Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jabeen & Tahir
Jabeen & Tahir
Jabeen & Tahir
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non
Commercial 4.0 International License (https://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
which permits non-Commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further
permission provided the original work is attributed as specified.
© Copyright: The Authors (2023)
Predictors of OCD Jabeen & Tahir
acts as a reinforcer and individual learns to and shared patterns of behavior are linked
act again the same way whenever he (Briley & Tucker-Drob, 2017), hence, they
reexperiences those thoughts (compulsion) are associated with developing a child's
(Bridley & Daffin, 2023). cognitive world. Psychiatric morbidity in
Parental relationship is very important in children is largely associated with
forming the layout of relationship styles of psychiatric illness in their first-degree
the individual in the future. Psychoanalytic relatives (having it in a parent or sibling
point of view emphasizes that early mother (i.e., 71%) (Behere et al., 2017).
child relationship is the basis of all Different factors in the family environment
relationships an individual may form in the have been associated with shaping a child’s
future. Interparental conflict is associated personality and behavior. Stress and
with self-esteem of adolescents (Yaacob, financial problems faced by the family for
2006). The controlling and punishing example have a negative influence on child
parenting style can lead to personality development across many domains
problems such as neuroticism, (Masarik & Conger, 2017). Parental
extroversion, and psychoticism (Zhang et education is also reported to be a causal
al., 2021). Obsessive compulsive disorder factor in shaping children’s schooling.
was put under variable taxonomies before it Family income also has a link with family
was put under the category of obsessive disruption and personality development.
compulsive and related disorders in the Obsessive compulsive disorder is not an
DSM 5-TR (APA, 2022). Categorization of exception. A number of etiological
OCD varied consistently with literature elements have been attributed to OCD
finding some new variant in its causation ranging from genetic and organic to
(APA, 2022; Insel, 1990). behavioral and personality factors. Home
Compulsions are usually divided into two environment was reported as an etiological
types - yielding and controlling factor by a significant number of OCD
compulsions (cc) (Akhtar et al., 1975; sample (i.e., 27.3%) (Jabeen, 2008).
Shooka et al., 1998). Patients with Emotional warmth is negatively related
Obsessive compulsive disorder use with OCD while high parental control,
different ways to control their obsessive parental punishment and overprotection are
thoughts and avoid or neutralize them e.g., positively related with OCD (Zhang et al.,
distraction and controlling compulsions 2021). Experience of trauma and family
(Comer, 1992). These compulsions involve psychiatric history leading to readmission
acts that would cancel out the undesirable of children to hospital with behavioral
impulse (Doron, 2006). Repetition of holy issues accentuates the significance of
verses, attempt to divert thoughts, family environment (Behere et al., 2017).
repetition of self-generated sentences, head Obsessive compulsive disorder runs in
jerking/shaking to get rid of thoughts and families (Nestadt et al., 2000; Purty et al.,
repetition of Kalma are a few examples 2019). Life-time prevalence of OCD is
which patients with OCD use to control recorded to be significantly higher in
their obsessional thoughts. Repetition of relatives of case compared to control
holy verse and repetition of Kalma are sample. Obsessive compulsive disorder
reported to be the highly loaded factors probands are five times more likely to have
(Jabeen, 2008). life-time prevalence of OCD compared to
Family members are the child's first contact their control counterparts (Nestadt et al.,
in their external world. Hence, it is 2000). Childhood anxiety and parental
understandable that family environment control has also been linked (van der
plays an important role in the mental health Bruggen et al., 2008; Smith, 2022). Local
of children (Behere et al., 2017). Family research is scarce with regard to OCD
members’ cognitions and their individual especially controlling compulsions.
of their parents when they were under 16 parental style with psychopathology has
years. These two parenting dimensions been recommended in the literature (Kapci
further identify four types of parenting & Kucuker, 2006). Therefore, the study
styles e.g., Optimal parenting, Affectionate opted to investigate the parental bonding
constraint, Affectionless control and and its relationship with OCD.
Neglectful parenting. Optimal parentingiii) Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Symptom
implicates high care and low Checklist (Jabeen & Kausar, 2010) was
overprotection. On the other hand, used to assess the symptoms of controlling
Affectionate constraints involves low care compulsions of OCD in the participants. It
and high overprotection, Affectionate is an indigenous measure developed in
control conceptualizes low care and high Pakistan. Alpha for obsessions and
overprotection and Low care and low controlling compulsions subscales was
overprotection conceptualizes Neglectful reported to be 0.80 and 0.70 respectively.
parenting.
Parental Bonding Instrument has been rated Results
as a reliable and valid measure based on Data were analyzed using Statistical
several studies. Dimensions of PBI for Package for Social Sciences, version 21
Father form is reported to be highly reliable (SPSS-v21). Descriptive statistics were
for overprotecting/controlling and care i.e., used to estimate demographic
0.90 and 0.70 respectively. Dimensions for characteristics of the sample. Inferential
PBI for Mother Form is also reported to be statistics (e.g., correlation analysis,
highly reliable for hierarchical regression (stepwise) analyses
overprotecting/controlling and care i.e., were carried out to explore the predictors of
0.91 and 0.70 respectively (Kapci & OCD cc.
Kucuker, 2006). Exploring the link of
Table 1
Sociodemographic Characteristics of the Sample (N=130)
Variables Men (n =65) Women (n =65)
Age (years) f Percentage f Percentage
20 - 30 36 55 42 65
31 - 40 18 28 17 26
41 50 11 17 6 9
Birth order
First 32 49 22 34
Second 15 23 18 28
Third 7 11 12 18
Fourth 5 8 3 5
Fifth 3 5 1 1
Sixth and above 3 4 9 14
Education
Under Matric 8 12 8 12
Matric 20 31 17 26
Intermediate 16 25 10 15
Graduate 16 25 15 23
Master 5 8 15 23
Marital Status
Unmarried 34 52 29 45
Married 28 43 32 49
Widow/divorced 3 5 4 6
Family
System
Nuclear 27 42 28 43
Joint 38 58 37 57
Family
Income
10000 – 30000 43 66 42 65
31000 - 50000 13 20 15 23
51000 - 70000 2 3 2 3
71000 - 90000 1 1 1 1
Up to 100000 6 9 5 8
Descriptive analysis shows that 87% of the years of education. Over 50% were single
participants were in the age range of 21- 40 (unmarried, divorced or widow). A
years which are the most productive years significant number of the participants were
of life. More than 60% had acquired 8 to 12 first born (e.g., 41%) (Table 1).
Table 2
Intercorrelation of Family Environment, Parental Bonding (mother. father) and OCDSC
(N=130)
Measures 1 2 3 4 M SD
FES - 27** .31** .19* 220.4 21.5
PBI (M) - - .72 -.02 44.24 6.76
PBI (F) - - - -0.03 41.85 8.11
OCDSC 86.61 18.84
Note: FES=Family environment scale, PBI (F) = Parental bonding instrument (Father), FBI (M) =
Parental bonding instrument (Mother), OCDSC= Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Symptom Checklist.
*p<.05, **p<.01
Table 2 shows the relationship of two significantly related with OCD (obsession
measures (FES and PBI) with OCDSC scale and controlling compulsions).
(obsession and controlling compulsion However, both types of parental bonding
subscales) it was evident that FES was (father, mother) were negatively related
with OCD, though not significant.
Table 3
Intercorrelation between Dimensions of Family Environment Scale, Parental Bonding (mother
& father) and OCDSC (obsessions & controlling compulsions subscales) (N=130)
Measures Dimensions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 M SD
FES*1
Relationship - .35* .10 .17 .28** .13 .36 -.01 42.1 7.1
Personal Growth - .51** .10 .17 .19* .12 .28** 54.3 6.7
System - .18* .12 .21* .13 .21* 19.0 3.1
Maintenance
PBI*2
Care (M)*3 - .38** 54** .48** .10 21.0 3.6
Overprotection/ - .46* .60** -.13 .10 4.5
Control (M) *
Care (F)*4 - .54** .12 20.1 3.8
Pearson correlation analysis was carried out (obsession and controlling compulsions).
to examine the relationship of dimensions Dimensions of Personal Bonding
of FES and PBI with OCDSC (obsession Instrument (PBI) overprotection/control
and controlling compulsions subscales). (M & F) both were negatively related with
The analysis showed that personal growth OCD. However. The results were not
and system maintenance dimensions of significant (Table 3).
FES were significantly related with OCD
Table 4
Hierarchical Regression (stepwise) for OCD (controlling compulsions)
Variables B 95% CI SE B Β R2 ∆R2
Step 1 LL UL
Constant 44.39** 18.42 70.35 13.1 .08 .07**
Personal Growth .78** .30 1.25 .24 .27**
Step 2
Constant 54.1** 26.81 81.51 14.0
Personal Growth (FES) .84** .36 1.31 .24 .30** .11 .10**
Table 4 shows the impact of personal while personal growth explained 30 percent
growth in FES and Over protecting, Care variance in OCD (β =.30 p < .005) with F
scale (Father) of PBI. In step 1, the R2 value (2, 127) = 7.45 p< .05. Further, over
of .07% indicates that the personal growth protecting father negatively explained 17%
dimension explained .07% variance in of variance in OCD (β = -.17 p < .01).
OCD (controlling compulsions) with F, (1, In step 3, the R2 value of .14 Indicated that
128) = 10.51, p< .05. This reveals that the dimensions of Personal growth (FES),
personal growth scale positively predicted over protecting/controlling (F) and caring
OCD (cc) (β = .27, p< .05). (F) (PBI) together explained 14 percent of
In step 2, the R2 value of .10 reveals that variance in OCD (β =.14 p<.05). Personal
Model 2 significantly predicted OCD (cc), growth dimension (FES) explained 30% of
variance in OCD (β = .27 p<.05). Care (PBI .30 p< .01) indicating overprotection from
F) explains 23 % variance in OCD (β = .23 father highly negatively predicts OCD.
p<.01). Over protecting/controlling father
explained 30% of variance in OCD (β = -
such actions. This leads to form controlling to cope with the perceived danger due to
compulsions. People in Pakistan are aggressive or sexual impulses. These
conservative especially in terms of their efforts are usually maladaptive. This can
religious beliefs and sexual thoughts. This also be a result of distorted information
may lead an individual to try hard to control processing and rigid cognitive styles which
their unwanted thoughts related to such emphasize on clarity and removing
content to avoid guilt and social ambiguity (Pittenger & King, 2017).
disapproval leading to the development of Current study examined the relationship of
controlling compulsions (Jan, 2018). parental bonding (mother and father) and
Indulging in controlling compulsions to OCD cc. Previous literature indicates a
avoid certain thoughts may satisfy family as significant link between parental bonding
well rendering them think that the person is and OCD. Poor maternal care, maternal
at least trying to avoid such socially overprotection and over control have been
disapproved thoughts. Family members’ found to be associated with OCD among
affirming attitude in this regard can also women (Chen et al., 2017). Optimal
play a reinforcing role for perpetuating the parenting involves high care and low over
problem of compulsions. protection (Parker et al., 1979). Personal
Results of the current study show that growth (of FES) and caring father (PBI F)
personal growth and system maintenance were found to be the best predictors of OCD
dimensions of Family environment and in the present research. However, high
OCD cc are related. Personal growth overprotection/controlling father (PBI F)
dimension came out as a strong predictor of showed an inverse relationship with OCD
OCD. Personal growth in FES is examined cc indicating that if there is protecting
through being encouraged and supported by father in the life of an individual there is
the family for independent decision- less likelihood of developing OCD cc may
making, social relationship and interaction be due to less stress in the individual’s life.
as well as recreational activities. Family Previous literature has established that
members are open to have social positive support from family can reduce
relationships and recreational activities and negative effects of stress and anxiety
there are not many restrictions from the (Murphy & Flessner, 2015).
family. One explanations of personal Obsessive Compulsive and Related
growth being a strongest predictor of OCD Disorders (OCRDs) have been reported to
cc may be that in a collectivistic society like have lower levels of cohesion and excessive
Pakistani being independent and active may level of abusive behavior within their
be supported in some families, however, at families (Murphy & Flessner, 2015). For
the same time it puts a huge burden of further understanding, Peris and Piacentini
responsibility on the individual as (2013) conducted positive family
individuation is not encouraged across interaction therapy with 20 youth
situations. This may lead to a sense of diagnosed with OCD. The study found a
excessive responsibility inducing sense of significant reduction in the symptoms with
over cautious. This process can result in improved family functioning. It is evident
excessive thinking and rumination and may that psychotherapy can help improve
cause guilt in case things do not go their family cohesion. A family focused
way. This may result in excessive Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) on
rumination and compulsive actions to stop youth with OCD reported that a large
those recurrent thoughts which may result number of participants (80%) improved at
in OCD (cc). Psychodynamic perspective posttreatment and three month follow up.
explains that a person suffering with OCD Symptom severity was reduced upto 54% at
and obsessive-compulsive personality both levels (Storch et al., 2010). Family
disorder (OCPD) makes excessive efforts involvement is reported to be an important
Jabeen, S., & Kausar, R. (2010). LaBuda, M., et al. (2000). A family
Development of indigenous study of obsessive compulsive
obsessive compulsive disorder disorder. Archives of General
symptom checklist. Pakistan Psychiatry, 57(4), 358-363.
Journal of Psychological Research, OCD-UK. (2023). The history of OCD.
25(1), 01-18. https://www.ocduk.org/ocd/history-
Jan, I. (2018, July 19). Pakistan liberals- of-ocd/ 2023/7/7.
closest hypocrites. The Express Parker, G., Tupling, H., & Brown, L. B.
Tribune. (1979). A Parental bonding
https://tribune.com.pk/story/17611 instrument. British Journal of
90/pakistani-liberals-closest- Medical Psychology, 52(1), 1-10.
hypocrites https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-
Jansen, M., Overgaauw, S., & De Bruijn, 8341.1979.tb02487.x
E. R. A. (2020). Social cognition Peris, T. S & Piacentini, J. (2013).
and obsessive- compulsive Optimizing treatment for complex
disorder: A review of subdomains cases of childhood Obsessive
of social functioning. Frontiers in Compulsive Disorder: A
Psychiatry, 11, 118. preliminary trial. Journal of Clinical
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020. Child & Adolescent Psychology ,
00118 42(1).http://doi:10.1080/15374416.
Kapci, E., & Kucuker, S. (2006). The 2012.673162
Parental Bonding Instrument: Pittenger, C. (2017). Obsessive compulsive
Evaluation of psychometric disorder, phenomenology,
properties with Turkish university pathophysiology and treatment.
students. Türk psikiyatri dergisi Oxford University Press.
=Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, doi:10.1093/med/9780190228163.0
17(4), 286-95. 01.0001
Masarik, S.A., & Conger, D.R. (2017). Pittenger, C., & King, R. A (ed.)
Stress and child development: a (2017), 'Psychodynamic
review of the family stress model. perspectives on OCD'. Obsessive-
Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, Compulsive Disorder:
85-90. Phenomenology, Pathophysiology,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.20 and Treatment.
16.05.008 https://doi.org/10.1093/med/978019
Muhlbauer, J. E., Ferrão, Y. A., 0228163.003.0007
Eppingstall, J., Albertella, L., do Purty, A., Nestadt, G., Samuels, J.F., &
Rosário, M. C., Mahjani, B., Bey, Viswanath, B. (2019). Genetics of
K., Boberg, J., & Burton, C. (2021). obsessive compulsive disorder.
Genetics of obsessive compulsive Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 61(1),
disorder. Psychological Medicine, 37-42.
51(13), 2247-2259. Ramezani, Z., Rahimi, C., & Mohammadi,
doi: 10.1017/S0033291721001744 N. (2016). Predicting Obsessive
Murphy, E.Y., & Flessner, A.C. (2015). Compulsive Disorder Subtypes
Family functioning in pediatric Using Cognitive Factors. Iranian
obsessive compulsive and related Journal of Psychiatry, 11(2), 75–81.
disorders. The British Journal of Renshaw, K. D., Steketee, G., &
Psychology, 54(4), 414-434. Chambless, D. L. (2005). Involving
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12088 family members in the treatment of
Nestadt, G., Samuel, J., Riddle, M., OCD. Cognitive Behavior
Bienvenu III, J., Liang, K-Y., Therapy, 34(3), 164–175.