Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Heat Transfer
Heat Transfer
COURSE PROJECT
Submitted By-
Name Roll No
Samiksha Patil 61
Sanjana Patil 62
Tanaya Patil 63
Vaibhav Patil 64
Aditya Pawar 65
1
INDEX
SR TITLE PAGE
NO NO
1 ABSTRACT 3
2 INTRODUCTION 4
4 WORKING CONDITIONS 6
6 PROCESS 7
7 RECTANGULAR FIN 9
8 TRIANGULAR FIN 11
9 TRAPEZOIDAL FIN 13
10 RESULTS 15
11 CONCLUSIONS 16
12 REFERANCES 17
2
ABSTRACT :
3
INTRODUCTION :
4
TYPES OF FINS CONSIDERED :
1 Straight Rectangular
2 Straight Triangular
4 Trapezoidal
WORKING CONDITIONS :
5
Following conditions are considered for the comparison of
performances of different shaped fins. These conditions are
considered such that they correspond to practical conditions.
SR NO CONDITION VALUES
1. Length of Fin (L) 5 cm
4. Ambient Temperature (T 0 ¿ 25 C
PROCESS :
6
1) Body is created in CATIA and saved in .stp form. Then it is
imported to ANSYS Workbench.
8
The profile of this type of fin is rectangular. This is the most
basic type of fin. The model of the fin can also be created in the
ANSYS but here CATIA mode is used. Three solutions are found out
using the ANSYS workbench: Temperature, Total Heat Flux and
Reaction Probe. Reaction Probe tells us about the total heat lost. Base
side is set at the base temperature and conditions of convections are
applied at the other five faces. The conditions used are already
mentioned.
9
The next solution is the Reaction Probe which gives the total
heat loss. For the rectangular profile the heat loss is found out to be
45.229 Watt. The more the heat loss, more will be the fin
effectiveness.
45.22
Therefore, effectiveness of fin = 3.9375 = 11.48
45.22
Therefore, efficiency of fin = 50.948 x 100 = 88.75 %
10
2)Triangular Fin
The profile of this type of fin is triangular. The area which is
perpendicular to conduction heat transfer changes continuously from
base side to the tip of the fin. This variation in area can be easily
found out by some mathematical calculations. As compared to the
rectangular profile fin this fin has less area of contact with the
surrounding. This can affect the performance of the fin. The
temperature profile for this type of fin is as follows :
We can see that the base temperature is maximum and its value
is 200 C. The temperature decreases gradually as expected as we
move from the base to the tip of the fin. The minimum temperature
observed here is 193.41 C which is less as compared to that of
rectangular fin. The following picture shows the total heat flux for the
triangular fin. The observed trend is somewhat irregular, we get the
minimum total heat flux at the tip of the fin and the maximum total
heat flux is observed at the corners of the base side.
The next solution is the total heat lost to the surrounding by the
fin. In this case, the total heat lost is 40.141 Watt. This value is less as
compared to the heat loss by rectangular profile fin. Also the
maximum and minimum total flux values differ from that of the
11
rectangular profile fin. Using these all parameters the performance of
fins can be compared easily.
40.141
Therefore, Effectiveness = 3.9375 = 10.19
40.141
Therefore, Efficiency = 47.315 x 100 = 84.83 %
3)Trapezoidal Fin
12
The profile of this type of fin is trapezoidal. The area
perpendicular to the direction of conduction heat flow also varies in
this type of fin. Also, the variation in area can be found out. The base
thickness of this fin is 1 centimetre and the thickness at the tip is
considered to be 0.5 centimetre. This fin has less area of contact with
the surrounding as compared to the rectangular fin but has more area
of contact as compared to the triangular profile fin. The variation in
temperature for this type of fin is shown in the following picture :
13
42.665
Therefore, Effectiveness = 3.9375 = 10.83
42.665
Therefore, Efficiency = 49.589 x 100 = 86.03 %
RESULTS :
14
The various results that we have found out for each
fin are enlisted below :
SR
N PARAMETERS RECTANGULA TRIANGULAR TRAPEZOIDAL
O R
CONCLUSIONS :
15
I. From the results that we have found out, the max
efficiency is observed for Rectangular Fin and least
efficiency is observed for Triangular Fin and the
efficiency of trapezoidal fin is between these two.
REFERENCES :
1) Heat and Mass Transfer by Cengel and Ghajar.
16
2)https://www.ansys.com/academic/free-student-
products/support-resources.
5)https://sites.ualberta.ca/~wmoussa/AnsysTutorial/
17