Retraction Notice

Retraction Notice: “I am not

alone – we are all alone: Using Qualitative Research
2022, Vol. 22(6) NP2–NP3
© The Author(s) 2022
masturbation as an
ethnographic method in Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
research on shota subculture in DOI: 10.1177/14687941221122713
journals.sagepub.com/home/qrj

Japan”

At the request of the Journal Editors and the Publisher, the following note has been
retracted and removed:

Andersson K (2022) I am not alone – we are all alone: Using masturbation as an eth-
nographic method in research on shota subculture in Japan. Qualitative Research. Epub
ahead of print 26 April 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941221096600

Having reviewed editorial and peer review processes in relation to this note, the Journal
Editors have concluded that there was a lack of clarity and hence ethical scrutiny at the
time of the initial submission. This was particularly so in relation to institutional location
and position, and ethical review of the work. While the Journal has systems in place to flag
ethical concerns raised by article submissions prior to review, those same systems do not
fully extend to note submissions. The two peer reviewers who considered the note did not
raise ethical concerns in relation to the method and material in their reviews.
The author has now explained that the work described in this note was carried out as a
piece of independent research in Germany, without institutional ethical oversight. The
author stated that they followed professional ethical guidelines for their discipline, in-
cluding the primary injunction to ‘do no harm’. The Editorial Team notes that such
principles also refer to the need for the thoughtful consideration of potential unintended
consequences of research, and the need to weigh competing ethical obligations.
The Editors are mindful of arguments that moral offense generated by the publication of
the note provides problematic grounds for the censoring of scholarship. However, the
Editorial Team recognises the argument that the note legitimizes sexual activity involving
sexually graphic illustrated images of children and young people, both as an activity in
itself and as a research method. Such arguments make the note highly problematic due to
the potential to cause significant harm.
The Journal Editors believe ethical conduct and oversight in relation to research, method,
methodology and publication is not a single event, but an ongoing process with shared and
NP3 Qualitative Research 22(6)

overlapping responsibilities between the author, the academic institution(s), the journal,
and the publisher. On reflection, due to the potential for significant harm caused by the
publication of this work compounded by ethical issues surrounding the conception and
design, the Journal Editors have made the decision to retract and remove the note.
This retraction notice replaces the previous removal notice for this note.

The Journal Editors and the Publisher sincerely apologise to readers who were negatively
impacted by the publication of this work.