Due

Diligence
 Due 10/20125 misstatement DD
Diligence marks exist
Benefits of
- .

In Annual audit reasonable is

b Evaluation matter
of subject
-
assurance

Retired Intelligence
# pertise
Expert

⇐
which auditor states that will provide
given ,
in in an
analysis
Due activity which his Fs
presents true subject matter
eafair of
is view
Diligence an in an
opinion
-

-
in all material aspects SWOT will be evaluated
Organization requires intelligence factors
.
.

An Limited is lower level

assurance
of Particularly when person
-

Organization requires
a
intelligence
- -

useful ,

because assurance In DD limited lacks expertise of target industry

.

assurance is .

⇒ It lack that particular because it isrelated to 3 valuation matter

may given future of Subject

which is uncertain balance sheet

intelligence Identification off
-

of
-
.

⑦ It lack time between Audit G DD assets G liabilities

may Difference
.

b to Financial data Valuation be done all

for several Audit relates
-

DD will
can be
performed as
of
-

liabilities
aspects ef in audit opinion
is
expressed on assets G
for
.

w
A hile FS whereas in DD Reduces risk valuation
acquiring company only financial over
-

of
.

e) While product G aspects both 3 Limited Assurance

launching a non
financial are ,

⇒ while Covered investment has to will limited

selecting a
supplier as be Expert provide assurance
-

⇒ while a customer Evaluated matter will

accepting for both aspects . on
subject which raise

⇒ while premises 2 Audit relates to data confidence investor

purchasing
year
one
,
of
.

provide been completed Risk

In DD expert will an which has
already of wrong
investment is reduced
-
. .
-

evaluation matter with Whereas DD relates to data

of subject , along future
a limited assurance .
which is uncertain

that 32 reasonable
In limited expert States
Lastly audit
-
assurance in assurance
,
,

based on his review

nothing was
found is whereas in DD limited
given ,

leads him to betel 've that

which assurance is
given
.
Matters to consider DD
during

key
b
employees
3 customers
Key
3 Product
lifecycle
,

↳ Case
Legal
5, Debt

6, Cost structure

7, laws
Applicable

B assets
Remaining life of
I -5 marks -
each evaluated

matter
What matter I I area
information
=

will be considered

How that matter

liryormartionl
area investment
affects
our .

+ Im → How that area can be

Procedure
verified
- .
 Tf
if
- ⇐

TEA
EEO
⇒

e-

=p

-30-220
⑧

EE
-

① BETI
EFFED

⑥ ② Of

Page
Page 106 130
of 416
Leopard
Co .
(a) .

I
-
6 marks It needs to be considered that what

Loss Customer needs to be are the restrictions the land 9

selling
on

of
as customer which whether zebra Co will be able to sell
further
is
investigated
.

switched represents 51 this land to Cheetah Co ER not

of revenue as
getting
.
.
.

Loss 51 will valuation part sale Co There are restrictions

of of
revenue
of affect
.
.

zebra Co as 51 revenue is that to whom the land can be sold

of
.
.

stream It needs to that

if
be
major revenue
investigated
.

Reason critical local will take back the land

of switching of
customer is .

authority
Customer is
switching to a new entrant then how Zebra Co . main
production

than G area will be accessed this land

who is
substantially cheaper zebra . as

It lead to loss other customers Surrounds the entrance to main production

may of
also .
area .

Zebra Co sells products to

unique
.

that customer who has switched .

It

needs to be considered that what are

the inventories levels that unique

of
products They obsolete
may get
.

Further it also not to be considered

that what will be the impact on

Cost when this customer switches

Organization
.

Certain cost be incurred

may on
servicing
this customer which will now be saved .
 Ftd
IIE
of
⇐
#
#

F-

Mo
?
FT

-E€===
.

← =

e←⇐⇐¥€⇒⇐€
÷¥€⇐FEEEZ€EEE⇐e .

8
II
↳
-

oeedur#

Page 207
Jacob Co CLI Additional 12 Sales trend Locke Co needs
of
marks
-

information
- .
.

(a) Benefits DD Service contracts directors will be to be considered as Co has

of of
- .

First DD will be that Jacob

required 3 out 5 directors achieved last 3
benefit of
as
of major growth
in

6 the IF It needs to be considered

will evaluation Locke Co Co
they will
are owners
get an
of of years
. . . .

As Locke Co leave directorship takeover then that whether

industry
is
.
deals in
different after growth continuing

8 hot tubs :
Jacob Co will at not
pools Joe managing
in
of swimming difficulty
o . .

Jacob Co lack expertise to Lock co Further Economic data needs to

may
-
.
.

will provide Structure considered that whether

to
evaluate Locke Co .

Expert -

of
.
needs to be be
any
an evaluation Locke Co which will considered that whether whole work recession is OE not Locke
of
. near .

include that be Co customers affluent customers

potential by existing ER
can was owners are
managed
.

synergies
made IF Locke Co 09 economic recession will
formed affect
was
were
-

system
. .

Expert will also

wholly then it will them most
provide a valuation
managed by
.

owners
of
Locke Co It will include valuation assets Jacob Co to Loan needs to be
agreement
-

of get difficult for manage

. . .

G liabilities which are on balance sheet Location new land needs to be evaluated that whether covenants
of any
-

G those which balance sheet considered that whether it is in exist loan Further it
agreement
are
off prestigious in
. .

9 valuations not be to considered that what

Earnings
will be predicted area of .
whether customers will needs be

will be made This will reduce risk to visit that head are the in loan
of willing new
mortgages agreement
.

office
.
.

valuation Locke co Cost head G needs

over
of of constructing
new
Overdraft facility agreement
-

office
- .

Lastly Expert will provide limited permissions need to be to be reviewed that what are
planning
a

Locke Co This limited considered Locke Co head the terms OD IF

agreement
assurance as new
of
.

on .
.

assurance will increase is not built it will revoked then Locke Co

confidence of office yet get
.
.

Jacob Co
they will it
face
as
.

management are
difficulty
as relies

first acquisition on that OD in winter months

making
.
.
 Minutes the court 9
of proceeding
-

will be considered to
legal opinion
estimate the possible amount
of
Locke Co loses the
penalty if
.

claim .

Customer be
feedback Survey will
-

considered that what Is the impact

Locke Co due to
on
reputation of
.

this incident . Whether customers are

to work with Locke Co ER

willing
.

not .

Details correspondence with that

of
-

will
famous
actor be
required to

estimate amount settlement that

of any
Can be reached .

Outsourcing
service contract of
Austin Co .

need to be reviewed to detail

gain
about their 3 their
fees scope of
work .
 = =

-
⇒ -

To
E
⑥
E
- =

= I

-eaT=
-

Eff
in
- .

I
- - e -

- -

- - - #

- -

#
¥
§
"÷÷÷e
-

I V
=

Ii
:÷÷÷
'

IEE-sw.IN?faitgyae------
.

-
- - -

FEIG ③

:÷÷÷÷÷⇐s=⇐
premises
,

€ ===te ③

r.ee#oEJf-E=o------
g-

¥E¥⇐¥⇒
=
-

Page
Page 171 195
of 416
-

-
- -

- a
✓ -

Page
Page 172 196
of 416
 Baltimore Co. Cc ) 3 marks Cb ) Matters to 9 additional
focus
-

Ca ) DD Gmarks In DD limited is
16€
Benefits of
assurance in
given information
-

-
=
,

provide Baltimore Co States that based his dependent

Expert will which
Expert Mizzen Co Vic E

an
.
on .
is on

It will be him Lou the

evaluation
of Mizzen
Co .

useful review
nothing
was
found
which leads
,
as
they are
founders of
Baltimore G it lacks expertise to believe that investment not viable Co 9 they have developed website
for
.
as is .
.

market G Co is
In auditor
in online Mizzen .
-

comparison ,
in audit opinion interfaces
which resulted in
growth
related to website development Complete reasonable that in IF Baltimore
gives
a assurance
of Mizzen purchase of
.

after
.

Co Fs true G then
of Mizzen
presents
fair
his
risk
q opportunities opinion Co they will leave
mizzen
Co
analysis
.
. .

will be done with all material Baltimore not be able to

along identification view in
aspects . Co .
will

Assurance it to lack
lower level due expertise
of potential
in DD as
synergies is
of manage of
. -

Expert will valuation it donot contain statement rather in website development

Secondly perform a
any positive ,
.

Co It will be it restricts the Service contracts with Vic G Lou

of Mizzen
basis
just liability of
as
-

useful
.

on

Co business intellectual data need to be considered that whether

Mizzen is in review
of found
.

Co Further audit only

includes an
opinion bound to with
property in which
great part of they are work
. -

will be balance Sheet It will reduce Fs whereas in DD with Mizzen Co

off along
.

on
-
.

being paid
risk value evaluation Lou
higher opinion a complete target Vic G secured
funds from a
of
.

of
Co It to be
Lastly expert will
provide Co is also venture capital needs
given
an assurance .
.
.

to Baltimore Co .
which will raise
considered that Venture capitalist will

there Co be
only willing to sell their shares
Mizzen
as
confidence
.

acquisition their acquisition Review their target rate

If
will
first
is
they get
.

expert will reduce return venture capitalist usually

by
chance
of wrong of
.

investment .
invest in
companies in order to provide
them 9 management support
financial
 .

till the period venture capitalist these will not be available G 5 IF Revenue
achieves
acquisition 2years
premises
for years
.

his return at nominal rent Market will is

target .
.

Adjustment of
rent
recognition policy wrong
G

⇒ Correspondence with Big Grow needs revenue is booked on cash basis

affect profits
.

that
of Big
to be considered whether their a
relating to market rent Grow then Co Fs will be
Information Mizzen .

rate return is acheiued used to be overvalued

of premises Co needs
minimum
by Mizzen .
.

ER not G whether
they are it ⇒ about contracts which
willing
as will
gained affect profits Information
to sell it .

a correspondence with Big Grow 9 rental are incomplete i.e

advance is
agreement
.

Co due to considered that whether received

Major growth of Mizzen .
was needs to be
against
website

a
particular website
interface developed Big will these premises after maintenance but is not
grow provide service

Lou It needs to takeover

get provided
G be not
by Vic of .
.
.

considered that Mizzen

Co is in
Mizzen Co has assets which it uses

few
. .

its It needs to considered

technology industry where obsolesce in
Company . be

rate whether that a valuation will

is
usually high any major part
of Mizzen
.
.

other interface are developed which can include

intangible
assets such as its

website which
replace existing one .

brand name G
interfaces
⇒ sales trend it developed
of
Co
mizzen needs has .
.

successful
to be reviewed that whether that ⇒ intellectual owned
Information
about properties
still sold Co
interface
is
being by Mizzen . will be required as

0¥ not website developed it will

interfaces by
.

It needs to be considered that be its Mv

Mizzen .
part of
.

Co do not have its It needs to be considered that how

premises
.
own .

It Big Grow Co
They
operates on
premises of Mizzen recognizes
revenue receive
.
.

the maintenance website

advance
of
which is
existing owner
After against
.