Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Display PDF
Display PDF
17/2023
MHND110004512023
04] Heard learned Counsel for the appellant and learned APP for the
State. Perused the application, reply and the impugned judgment. It is the
submission of learned Counsel for the appellant that the learned Trial
Court is empowered to sentence the accused only for 03 years
imprisonment and to impose the fine only of Rs. 50,000/-, but in the case
in hand, the learned Trial Court has exceeded its limit and imposed the
aggregate sentence of imprisonment of 06 years and total fine of Rs.
1,51,000/- and therefore, the sentence of imprisonment and fine needs to
be suspended. On going through the provisions of section 29 and 31 of
2 Order passed below Exh. 03 in Cri.Appeal No. 17/2023
the Code and section 71 of the Indian Penal Code, I do not find substance
in the submission of learned Counsel for the appellant. The sentences of
imprisonment and fine passed by the learned Magistrate is permissible as
per the provisions of section 29 and 31 of the Code. But, considering the
fact that appellant is challenging the judgment of conviction and the
appeal would take sufficient time in disposal, it would be just and proper
to suspend the sentence of imprisonment and to release the accused on
bail till the decision of the appeal. I, therefore, proceed to pass following
order:-
ORDER
02] In the event appellant deposits fine amount of Rs. 1,51,000/- (Rs.
One lakh fifty one thousand only) before the Trial Court or before
this Court, he be released on execution of P.R. bond of Rs.15,000/-
(Rs. Fifteen thousand only) and on furnishing surety bond in like
amount.
Digitally
03] Inform Trial court accordingly. signed by
RAJESHWAR
RAJESHWAR D GADWE
D GADWE Date:
2023.08.16
17:33:49
+0530
CERTIFICATE
I affirm that the contents of this P.D.F file order are same word to
word, as per the original order.