Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SS Notes Condensed
SS Notes Condensed
THE WORDS IN RED MAY DIFFER BY QUESTION FOCUS (E.G. IN WORKING FOR THE
GOOD OF SOCIETY)
MAKE LINKAGES TO SHOW HOW THE EXAMPLE ANSWERS THE QUESTION FOCUS
Legal statuscan shape citizenship because it allowsone toenjoy rights and participate in
the country’s politics.Legal status includes therights of citizens toaccess public services
such as education andfreedom to practice one’s ownreligion,the responsibility to protect
one’s own country, and to observe the laws of thecountry. For citizens in a democracy,
legal status consists ofthe right to votefor theirdesired leaders of the country.The rights
of citizensare also crucial for one’s legal status.For example, the Singapore Constitution
established in 1965 states that there must be a freedom of speech and freedom of religion
in Article 14 and Article 15 respectively. The PCMR, (Presidential Council for Minority Rights)
examines all laws before they are passed to prevent any laws from discriminating against
any racial or religious minority.This shows thatcitizens have rights or liberties and are
protected by the law of the country.
Differing needs and interestspose a challenge indeciding what is good for society as
people from Singapore’s diverse population havedifferentcultures and lifestyles. Hence,
these various groups of peoplemay not be able toagree on common interestsandwhat is
important for a happy and fulfilling life is different for everyone.For example, an efficient
public transport system would be an important priority for those without their own mode
of transport. However, those with their private transport may be more concerned about an
efficient road network to ensure that they are able to reach their destination quickly and
efficiently.Given that society has limited resources,it would be impossible for everyone’s needs
and interests to be met fully. As such, wise decisions on how the resources should be used would
need to be made. It is therefore a challenge due to the inability to please everyone in decision
making.
Chapter 3A: Role of the government in working for the good of society
Inmaintaining internal order, agencies such as thepolice, prisons and civil defence
forcesprotect the citizens, propertyand whateversociety believes should be protected.
This is important so that social services such as schools and hospitalscan exist with the
peace and safetythat the government provides.Anexample of maintaining internal order
in Singapore is the Singapore Police Force (SPF). During the Little India Riots in December
2013, foreign workers attacked a bus involved in a fatal accident with another foreign
worker. The SPF was dispatched to do a thorough investigation on the situation of the riot,
dispersed the rioters and deterred future occurrences by increasing the number of officers
on patrol to ensure social order in Little India. The SPF was able to prevent people from
using violence via effective communication, managing the rioters and improving the lives of
the foreign workers. The SPF also deterred potential troublemakers from succeeding in
sparking social disorder.
The government is responsible forproviding goodsand services for the public. The
government mustprovide citizens with affordable basicservices, such as healthcare,
transport and water. The government ensures that people haveconvenient accessto basic
services andoffers subsidiesto make services moreaffordable. This in turn improves the
well-being of citizens.An example of a service providedfor the public is transportation. To
enhance commuter experience, the Singapore government provides premium bus services,
an app known as My Transport SG, upgraded bus stops, upgraded bus poles, CEPAS
Smartcard, bus services map, real-time bus arrival info and travel information system. As of
2014, there are 22 bus interchanges, 272 taxi stands, 35 LRT stations, 105 MRT stations,
4638 bus stops and 164 km of expressways.
(b) NGOsplay a very important role ininfluencinggovernment decisions. NGOs can help
torefine government policiesandpoint to areas thatrequire more attention, by working
for the good of the people through their daily work and the activities they organise.In
2011, two NGOs, the Humanitarian Organisation for Migration Economics (HOME) and
Transient Workers Count Too (TWC2), put forth their recommendations on improving the
working conditions of foreign domestic workers in Singapore. They recommended that
foreign domestic workers should be given a day off a week in recognition of the work they
do.
Nationalityis a great factor in shaping one’s personalidentity because it builds a sense of
belonging which can shape one’s identity. This is because people of the same nationality
usuallyshare a common history, acommon set of traditions,common practices, a common
language, andlive together in a particular geographicalarea.For example, New Zealanders
identify themselves as “Kiwis” and rugby is their national sport. Most kiwis would watch the
games of the national team, the All Blacks. The Kiwis bond through their common love for
rugby and their admiration of the All Blacks.
Race and ethnicityis a great factor in shaping one'spersonal identity because we belong
to a particular racial and / or ethnic community and the practices and beliefs of these
communitiesshape our way of life, thus influencingour identity. "Race" refers to the
classification of people according to physical characteristics that are biological in nature.
Examples of physical characteristics that define a person's race includeskin, hair and eyes,
bone structure and jaw structure. "Ethnicity" refersto one'sancestry, cultural practices,
language, food and dressing that are associated with a set of practices and customsunique
to a particular country or region.For example, withinthe Malay race, there are different
ethnic groups like the Bataks, Bugis, Dayaks etc. They may share the similar physical
features of the Malay race, but they have unique costumes, practices and customs that
shape their lives and influence their personal identity.
Religionis important in shaping one’s identity asthey influence our way of life in many
ways. Religionembodies a set of shared core beliefsand practices, regardless of nationality
and ethnicity. These beliefs and practicesshape theway we interact with others, choices
we make and our thinking. The main religions in Singaporepromote the attitudes of
compassion, sensitivity in believers’ interactions with others, and helping others.For
example, believers of Buddhism known as Buddhists follow the teachings of Buddha. The
teachings of Buddha promote peace and harmony amongst different races and religions,
non-violence and the appreciation of all living beings in an interdependent world. Hence,
Buddhists also believe that they must care for the welfare of all living things as they too
equally desire peace and happiness.
Conclusions
Competition for resources such as (a) jobsposes achallenge to a diverse society, as it
could in turn lead to frustration and tension. Concerns can cause tension in areas such as
employment, housing and transportation. With more than 40% of Singapore’s population
being work permit holders, there will inevitably beincreased competition over resources in
terms of opportunities such as employment and availability of infrastructuresuch as
demands for public transport. This could cause Singaporeans toresent foreign workersfor
the impacts they brought to their lives, as they fear that the increased number of
foreigners in Singapore’s workforce would lead to increased competition for jobs. As some
believe employers would ratherhire foreign workersthan local workersbecause of the
lower salary, they may attribute suchjob lossestobeing the result of having more foreign
workers in Singapore, leading to unhappiness and tension.An example of such tension
over competition for jobs would be in 2014 when abuse was directed against the Filipino
community after they revealed plans for celebrating the Philippines Independence Day in
Orchard Road.This shows that with more competitionfor resources, the greater inflow of these
work permit holders could be taken as the reason for the negative impacts people experience in
life, therefore illustrating the challenge competition for resources poses to a diverse society.
Benefits:
- Ensures a homogenous population - greater social cohesion as all French nationals
would have a common culture and language
- Assimilation of minority groups - strengthen French national identity
Challenges:
- Lack of rights of individuals to practice religion and lack of recognition of impact of
religion on identity
- Certain religious groups feel marginalised and unrecognised, cause social division
Benefits:
- Government services can be easily overwhelmed logistically, especially in a large
country like USA, thus delegating some of these roles to private sectors
- Less government budget needs to be spent on providing healthcare, freeing up
funds to develop other areas of the country like education and infrastructure
Challenges:
- Cost and coverage of medical insurance is a challenge for Americans of lower
income groups, burdened as insurance premiums are deducted
- Many choose not to buy insurance to save money on premiums - risky for health
Shared Responsibility Approach in Singapore: In a shared responsibility approach, the
government intervenesthrough the provision of basic healthcare services andshares the
cost of some aspectsof healthcare. There is abalance of personal responsibilityand the
role of government in providing healthcare. This approachcan be seen in Singapore’s
healthcare system. Singapore’s healthcare system is made up of both public and private
healthcare service providers. Within the public hospital system, people are allowed to
choose between the wards which offer varying amounts of luxury and convenience and
higher-class wards would mean less government subsidy or aid. While the government
provides subsidies, citizens have a part to play too. A portion of their Central Provident
Fund (CPF) savings is set aside in Medisave to help them pay for healthcare. There are also
other schemes such as Medishield and Medifund to aid Singaporeans in financing their
healthcare.Singapore’s approach ensures that financing healthcare isnot the sole
responsibilityof one party alone. This approach ensures that while the government helps
to subsidise healthcare, citizens too, take the personal responsibility to fund their
healthcare.This will ensure that healthcare remainsaffordable and accessible to all regardless
of socio-economic status.
Benefits:
- Good balance between the role of government and individuals to ensure healthcare
remains accessible to citizens who require healthcare coverage
- Everyone gets treatment regardless of their income as government is able to bear
the brunt of subsidising amounts for those who are unable to afford
Challenges:
- The population continues to grow with a large percentage of the ageing population -
healthcare system needs to accommodate the needs of the elderly
- Infrastructure needs to be upgraded, manpower will be imperative
- Healthcare costs rising all over the world, government implements more subsidies
to assist lower income groups, costs shared among different stakeholders -
Singaporeans will not feel the pinch in paying for healthcare
- For-profit hospitals may focus more on providing better service for people of higher
socio-economic status as they earn more from them - situation where healthcare is
catered to the rich
Benefits:
- Entire population has access to healthcare - better health among people
Challenges:
- Personal taxation in Sweden is hefty to finance such approach - although Swedes
are willing to pay such high taxes, burden will eventually fall on younger generations
as there is a high percentage of ageing population - not sustainable in the long run
- Immigrants and citizens of European Union eligible for government-financed
healthcare - enormous strain on government - over-reliance on taxation
- Everyone has equal access to healthcare - people more likely to pursue treatment
for minor illnesses - longer waiting times - may not receive the care they require
Loss of Income (negative):With globalisation, individuals may also face a loss of income
due to increased competition in securing employment. Withcheaper labour costs
elsewhere and the inability to find alternative employment, individuals face the prospect of
losing their jobsand hence their stable source of income. Individuals who are unable to
upgrade their skills are at risk of facing these threats.For example, when MNCs close down
their operations in a country and move to another country where labour costs are cheaper,
which is made possible by globalisation. This can be seen by the Japanese fashion chain
Uniqlo, which moved out of Shenzhen China to Vietnam in 2013 when labour costs rose.
This led to individuals who previously worked at Uniqlo losing their jobs.As globalisation
increases the volatility and mobility of jobs, individuals can be adversely affected. If they are
unable to upgrade their skills to keep up with the changing time, they face a risk of losing their
jobs, eventually affecting their livelihoods and standard of living.
Homogenisation in Food:With the spread of fast food culture, food varieties have been
criticised to have fallen as local food culture becomes homogenised. With globalisation,
food chains and restaurants canexpand their businesses across countries, providing
people with awider food landscapeand easier access to foreign flavours without having to
travel out of their countries. This may lead todilution of local flavours.For example, as of
January 2022, StarBucks Coffee has over 34,000 stores in 80 countries serving coffee drinks.
Its popularity shows that many have embraced this aspect of American culture, highlighting
the homogenisation of coffee culture.When foreign food chains gain popularity in other
countries, the local flavours are at risk of losing their influence, leading to homogenisation
of food culture.This will lead to subsequent dilution or loss of local food culture when no
resistance is put up by the government or locals, creating a significant impact on the local food
diversity.
Hybridisation in Food:The presence offoreign food cultures shows that locals have
embraced some aspects of foreign influences, leading to hybridisation as food varieties
have increased. With globalisation, food chains and restaurants canexpand their
businesses across countries, providing people with awider food landscapeand easier
access to foreign flavours without having to travel out of their countries. This can lead to
increased acceptance towards foreign flavours.For example, in Singapore, an example
would be fusion foods like otah burgers, beef satays or chilli crab pasta, which are new
dishes created from different cuisines blended together.With hybridisation, unique
combinations of different food cuisines can be formed. Local flavours, which may at times
be at threat of being replaced,can be preserved. Local cultures are respected and kept
close to the hearts and taste buds of the locals.
While surveillance can enhance security for society, some maycriticise these methodsdue
to being aninfringement of people’s privacy. The introduction of full body scanners in USA
in 2007 led to much opposition as some saw such scanssimilar to a virtual body strip. In
2013, these scanners were replaced with those which revealed fewer details.