Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1208 Masbate 2008 NI 43
1208 Masbate 2008 NI 43
Certificate of Authors
Daniel Albert Tuffin. Daniel.Tuffin@LQSgroup.com
I, Daniel Albert Tuffin, BEng, BSc, Dip.PM, MAusIMM hereby certify that:
I am an independent Consulting Mining Engineer with my office at 1311 Hay Street, West Perth,
Western Australia 6005, Australia (telephone +61-8-9467-7456)
I have Bachelor’s Degrees in Science (Engineering and Mine Surveying) from the Western Australian
School of Mines and Engineering (Mining) from the University of Ballarat. Additional to this, I also hold
a Diploma in Project Management. I am a current member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and
Metallurgy (AusIMM), membership number 228649.
For the purposes of this Technical Report I am a Qualified Person as defined in National Instrument
43-101. I have read NI43-101F1 and Form 43-101F1, and this technical report has been prepared in
compliance with that instrument and form.
My most recent personal inspection of the Masbate property was in May 2008.
As of the date hereof, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Technical Report
contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical
Report not misleading.
I consent to the public filing of the technical report with any stock exchange and other regulatory
authority and any publication by them for regulatory purposes of the Technical Report.
th
Dated at Perth this 5 day of December 2008.
I, Anthony James Keers, BEng Hons, Dip.PM, MAusIMM hereby certify that:
I am an independent Consulting Mining Engineer with my office at 1311 Hay Street, West Perth,
Western Australia 6005, Australia (telephone +61-8-9467-7456)
I have a Bachelor’s Degree with Honours in Engineering (Mining) from the University of Queensland.
Additional to this, I also hold a Diploma in Project Management. I am a current member of the
Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM), membership number 209571.
My most recent personal inspection of the Masbate property was in September 2008.
As of the date hereof, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Technical Report
contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical
Report not misleading.
I consent to the public filing of the technical report with any stock exchange and other regulatory
authority and any publication by them for regulatory purposes of the Technical Report.
th
Dated at Perth this 5 day of December 2008.
i
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
Contents
3 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... 1
4 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 3
5 Reliance on Other Experts ................................................................................................. 4
6 Property Description and Location ..................................................................................... 4
7 Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography ......................... 4
8 History................................................................................................................................ 4
9 Geological Setting .............................................................................................................. 4
10 Deposit Types .................................................................................................................. 4
11 Mineralization ................................................................................................................... 4
12 Exploration ....................................................................................................................... 5
13 Drilling .............................................................................................................................. 5
14 Sampling Method and Approach ...................................................................................... 5
15 Sample Preparation, Analyses and Security..................................................................... 5
16 Data Verification ............................................................................................................... 5
17 Adjacent Properties .......................................................................................................... 5
18 Mineral processing and Metallurgical Testing ................................................................... 5
19 Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve ........................................................................... 5
19.1 Mineral Resource ...................................................................................................... 5
19.2 Mineral Reserve ........................................................................................................ 6
19.2.1 Block Model Preparation ..................................................................................... 6
19.2.2 Whittle Optimisation Parameters ......................................................................... 7
19.2.2.1 Slope Sets .................................................................................................... 7
19.2.2.2 Study Base Date ........................................................................................... 7
19.2.2.3 Initial Capital ................................................................................................. 7
19.2.2.4 Plant Capacity .............................................................................................. 7
19.2.2.5 Mining Limit .................................................................................................. 8
19.2.2.6 Processing Recovery .................................................................................... 8
19.2.2.7 Grade Cut-Offs ............................................................................................. 9
19.2.2.8 Mining Dilution .............................................................................................. 9
19.2.2.9 Mining Recovery ........................................................................................... 9
19.2.2.10 Commodity Price ........................................................................................ 9
19.2.2.11 Selling Costs............................................................................................... 9
19.2.2.12 Exchange Rate ........................................................................................... 9
ii
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
iii
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
Tables
Table 1: Block Model Rock Codes for Whittle Optimisation ................................................... 6
Table 2: Mining Limits for each Area ..................................................................................... 8
Table 3: Processing Recoveries by Rock Code..................................................................... 8
Table 4: Mining Cost by Rock Code .................................................................................... 10
Table 5: Main Vein Whittle Results...................................................................................... 11
Table 6: Colorado Whittle Results ....................................................................................... 13
Table 7: Holy Moses Basalt Whittle Results ........................................................................ 15
Table 8: Montana Whittle Results........................................................................................ 17
Table 9: Whittle Results Summary – Shell Inventories ........................................................ 18
Table 10: Results from Sensitivity Runs .............................................................................. 20
Table 11: Comparison of Sensitivity Run Results ................................................................ 20
Table 12: Geotechnical Design Parameters ........................................................................ 24
Table 13: Main Vein Staged Pit Design Tonnes and Grade................................................. 25
Table 14: Colorado Staged Pit Design Tonnes and Grade .................................................. 29
Table 15: Holy Moses Basalt Staged Pit Design Tonnes and Grade ................................... 31
Table 16: Montana Staged Pit Design Tonnes and Grade .................................................. 33
Table 17: Mineral Reserves at the Masbate Gold Project .................................................... 35
Table 18: Masbate Production Schedule ............................................................................. 37
Table 19: Unchanged Items from 2006 Technical Report.................................................... 41
Figures
Figure 1: Masbate Gold Project Location Map....................................................................... 3
Figure 2: Main Vein Whittle Results Graph.......................................................................... 12
Figure 3: Colorado Whittle Results Graph ........................................................................... 14
Figure 4: Holy Moses Basalt Whittle Results Graph ............................................................ 16
Figure 5: Montana Whittle Results Graph............................................................................ 18
Figure 6: Whittle Pit Shells .................................................................................................. 19
Figure 7: Spider Graph of Key Parameters ......................................................................... 21
Figure 8: Discounted Pit Value Sensitivity Graph ................................................................ 22
iv
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
v
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
3 Executive Summary
Lower Quartile Solutions Pty Ltd (LQS) was commissioned by CGA Mining Limited (CGA) to
perform a review of the Bankable Feasibility Study conducted in 2006 by IMC Mining
Solutions Pty Ltd (IMC 2006 BFS) and to update the Total Mineral Reserve based on an
updated Mineral Resource model and economic factors.
Upon receiving the Mineral Resource model from Filminera Resource Corporation (Mineral
Resource Geology work carried out by Mining Associates Pty Ltd), the model was prepared
for Whittle optimisation. Using costs supplied by CGA (as detailed in Section 19.2.2) in the
Whittle optimisation and a gold sell price of US$750/oz, a set of pit shells were produced
which formed the basis of the pit design. The model was split into four areas before
importing into Whittle; this was done to accurately depict the mining schedule, in particular
mining three large, independent pits using three mining fleets capable of moving a total of
12Mtpa.
The geotechnical constraints used during the design phase were based on work conducted
for the IMC 2006 BFS. Much of this information is still relevant; however there are issues in
some areas due to the increase in pit size when compared to the IMC 2006 BFS work. It is
relevant to understand that previous mining has taken place and that all original ‘pitwalls’
remain in good condition and are stable. Detailed examination of the walls is not possible
due to revegetation. It is strongly recommended that as soon as possible following project
commissioning, a geotechnical review be carried out on all work completed during this study.
In saying this it is expected that any changes that may arise from a latter geotechnical
review will not cause significant changes to the overall Mineral Reserve stated in this report.
The total Mineral Reserve at the Masbate Project is 92 Mt at a grade of 1.0 g/t containing 3
Moz of Gold. This material is sourced from 3 major independent pits and a number of
smaller surrounding pits, with the average strip ratio (W:O) being 1.05:1. In the Mineral
Reserve Statement released on October 22, 2008, the tonnes and grade for each area was
labeled incorrectly. The overall tonnes and grade were correct, below is the table as it should
have read in the Mineral Reserve Statement.
Dumping of waste and low grade material (planned low grade/ high grade split in the first two
years of production) will play a significant role in the scheduling of this project. There is
limited surface area on which to dump waste within the existing mining lease boundary and
in-pit dumping could lead to potential sterilisation of ore should there be any changes to the
1
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
Existing underground voids, a result of the previous mining operation could, also affect the
design and schedule. The information available to LQS at the time of this study was
sufficient in terms of size and location of major underground voids, however the geotechnical
conditions in these areas is not as well known. The Mineral Resource model has been
created to take a conservative approach to the material around these voids, with tonnes and
grade reduced, resulting in a possible slight upgrade to the Mineral Reserve should probe
drilling and or geotechnical holes highlight any discrepancies from the voids file created for
this purpose.
CGA has committed to an initial two year high grading period, where an elevated cut-off will
be used to determine the material fed to the mill. During this period all material above a cut-
off of 0.7g/t will be preferentially fed to the mill, any shortfall in the mill capacity will be made
up using the low grade material (0.4 – 0.7g/t). The remaining low grade material will be
stockpiled for later processing. The mill feed in the first two years will be at a rate of 4Mtpa at
an average grade of 2.0g/t.
Beyond the second year a bulk mining approach will be implemented to exploit the
remaining in situ Mineral Reserves. With the mill limit increasing to 5Mtpa the average feed
grade will fall to around 1.0g/t up to year 15. After YR 15 all in situ Mineral Reserves will be
exhausted and the low grade stockpile will begin to be fed into the mill if still financially
viable, which based on current knowledge of the area may extend the processing life to a
total of approximately 18.5 years.
For this project, the limiting process is the mill capacity. If future studies into the milling
capacity could be conducted and it is found that there is a possible expansion to the mill an
updated mining study would be highly recommended. Other potential studies could be to
investigate increasing the mining limit to maintain a high grade mill feed for as long as
possible, while stockpiling all low grade material; and continuing Mineral Reserve updates
following completed drilling programs.
2
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
4 Introduction
Lower Quartile Solutions Pty Ltd (LQS) was commissioned by CGA Mining Limited (CGA) to
perform a review of a Bankable Feasibility Study conducted in 2006 by IMC Mining Solutions
Pty Ltd (IMC 2006 BFS) and to update the Total Mineral Reserve for the Masbate Gold
Project based on an updated Mineral Resource model and economic factors.
The Masbate Gold Project is located on the island of Masbate in the Philippines,
approximately 350km southeast of the capital Manila. Primary access to the mine site is by
the Samar Sea. Anthony Keers, the author of this report, visited the site on the 8th
September 2008 to gain a better understanding of the project and comply with NI43-101
standards.
3
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
The primary focus of this study is to update the Total Mineral Reserve based on an updated
Gold price of US$750/oz; the IMC 2006 BFS used a Gold price of US$450/oz. Other
information that has been updated from the original study includes a slight increase in mining
costs from an average $1.80/t to $1.93/t and taking a slightly different approach in applying
the processing recovery.
As a result of this being an update to a previous study, there are several issues not
specifically covered in this report such as capital costs and mining fleet selection. The mining
fleet had been selected based on the IMC 2006 BFS and ordered prior to LQS undertaking
this study. Other capital costs for site infrastructure had already been finalised and
committed, the IMC 2006 BFS also covers these areas.
8 History
Refer to - Technical Report on the Mineral Resources of the Masbate Deposit Masbate
Province, Republic of the Philippines, For CGA Mining Limited, 20 May 2008, Section 6
9 Geological Setting
Refer to - Technical Report on the Mineral Resources of the Masbate Deposit Masbate
Province, Republic of the Philippines, For CGA Mining Limited, 20 May 2008, Section 7
10 Deposit Types
Refer to - Technical Report on the Mineral Resources of the Masbate Deposit Masbate
Province, Republic of the Philippines, For CGA Mining Limited, 20 May 2008, Section 8
11 Mineralization
Refer to - Technical Report on the Mineral Resources of the Masbate Deposit Masbate
Province, Republic of the Philippines, For CGA Mining Limited, 20 May 2008, Section 9
4
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
12 Exploration
Refer to - Technical Report on the Mineral Resources of the Masbate Deposit Masbate
Province, Republic of the Philippines, For CGA Mining Limited, 20 May 2008, Section 10
13 Drilling
Refer to - Technical Report on the Mineral Resources of the Masbate Deposit Masbate
Province, Republic of the Philippines, For CGA Mining Limited, 20 May 2008, Section 11
16 Data Verification
Refer to - Technical Report on the Mineral Resources of the Masbate Deposit Masbate
Province, Republic of the Philippines, For CGA Mining Limited, 20 May 2008, Section 14
17 Adjacent Properties
Refer to - Technical Report on the Mineral Resources of the Masbate Deposit Masbate
Province, Republic of the Philippines, For CGA Mining Limited, 20 May 2008, Section 15
5
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
• All blocks not of Mineral Resource Category Indicated given zero grade
• Created a “rock” attribute which would be divided by area and rock type (primary,
transitional and oxide)
• Created a “zone” attribute that to give the option of differing slope wall angles in
Whittle optimisations depending on the area- ultimately this wasn’t used
• Main Vein given rock code in 100’s, Colorado 200’s, HMB 300’s and Montana 400’s
• Oxide given suffix in rock code of 1, Transitional 2, Primary 3 and dumps 0
• Waste values given rock code of 1, air given a value of 0
• Fill waste blocks with density- material given transitional ore density (2.35t/m3) above
100RL and primary ore density (2.5t/m3) below 100RL
Air 0
Waste 1
Main Vein Dump 100
Main Vein Oxide 101
Main Vein Transitional 102
Main Vein Primary 102
Colorado Grand View Dump 200
Colorado Grand View Oxide 201
Colorado Grand View Transitional 202
Colorado Grand View Primary 203
HMB Dump 300
HMB Oxide 301
HMB Transitional 302
HMB Primary 303
Montana Oxide 401
Montana Transitional 402
Montana Primary 403
6
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
A Surpac tcl script was used to perform the above work. This script can be viewed in
Appendix I.
The result of the above processes was an Engineering block model in Surpac format
covering the entire Masbate Gold Project “masbate20080903.mdl”. In order to get separate
block models for each individual area, the au_krig grade field was cleared to zero for all
blocks not in the area. For example, to create the Montana model, all blocks that didn’t have
a “Rock code” of 401, 402 or 403 were given zero grade, the au_krig field was left
unchanged for blocks with a rock code of 401, 402 or 403.
The Whittle optimisation was run using a block size of 20m x 20m x 10m (X,Y,Z). The block
size chosen was due to the model type, whereby the deposit contains a mixture of high
grade veins and lower grade stockwork and halo areas, with the model being estimated
using this block size. A secondary advantage of this is the reduced processing time.
7
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
8
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
The economic cut-off grade for the base case optimisation determined by Whittle ranged
from 0.37g/t to 0.46g/t depending on the location and material type. This figure was rounded
to 0.4g/t Au across all locations and material types for practicality purposes.
9
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
To get a more realistic final pit shell, a number of pushbacks were chosen such that the end
result, or “Specified Case”, is somewhere between the Worst Case and Best Case
scenarios. In Main Vein, the chosen pushbacks were pits 15, 20 and 26; the overall pit shell
chosen was pit 34 (highlighted in Table 5) which has the highest Specified Case discounted
cashflow.
Table 5 has been truncated to pit 53, while Figure 2 is the graphical representation of the full
table. Appendix II contains the full Whittle output table for each of the four optimisations.
10
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
11
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
250
Discounted Cashflow (US$M)
200
200
Tonnes (Mt)
150
150
100
100
50
50
0 0
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 52 55 58 61 64 67 70 73 76 79 82 85
Pit Number
Ore Tonnes Waste Tonnes Best Case Specified Case Worst Case
19.2.3.2 Colorado
The Colorado pit was again sufficiently large to select one pushback to increase the pit size
and improve the discounted cashflow. The pushback selected was pit 21, the selected final
pit was pit 33; Table 6 highlights these two pits and has been truncated to pit 48, with Figure
3 showing the full table in graphical form.
12
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
13
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
140
100
120
Tonnes (Mt)
100 80
80 60
60
40
40
20
20
0 0
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 52 55 58 61 64 67 70 73 76 79 82 85
Pit Number
Ore Tonnes Waste Tonnes Best Case Specified Case Worst Case
14
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
15
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
70
60 40
Tonnes (Mt)
50
30
40
30 20
20
10
10
0 0
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 52 55 58 61 64 67 70 73 76 79 82 85
Pit Number
Ore Tonnes Waste Tonnes Best Case Specified Case Worst Case
19.2.3.4 Montana
Due to the small size of Montana, no pushbacks were needed to be selected; in this case
the final pit selected was pit 30. Table 8 and Figure 5 show the Whittle optimisation results
for Montana.
16
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
17
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
14
10
Discounted Cashflow (US$M)
12
8
10
Tonnes (Mt)
8 6
6
4
4
2
2
0 -
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59
Pit Number
Ore Tonnes Waste Tonnes Best Case Specified Case Worst Case
18
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
19
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
20
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
21
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
Dilution 10%
Mining Cost -20%
Mining Cost -10%
Mining Cost +10%
Mining Cost +20%
Processing Cost -20%
Processing Cost -10%
Processing Cost +10%
Processing Cost +20%
Metal Price -20%
Metal Price -10%
Metal Price +10%
Metal Price +20%
Base Case
Dilution 15%
Dilution 10%
Mining Cost -20%
Mining Cost -10%
Mining Cost +10%
Mining Cost +20%
Processing Cost -20%
Processing Cost -10%
Processing Cost +10%
Processing Cost +20%
Metal Price -20%
Metal Price -10%
Metal Price +10%
Metal Price +20%
Base Case
22
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
Geotechnical work carried out by Knight Piesold (KP) for the IMC 2006 BFS was used as a
starting point and altered slightly for these designs based on the increased size of each of
the pits.
23
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
The tonnes and grade stated over the following pages are in-situ, mining recovery and
dilution will be taken into account during scheduling.
24
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
In each case, the ore mined in stage 1 will be split into high grade (+0.7g/t) and low grade
(0.4-0.7g/t) where the low grade material will be stockpiled allowing an elevated mil feed
grade for the first two years.
Some of the smaller pit shells pictured in Figure 6 have not been included in the pit design
due to one of two factors; either the pit was too small to realistically mine, or was located in
an area where the Mineral Resource is largely classified as Inferred and will be optimised
and designed at a later time.
Table 13: Main Vein Staged Pit Design Tonnes and Grade
25
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
26
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
27
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
28
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
19.4.3.2 Colorado
Three stages have been designed for Colorado (including the Syndicate area), with Stage 2
by far the largest. During the mining process, smaller pushbacks designed by the site
engineer as required may be advantageous, but these 3 stages are sufficient for the
purposes of this study.
From the Whittle pit shell in Figure 6, Syndicate and the main Colorado area are linked by a
continuous pit. This area has not been included in the final design as the Whittle optimised
pit shell crosses the extent of the current mining lease boundary.
29
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
30
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
Table 15: Holy Moses Basalt Staged Pit Design Tonnes and Grade
31
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
32
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
19.4.3.4 Montana
As Montana is a small area, only one stage has been designed. The size of the designed pit
varies from the Whittle optimised shell due to the optimised shell crossing the extent of the
current mining lease boundary.
19.4.4 Dumps
Dumping is a primary concern for this project; within the current mining lease boundaries
there is a lack of available land on which to create waste dumps. One option is to backfill
completed pits, the issue here being the potential sterilisation of future economic ore at
depth should there be any changes to the Mineral Resource model or financial situation
resulting in an increased Mineral Reserve in the future.
Looking at the current Mineral Resource model, there appears to be the option of backfilling
the Holy Moses Basalt East pit and Colorado as neither seems to have geology open at
depth (note however that this may just be resulting from a case of only shallow drilling done
to date. LQS makes this statement without confirmation).
33
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
In the first two years of production, the mill will be fed using only high grade ore (+0.7g/t),
requiring all other economic ore (0.4-0.7g/t) to be stockpiled for later processing. This
stockpile will be an extension of the existing low grade dump “Dump 90” as this dump has
been ‘modelled’ and found to have an average grade of 0.7g/t. The location of “Dump 90” is
close to most pits and the processing plant, limiting haulage distance both to the dump and
to the mill when being processed.
19.4.5 Voids
Voids from existing underground workings could play a significant role during the mining
operation of this project. The Mineral Resource model has been created taking into account
the known voids, with a buffer zone around these voids where the grades have been
downgraded. The Mineral Resource has therefore been conservatively stated, with a
potential increase in ounces possible.
There are several unknowns when it comes to the voids, primarily the final size and location
of voids and the ground conditions surrounding them. This is not an uncommon situation
when re-development of a previously operated mine takes place. The reason is that it is
extremely unlikely that the original operators carried out ‘Stope’ surveys at the completion of
the previous operation. Reliance is placed on these ‘Stope’ plans that are available. In
addition recent small scale mining may have resulted in an increase in voids, particularly in
the Syndicate and Colorado areas. Ground conditions around the final stopes are unknown.
Pit walls that have been designed in reasonably close proximity to known stopes in the
Colorado and Main Vein (Binstar area) pits have tried to account for this. Geotechnical or
probe drill holes will be required around void areas to clearly understand the prevailing
conditions.
Scheduling will also be affected by the presence of voids with some of the larger known
stopes upward of 20 metres wide. The voids will reduce productivity around these areas; a
suitable voids procedure will need to be in place to ensure safe and efficient mining around
these voids.
34
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
19.6 Schedule
The schedule covered in this report is focused mainly on the mining of ore and feeding the
processing plant as opposed to dumping waste and low grade material. These issues could
play a significant role in the final schedule; however the focus for the purposes of this
Mineral Reserve update was to focus on ore movement; onsite short to medium term
planning should be put in place to deal with the issue of dump spacing and capacities. As
with the Whittle optimisation, a total production rate of 12Mtpa has been used for the entire
life of the mine which will be provided by three mining fleets each consisting of a PC1250
and the required number of CAT773 dump trucks and auxiliary support machinery.
In previous reports, there is an amount of alluvial and eluvial material in and around the HMB
and Colorado areas. This material has not been included in the Mineral Reserve statement
as it is still considered to be Inferred, however has been included in the schedule for two
reasons. The area on which the alluvial material sits is potentially a waste dump area,
therefore the material needs to be removed before dumping commences. Secondly, the
material is of sufficient tonnes and grade (~640,000t at 1.7g/t) to assist in the early mill feed
in year three of the schedule. The primary reason this material is considered Inferred and not
Indicated is there has been no statement made by any qualified persons confirming that the
Mineral Resource estimation work in the alluvial / eluvial areas has been carried out under
the guidelines of NI43-101.
In the first two years of production, CGA has committed to target the highest possible grade
material in order to achieve a mill feed of 8mt (4Mtpa) at a grade of 2.0g/t. This material
includes a limited amount of Inferred material that would need to be mined in this initial two
year period. No inferred material was included in the Mineral Reserve figures discussed in
Section 19.5 of this report.
Within the first two years, mining will commence in the pits within close proximity to the
processing plant, limiting hauling distance and allowing for potential civil works (final haul
roads, river crossings etc) to be completed in advance of these facilities being fully utilised.
In this time there will be significant movement of mining fleets, however the distances
between pits is limited. The movement of ore and waste has also been scheduled to limit
fluctuations in grade to 2g/t ± 0.3g/t for the majority of this period and maintain a
35
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
manageable ROM stockpile on a monthly basis. There are a few spikes in the feed grade,
however with further blending grade fluctuations could be limited to ± 0.2g/t.
There are two pits close to the processing plant which ideally would be completed in the first
two years for practicality purposes, but due to the low grade in these areas have been left
until year three. If the feed grade of 2.0g/t could be lowered slightly to 1.3 or 1.4g/t for a few
months in year 1, these pits (named Main Vein West and Holy Moses Basalt West) could be
included in the initial two year schedule.
The pits on the northern side of the river will be left until into the second year of production to
allow time for the construction of a suitable river crossing and the upgrading and creation of
roads to allow heavy vehicle access to the top of the Colorado pit.
The selected cut-off grade to achieve the 2.0g/t mill feed is 0.7g/t. All material below this
grade but above the economic cut-off of 0.4g/t will create a low grade stockpile near the
processing plant adjacent to the ROM pad and will be used to supplement the mill feed
should there be insufficient high grade material to maintain the full mill capacity. This
stockpile is expected to be in the region of 5Mt after year two.
From year three to the end of the mine life, the economic cut-off of 0.4g/t has been used as
the mining cut-off grade (this economic cut-off will need to be regularly reviewed during the
life of the mine). The milling capacity will be increased to 5Mtpa from year three, with the
resulting mill feed grade being 1.0g/t ± 0.5g/t up until production year 15. During the years
three to fifteen there will still be a low grade/high grade split at the 0.7g/t mentioned earlier
with the higher grade ore being fed preferentially. Approximately 12Mt of low grade material
will be added to the stockpile started in the first two years, resulting in a total of around 17Mt
of material averaging 0.54g/t, which could then be treated at the completion of mining
operations if it is feasible to do so at the time.
The general schedule of mining from years three to fifteen is to complete the small satellite
pits including Main Vein West, Syndicate and HMB West and the alluvial/eluvial material
mentioned earlier as soon as possible. Due to the size of the Main Vein pit, this will be the
focus of mining operations for much of the mine life, in general there will be two fleets
operating for the life of the mine in this pit. The second fleet from the Main Vein pit will be
shifted to Colorado or HMB East Stage 3 at various times when required. Stage 2 of HMB
East will commence in year three and should be complete by year five, at which point that
fleet will move across to Colorado for the remainder of the mines life.
There is a difference of 2Mt between the Mineral Reserve stated in Section 6 of this report
and the ore mined in the schedule in Table 17; this is due to the fact that Main Vein Stage 6
has not been included in the schedule, while the alluvial and eluvial material is included.
Mining Main Vein Stage 6 which is in effect the existing waste dump, will consist of little
more than free digging, and could provide the mill with a further 6-12 months feed at a grade
of 0.72g/t.
The overall production schedule is shown in Table 18, a more detailed schedule can be
found in Appendix III. Within the schedule is a pre-production period which is envisaged to
36
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
take approximately one to two months to complete. The first year’s production is separated
into months, the second year into quarters, then annually until the end of the mine’s life.
A second schedule was tested where the high grade material (>0.7g/t) was targeted and fed
through the mill within a constrained mine life of 10 years. The schedule has not been shown
37
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
in this report as altering the mining rate could significantly alter the economics of this project
and the overall Mineral Reserve. The information supplied in this paragraph is just an
indication to highlight the fact that a high grading option could be achievable with a change
in fleet or equipment size. In order to achieve this mill feed, the mining production rate would
have to be increased to around 20Mtpa, resulting in high grade production of 5Mtpa at an
average feed grade of around 1.4g/t. If a more detailed study into this schedule is requested,
the ability to mine at the elevated production rate will need to be confirmed and the study will
need to be reviewed, specifically the Whittle optimisation.
There is no new “other relevant data and information” since the last Technical Report
submitted for the Mineral Reserve. Please refer to this document: Masbate Gold Project,
Masbate Island, Philippines Form NI43-101F1 Technical Report to Thistle Mining and CGA
Mining Limited, 30 April 2006, Report No: IMC 01099.
Under the current circumstances in terms of mining and milling capacity, this project has a
high return; however future studies into increasing the mining and/or milling capacity could
further improve this project.
For those areas of the study that have not changed since the April 2006 Technical Report
(Tailings Storage Facility Geotechnical work, Environmental considerations etc), please refer
to: Masbate Gold Project, Masbate Island, Philippines Form NI43-101F1 Technical Report to
Thistle Mining and CGA Mining Limited, 30 April 2006, Report No: IMC 01099.
22 Recommendations
Further drilling will be advantageous to convert the current Inferred material in the Panique
and Doris areas to Indicated, with the potential to turn those Mineral Resources into Mineral
Reserves. Drilling at depth in existing areas is also required to determine the extent of
mining and the possibility of utilising the mined out pits as waste dumps.
38
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
23 References
IMC Mining Solutions Pty Ltd, 2008, Report to CGA Mining on the Masbate Optimisation
Based on $750, Report No IMC908.
Lawrence, Julien and Wan, Irwan, 2008, Masbate Whittle Optimisation- Input Parameters
Summary, memo communicated to Filminera Resources Corporation and Leighton.
IMC Mining Solutions Pty Ltd, 2006, Report to Thistle Mining and CGA Mining Limited-
Masbate Gold Project, Masbate Island, Philippines-Form NI43-101F1 Technical Report,
Report No IMC01099
Mining Associates Pty Ltd, 2008, Technical Report on the Mineral Resources of the
Masbate Deposit- Masbate Province, Republic of the Philippines, for CGA Mining Limited
IMC Mining Solutions Pty Ltd, 2006, Masbate Project Bankable Feasibility Study Mining
Report for Thistle Mining Corp- Version 1, Report No IMC1084
39
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
Mr Daniel Tuffin
_____________________
Mr Anthony Keers
_____________________
40
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
25.2 Power
Power costs have been included in the US$7.50/t processing cost supplied by CGA, no
further breakdown of costs was provided.
25.3 Markets
The selling price of gold used for this Technical Report was US$750/oz, this lies towards the
lower end of the gold price over the last twelve months which has seen the price vary from
US$720/oz to over US$1000/oz. Taking into account forward predictions from varied
sources, a sell price of US$750/oz was considered appropriate for this study.
25.4 Contracts
Filminera Resources Corporation and Leighton have undertaken an Alliance to exploit this
Mineral Reserve.
The mining rate used for this study was 12Mtpa using three fleets each consisting of a
PC1250 excavator and five trucks. A conservative estimate has been used due to the
prevailing poor weather conditions and limited operator experience; there is however a
potential upside if a high standard of road maintenance operator training can be achieved.
A detailed breakdown of operating costs was not available for this report, operating costs
supplied by CGA for this study can be found in Section 19.2.2 of this report.
There is a good potential for exploration drilling to increase the life of mine. Areas to the
south of the Main Vein pit have had a number of exploration holes drilled but require more to
be able to improve the classification of the Mineral Resource from Inferred to Indicated.
Future drilling could increase the high grading period at the beginning of the project.
26 Illustrations
42
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
# Fill sg for waste blocks with value of 2.35 above the 100RL
set status [ SclFunction "BM BLOCK MATHS" {
frm20220={
{
block_maths={
{
opfld="sg"
value="2.35"
}
}
constrain="YES"
}
}
frm20111={
{
constraints=table { not op contype location id rnga rngb lbound ubound ext } {
{ "" "ABOVE" "Z PLANE" "100" "" "" "" "" "" "" }
{ "" "=" "BLOCK" "au_krig" "0" "" "" "" "" "" }
}
conexp=""
confile=""
43
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
keep_blocks="N"
}
}
}]
# Fill sg for waste blocks with value of 2.5 below the 100RL
set status [ SclFunction "BM BLOCK MATHS" {
frm20220={
{
block_maths={
{
opfld="sg"
value="2.50"
}
}
constrain="YES"
}
}
frm20111={
{
constraints=table { not op contype location id rnga rngb lbound ubound ext } {
{ "NOT" "ABOVE" "Z PLANE" "100" "" "" "" "" "" "" }
{ "" "=" "BLOCK" "au_krig" "0" "" "" "" "" "" }
}
conexp=""
confile=""
keep_blocks="N"
}
}
}]
# Create attribute "rock" to separate areas and material type and "zone" for geotech/slope
regions
set status [ SclFunction "BM ADD ATTRIBUTE" {
frm20150={
{
attributes=table { name type decimals bgv description } {
{ "rock" "integer" null "1" "100-400 for area, 001-003 for ox zones, 000 for dumps" }
44
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
45
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
confile=""
keep_blocks="N"
}
}
}]
# Fill the "rock" attribute with 0 for all blocks completely in air (either above topo or in stope
voids)
set status [ SclFunction "BM BLOCK MATHS" {
frm20220={
{
block_maths=table { opfld value } {
{ "rock" "iif(air=1,0,rock)" }
}
constrain="NO"
}
}
}]
46
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
47
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
48
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
49
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
50
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
51
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
52
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
53
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
54
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
tonne g/t tonne g/t tonne g/t tonne g/t tonne g/t tonne g/t tonne g/t tonne g/t tonne g/t tonne g/t tonne g/t
pre-prod 105,957 1.97 60,000 1.36 45,957 2.83 45,957 2.83 69,920 0.53 - 0.53 69,920 0.53 69,920 0.53 60,000 1.36 728,124 4.14 904,000
M1 254,096 1.75 254,096 1.75 - - 45,957 2.83 - - 205,620 0.51 33,280 0.51 172,339 0.51 - - 242,259 0.52 333,333 1.78 540,284 1.18 1,000,000
M2 352,549 2.18 333,333 2.18 19,216 2.18 - - 19,216 2.18 102,099 0.56 - - 102,099 0.56 - - 344,358 0.53 333,333 2.18 544,511 1.20 999,159
M3 389,456 2.30 333,333 2.30 56,122 2.30 - - 75,338 2.27 139,502 0.58 - - 139,502 0.58 - - 483,860 0.54 333,333 2.30 521,042 0.99 1,050,000
M4 359,105 2.41 333,333 2.41 25,771 2.41 - - 101,109 2.30 189,596 0.56 - - 189,596 0.56 - - 673,456 0.55 333,333 2.41 501,300 0.91 1,050,000
M5 251,317 2.69 251,317 2.69 - - 82,017 2.30 19,093 2.30 163,446 0.53 - - 163,446 0.53 - - 836,902 0.55 333,333 2.59 635,237 1.53 1,050,000
M6 328,133 2.18 328,133 2.18 - - 5,200 2.30 13,892 2.30 168,209 0.54 - - 168,209 0.54 - - 1,005,111 0.55 333,333 2.18 522,124 1.05 1,018,466
M7 366,683 1.48 333,333 1.48 33,349 1.48 - - 47,242 1.72 212,335 0.55 - - 212,335 0.55 - - 1,217,446 0.55 333,333 1.48 420,983 0.73 1,000,000
M8 315,631 1.70 315,631 1.70 - - 17,702 1.72 29,540 1.72 333,320 0.57 - - 333,320 0.57 - - 1,550,765 0.55 333,333 1.70 397,436 0.61 1,046,387
M9 294,923 1.88 294,923 1.88 - - 29,540 1.72 - - 357,247 0.55 8,871 0.55 348,376 0.55 - - 1,899,142 0.55 333,333 1.83 397,830 0.61 1,050,000
M10 388,823 1.91 333,333 1.91 55,490 1.91 - - 55,490 1.91 299,228 0.54 - - 299,228 0.54 - - 2,198,370 0.55 333,333 1.91 361,949 0.53 1,050,000
M11 410,043 1.95 333,333 1.95 76,710 1.95 - - 132,200 1.93 287,641 0.54 - - 287,641 0.54 - - 2,486,011 0.55 333,333 1.95 352,315 0.50 1,050,000
M12 377,064 1.99 333,333 1.99 43,731 1.99 - - 175,931 1.95 290,257 0.54 - - 290,257 0.54 - - 2,776,268 0.55 333,333 1.99 382,769 0.57 1,050,090
M13 174,760 2.17 174,760 2.17 - - 158,574 1.95 17,357 1.95 243,105 0.53 - - 243,105 0.53 - - 3,019,373 0.55 333,333 2.07 632,135 1.51 1,050,000
M14 258,200 2.24 258,200 2.24 - - 17,357 1.95 - - 215,563 0.54 57,776 0.54 157,787 0.54 - - 3,177,160 0.55 333,333 1.93 576,236 1.22 1,050,000
M15 349,398 2.31 333,333 2.31 16,065 2.31 - - 16,065 2.31 252,164 0.54 - - 252,164 0.54 - - 3,429,324 0.55 333,333 2.31 448,438 0.75 1,050,000
M16 496,687 1.99 333,333 1.99 163,354 1.99 - - 179,418 2.02 232,009 0.56 - - 232,009 0.56 - - 3,661,333 0.55 333,333 1.99 321,304 0.44 1,050,000
M17 464,431 2.08 333,333 2.08 131,098 2.08 - - 310,517 2.04 200,449 0.58 - - 200,449 0.58 - - 3,861,783 0.55 333,333 2.08 382,526 0.58 1,047,407
M18 269,124 2.15 269,124 2.15 - - 64,209 2.04 246,308 2.04 206,668 0.56 - - 206,668 0.56 - - 4,068,450 0.55 333,333 2.13 574,208 1.21 1,050,000
M19 218,947 2.26 218,947 2.26 - - 114,387 2.04 131,921 2.04 175,365 0.55 - - 175,365 0.55 - - 4,243,815 0.55 333,333 2.18 604,754 1.53 999,066
M20 208,444 2.28 208,444 2.28 - - 124,889 2.04 7,032 2.04 196,321 0.53 - - 196,321 0.53 - - 4,440,136 0.55 333,333 2.19 595,235 1.47 1,000,000
M21 325,917 2.14 325,917 2.14 - - 7,032 2.04 - - 188,690 0.54 385 0.54 188,306 0.54 - - 4,628,442 0.55 333,333 2.14 485,393 0.94 1,000,000
M22 361,857 1.76 333,333 1.76 28,524 1.76 - - 28,524 1.76 181,356 0.61 - - 181,356 0.61 - - 4,809,798 0.55 333,333 1.76 456,787 0.84 1,000,000
M23 225,326 1.89 225,326 1.89 - - 28,524 1.76 - - 69,456 0.57 69,456 0.57 - - 10,028 0.55 4,799,770 0.55 333,333 1.57 705,218 2.39 1,000,000
M24 248,793 2.40 248,793 2.40 - - - - - - 119,898 0.57 84,540 0.60 35,358 0.57 - - 4,835,128 0.55 333,333 1.94 1,830,741 4.97 2,199,432
Y3 2,610,338 1.47 2,610,338 1.47 - - - - - - 2,290,961 0.53 2,290,961 0.53 - - 98,702 0.55 4,736,426 0.55 5,000,000 1.02 7,156,758 1.46 12,058,056
Y4 3,665,676 1.33 3,665,676 1.33 - - - - - - 3,285,702 0.54 1,334,324 0.54 1,951,378 0.54 - - 6,687,804 0.55 5,000,000 1.12 5,048,622 0.73 12,000,000
Y5 5,002,516 1.50 5,000,000 1.50 2,516 1.50 - - 2,516 1.50 3,186,844 0.55 - - 3,186,844 0.55 - - 9,874,648 0.55 5,000,000 1.50 3,810,640 0.47 12,000,000
Y6 2,282,118 1.43 2,282,118 1.43 - - 2,516 1.50 - - 1,995,419 0.53 1,995,419 0.53 - - 719,947 0.55 9,154,701 0.55 5,000,000 0.94 7,713,928 1.80 11,991,464
Y7 1,883,673 1.36 1,883,673 1.36 - - - - - - 2,286,972 0.55 2,286,972 0.55 - - 829,355 0.55 8,325,346 0.55 5,000,000 0.86 7,829,355 1.88 12,000,000
Y8 1,510,930 1.47 1,510,930 1.47 - - - - - - 2,312,834 0.55 2,312,834 0.55 - - 1,176,236 0.55 7,149,110 0.55 5,000,000 0.83 8,176,236 2.14 12,000,000
Y9 3,767,619 1.31 3,767,619 1.31 - - - - - - 2,690,312 0.56 1,232,381 0.56 1,457,931 0.56 - - 8,607,041 0.55 5,000,000 1.12 5,542,069 0.86 12,000,000
Y10 2,658,944 1.55 2,658,944 1.55 - - - - - - 2,105,061 0.57 2,105,061 0.57 - - 235,995 0.55 8,371,046 0.55 5,000,000 1.09 7,233,239 1.52 11,997,244
Y11 2,866,241 1.36 2,866,241 1.36 - - - - - - 2,699,805 0.56 2,133,759 0.56 566,046 0.56 - - 8,937,092 0.55 5,000,000 1.02 6,430,179 1.16 11,996,225
Y12 2,411,034 1.19 2,411,034 1.19 - - - - - - 3,391,347 0.55 2,588,966 0.55 802,381 0.55 - - 9,739,473 0.55 5,000,000 0.86 6,189,827 1.07 11,992,208
Y13 3,175,295 1.32 3,175,295 1.32 - - - - - - 3,843,930 0.56 1,824,705 0.56 2,019,225 0.56 - - 11,758,698 0.55 5,000,000 1.04 4,980,775 0.71 12,000,000
Y14 3,537,846 1.38 3,537,846 1.38 - - - - - - 3,556,870 0.57 1,462,154 0.57 2,094,716 0.57 - - 13,853,414 0.56 5,000,000 1.14 4,905,284 0.69 12,000,000
Y15 3,727,612 1.41 3,727,612 1.41 - - - - - - 3,575,887 0.55 1,272,388 0.55 2,303,500 0.55 - - 16,156,914 0.55 5,000,000 1.19 4,654,029 0.64 11,957,529
Y16 419,027 1.51 419,027 1.51 - - - - - - 595,676 0.57 595,676 0.57 - - 3,985,297 0.55 12,171,617 0.55 5,000,000 0.64 808,470 0.80 1,823,173
Y17 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5,000,000 0.55 7,171,617 0.55 5,000,000 0.55 - - -
Y18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5,000,000 0.55 2,171,617 0.55 5,000,000 0.55 - - -
Y19 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2,171,617 0.55 - - 2,171,617 0.55 - - -
55 LQS2008.014
NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT- MASBATE GOLD PROJECT
OCTOBER 2008
% of period in
% of period in
% of period in
% of period in
% of period in
% of period in
% of period in
% of period in
Bench (m) Bench (m) Bench (m) Bench (m) Bench (m) Bench (m) Acitve Pit Bench (m) Bench (m)
Acitve Pit or Acitve Pit or Acitve Pit or Acitve Pit or Acitve Pit or Acitve Pit or Acitve Pit or
pit
pit
pit
pit
pit
pit
pit
pit
or
Pushback Pushback Pushback Pushback Pushback Pushback Pushback
Pushback
From To From To From To From To From To From To From To From To
- - - - - - - - HMB East 47% 150-2 90-2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMB West 44% 90 50 pre-prod
- - - - - - - - HMB East 50% 90-2 70-2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMB West 50% 50 30 M1
- - - - - - - - HMB East 50% 70-2 50-2 Libra West 42% 70 40 - - - - - - - - - - - - HMB West 8% 30 30 M2
- - - - - - - - HMB East 50% 50-2 40-2 Libra West 55% 40 30 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - M3
- - - - - - - - HMB East 50% 40-2 90-1 Libra West 55% 30 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - M4
- - - - - - - - HMB East 50% 90-1 70-1 Libra West 55% 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - M5
- - - - - - - - HMB East 50% 70-1 60-1 Libra West 32% - -20 - - - - Libra1 20% 160 140 - - - - - - - - M6
- - - - - - - - HMB East 50% 60-1 50-1 - - - - - - - - Libra1 50% 140 110 - - - - - - - - M7
Binstar 35% 160 130 - - - - HMB East 50% 50-1 40-1 - - - - - - - - Libra1 20% 110 90 - - - - - - - - M8
Binstar 55% 130 110 - - - - HMB East 50% 40-1 30-1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - M9
Binstar 55% 110 110 - - - - HMB East 50% 30-1 20-1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - M10
Binstar 55% 110 100 - - - - HMB East 50% 20-1 10-1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - M11
Binstar 55% 100 90 - - - - HMB East 37% 10-1 -20-1 - - - - MV1 13% 130 100 - - - - - - - - - - - - M12
Binstar 55% 90 90 - - - - - - - - - - - - MV1 50% 100 70 - - - - - - - - - - - - M13
Binstar 55% 90 80 - - - - - - - - - - - - MV1 50% 70 60 - - - - - - - - - - - - M14
Binstar 55% 80 80 - - - - - - - - - - - - MV1 50% 60 40 - - - - - - - - - - - - M15
Binstar 55% 80 70 - - - - - - - - - - - - MV1 50% 40 10 - - - - - - - - - - - - M16
Binstar 55% 70 60 Colorado1 13% 310-1 300-1 - - - - - - - - MV1 37% 10 -10 - - - - - - - - - - - - M17
Binstar 55% 60 40 Colorado1 50% 300-1 290-1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - M18
Binstar 17% 40 20 Colorado1 50% 290-1 280-1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Montana 33% 100 70 - - - - M19
- - - - Colorado1 59% 280-1 270-1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Montana 41% 70 60 - - - - M20
- - - - Colorado1 60% 270-1 260-2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Montana 40% 60 50 - - - - M21
- - - - Colorado1 60% 260-2 220-2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Montana 40% 50 40 - - - - M22
- - - - Colorado1 60% 220-2 160-3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Montana 40% 40 30 - - - - M23
HMB East- 2&3 100% 2-150 2-70 Colorado1 64% 160-3 130-3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Montana 36% 30 10 - - - - M24
HMB East- 2&3 33% 2-70 2-20 Colorado1 1% 130-3 100-3 Main Vein- 2 46% 170 80 - - - - - - - - - - - - Satellite Pits 17% mvw-100 syn-30 Alluvials/Eluvials 3% Eluvials Eluvials Y3
HMB East- 2&3 33% 2-20 2--10 - - - - Main Vein- 2 67% 80 40 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Y4
HMB East- 2&3 24% 2--10 2--50 Colorado- 2&3 9% 2-310 2-280 Main Vein- 2 67% 40 -20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Y5
- - - - Colorado- 2&3 33% 2-280 2-250 Main Vein- 2 13% -20 -70 Main Vein- 3 54% 180 80 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Y6
- - - - Colorado- 2&3 33% 2-250 2-240 - - - - Main Vein- 3 67% 80 50 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Y7
- - - - Colorado- 2&3 33% 2-240 2-230 - - - - Main Vein- 3 67% 50 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Y8
- - - - Colorado- 2&3 33% 2-230 2-220 - - - - Main Vein- 3 67% - -80 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Y9
- - - - Colorado- 2&3 33% 2-220 2-210 - - - - Main Vein- 3 12% -80 -110 Main Vein- 4 55% 170 60 - - - - - - - - - - - - Y10
HMB East- 2&3 11% 2--50 3-60 Colorado- 2&3 33% 2-210 2-200 - - - - - - - - Main Vein- 4 22% 60 - Main Vein- 5 34% 150 80 - - - - - - - - Y11
HMB East- 2&3 20% 3-60 3-0 Colorado- 2&3 33% 2-200 2-180 - - - - - - - - - - - - Main Vein- 5 47% 80 50 - - - - - - - - Y12
- - - - Colorado- 2&3 33% 2-180 2-160 - - - - - - - - - - - - Main Vein- 5 67% 50 10 - - - - - - - - Y13
- - - - Colorado- 2&3 66% 2-160 3-170 - - - - - - - - - - - - Main Vein- 5 34% 10 -10 - - - - - - - - Y14
- - - - Colorado- 2&3 33% 3-170 3-120 - - - - - - - - - - - - Main Vein- 5 67% -10 -150 - - - - - - - - Y15
- - - - Colorado- 2&3 15% 3-120 3-70 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Y16
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Y17
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Y18
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Y19
56 LQS2008.014