1000 for area more than 20 hectares
Size: A3 or A1.
Page 11
APR
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
The objectives of the Land Disturbance Pollution Prevention and Mitigation Measures report (LDP2M2)
for the Project Site entitled “THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF CLINICAL WASTE THERMAL TREATMENT
PLANT AT PTD 4865, KAWASAN PERINDUSTRIAN TANJUNG LANGSAT, MUKIM SG TIRAM, JOHOR DARUL
TAKZIM” are:
a) To provide a guide and effective control measures for the developer in managing erosion and
sediment impacts during the development activities.
b) To assess the hydrological condition for pre, during and post development.
c) To provide adequate drainage network to suit with development and environmental friendly
demand.
d) To determine the sediment storage required and provide suitable construction program to prevent
excessive and uncontrol sedimentation.
e) To indicate the level of erositivity for the whole development area.
f) To propose prevention measures and control of offsite damage.
The site key plan and site location plan for the proposed Project Site are shown in Figure 1.1 and 1.2
respectively.
Page 12
APR
Figure 1.1: Project Site Key Plan
Figure 1.2: Project Site Location Plan
Page 13
APR
CHAPTER 2
SITE DESCRIPTION
2.1 Site Description
The topography of the Project Site is perimetered by an industrial complex with a flat terrain in general.
The Project Site location is approximately at 2.5 km away from the nearest residential area of Kampung
Tanjung Langsat. The GPS coordinates of the Project Site is 1.460183 N, 103.979963 E.
Details of stages of the Project Site development is tabulated in Table 2.1 and Figure 2.1.
Table 2.1: Project Site Development Summary

No Descriptions Total Area Total Area
(m2) (acre)
1. Factory 840.00
2. Washing Facility 27.00
3. Clean Bin and Storage 82.80
4. Walkway 23.40
5. Cold Room 81.30
6. Loading Area 25.50
= 0.2959 acre
7. Office 1 15.86
8. Office 2 15.86
9. Electrical Room 15.75
10. Pantry and Toilet 17.55
11. Entrance and Management Office 52.35
TOTAL 1197.37
In regard to Table 2.1 and Figure 2.1, construction development shall cover 0.2959 acre (refer Appendix
B) and the detail of work program is as attached in the Appendix A.
Page 14
APR
Figure 2.1: Project Site Area Development
Page 15
APR
CHAPTER 3
EROSION RISK AND ENGINEERING ANALYSIS
3.1 Erosion Risk and Engineering Analysis
Erosion risk and engineering analysis is required to be performed for Project Site as listed-
a) Hydrological Assessment
b) Soil Loss Estimation
c) Sediment Yield Estimation
d) Evaluation of Impact
3.2 Hydrological Assessment
The Hydrological Assessment were assess for the Project Site as to determine the peak flow
discharge (Qp) based on the following requirement:-
a) Existing which is before construction (Qpre) for for minor (2, 5 and 10 years ARI) and
major (50 and 100 years ARI) conditions.
b) During construction (Qduring) for minor (2, 5 and 10 years ARI) and major (50 and 100
years ARI) conditions.
c) Post construction (Qpost) for minor (2, 5 and 10 years ARI) and major (50 and 100
years ARI) conditions.
The Project Site catchment considered for the hydrological assessment are shown in Figure 3.1.
The summary results of the peak flow discharge assessment as described in item 3.2 (a), 3.2 (b)
and item 3.2 (c) is shown as in Table 3.1 for Existing Condition, During Construction and Post
Construction.
Page 16
APR
3.3 Criteria Selection of Method Application
The calculation method and application used in Hydrological Assessment were based on the
Quantity Design Fundamentals of the Urban Stormwater Management Manual for Malaysia 2nd
Edition 2011 (MSMA, updated on May 2015). The applied calculation method is described as
below:-
a) Time of Concentration (tc) by applying the overland flow travel path.
b) Empirical IDF Curves as to determine the average Rainfall Intensity (i). The selected
station for fitting constants dependant on the rain gauge location are:
 DID Station Name: Johor Silica
 Station ID: 15441139
 Fitting Constant Determined: (λ=59.060), (ƙ=0.202), (Ɵ=0.128), (ŋ=0.660)
c) Rational Method as to determine the peak flow discharge.
The time of concentration (t-con, minute) for pre-construction and post-construction found to
have improve which mean the provided slope gradient and surface cover is suitable for this
development. This is also proven from the flowrate calculation (refer Table 3.1) where the peak
flow discharge for post construction are lower compared to pre construction, hence the
flowrate for post construction are improved and controllable. Detail calculation of hydrology
assessment is attached in Appendix E.
Page 17
APR
Table 3.1: Summary Results of Peak Flow Discharge for Project Site
ARI / Q (peak flow discharge)
PROJECT: TANJUNG LANGSAT Unit: (m3/s)
2 Years ARI 5 Years ARI 10 Years ARI 50 Years ARI 100 Years ARI
EXISTING CONDITION (Qpre) 0.016 0.019 0.022 0.030 0.035
DURING CONSTRUCTION (Qduring) 0.020 0.024 0.028 0.039 0.045
POST CONSTRUCTION (Qpost) 0.011 0.013 0.015 0.021 0.024
*Refer to the Calculation Sheet in Appendix E
Figure 3.1: Project Site Catchment Considered for Hydrological Assessment
Page 18
APR
3.4 Soil Loss Estimation
The Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) is used to assess the Erosion Risk at the Project Site
under these required conditions:-
 Existing (Before construction)

 Disturbed and uncontrolled (During construction and no application of ESCP)
 Disturbed and controlled (During construction and with application of ESCP)
3.4.1 Rainfall Erosivity, R Factor
R factor for the Project Site at Pengerang (Johor) falls in the range of 15,000 to 17,500
MJ.mm/ha.yr with reference to Appendix F. For evaluation purposes, the higher limit is used,
therefore,
R Factor = 17,500.00 MJ.mm/ha.yr.
Page 19
APR
PROJECT SITE
Figure 3.2: Rainfall Erosivity Map for Johor State
Page 20
APR
3.4.2 Soil Erodibility, K Factor
The types of soil series representing the soil background at the Project Site which is based on
the Reconnaissance Soil Map (Appendix G) are:-
a) Kranji Series - with range of erodibility of 0.048 to 0.051 (ton/ha)(hr/MJ.mm)
The selection of the appropriate value in design consideration is based on factor of safety and
reliability. Thus, we decided to select the higher value of soil erodibility as given in Table 3.2.
Table 3.2: The Selection of Erodibility Factor for Soil Loss Estimation
Conditions Layer Represents K Factor Soil Texture HSG

Before Construction A and B
0.051 Clay D
(Existing) (0 to 1 meters depth)
A and B
During Construction 0.051 Clay D
(0 to 1 meters depth)
3.4.3 Length of Slope, LS Factor
Referring to the Pre-Development topology (Before) and Post-Construction Grading Plan

(During), the length and slope for the Project Site is described as in Table 3.3.
Table 3.3: The Determination of LS Factor for Soil Loss Estimation for Project Site
PROJECT: SWMCJ Condition Slope Length, λ (m) Slope Steepness, s (%) LS Factor
Before (Existing) 0.30 0.15
SWMCJ 600.00
During Construction 0.05 0.13
*Refer to the Calculation Sheet Appendix H
Page 21
APR
3.4.4 Cover Management, C Factor
For the determination of cover management, the appropriate value was selected as shown in
Table 3.4.
Table 3.4: The Determination of C Factor for Soil Loss Estimation
PROJECT:
Condition C Factor Description
TANJUNG LANGSAT
Before Construction
0.35 Bushes / Shrub - 50% Cover
(Existing)
TANJUNG LANGSAT
1.00 Bare Soil
During Construction
0.05 Proposed to apply compacted gravel layer
3.4.5 Management Support, P Factor
For the determination of management support value, the proposed and appropriate practices
are described in Table 3.5.
Table 3.5: The Determination of P Factor for Soil Loss Estimation
PROJECT:
Condition P Factor Description
TANJUNG LANGSAT
Before Construction
1.00 No support practice
(Existing)
During Construction
1.00 No support practice
(No BMP’s)
To apply sediment containment systems
(Silt Trap)
* Remarks
Additional practices shall be proposed in a
TANJUNG LANGSAT
way to adhere and ensure the reduction of
soil loss estimation which is:-
During Construction
0.5 a) Check dam
(With BMP’s)
b) Silt fence
c) Temporary Diversion Drainage
A combination of a listed support practices

will result to 0.588 which is considered
acceptable as to provide additional
reduction of the soil loss estimation.
Page 22
APR
3.4.6 Conclusion
As summarized in Table 3.6, the application of the Best Management Practices (BMP’s) which is
to have a sediment trap systems and a combination of check dam, silt fence and diversion ditch
at the Project Site can minimize and reduce the erosion risk (soil loss) up to an average range of
97.50% compare to no application of BMP’s.
Table 3.6: Summary of Soil Loss Estimation based on the Various Conditions at the Project Site
PROJECT:
CONDITION DETAILS OF APPLICATIONS SOIL LOSS ESTIMATION (ton/ha/year)
TANJUNG LANGSAT
Before Construction Existing 48.281
TANJUNG
No BMP’s 116.242
LANGSAT During Construction
With BMP’s 2.906
*Refer to the Calculation Sheet Appendix H
Page 23
APR
3.5 Sediment Yield Estimation
The Modified Universal Soil Loss Equation (MUSLE) is used for sediment yield estimation for the
Project Site as a result of a specific storm event. The sediment yield estimation for the Project
Site shall be based on these required conditions:-
a) Existing (Before construction)
b) Disturbed and uncontrolled (During construction and no application of BMP’s)
c) Disturbed and controlled (During construction and with application of BMP’s)
The summary results of the sediment yield estimation as described in item 3.5 (a), 3.5 (b) and
3.5 (c) is shown as in Table 3.7.
3.5.1 Determination of Runoff Parameters
The design criteria for the sediment yield estimation for the existing and during construction
conditions are described as below:-
d) Design ARI is 100 years as to fulfill the requirement of runoff quantity and quality
design criteria of BMP’s facilities in MSMA 2nd Edition. The total estimated
construction period is about 24 months.
e) Storm Duration (D) is assume to be similar with Time of Concentration (tc) which is
(D = tc) for each conditions (existing and during construction).
f) The application of No BMP’s and With BMP’s conditions is applied for sediment yield
estimation for during construction condition.
3.5.2 Conclusion
As summarized in Table 3.7, the estimated total sediment yield from the Project Site is 0.028
tonne per storm event with the application of BMP’s together with designated design storm of
100 ARI. The recommendation for BMP’s pollution prevention and mitigation measures of
Project Site shall be covered in the next chapter.
Page 24
APR
Table 3.7: Summary of Sediment Yield Estimation based on the Various Conditions at the Project Site
PROJECT: DETAILS OF SEDIMENT YIELD ESTIMATION

CONDITION
TANJUNG LANGSAT APPLICATION (tonne / storm event)
Before Construction Existing 0.361
TANJUNG LANGSAT No BMP’s 1.103
During Construction
With BMP’s 0.028
*
Refer to the Calculation Sheet Appendix I
Page 25
APR
CHAPTER 4
POLLUTION PREVENTION AND MITIGATION MEASURES
In order to prevent any uncontrolled environmental damages during construction works,

pollution prevention and mitigation measures are required to be done namely:
4.1 Scheduled of Phasing, Staging and Sequencing
a) Schedule of the Project Site development as tabulated in Appendix A.

b) The working area for earthworks and construction should be kept to a minimum to avoid
excessive soil erosion and sedimentation.
c) All movements of construction vehicles over unpaved roads and exposed areas should be
kept to a minimum.
d) Earthwork activities should be carried out during periods of low rainfall to minimize erosion.
e) Phasing of land clearing and earthworks should be in tandem with the building construction
schedule in order to minimize possibilities of over exposure of cleared lands of Project Site.
4.2 Schedule Site Meeting
a) Schedule site meeting (kickoff meeting) shall be carried out before commencement of
works which to be attended by project proponent, environmental officer, consultant and
contractor.
b) During the works progress, site meeting required to be performed as well to facilitate the
works progress by parties involved.
c) Proper minute meeting need to be recorded in order to trace progressive works.
4.3 Construction Marker
a) As for the construction monitoring, construction markers shall be provided with pole to
indicate barrier of construction area.
b) Discharge Point from the Project Site need to be marked.
Page 26
APR
4.4 Stabilized Construction Entrance
a) Access road shall be stabilized with hardcore layer and sufficient drainage networks.
b) All vehicles going out of the Project Site must pass through a washing bay / wash trough to
wash away the dirt. The water in the washing bay must be channeled to nearby drainage
network and channeled to detention pond.
c) If earth is transported into the Project Site by lorries, they must be covered with adequate
tarpolin to reduce spillage on the roads and to avoid dust pollution.
d) Dust emitted during earthworks can be reduced by regularly spraying the dusty surfaces
and the water channeled into a nearby drainage network and channeled to detention pond.
e) Any pothole or road crack shall be repaired to avoid water seeping through and worsen the
condition.
4.5 Stream / Drainage Way / Waterway / Watercourse Buffers
a) A minimum 20m vegetated buffer zone are required to be provided near discharge point as
indicated in the guidelines (Environmental Impact Assessment Guidelines in Malaysia).
b) The buffer shall be maintained as it will assist to reduce any direct inflows into the river and
affect the river quality.
4.6 Perimeter Control
a) Before commencing on the earthworks, temporary earth drains are required to be

established to cater the sediment and channel to sediment trap.
b) Between disturbed area and undisturbed area, site fencing are required to be installed to
trap sediment intrusion to undisturbed area.
Page 27
APR
4.7 Sediment Trap
a) Sediment trap are required and to be maintained until the site area is permanently
protected against erosion or water quality control structure constructed.
b) The sediment trap to be designed as specified in the standard specification.
c) All waters from disturbed area should be channeled first to a sediment trap prior to
discharge.
d) The outlet of the sediment trap should have a layer of geotextile materials to reduce silt
being discharged.
e) For sediment inspection and maintenance checklist are attached in Appendix J.
4.8 Runoff Management
a) All waters from disturbed area should be channelled first to a sediment trap prior to
discharge.
b) The outlet of the sediment trap should have a layer of geotextile materials to reduce silt
being discharged.
c) Check dam is also recommended to be constructed across a temporary earth drain as to
reduce the velocity of stormwater, erosion and sedimentation. Hence, check dams will be
installed at 10 m intervals.
4.9 Temporary or Permanent Watercourse Crossing
a) For water course crossing installation (circular culvert), adequate collar joint required to
provided to avoid water leakage.
b) Exposed soil near the outfall structure need to be turfed.
Page 28
APR
4.10 Temporary or Permanent Roadways
a) Access road will be constructed with hardcore layer.

b) During construction or roadworks, temporary traffic management shall be provided such
as:-
i. Flagman
ii. Traffic barrier.
c) All disposed soil need to export to soil disposal area.
d) Temporary earth drain shall be provided near the access road to channel the water
sediment trap prior to discharge.
4.11 Stockpile Soil Management
a) Stockpile required to be localized minimum 20m away from any watercourse nearby.
b) Surrounding stockpile, sufficient drainage networks (toe drain) must be provided and
channel to sediment trap for sediment control.
4.12 Spoil Management Area
a) Disposal area required to be localized minimum 20m away from any watercourse nearby.
b) Disposed soil are required to be laid with not steeper than 2H:1V (H=horizontal, V=vertical)
and well compacted.
c) Sufficient drainage system required to be provided to control surface runoff within the
Project Site.
4.13 Dewatering Practices
a) Accumulated runoff water from disturbed are shall be channelled to sediment trap.
b) De-silting works required to be carried out to remove all clogged material.
Page 29
APR
4.14 Discharge
a) Water from ongoing construction area required to be channel to sediment trap prior to
final discharge point.
b) Untreated process water, washing water shall be channeled to Effluent Treatment Plant
before final discharge point.
4.15 Corrective Action
a) For the situation where structures or facilities installed incorrectly, rectification works are
required to be carried out within 7 days upon encountering the issue.
b) Any status of rectification works shall be recorded and informed to DOE via online
communication system.
4.16 Site Inspection
a) Prior to commence any works, site inspection shall be carried out by Project Proponent,
Environment Officer or equivalent competency of Certified Competent Person Stormwater
Inspector (CESSWI) or Competent Inspector Sediment Erosion Control (CISEC) and
contractor to evaluate the site condition.
b) Usually in the normal practice, contractor will submit Request for inspection (RFI) at least
two (2) days early to notify EO or consultant on the particular items to be inspected.
c) In the case of incorrect installation, EO or consultant shall assess the quality or wrongly
installed and seek the rectification works. Second inspection shall be performed upon
completion of rectification works.
d) Minimum one (1) unit of rain gauge are recommended to be installed at project site in
order to determine the quantity of rainfall particularly.
e) Reading of rain gauge need to be taken daily and the data shall be recorded properly.
f) Inspection need to be carried out at least once in seven (7) days or 24 hours after storm
event more than 12.5mm on the constructed elements.
Page 30
APR
4.17 Maintenance
a) Sediment trap must be de-silted when it reaches half of the sediment trap capacity to
ensure it function effectively.
b) Clogged check dam shall be de-silted when the clogged reach half of the maximum height.
c) Regular maintenance shall be performed as well on the drainage networks to avoid flood
event.
Page 31
APR
CHAPTER 5
CONCLUSION
5.1 Conclusion
Based on the assessment performed, land disturbance and pollution control can be adopted to
Project Site with the following:-
a) One (1) unit of sediment trap following to the standard specification installation specified
in the Appendix D.
b) Effective mitigation measure with the following provided:-
i. Check dam
ii. Silt fencing.
iii. Significant earth drain network.
d) Frequent maintenance (i.e. de-silting of the sediment inside sediment trap, check dam)
need to be carried out at site.
e) Since development will be carried by phases, earthwork and sediment can effectively be
controlled.
f) Regular site inspection by PP, EO, consultant and contractors.
g) Inspector of BMP’s is required for Certified Competent Person Stormwater Inspector
(CESSWI) or Competent Inspector Sediment Erosioin Control (CISEC).
As shown in this modeling exercise, the estimation of soil erosion at the construction stage
without BMP’s will generate a very high soil erosion rate. The estimated soil erosion value was
however drastically reduced with the adoption of BMP’s. As such, the usage of BMP’s is
considered to be critical when the site is developed. Some of the key measures utilized shall be
the usage of sediment trap, silt fencing as well as the opening of the site in phases. This means
that the entire area should not be left exposed but rather developed in sequence where each
phase is stabilized prior to the opening of the next phase.
The BMP’s proposed installation for Project Site can be refer to Appendix C with a reference to
BMP’s standard specification installation as in Appendix D.
Page 32
APR
REFERENCES
1. Urban Stormwater Management Manual for Malaysia (MSMA Second Edition,

December 2011), updated May 2015.
2. Guideline of Erosion and Sediment Control in Malaysia (October 2010), Department of

Irrigation and Drainage Malaysia.
3. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) Volume 1 Report For PETRONAS Refinery and
Petrochemical Integrated Development (RAPID) In Pengerang, Johor (September 2012),
Integrated Environtech Sdn. Bhd.
4. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) for the “Projek Infrastruktur dan Kemudahan
Awam Bagi Pembangunan Kompleks Petroleum Bersepadu Pengerang, Daerah Kota
Tinggi, Johor: Membina Jalanraya 4 Lorong 2 Hala dari Jalan FT92 Persimpangan Bukit
Gelugor ke Persimpangan Punggai J91 (P4)” Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia (April 2017).
5. Land Disturbance Pollution Prevention and Mitigation Measures (LD-P2M2) for the
Proposed Development of Satelitte Waste Management Centre Johor (SWMCJ) at PTD
2288 In Mukim Pantai Timur, District of Kota Tinggi, Johor for CENVIRO Johor Sdn Bhd.
(September 2017), AMR Environmental Sdn. Bhd.
Page 33
NOTES:
RIZA
RIZA B TNB
B KT
M
KOMPLEK PERINDUSTRIAN TG LANGSAT
RIZAB
KTM
JALAN NIBONG
1000
2000
2500
6000
TAJUK :
3500
PERMOHONAN PELAN BANGUNAN DI BAWAH AKTA

15000
133 BAGI TUJUAN CADANGAN MEMBINA SEBUAH
LOJI RAWATAN TERMA SISA KLINIKAL SETINGKAT,
PEJABAT SETINGKAT SETENGAH, SEBUAH
PONDOK PENGAWAL, BILIK SAMPAH DAN
KEMUDAHAN DI ATAS PTD 4865, JALAN NIBONG 3,
KAWASAN PERINDUSTRIAN TANJUNG LANGSAT,
JOHOR DARUL TAKZIM.
UNTUK :
TETUAN SOUTHERN MEDI ONE SDN BHD
TAJUK LUKISAN
- KEY PLAN , LOCATION PLAN & SITE PLAN
Lukisan ini adalah hakcipta dan hakmilik ICSB dan tidak boleh disimpan, ataupun disalin ataupun
digunakan tanpa kebenaran daripada ICSB.
Pihak Kontraktor mestilah menyemak segala ukuran di tapak pembinaan, hanya ukuran yang
dinyatakan akan digunakan.
Sebarang perselisihan dalam ukuran haruslah dilaporkan kepada Jurutera dengan serta-merta
sebelum meneruskan kerja.
DEVELOPER
BOUNDARY LINE
6.096m MIN. BUILDING SETBACK LAND OWNER
TNB
9000 10425
1200
450
1200
WASH AREA
6.096m MIN. BUILDING SETBACK
TNB DOUBLE CHAMBER SUB STATION

SOUTHERN MEDI ONE SDN. BHD.
7800
DRY ROOM PLANT 2 CLEAN

BIN
STORE
OFFICE AREA
COLD ROOM Jurutera Perunding Awam & Struktur :

PLANT 1
IRFA CONSULT SDN BHD
6000
WWTP AREA (TBA)
LOADING AREA
BY SPECIALIST No. 18-02, Jalan Perjiranan 2,
Bandar Dato' Onn,
3150 81100 Johor Bahru, Johor Darul Takzim.
Tel : +607 - 351 7313
Fax : +607 - 364 0313
e-mail : projects@irfaconsult.com
3715
GUARD POST
6000
6.096m MIN. BUILDING SETBACK 2400 12230

LPG AREA
DIESEL HOSEREEL
2400
TANK TANK RUMAH SAMPAH .....................................................
SEPTIC TANK
5 PE Ir. MOHD AFANDI BIN KONTING
B. Eng. (Hons) Civil, UTHM, M.I.E.M, P. Eng.
IC. No. : 810106-01-6575
BOUNDARY LINE I hereby certify that these structural details / calculations are in accordance
with the uniform building by-laws (Chapter 5, Structural requirements)
DILUKIS OLEH SYU DISEMAK OLEH AFK
SKALA As Shown TARIKH MAC 2018
NO LUKISAN
ICSB/1802/ARCH/01
U
0
270
90
180
CROSS SECTION CROSS SECTION
TRANSACTION BETWEEN TRANSACTION BETWEEN
SECTION B & C SECTION B & C
TOP OF CHECK DAM
COMPACTED BACKFILL,TYP CHANNEL GRADE

UPSTREAM & DOWNSTREAM
B
ELEVATION
SCALE : N.T.S
FLOW CHANNEL GRADE
EXCAVATION TO NEAT LINE

AVOID OVEREXCAVATION (TYP.)
D50= 300mm Ø RIPRAP

SEE SHEET D-30 FOR GRADIENT
SECTION B
SCALE : N.T.S
CHANNEL GRADE
D50= 300mm Ø RIPRAP
SEE SHEET D-30 FOR GRADIENT
EXCAVATION TO NEAT LINE

AVOID OVEREXCAVATION (TYP.)
SECTION C
SCALE : N.T.S
NOTE : ALL UNITS MILIMETER (mm)
W
FLO
EXISTING GRADE
RIPRAP 'D50' SEE SHEET 14 FOR

GRADIATIONS
RIPRAPLINED - DETAIL D
SCALE : N.T.S.
COMPACTED
EMBANKMENT UNLINED - DETAIL A
MATERIAL SCALE : N.T.S.
STAKES PER DETAILS 9

STAKES PER DETAILS 9
ANCHOR TRENCH AT PERIMETER OF BLANKET AND AT THE ANCHOR TRENCH AT PERIMETER OF BLANKET AND AT
OVERLAPPING JOINTS WITH ANY ADJACENT ROLLS OF BLANKET. SEE THE OVERLAPPING JOINTS WITH ANY ADJACENT ROLLS
DETAIL 9 OF BLANKET. SEE DETAIL 9
EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
(ECB) SEE DETAIL 9
TRANSVERSE ANCHOR TRENCHES AT PERIMETER OF

INTERMEDIATE ANCHOR TRENCH TRANSVERSE ANCHOR TRENCHES AT PERIMETER OF BLANKET
INTERMEDIATE ANCHOR TRENCH AT BLANKET AND AT OVERLAPPING JOINTS WITH ANY
AT ONE HALF ROLL LENGTH. AND AT OVERLAPPING JOINTS WITH ANY ADJACENT ROLLS OF
ONE HALF ROLL LENGTH. SEE DETAIL 9 ADJACENT ROLLS OF BLANKETS, SIMILAR TO DETAIL
SIMILAR TO DETAIL 9, BUT NO STACKING BLANKETS, SIMILAR TO DETAIL 9, BUT NO STACKING
9, BUT NO STACKING
EROSION CONTROL BLANKET(ECB) LINED - DETAIL B PLASTIC LINED - DETAIL C

SCALE : N.T.S. SCALE : N.T.S.
DIVERSION DITCH INSTALLATION NOTES. DIVERSION DITCH MAINTENANCE NOTES.
1. SEE PLAN VIEW FOR: 1. THE ESCP MANAGER SHALL INSPECT DIVERSION DITCHES WEEKLY, DURING AND
AFTER ANY STORM EVENT AND MAKE REPAIRS OF CLEAN OUT THE NECESSARY.
- LOCATION OF DIVERSION DITCH.
-TYPE OF DITCH (UNLINED,ECB LINED,PLASTIC LINED, OR RIPRAP LINED. 2. DIVERSION DITCHES ARE TO REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL THE END OF
-LENGTH OF EACH TYPES OF DITCH. CONSTRUCTION.
-DEPTH 'D' AND WIDTH 'W' DIMENSIONS.
-FOR ECB LINED DITCH, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET TYPE ( SEE DETAIL 9) 3. IF DIVERSION DITCHES ARE REMOVED, THE DISTURBED AREA SHALL BE DRILL
-FOR RIPRAP LINED DITCH, SIZE OF RIPRAP IS 'D50'. SEEDED AND CRIMP MULCHED OR OTHERWISE STABILIZED IN A MANNER
APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY.
2. SEE DRAINAGE PLANS FOR DETAILS OF ANY PERMANENT CONVEYANCE FACILITIES
OR DIVERSION DITCHES EXCEEDING A 2-YEARS FLOW RATE.
3. DIVERSION DITCHES INDICATED ON INITIAL ESCP PLAN SHALL BE INSTALLED NOTE: ALL UNITS IN MILIMETERS (mm)
PRIOR TO ANY LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES.
4. FOR ECB LINED DITCHES, INSTALLATIONS OF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SHALL

CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS.
5. IN LOCATIONS WHERE CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC MUST CROSS A DIVERSION DITCH,

THE DEVELOPERS SHALL INSTALL A TEMPORARY CULVERT WITH MINIMUM
DIAMETER OF 300mm.
WIRE BOX GABION
B B WITH ROCKFILL
SAND FILLING
1000
C B C (MIN)
OUTLET
INLET
TOP WATER LEVEL
2
1
SECTION A-A
L 300mm THK. RIVERSTONE
PLAN B
WIDTH
SAND FILLING WIRE BOX GABION

WITH ROCKFILL
SAND LAYER
EARTH CHANNEL
2 2
1 1
WIRE BOX GABION
WITH ROCKFILL
SECTION B-B
GEOTEXTILE
300mm THK.
SAND LAYER
SECTION C-C
NOTE : ALL UNITS MILIMETER (mm)

37.5mm x 37.5mm WOODEN FENCE POSTS 3500mm MAX. SPACING
DETAIL A
SCALE N.T.S
SILT FENCE GEOTEXTILE
B B UNDISTURBED VEGETATION ON DOWN GRADIENT SIDE (FOR

SILT FENCE SHOWN IN INITIAL GESC PLAN)
EXISTING GROUND
COMPACTED
BACKFILL
AT LEAST 275mm OF SILT FENCE GEO TEXTILE

SHALL BE BURIED.
JOINTS - SECTION B
SCALE N.T.S
POST SHALL OVERLAP AT JOINTS SO THAT

NO GAPS EXIST IN SILT FENCE
POSTS SHALL BE JOINED AS SHOWN, NOTE: THICKNESS OF GEO TEXTILE

THEN ROTATED 180° IN DIRECTION SHOWN HAS BEEN EXAGGERATED
AND DRIVEN INTO THE GROUND
CONSTRUCTION FENCE INSTALLATION NOTES
1. SEE PLAN VIEW FOR:

-LOCATION AND LENGTH OF FENCE
2. ANCHOR TRENCH SHALL BE EXCAVATED WITH TRENCHER, OR WITH SILT FENCE INSTALLATION MACHINE, NO ROAD
GRADERS, BACKHOES ETC. SHALL BE USED TRENCH SHALL BE COMPACTED BY HAND WITH "JUMPING JACK" OR BY THE
WHEEL ROLLING, COMPACTION SHALL BE SUCH THAT SILT FENCE RESISTS BEING PULLED OUT OF ANCHOR TRENCH BY
HAND.
3.SILT FENCE INDICATED INITIAL E.S.C.P PLAN SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES.
SILT FENCE MAINTENANCE NOTES
1. THE E.S.C.P MANAGER SHALL INSPECT SILT FENCE DAILY, DURING AND AFTER ANY STORM EVENT AND MAKE REPAIRS
OR CLEAN OUT UPSTREAM SEDIMENT AS NECESSARY.
2. SEDIMENT ACCUMULATED UPSTREAM OF SILT FENCE SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THE UPSTREAM SEDIMENT REACHES A
DEPTH 150mm.
3. SILT FENCES SHALL BE REMOVED AT THE UPSTREAM DISTURBED AREA IS STABILIZED AND GRASS COVER IS APPROVED
BY THE COUNTRY. IF ANY DISTURBED AREA EXISTS AFTER REMOVAL, IT SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED OR
OTHERWISE STABILIZED.
NOTE : ALL LIMITS IN MILIMETER (mm)

PLAN
100.5
SEDIMENT FENCE
100.0
101.0
A
A
STOCKPILE
EARTH BANK
SECTION A-A STABILIZED STOCKPILE SURFACE
EARTH BANK SEDIMENT FENCE

FLOW
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
1. LOCATE STOCKPILE AT LEAST 5 METRES FROM EXISTING VEGETATION

CONCENTRATED WATER FLOWS ROADS & HAZARD AREAS
2. CONSTRUCTION ON THE CONTOUR AS A LOW, FLAT, ELONGATED MOULD.
3. THERE THERE IS SUFFICIENT AREA, TOPSOIL STOCKPILES SHALL BE LESS

THAN 2 METRES IN HEIGHT.
4. CONSTRUCT EARTH BANK ( STANDARD DRAWING SDI-5) ON THE UP SLOPE

SIDE TO DIVERT RUNOFF AROUND THE STOCKPILE AND A SEDIMENT FENCE
( STANDARD DRAWING SDI-11) 1 TO 2 METRES DOWN SLOPE OF STOCKPILE
STAGING AREA FOR PARKING, STORAGE,LOADING AND
UNLOADING STABILISED WITH 75mm MIN. THICKNESS
GRANULAR MATERIAL
(GRAVEL OR RECYCLED CONCRETE)
CONSTRUCTION
SITE ACCESS
VTC AT CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE (SEE DETAIL 24)
STABILISED STAGING AREA INSTALLATION NOTES
1. SEE PLAN VIEW FOR GENERAL LOCATION OF STAGING AREA, CONTRACTOR MAY MODIFY
LOCATION AND SIZE OF STABILIZED STAGING AREA WITH COUNTRY APPROVAL.
2. STABILIZED STAGING AREA SHALL BE LARGE ENOUGH TO FULLY CONTAIN PARKING,

STORAGE, AND UNLOADING & LOADING OPERATIONS.
3.STAGING AREA SHALL BE STABILIZED PRIOR TO ANY OTHER OPERATIONS OF THE SITE
STABILIZED STAGING AREA MAINTENANCE NOTES
1. THE ESCP MANAGER SHALL INSPECT STABILIZED STAGING AREA DAILY, DURING AND
AFTER ANY STORM EVENT AND MAKE REPAIRS OR CLEAN OUT UPSTREAM SEDIMENT AS
NECESSARY.
2. ESCP MANAGER SHALL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL THICKNESS OF GRANULAR MATERIAL IF

ANY RUTTING OCCURS OR UNDERLYING SUB GRADE BECOMES EXPOSED.
3. THE STABILIZED STAGING AREA SHALL BE REMOVED AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION.

THE GRANULAR MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED OR, IF APPROVED BY THE COUNTRY,
USED ON SITE, AND THE AREA TOP SOILED, DRILL SEEDED AND CRIMP MULCHED OR
OTHERWISE STABILIZED.
NOTE : ALL LIMITS IN MILIMETERS (mm)

APPENDIX E : PAGE 1
CALCULATION SHEET - HYDROLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Calculation by: M Johari A Malik
PROJECT SITE – TANJUNG LANGSAT CLINICAL WASTE THERMAL PLANT, JOHOR
1. Qpre (Before Construction or Existing Condition) , Qduring (During Construction Period) and Qpost (Post Construction Condition)
Determination:-
Cpre = 0.5 (Grass Cover) for >10 year ARI Major System
*Recommended Runoff Coefficients for Various Landuses (MSMA 2nd Edition)
Cduring = 0.6 (Bare Soil ) for >10 year ARI Major System
Cpost = 0.5 (Grass Cover) for >10 year ARI Major System
npre = 0.045 (Average Grass)*

*Horton’s Roughness value for Land Surface (MSMA 2nd Edition)
nduring = 0.0275 (Bare Soil)*
* Horton’s Roughness value for Land Surface (MSMA 2nd Edition)
npost = 0.045 (Average Grass)*
* Horton’s Roughness value for Land Surface (MSMA 2nd Edition)
th L /3
Overland Flow, tc =
S /5
Tk
Rainfall Intensity, i =
(d+θ)ŋ
Station: Johor Silica

Fitting Constants (ID 15441139)
λ = 59.060
Ϗ = 0.202
θ = 0.128
ŋ = 0.660
Rational Method = (C)(i)(A)

APPENDIX E : PAGE 2
CALCULATION SHEET Calculation by: M Johari A Malik
PROJECT : TANJUNG LANGSAT CLINICAL WASTE THERMAL PLANT JOHOR
Coefficients
Roughness
IDF Fitting
Constants
Gradient
Horton's
Runoff
Slope
Section 2 ARI 5 ARI 10 ARI 50 ARI 100 ARI
Symbol λ Ϗ θ ŋ C n s tc ὶ Q tc ὶ Q tc ὶ Q tc ὶ Q tc ὶ Q
Unit - - - - - - % min mm/hr m3/s min mm/hr m3/s min mm/hr m3/s min mm/hr m3/s min mm/hr m3/s
59.06 0.202 0.128 0.66 0.5 0.045 0.31 28.25 95.30 0.016 28.25 114.68 0.019 28.25 131.91 0.022 28.25 182.59 0.030 28.25 210.03 0.035
Qpre
59.06 0.202 0.128 0.66 0.6 0.0275 0.05 24.87 101.73 0.020 24.87 122.41 0.024 24.87 140.81 0.028 24.87 194.91 0.039 24.87 224.20 0.045
Qduring
59.06 0.202 0.128 0.66 0.5 0.045 0.01 56.14 65.23 0.011 56.14 78.49 0.013 56.14 90.28 0.015 56.14 124.97 0.021 56.14 143.75 0.024
Qpost
PROJECT SITE
PROJECT SITE
RECONNAISSANCE SOIL MAP FOR JOHOR
Saline gley soils (Gleysols)
Peat soils (Histosols)
Peat soils (deep) (Histosols)

Eutric Fluvisols
Dystric Fluvisols & Dystric Gleysols PROJECT SITE Recent alluvial soils (Rhegosols)
Thionic Fluvisols & Dystric Gleysols

Dystric Cambisols & Dystric Gleysols
Skeletal soils (Lithosols)
Dystric Cambisols & Plinthic Gleysols
Gleyic Cambisols, Humic Gleyic & Dystric Plinthic Acrisols & Orthic Ferralsols
Skeletal soils & Brown forest soils (Lithosols &
Histosols Plinthic Acrisols Rendzinas)
Gleyic Cambisols & Dystric Fluvisols Gleyic Acrisols & Plinthic Acrisols
Gleyic Cambisols & Orthic Acrisols Skeletal soils & Lateritic soils
Dystrc Nitosols
(Lithosols, Acrisols & Oxisols)
Vertic Cambisols & Eutric Gleysols Dystric Nitosols & Orthic Ferralsols
Ferralic Cambisols Skeletal soils & Red-yellow podzolic soils
Dystric Nitosols & Dystric Cambisols
Orthic Podzols (Lithosols & Acrisols)
Dystric Nitosols Red-yellow podzolic soils (Acrisols & Ferralsols)
Orthic Acrisols
Orthic Ferralsols & Ferric Acrisols
Orthic Acrisols & Gleyic Acrisols Grey-white podzolic soils (Acrisols, Ferralsols & Planosols
Orthic Acrisols & Orthic Ferralsols Rhodic Ferralsols & Xanthic Ferralsols
Orthic Acrisols & Plinthic Acrisols Dystric Histosols Podzols (Podzols)
Ferric Acrisols ‘Steepland’ Gley soils (Gleysols)
Orthic Acrisols & Dystric Cambisols ‘Mined & Urban Land’
Ferric Acrisols & Plinthic Acrisols
RECONNAISSANCE SOIL MAP FOR PENINSULAR MALAYSIA
PROJECT SITE
APPENDIX H : PAGE 1
CALCULATION SHEET : SOIL LOSS ESTIMATION / EROSION RISK Calculation by: M Johari A Malik
SOIL LOSS ESTIMATION / EROSION RISK
PROJECT SITE – TANJUNG LANGSAT CLINICAL WASTE THERMAL PLANT JOHOR
1. Qpre (Before Construction or Existing Condition) and Qpost (During Construction Condition)
Determination:-
a) R Factor = 17,500.00 MJ.mm/ha.yr
b) K Factor :
Kpre = 0.051 (represents top soil or surface soil)
Kpost = 0.051 (represents top soil or surface soil, same soil shall be used for filling and levelling)
c) C Factor :-
Cpre = 0.35 (Bushes / Shrubs 50% Cover)
Cpost = 1.00 (Bare Soil) and 0.05 (Compacted gravel layer)
d) P Factor :-
Ppre = 1.00 (No support practice)
Ppost (No BMP’s) = 1.00 (No support practice)
Ppost (With BMP’s) = 0.50 (To apply Sediment Containment - Silt Trap)
APPENDIX H : PAGE 2
CALCULATION SHEET : SOIL LOSS ESTIMATION / EROSION RISK Calculation by: M Johari A Malik
SOIL LOSS /
Symbol R K s LS C P
EROSION RISK
PROJECT : TANJUNG LANGSAT
CONDITION
(ton/ha) LS Factor from Wischmeier Equation
Unit MJ.mm/ha.yr % - - - Tonne/ha/year
(hr/MJ.mm) SITE Sheet Length, λ (m) Ψ m
Before Construction TANJUNG LANGSAT 17,500.00 0.051 0.31 0.15 0.35 1 48.281 600.00 22.13 0.2
or TANJUNG LANGSAT
Existing Condition
During Construction 17,500.00 0.051 0.05 0.13 1 1 116.242
TANJUNG LANGSAT TANJUNG LANGSAT 600.00 22.13 0.2
(No BMP’s)
During Construction 17,500.00 0.051 0.05 0.13 0.05 0.5 2.906

TANJUNG LANGSAT TANJUNG LANGSAT 600.00 22.13 0.2
(With BMP’s)
APPENDIX I : PAGE 1
CALCULATION SHEET - SEDIMENT YIELD Calculation by: M Johari A Malik
SEDIMENT YIELD ESTIMATION /
PROJECT SITE – TANJUNG LANGSAT CLINICAL WASTE THERMAL PLANT JOHOR
1. Ypre (Before Construction or Existing Condition) and Ypost (During Construction Condition)
Y = 89.6 (V × Qp )0.56 (K × LS × C × P)
V = 0.5 × (2 × tc × 60) × (Qp)
Determination:-
a) Design ARI = 100 Years

APPENDIX I : PAGE 2
CALCULATION SHEET Calculation by: M Johari A Malik

100 YEARS ARI
Symbol A K LS C P V Y
tc ὶ Q
CONDITION
(ton/ha) Tonne /
Unit m2 % - - min mm/hr m3/s m3
(hr/MJ.mm) Storm Event
Before Construction or 1197.37 0.051 0.15 0.35 1 28.250 210.030 0.035 59.325 0.361
TANJUNG LANGSAT
Existing Condition
During Construction 1197.37 0.051 0.13 1 1 24.870 224.200 0.045 67.149 1.103
TANJUNG LANGSAT
(No BMP’s)
During Construction 1197.37 0.051 0.13 0.05 0.5 24.870 224.200 0.045 67.149 0.028
TANJUNG LANGSAT
(With BMP’s)
U
0
270
90
180
JURUKUR TANAH BERLESEN :-

Escp Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Escp Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Escp Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

LAND DISTURBANCE POLLUTION PREVENTION

AND MITIGATION MEASURES (LD-P2M2)

“PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF CLINICAL WASTE

AMR ENVIRONMENTAL SDN. BHD.

CHAPTER 2: SITE DESCRIPTION 14

2.1 Site Description 14

CHAPTER 3: EROSION RISK AND ENGINEERING ANALYSIS 16

3.1 Erosion Risk and Engineering Analysis 16

3.2 Hydrological Assessment 16

3.3 Criteria Selection of Method Application 17

3.4 Soil Loss Estimation 19

3.4.1 Rainfall Erosivity, R Factor 19

3.5 Sediment Yield Estimation 24

3.5.1 Determination of Runoff Parameters 24

CHAPTER 4: POLLUTION PREVENTION AND MITIGATION MEASURES (P2M2) 26

4.1 Schedule of Phasing, Staging and Sequencing 26

4.2 Schedule Site Meeting 26

4.3 Construction Marker 26

4.4 Stabilized Construction Entrance 27

4.5 Stream / Drainage Way / Waterway / Watercourse Buffers 27

4.6 Perimeter Control 27

4.7 Sediment Trap 28

4.8 Runoff Management 28

4.9 Temporary or Permanent Watercourse Crossing 28

4.10 Temporary or Permanent Roadways 29

4.11 Stockpile Soil Management 29

4.12 Spoil Management Area 29

4.13 Dewatering Practices 29

4.15 Corrective Action 30

4.16 Site Inspection 30

APPENDIX A Tanjung Langsat Project Site Work Programme and Schedule

APPENDIX E Hydrological Assessment Calculation

APPENDIX F Rainfall Erositivity Map for Johor State

APPENDIX G Reconnaissance Soil Map for Johor State

APPENDIX H Soil Loss Estimation Calculation

APPENDIX I Sediment Yield Estimation Calculation

APPENDIX J Best Management Practices (BMP’s) Site Inspection Form

APPENDIX K Tanjung Langsat Plant Project Site Topography Layout Map

FOR AMR ENVIRONMENTAL SDN. BHD.

LAND DISTURBANCE - POLLUTION PREVENTION AND MITIGATION MEASURES FOR THE

a) Planning of general pollution control and mitigation measures to be implemented.

a) Mohd Johari Bin Abdul Malik (CPESC)

(a) Phasing plan if relevant 14 √ Table 2.1

(b) Project implementation schedule √ Appendix A

(c) Description of the construction activity 14 √ Table 2.1

ITEMS PAGE MARK REMARKS

(a) Weather and rainfall data. √ Refer EIA Report

(j) Earthworks cut and fill volume. x

(k) Availability of rocks material NA No rock material were observed

(l) Biomass management x

ITEMS PAGE MARK REMARKS

(o) Hazardous Waste Management √ Refer EIA Report

(I) Site Map Which Refers To:

(b) Geological Terrain Mapping (if relevant). NA

(c) Erosion risk map NA

(d) Drainage pattern showing: √ Appendix B

ITEMS PAGE MARK REMARKS

(III) Adjacent within 150 metres from project site: √ Appendix B