Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Traumas Face
Traumas Face
KVS
To be able to recognize life
threatening nature of facial injuries –
Airway obstruction, associated head &
spinal injuries.
Method of examining facial injuries.
Diagnosis & principles of management
of facial injuries
3
Road traffic
accidents
Intentional
violence
Sporting
activities
High Impact:
◦ Supraorbital rim – 200 G
◦ Symphysis of the Mandible –100 G
◦ Frontal – 100 G
◦ Angle of the mandible – 70 G
Low Impact:
◦ Zygoma – 50 G
◦ Nasal bone – 30 G
At 60% of patients with severe
facial trauma have multisystem
trauma and the potential for
airway compromise.
◦ 20-50% concurrent brain injury.
◦ 1-4% cervical spine injuries.
◦ Blindness occurs in 0.5-3%
KVS
Based on
Targeting care: Glasgow Coma Scale
(GCS)
Predicting outcome: Abbreviated
Injury Scale (AIS) and Injury Severity
Score(ISS)
Assessing critically injured patients:
APACHE II
KVS
Triage the causalities
(sorting for prioritization)
A: airway with cervical spine control
B: breathing and ventilation
C: circulation and hemorrhage control
D: disability due to neurologic deficit
E: exposure and environment control
KVS
Injuries to facial skeleton →
Immediate airway
obstruction
KVS
inhalation of tooth fragments
KVS
Control airway:
◦ Chin lift.
◦ Jaw thrust.
◦ Oropharyngeal suctioning.
◦ Manually move the tongue
forward.
◦ Maintain cervical immobilization
Avoid nasotracheal intubation:
◦ Nasocranial intubation
◦ Nasal hemorrhage
Avoid Rapid Sequence Intubation:
◦ Failure to intubate or ventilate.
Consider awake intubation.
Sedate with benzodiazepines.
Consider fiberoptic intubation if
available.
Alternatives include percutaneous
transtracheal ventilation and
retrograde intubation.
Be prepared for
cricothyroidotomy.
Maxillofacial bleeding:
◦ Direct pressure.
◦ Avoid blind clamping in wounds.
Nasal bleeding:
◦ Direct pressure.
◦ Anterior and posterior packing.
Pharyngeal bleeding:
◦ Packing of the pharynx around ET tube.
KVS
Obtain a history from the patient,
witnesses and or EMS
Specific Questions:
◦ Was there LOC? If so, how long?
◦ How is your vision?
◦ Hearing problems?
KVS
Specific Questions:
◦ Is there pain with eye movement?
◦ Are there areas of numbness or
tingling on your face?
◦ Is the patient able to bite down
without any pain?
◦ Is there pain with moving the jaw?
KVS
ATLS standard
approach
Inspection
Palpation
Visual examination
Eye movement
Diplopia
Pupil reaction
19
Inspection of the face for asymmetry.
Inspect open wounds for foreign
bodies.
Palpate the entire face.
◦ Supraorbital and Infraorbital rim
◦ Zygomatic-frontal suture
◦ Zygomatic arches
KVS
Inspect the nose for asymmetry,
telecanthus, widening of the nasal
bridge.
Inspect nasal septum for septal
hematoma, CSF or blood.
Palpate nose for crepitus, deformity
and subcutaneous air.
Palpate the zygoma along its arch and
its articulations with the maxilla,
frontal and temporal bone.
Check facial stability.
Inspect the teeth for malocclusions, bleeding and
step-off.
Intraoral examination:
◦ Manipulation of each tooth.
◦ Check for lacerations.
◦ Stress the mandible.
◦ Tongue blade test.
Palpate the mandible for
tenderness, swelling and step-off.
KVS
Upper third – above the
eyebrows – involves
frontal sinuses &
supraorbital ridges
Lower third --
Mandible
Frontal Sinus/ Bone Fractures
Diagnosis
Radiographs:
◦ Facial views should include
Waters, Caldwell and lateral
projections.
◦ Caldwell view best evaluates
the anterior wall fractures.
KVS
CT Head with
bone windows:
◦ Frontal sinus
fractures.
◦ Orbital rim and
nasoethmoidal
fractures.
◦ R/O brain injuries
or intracranial
bleeds.
Fractures that extend
into the nose through
the ethmoid bones.
Associated with
lacrimal disruption and
dural tears.
Suspect if there is
trauma to the nose or
medial orbit.
Patients complain of
pain on eye movement.
Clinical findings:
◦ Flattened nasal bridge or a saddle-shaped
deformity of the nose.
◦ Widening of the nasal bridge (telecanthus)
◦ CSF rhinorrhea or epistaxis.
◦ Tenderness, crepitus, and mobility of the nasal
complex.
◦ Intranasal palpation reveals movement of the
medial canthus.
KVS
Three types of NOE fractures
– Type I: Large fragment of medial orbit, medial
canthal insertion is intact
KVS
Examination for
determination of the extent
of the injury (surgical
exploration)
Nasal bone
Orbital and ethmoidal
Frontal bone
30
Increase in inter-canthal
distance secondary to
canthus displacement or
detachment
31
Transnasal wiring
technique (unilateral
type)
Canthopexy
◦ Identification of the
ligament
◦ Liberation of the
periorbital tissue
◦ Liberation of the lacrimal
pathway
◦ Nasal transfixation
◦ Contralateral fixation
32
Anatomy
Star-shape like with four processes
Frontal process
Temporal process
Buttress
Orbital floor (Maxilla and GWSB)
Temporal fascia
and muscle
Masseter muscle
33
The malar bone represent a
strong bone on fragile
supports, and it is for this
reason that, though the
body of the bone is rarely
broken, the four processes-
frontal, orbital, maxillary
and zygomatic are frequent
sites of fracture.
35
Trismus
Abnormal nerve sensibility
Epistaxis
Subconjunctival ecchymosis
Crepitation from air
emphysema
Displacement of palpebral
fissure (pseudoptosis)
Unequal pupillary levels
Diplopia
enophthalmos
36
Occipitomental view
(Posterioanterior oblique)
(water’s view)
37
submentovertex
38
CT scan
Coronal sections
Axial sections
39
Timing:
As early as possible unless there are
ophthalmic, cranial or medical complications
Indications:
•Diplopia
•Restriction of mandibular movement
•Restoration of normal contour
•Restoration of normal skeletal protection for the eye
40
Temporal approach (Gillies et al
1927)
• Buccal
sulcus
approach
(Keen 1909)
41
Rigid fixation using plate and screws at
Frontozygomatic suture
Infraorbial rim
Inferior buttress of the zygoma
Surgery:
42
Points of fixation:
open reduction.
54
Anatomy
The floor is made
of: Maxillary bone
and part of zygoma
bounded laterally
by the inferior
orbital fissure and
small part of the
ethmoid bone
55
Subconjunctival ecchymosis
Displacement of palpebral
fissure
Diplopia
enophthalmos
56
Rational for intervention:
57
Intra-sinus
approach to the
orbital floor
External approach
to the internal
orbital floor
58
Autologous graft
Bone (cranial, rib, iliac)
Cartilage
Allogenic materials
Lyophilized dura
Alloplastic
materials
Siliastic and proplast
implants
Teflon
hydroxyapatite
Titanium mish
59
Mandibular fractures
are the third most
common facial fracture.
Assaults and falls on
the chin account for
most of the injuries.
Multiple fractures are
seen in greater then
50%.
Associated C-spine
injuries – 0.2-6%.
KVS
Sites of weakness
◦ Third molar (esp. impacted)
◦ Socket of canine tooth
◦ Condylar neck
Masseter, Medial and Lateral Pterygoid, and
Temporalis tend to draw fractures medial and
superior
Almost all fractures of angle unfavorable
Complete Head and Neck exam
◦ Palpable step off
◦ Tenderness to palpation
◦ Malocclusion
◦ Trismus (35 mm or less)
◦ Sublingual hematoma
◦ Altered sensation of V3
◦ Crepitus
Mandibular pain.
Malocclusion of the
teeth
Separation of teeth
with intraoral bleeding
Inability to fully open
mouth.
Preauricular pain with
biting.
.
Unilateral fractures of Condyle
◦ Decreased translational movement, functional
height of condyle
◦ Deviation of chin away from fracture, open bite
opposite side of fracture
Bilateral fractures of condyle
- Anterior open bite
Panorex (OPG)
X ray skull Reverse towns view.
X Ray mandible PA View, Lateral oblique views
TMJ views
CT scan
◦ Not as diagnostic as plain films
for nondisplaced fractures of
mandible.
◦ Most useful for coronoid and
condylar fractures, associated
midface fractures
DZS
Favorable, non-displaced fractures
Grossly comminuted fractures when
adequate stabilization unlikely
Severely atrophic edentulous
mandible
Children with developing dentition
Displaced unfavorable fractures
Mandible fractures with
associated midface fractures
When MMF contraindicated or not
possible
Patient comfort
Facilitate return to work
Associated condylar fracture
Associated Midface fractures
Psychiatric illness
GI disorders involving severe N/V
Severe malnutrition
To avoid tracheostomy in patients who
need postoperative intubation
Contraindications
◦ General Anesthetic risk too high
◦ Severe comminution and
stabilization not possible
◦ No soft tissue to cover fracture
site
◦ Bone at fracture site diffusely
infected (controversial)
Length of MMF
◦ Fracture at angle of mandible for adults :
4 wks
◦ Add 2 wks more for symphysis fracture
◦ Add 2 wks for geriatric patients
(edentulous)
◦ Less 1 wk for peadiatric mandibular
fractures.
◦ Less 1 wk for condylar fractures.
◦ Rigid fixation
1. Compression plates (DCP)
2. Lag screws
◦ Semirigid fixation
1. Miniplates
2. Transosseous wiring
3. External fixators
Compression plates
◦ Rigid fixation
◦ Allow primary bone healing
◦ Difficult to bend
◦ Operator dependent
◦ No need for MMF
Lag Screws
◦ Rigid fixation (Compression)
◦ Good for anterior mandible fractures,
Oblique body fractures, mandible
angle fractures
◦ Cheap
◦ Technically difficult
◦ Injury to inferior alveolar
neurovascular bundle
Miniplates
◦ Semi-rigid fixation
◦ Mono cortical screws
◦ Uses tension band principle
◦ Allows primary and secondary bone
healing
◦ Easily bendable
◦ More forgiving
Areas of tension and compression
2 mm plates
Monocortical screws.
Placed in favourable positions on mandible.
Micromovements possible favourable to
healing.
Technically not highly demanding.
Plate removal is not routinely required.
KVS
Alternative form of rigid
fixation
Grossly comminuted fractures,
contaminated fractures, non-
union
Often used when all else fails
Lindhal and Hollender
◦ Closed reduction in children, teens,
adults
◦ Intracapsular fractures
◦ Higher incidence of postoperative
sequelae in adults
◦ Children and Teens with less
sequelae, more remodeling
ORIF, Absolute indications
◦ Displacement into middle cranial
fossa
◦ Inability to achieve occlusion
with closed reduction
◦ Foreign body in joint space
Relative indications
◦ Bilateral condylar fractures to
preserve vertical height
◦ Associated injuries that dictate
earlier function
Soft tissue swelling causing airway
compromise with MMF
Intracapsular fracture on opposite
side where early mobilization
important
Expose all fracture sites
Reconstruct the AP projection of face, start from
stable post area (temporal bone, proximal arch
Reconstruct the width of the face across
zygomatic arches (frontozygomatic suture)
Recreate NOE area.
Restore height (fix ramus fractures)
Restore occlusion.
Repair the fractures in maxilla and mandible
closer to teeth bearing areas
PGM