2008S CfSi7IAIstel SABES 1S1SCHE EW pp. 94-97 KSME OOFEZI USS4 FARIS 18a UII47] Yaa aa unet. sys- Falel za". BBS" Design of a Centrifugal Compressor Impeller Using Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithm Jin-Hyuk Kim, Jae-Ho Choi, Afzal Husain and Kwang-Yong Kim Key Words: Centrifugal Compressor( % 4! 9471), Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm(t}$2 4 AS} SWF), Pareto-Optimal Solution(>}al =~] 3 a) Abstract ‘This paper presents a design optimization of a centrifugal compressor impeller with hybrid multi objective evolutionary algorithm (hybrid MOEA). Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations with shear stress transport turbulence model are discretized by finite volume approximations and solved on hexahedral grids for flow analyses. Two objectives, i.e, isentropic efficiency and total pressure ratio are selected with four design variables defining impeller hub and shroud contours in meridional ‘contours to optimize the system, Non-dominated Sorting of Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-Il) with © constraint strategy for local search coupled with Radial Basis Neural Network model is used for multi-objective optimization. The optimization results show that isentropic efficiencies and total pressure ratios of the five cluster points at the Pareto-optimal solutions are enhanced by multi-objective ‘optimization, Buia] sada Bal A, des] das LA ae ude dH tao Bde) ade AQBS Woe she +a Hye dee a4 | +e] ohd Adda] FGOe= ARE = MA SV. ols BE AAMAS 7) 28 he FARRIS Ab} See A 1422 28 + Us, 77) oe Basso] S8e ut Bae ase + Ade Ball AEA SAA AA HF Hea AS Az ad. + shat Te 7st E-mail : jinhyuk@inha.edu ‘TEL : (032)860-7317 FAX : (032)868-1716 aadad waders lshutiat deal 7ld-zeap eee catalan ABE * Ade Adavt oh, 4S SATS E Me ASSATT ARs] Ge art s 2 APA a} AA a arp o}2}g ASSaee BASS FE aoe del 73] AaAsvss UneySo] Yeu] awace SSAtT JAAR PANS Bae-3] yah (Parato-optimal solutions) °]-%! "Yo] wo} ARSS]O}, oO} YL Aalapt AMYY oyay QTE Abo] ep Sa Ge Se Aqaes HS = RE 1B} Bch. o} 7]YS Kicinger eo} 2}e] ZARS|Oe}, MarlerS} Arora} 9} ay St tok] GSS AA sol Ags} ©}. 2174312 BiRadial Basis Neural Network) & HFA DISS AGI AA 7S 1S @ AFZE Cosentino FR Tat Fao F, 2S iso] Aas ol fete] age S79 RKS PP ANZA Hb aly, BAPE Casals Ase BIA)ma}, baal RANS(Reynolds-averaged —Navier- Stokes)a4s} ALAaes VAS Atel hybrid MOEA(Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm) sete] FAA qsas +Botarh. ase} a 28 te] FEF Ba 47s] AAWTS AE ROM, AS TS SAGTR Bola ole Aaiststavt staat. 2 atage Adds) ages ayo Uy TESS Vide Al Badds a Sti, ANSYSA}S] 3 == so}@l ANSYS CEX-1O7S AbSete] ALS PYstsaeh apase UHes7] Baelal ae zbile Ab Fe Table 1] 7) zsh Vet. Bdols Ha Vee OF Aaa, 2 sI9] BAe HICLA AAS Asoo, BE Sa AzAz Passi. UGS Fab the He oltas] S712 7gdaaa, al aalzs] GS5 FRA BIS Ha Usshe + PAE stole] Sse] BANA hail FNAL2 BAsol RR 7hgsto} Fig. 12} Bol she] FS GANT AS Fags Go. UPZALEE AGGF ALES FAD, At HEUILA 10atma} 298KS AVRO OH, SPRACSE CUFEANY FES FU 3, AWIANS FM AY OS of Absa. CHEAEE Bers} Wl ssT(Shear Stress Transport)” BAS ASA. SsT BAS Ae atue de ete ads Assen gel GE 284 HSS wel sol +Fab OH Bardina Sol] 2a} wired wh skch aUtSA dato] Ge a4 al, easte a] Ee F soovlal ws AAS Fete] Pentium Vv ‘Table 1 Design specifications of the centrifugal impeller Flow coefficient oa Rotational speed, rm. (65,550 ‘Total pressure ratio 96 Impeller outlet diameter, mm 102.32 6@ 05 ~95— Fig. 1 Computational domain and boundary conditions 3.0 GHz CPUS A+Hto} oF 641% YR AAs ate. 3. SMES AAS TAAATS ANAT BASS AAT SAG Age] F.A4) solo} sey, BAT ade dada aes Ages el zt SAGs 485 tel AIA SAE Ss) Fee} AVMS Agate, ay hae _ Phot Pon Q) PR oP ke Mee Gea, pet TS 2 AV ALES YEH, YA ish owe Py EHS} STE Usha. 2 ates dda Aead yo gee a Asha} o] HLS Ade F YES Sw FE VANS ABshar stoke. Aaa A, 42a B) H2S EO] We Aa AGPE Y us] Meshal ashe} zt sap vizjo] Shoe BMA AeteeS BSTable 2 Design variables and objective functions at the five clusters from global Pareto-optimal solutions Design variables ‘MOEA RANS: Increased, (9%) solution Svmtiat Sait Hiniia | Had PR Or PR Nr PR Or Cluster A | 0.679 | -0.542 | 0411 0302 | 1.989 | 0.8691 1.982 | 0.8654 0.86 0.65 Cluster B | 0.679 | -0.543 | 0.408 | -0307 | 1.992 | 0.8687 1.985 | 0.9626 101 0.32 Cluster C | 0.680 | -0545 | 0.406 | -0.305 | 1995 | 0.8677 1.987 | 0.8623 Al 0.29 Cluster D | 0.680_| -0.547 | 0.403 | -0.304 | 1.996 | 0.8665 1.991_| 0.8620 131 0.26 Cluster E | 0.680 | -0.549 | 0.400 | -0.302 | 1.997 | 0.8648 1993 | 0.8614 1.40 0.19 Reference | 0.666 | -0534 | 0.385 | -0.302 = = 1.965 | 0.8598 = i F8 ate B47) Mola S dels] depot 5. a at FAYS BGS FE A 319) Molde 24) 2%, 4 1A Add al ag Re dy led adwey pala AVBLZA SE Ab Sass Suan Hts B Haw BAA} FYB UWBW FE IES ahah. 4. IAS 7l718 USSads AAHE TRE AXASS 4 Set7] Nal AABA vis] AWAABDesign of experiment) J@ VYBS SAITSS B re + ME HILAS Hespojoh shea], E APIS ABISY BMS YRS spo} 4 ABMAINS S4NTS2] VHS Bah 2, aYAgwose Aso #e 29 (Latin Hypercube Sampling)"7)'8-2 AlB-8te} 30 AMY ABBS BA. o] AWS mxny Wa & PRAHA AIA me 4 VF AS aye FY + (MEY FID, ne AABF9) Folch. 14E] mz] AMS EGHE BA v7 @ Ate sedsoA7Vs Tas] AA WIS aAad. as, dass] PE eS AE He BAAS ol YS Sel Gola. MAS-AGAZ ASAE GSSAds aa WAS Deb So] Yai AWA NSGAM 2 =7} hybrid MOEAS 98) AHS) 2iCh. NSGA-IL ol Sieh Sola ASS Belst7) sal FHIGs o] ASSeul le Hal B APE sop (Sequential Quadratic Programming)" A}$-8}0} AAASS Peach. Palys] BA eae) SU spe A71zel Het AA go] Aa + ROLES 7K fe] UW wBal7b} AS a ABSe FAW. +¥e7)] a eae F584 aso] SS ASe7) Aste} RANS #4 Ass} WE VA tl Ae AVAso) wae Kim Fo} Ja Bus|aich ee AVS AG aay Aap AS Aas] Ad Art JERS asp) a @ WAS Gadtzl aeto] S isda) sows] Aa Atol4Al co} Fol zoo, a a 3 Alte ABD AA Bape SF 26s ABIRG. Fig. 26 4133/29 23} NsGA-tol Ve B80 BqE-AAAS vole. Jays FA ol Fk hybrid MOEAS Sel eho} a 2G AgdSS eho, seysy Glustering)= Set} so] APIS TsRD, Table 2°] RANS AAS Say Atel Sd aed a4 ge 4 Aas Aqas hybrid MOEAS $3 AS SANTI RSS WRIAG. AAUFSL Ute St waa al Padasiach. ABTS YB FEE A SVG WAS Hon) HA BE SB le Tas Ta 1985 2 ‘Total pressure ratio Fig. 2 Pareto-optimal solutions by hybrid MOEA.HSmtt, Hooo)7t AA GERD, 1 Se By HEY UATE BH aad7t 7H Ba ERE H. EMA Bete] so] AAW 2S RR UF US] St AS a F Ut. ol wy 2 ade Fa 3a FaAAeds aaa & ati gay} a2 299g 4ssay 7 qq SAS TAU G, Bay} 2S SAA SPAAY FESR Sats BSE Sse SPOS AAS ME A] STS 27 24 6. az 2 APAME Adds ase B27) ZA aH RANS M4 AAdet SVS Ae hybrid MOEAS ol-$sto} gle} aatoy ase aaaae +¥etac. age Age 39 APES Holl zo] Aus Bag ano] MTS ASsle Ut AUIe veces FECA Af BHA NSGAME ©] she] SHEA AIS PSAs, FYAPYS Sate] sa] JABS FAs. AAP AVse +A as, 48rd Re Bayle] sete] 2p ANSVt4 Wa Boa sats auc. 2 S79) Bae Eo|S RANS 445} hybrid MOEAS 28% FAASSAE USS AaSo) qa SAS FIG G, AS RBA Vs = T4719 Ves BAM All olay HH @ 4aedo] g aoe Yztad. anew (1) Benini, E., 2004, “Three-Dimensional Multi- Objective Design Optimization of a Transonic Compressor Rotor,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 359-565. @) Samad, A., Kim, K. ¥., and Lee, K. S, 2007, “Multi-Objective Optimization of a Turbo machinery Blade Using NSGA-II,” ASME 5” Joint ASMEWISME Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting and Exibition, California, USA, FEDSM 2007-37434. () Samad, A, and Kim, K. Y., 2008, “Shape Optimization of an Axial Compressor Blade by Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm,” Proceeding of ~97- the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A, Journal of Power and Energy, Vol. 222, No. 6, pp. 599-611 (4) Kicinger, R., Arciszewski, T:, and Jong, K. D., 2005, “Evolutionary Computation and Structure Design: A Survey of the State-of-the-art,” Computers & Structures83, pp. 1943-1978. (5) Marler, R. T., and Arora, J. S., 2004, “Survey ‘of Mult-Objective Optimization Methods for Engineering,” Structural and —Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 26, No. 6, pp. 369-395. (©) Cosentino, R, Alsalihi, Z., and Van den Braembussche, R, A., 2001, “Expert System for Radial Impeller Optimization,” Proc, Fourth Euro ean Conference on Turbomachinery, Paper No. ATE-CST-039/01 (7) ANSYS CFX ANSYS Inc. (8) Menter, F. R, Kuntz, M. and Langtry, R, 2003, “Ten Years of Industrial Experience with the SST Turbulence Model,” Turbulence, Heat ‘and Mass Transfer 4, Begell House, New York. (9) Bardina, J. E, and Huang, P. G., Coakley, T., 1997, “Turbulence Modeling Validation,” 4144, pp. 97-2121 (10) Orr, M. J. L, 1996, “Introduction to Radial Basis. Neural Network,” Center for Cognitive Science, Edinburgh University, UK, bttpiane.ed.oc.uk/RBNN’. (11) JMP® 5.1, 2004, SAS Institute, Inc. (12) Deb, K, Agrawal, $, Pratap, A. and Meyarivan, T., 2000, “A Fast and Blitist Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm for Malti- Objective Optimization: NSGA-II,” Proceeding of the Parallel Problem Solving from Nature VI Conference, Paris, pp. 849-858 (3) MATLAB®, The Language of Technical Computing, Release 14, 2004, The Math Works Ine. (14) Kim, J.-H, Choi, JH, and Kim, KY, 2008, “Design Optimization of a Centrifugal ‘Compressor Impeller Considering the Meridional Plane,” KFMA Annual Meeting 2008, Jeju, Korea, pp. 385-390. 11.0 Reference Guide, 2007, Scotland,