eS
Module, challenge yourself ¢o attain the follow
taxonomy.
the use of technology apps in applying the revised taxonomy.
Tymagine that you are already working as a teacher. How would you
ffyou enter your classroom without specific learning outcomes? How
mld you proceed without clear and specific targets? Being sure about
jearning outcomes will help you to facilitate learning &fectively.
fii appropriate, clear and specific leaming,outcomes, you do not need
guess nor grope in the dark on what to accomplish.
This Module will present the original and the revised Bloom’s
Tuonomy of Educational Objectives. Although the revised taxonomy
tame out years ago, it is important to still present both the old and the
Heised to have a complete understanding and better appreciati
fmonomy’s use in education.
Benjamin Bloom
ion of the 4913-1999
He was the
Associate Director
of the Board for
Examination in
the University of
The Original Bloom's Taxonomy oa Chicago. They
needed a.way
y of cassiying
#Six Levels of Bloom's Taxonomy ‘questions shared
eens cnerecamcncnanas bby faculty members
a - to form a test bank.
je For six years, from
Revised Taxonomy "4949 to 1956, he
led a group of
exper to come Up
wi a framework to
classy objectives.combine, formulate, dese
take apart, examing, compe
uuse, work with, utiling
describe, retell, explain
enumerate, list, define
Clues
separate, compare, organize
practice, implement, show
We hope the clues helped you get them all right!
explain, discuss, defin
recall, name, li
Are the answers in Group B nouns or verbs?_ Nur
_ Read the answers again. What do you notice about the order by which the
words in Group A and B were presented? Write the answers here again“The words you unscrambled in Grot ‘ -
omain of the old Bloom’s Taxonomy, You ae = ae aoe See
Group A ate all nouns. ‘The words in Group B are the levels in the cognitive
domain in the Revised Taxonomy. You are right again, The words in G
B are verbs. This is one of the main differences of the old and the revised
taxonomies
Read on to lear about the old and the revised Bloom’s taxonomy. You
will definitely find this very relevant and useful to you as a future teacher.
Old Taxonomy
In 1956, the Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of
Rducational Goals Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain was published. Initially, the
purpose was simply to have a framework to classify test questions that faculty
members shared. Eventually, it became so relevant and useful in education.
Since then, it has been used. in planning the curriculum, planning learning,
activities and assessment. Bloom and his colleagues published Handbook If,
The Affective Domain in 1964. Eventually, other experts published a taxonomy
for the psychomotor domain in 1966, 1970 and 1972.
This Module will focus more on the cognitive domain.
Bloom’s taxonomy was a model that deseribed the different levels of
.d competencies the teachers aim:
learning outcomes that target what skills an 2
develop in the learners. The taxonomy in the cognitive domain containsand principles, these are broken down in
re contrast, classify, further investigag =
evel of thinking. > ete,
F thinking is when students put together elem,
ed ina new way (synthesis). They come up with
fntegrated, or even new view oF perspective gh
[grasp of what was learned, the students can now assess g,
ist of standards, on what they have learned (evaluation,
“cognitive domain levels. or thinking levels also have subcategories
for that of application. The next Table shows the original taxonomy
s levels, subcategories and sample verbs.
vare'some examples of learning outcomes using the taxonomy:
The Original Bloom’s Taxonomy
Cognitive Domain Levels and their Subcategories
Sample Vi
define, describe, draw, inden
label, locate, memorize, name,
reciti e, Select, state,
write
nowledge of ways and means of dealing with
ae specifics
1.2.1 conventions
1.2.2 trends and sequences
“1.2.3 classifications and categories
1.24 criteria
12,5 methodology
ledge of universals and abstractions in the
gal 3.1 prneiples and generalizations
[.3.2_theories“and structures
paraphrase,
summarize, restate,
tetell, illustrate
apply, change,
prepare, produce,production ofa plan, or
operations PK
53___derivation ofa set of as
in terms of internal evi
io terms of teael aed
tthe end of the unit, the students wi
sari Tumerate the characters in “The gene
~ Summarize the story (compreheset on SU APB” (knowledge)
~ apply the rules of subject-v. =e sion)
of tlie story (application)
_ compare and contrast the qualiti
(analysis) qualities of
_ write a song expressi
(synthesis) Pressing the message or lesson of the story
= write a critique of the author's writing style (evaluation)
‘greement when writing a summary
the characters in the story
pevised Taxonomy
After 45 years since the publication of Bloom’s taxonomy, Lorin Anderson
{Bloom's former student) and David Krathwohl led a new group of experts
work together. The result was what is now called the revised taxonomy.
Below are the salient differences between the old and the revised
taxonomies (You may refer to Figure 1 on page 174 while you are reading
this.):
1. Levels or categories of thinking in the old taxonomy were nouns, while
in the revised taxonomy they are verbs. The use of action words instead:
of nouns was done to highlight that thinking is an active process.
For example, evaluate instead of evaluation, or analyze instead of
analysis.
2. While the revised taxonomy remains to be in hierarchical levels of
increasing complexity, itis intended to be more flexible, in that it
allows the categories to overlap. For example some action words in
understand level, like explain, may appear to be more complex than
the action word, show in the apply level. However, when we look into
the six levels from remember to create, we ‘will still find that, over-all,
the taxonomy proceeds in a hierarchical order. ‘
3. The knowledge level was changed to remember. The change was
made because knowledge does not refer to a cognitive or ‘thinking.on includes four knowledge categories: fygy
“metacognitive, The knowledge that teachery “™h
Tearn can be about facts, concepts, Procedures s
mentor ming objectives, you consider what
Gun) ae vathia achieve, and aisn er Fe. or
wledge it is you want to teach. of
When we write aleamingobjetve, the level of thinking is reps,
by the verb, while the knowledge dimensions is represented by the noun, ;
[the example, “at the end ofthe lesson, the leamer will be able to: explain
Photosynthesis process,” explain is the action word which will fall under
Second cognitive dimension level, understand, and photosynthesis isthe nyt
that will fall under procedural knowledge.
‘ Below is a table that shows how the cognitive and knowledge dimensiog
‘Pair t0 form various kinds of leaming objectives and activities. An examys
for each pairing is given. Study each one to learn more.
Knowledge Dimension
oo
Conceptual Procedural | Metacognitive
Subject- Strategie
specific skills, | knowledge,
algorithms, cognitive tasks.
techniques and | contextual and
conditional
Classifications,
ogy, specific | categories,
details, ele- | principles and
‘ments generalizations,
theories, mod- | methods,
els, structures | criteria for knowledge,
determining _| self-knowledge
when to use the
procedures
Remember- | Remember- Remember-
Metacognitive
Knowledge
Remember-
Facts Concepts Procedures
Ex. Listthe | Ex.Describe | Ex, Recall the | Ex. Review
ingredients | kare-kare as a | steps in cooking | tasks
| ofkare-kare | Filipino dish | kare-kare accomplished
in cooking
kare-kareT Analyze
smart phone
model
Apply-
Facts
Ex. Use facts
in answering
questions,
‘Analyze-
differentiate,
organize,
autribute
Facts
Ex. Iden-
tify the key
words in the
definition of
anger
Ex. Iden-
tify triggers of
anger among
teenagers
5. Evaluate
Check,
critique
Evaluate-
| Facts
Ex. Select
the most
| complete
list of
investment
banks
Evaluate-
Concepts
Ex. Critique the
different views
about financial
literacyUsing the Revised Taxonomy
When you are ready to plan your units, lessons or activities, Bloom's taxonom,
ing you formulate your learning objectives. Below is a collciaa
‘very usefil in help °
action words and possible activities or work which you can use for your Plan,
[Cognitive
‘Sample Action Words
Suggested Activities, On
or Outcomes mal
Recitations, worksheets,
‘Remember
| Dimension Levels
| Gecalling information)
| List
Desoribe
Locate
Write
State Find
Tell Underline
Reproduce Define
Recall
‘Name
definitions, fact charts, lists
Understand
(explaining
information and
concepts
Explain Describe
Translate Define
Interpret Report
Discuss Predict
Story problems, drawing
show and tell, s
paraphrasing
Apply
new way)
(using information ina
Use Practice
Solve Execute
Implement Demonstrate
Construct Dramatize
Presentation, role-playing,
simulation, collection, model,
scrapbook, product
Analyze
distinguishing
different parts of a
whole
Compare Contrast
Distinguish Separate
Investigate Differentiate
Infer Sequence
Chart, plan, questionnaire,
spreadsheet, summary, survey
Evaluate
(defending a concept’
Assess ‘Appraise
Debate Check
. | Defend Decide
Dispute Justify
Judge Rate
Change
Design
Formulate
Improve
Plan
Propose
Invent
Devise
Generate
Compose
Combine
Opinion, judgment,
recommendation, report, self-
evaluation, position paper, critique
Framework, model, story, ,
multimedia presentation, poem,
haiku, song, essay‘think of topic you are really inte,
it on this topic.
at least 10 leaming outcomes:
| Whee veoh wor 1 ond whey yun con ed”
‘Leaming Outcomes
VeKaning Ge aierere, Yawern 4d, Nay). ond 995
Give cromges A atlids, Kavide ord gp sth
COS aS bY" vtehr thes, o Oa, ligula
Voudiln he dotadanca, of Id
Virion We drorodeatties ch Wald.
| deat Ne dowordaie 1 __ 98
Tesodge . the REA, NALCO, gon oF
Cowity aixds ad nds 05 91d) gud