Average Years

Customer
Salesperson Total Sales ($) Performance Bonus with
Accounts
Previous Years ($) Company

Smith, Michael $325,000.78 $12,499.35 124 14

Yu, Joe $13,678.21 $239.94 9 7
Reeves, Bill $452,359.19 $21,987.25 175 21
Hamilton,Joshua $87,423.91 $7,642.90 28 3
Harper,Derek $87,654.21 $1,250.14 21 4
Quinn, Dorothy $234,091.39 $14,567.98 48 9
Graves, Lorrie $379,401.94 $27,981.44 121 12
Sun, Yi $31,733.59 $672.91 7 1
Thompson, Nicole $127,845.22 $13,322.97 17 3
 Chart Title
Thompson, Nicole
Sun, Yi
Graves, Lorrie
Quinn, Dorothy
Harper,Derek
Hamilton,Joshua
Reeves, Bill
Yu, Joe
Smith, Michael
$0.00 $100,000.00 $200,000.00 $300,000.00 $400,000.00 $500,000.00

Years with Company Customer Accounts

Average Performance Bonus Previous Years ($) Total Sales ($)
hart Title

00,000.00 $300,000.00 $400,000.00 $500,000.00

Customer Accounts
Previous Years ($) Total Sales ($)
 Gross Domestic Product (in US $)
Country Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
Albania 7,385,937,423 8,105,580,293 9,650,128,750 11,592,303,225
Argentina 169,725,491,092 198,012,474,920 241,037,555,661 301,259,040,110
Australia 704,453,444,387 758,320,889,024 916,931,817,944 982,991,358,955
Austria 272,865,358,404 290,682,488,352 336,840,690,493 375,777,347,214
Belgium 335,571,307,765 355,372,712,266 408,482,592,257 451663134614.00

a.
Gross Domestic Product (in US $)
Country Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
Albania $7,386 $8,106 $9,650 $11,592
Argentina $169,725 $198,012 $241,038 $301,259
Australia $704,453 $758,321 $916,932 $982,991
Austria $272,865 $290,682 $336,841 $375,777
Belgium $335,571 $355,373 $408,483 $451,663

b.
Chart Title
$1,400,000

$1,200,000

$1,000,000

$800,000

$600,000

$400,000

$200,000

$0
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6

Albania Argentina Australia Austria Belgium

$)
Year 5 Year 6
10,781,921,975 10,569,204,154
285,070,994,754 339,604,450,702
934,168,969,952 1,178,776,680,167
344,514,388,622 341,440,991,770
421,433,351,959 416,534,140,346

$)
Year 5 Year 6
$10,782 $10,569
$285,071 $339,604
$934,169 $1,178,777
$344,514 $341,441
$421,433 $416,534
Moth Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug
Revenue ( 145,869 123,576 143,298 178,505 186,850 192,850 134,500 145,286

The chart uses a lot of distra

too many zeros.

250000

200000
192850
186850
178505

150000 154285 148523

145869 143298 145286 148235
134500 139600
revenues

123576
100000

50000

0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Months
 Sep Oct Nov Dec
154,285 148,523 139,600 148,235

rt uses a lot of distracting horizontal lines and numeric data with

ny zeros.

148523 148235
139600

Oct Nov Dec

 Number of
Franchise U.S. Locations Number ofU.S. Locations
Hampton Inns 1864.00 0-9999 10000-19999 20000-29999
ampm 3183.00 13 3 1
McDonald's 32805.00
7-Eleven Inc. 37496.00
Supercuts 213.00 25

Days Inn 1877.00

20
Vanguard
2155.00
Cleaning Systems 15

Servpro 1572.00 10
Subway 34871.00
Denny's Inc. 1668.00 5

Jan-Pro
0
Franchising Intl. 12394.00 13
Inc.
Hardee's 1901.00
Pizza Hut Inc. 13281.00
Kumon Math &
25199.00
Reading Centers
Dunkin' Donuts 9947.00
KFC Corp. 16224.00
Jazzerc ise Inc. 7683.00
Anytime Fitness 1618.00
Mateo Tools 1431.00
Stratus Building
5018.00
Solutions
30000-40000 Total Result
3 20

10000-19999
20000-29999
30000-40000
Total Result
Observation x y
1 -22 22 a.
y
2 -33 49
60
3 2 8
50
4 29 -16 40
5 -13 10 30
6 21 -28 20
7 -13 27 10
8 -23 35 0
-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20
9 14 -5 -10

10 3 -3 -20
-30
11 -37 48
-40
12 34 -29
13 9 -1 8 b.
14 -33 31 negative relatioship
15 20 -16
16 -3 14
17 -15 18
18 12 17
19 -20 -1 1
20 -7 -22
 y
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10 0 10 20 30 40
-10
-20
-30
-40
 Production (millions of vehicles)
Manufacturer Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 a.
Toyota 8.04 8.53 9.24 7.23 8.56
GM 8.97 9.35 8.28 6.46 8.48
Volkswagen 5.68 6.27 6.44 6.07 7.34 10

Hyundai 2.51 2.62 2.78 4.65 5.76 9

8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Year 1 Year 2

Toyota

b. Years 1-3: Most companies' out

decreased in the period 2-3 from
ceded the leading position to To
Year 3-4: Automobile output of
with strong growth from 2.8 to
Years 4-5: Output of all compan
output of 8.5 million
 c.
Chart Title

Hyundai

Volkswagen

GM

Toyota

0 1 2

Year 5

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

Toyota GM Volkswagen Hyundai

Year 1
Year 2
1-3: Most companies' output increased, except for GM whose output Year 3
ased in the period 2-3 from 9.3 million vehicles to 8.2 million vehicles and Year 4
the leading position to Toyota with an output of 9.2 million vehicles.
3-4: Automobile output of most companies decreased, except for Hyundai Year 5
strong growth from 2.8 to 5.8 million vehicles.
4-5: Output of all companies increased and led by GM and Toyota with
t of 8.5 million
 Chart Title

Hyundai

olkswagen

GM

Toyota

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Year 5 Year 4 Year 3 Year 2 Year 1

GM
GM
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Month Price
($)
1 2.26 a.
2 2.63 Price ($)
4.5
3 2.53
4
4 2.62
3.5
5 2.55
3
6 2.55
2.5
7 2.65
2
8 2.61
1.5
9 2.72
1
10 2.64
0.5
11 2.77
0
12 2.85 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536

13 2.84 b.
14 2.73
15 2.73
16 2.73
17 2.71
18 2.80
19 2.86
20 2.99
21 3.10
22 3.21
23 3.56
24 3.80
25 3.91
26 3.68
27 3.65
28 3.64
29 3.61
30 3.45
31 3.38
32 3.27
33 3.38
34 3.58
35 3.85
36 3.90
 b.
Overall the average worry price increased from
$2.26 to $3.90 over 36 months.
From the first month to the 17th month, the gas
price fluctuated from $2.26 to $2.71. From the
17th to the 25th month, the gas price increased
sharply from $2.71 to $3.91. During the period
The remaining time the security price
fluctuates strongly and restores the price to
$3.91 in the 36th month

27282930313233343536
Salesperson Contracts Sold a.
Tim 53
David 41
Mona 39
Column chart illustrate the contracts sold
Harish 24 Tim David Mona Harish Steven Kristina
Steven 23 60
53
Kristina 19 50
41 39
40

30
24 23
19
20

10

0
Contracts Sold

b.
ate the contracts sold
Harish Steven Kristina

24 23
19

acts Sold
Harish 12.1% a. It is diffcult to compare
David 20.6%
Kristina 9.5% 20% 12%
Steven 11.6% b.
Tim 26.6% 21%

Mona 19.6% 27% C

10%
12% 0.3

0.25

Harish David Kristina 0.2

Steven Tim Mona
0.15

0.1

0.05

0
Harish David Kr
 It is diffcult to compare the percentage of each person

Chart Title

arish David Kristina Steven Tim Mona

Exterior Color Four Cylinders Six Cylinders
Red 143 857 a.
Black 200 800
Green 321 679
White 420 580
 Chart Title
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
Red Black Green White

Four Cylinders Six Cylinders

Age Category Smartphone (%) Other Cell Phone (%)
18-24 49 46
25-34 58 35
35-44 44 45
45-54 28 58
55-64 22 59
65+ 11 45
No Cell Phone (%) a.
5 stacked-column chart
7 120
11
100
14
19 80
44
60

40

20

0
18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+

Smartphone (%) Other Cell Phone (%) No Cell Phone (%)

b.
clustered column chart
70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0
18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+

Smartphone (%) Other Cell Phone (%) No Cell Phone (%)

 c.

There are similarities between the number of

smartphone users and mobile phone users between the
ages of 18-24 and 35-44. Meanwhile, in the 25-34 age
group, the percentage of people using smartphones is
the highest, and this trend is completely opposite when
compared to the 45-64 age group, the age group with
The majority use cell phones. Finally, over the age of
65, the percentages using cell phones and not using
cell phones are the same.

clustered column chart is best for interpreting this

64 65+
relationship because it makes it easy to compare
ne (%) percentages across age groups

4 65+

ne (%)
 Attending Required Meetings Tasks Prepar- ing
(%) Business Reports (%)
Seattle 32 17
Portland 52 11
Bend 18 11
Locations
Missoula 21 6
Boise 12 14
Olympia 17 12

a.

Chart Title
Olympia

Boise

Missoula
Locations

Bend

Portland

Seattle

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Attending Required Meetings (%) Tasks Prepar- ing Business Reports (%)
Customer Interaction (%) Idle (%)

c.
Chart Title

Seattle
Portland

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
0 10 2
Idle (%) Customer Interaction (%)
Tasks Prepar- ing Business Reports (%) Attending Required Meetings (%)

Chart Title

Missoula Boise
 Chart Title

Missoula Boise

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 0 10 20

30 43 6 21

d. a clustered-bar chart is preferable for these data

 Customer
Idle (%)
Interaction (%)
37 14
24 13
52 19
43 30
64 10
54 17

b.

Chart Title
Olympia

Boise

Missoula
Locations

Bend

Portland

Seattle

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Idle (%) Customer Interaction (%)

Tasks Prepar- ing Business Reports (%) Attending Required Meetings (%)

Chart Title Chart

Portland Bend

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 10 20 3

13 24 11 52 19 52

Chart Title Chart T

Boise Olympia
 Chart Title Chart T

Boise Olympia

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0 10 20

10 64 14 12 17 54
60 70

gs (%)

Chart Title

10 20 30 40 50 60

19 52 11 18

Chart Title
 Chart Title

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

17 54 12 17
 Expected Rate of Capital Invested
Project Risk Estimate
Return (%) (Millions $)
1 12.6 6.8 6.4
2 14.8 6.2 45.8
3 9.2 4.2 9.2
4 6.1 6.2 17.2
5 21.4 8.2 34.2
6 7.5 3.2 14.8

a. b Project 1

50
45 45.8
40
35 34.2
Risk estimate

30
25
20
17.2
15 14.8
10 9.2
5 6.4

0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0
expexted rate of return
b Project 1