Professional Documents
Culture Documents
6 - Drilling Hydraulics
6 - Drilling Hydraulics
6 - Drilling Hydraulics
Dr Masood Mostofi
WARNING
This material has been copied and communicated to you by or on
behalf of Curtin University of Technology pursuant to Part VB of
the Copyright Act 1968 (the Act)
2
Lecture Note
Concept of average
fluid velocity
Characterising
Parasitic Pressure
3
Application of Drilling Hydraulics
Hole Cleaning
Drilling Hydraulics
Safe Mud
Weight Window
Well Control
Bit Nozzle
Selection
Rig selection
4
Application of Drilling Hydraulics
5
Backgrounds: Average fluid velocity
No-slip condition:
interface.
6
Backgrounds: Average fluid velocity
7
Backgrounds: Average fluid velocity
Flow rate
Flow rate
4 4
Inner diameter Outer Inner diameter of
of pipe diameter of annulus
annulus
Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
8
Example
Determine the average fluid velocity inside the drill string and also in the
annulus for a drill string made of 1400 ft of drill pipe (OD = 5”, ID =
4.275”), and 600 ft of drill collar (OD = 10, ID =3.5) and 600 ft of Heavy
drilling fluid and the wellbore diameter is 12 1/4 in. The flow rate is 280
gpm.
9
Example
1
4 144
1
4 144
10
Example
11
B A
Energy Conservation
1 1
̅ Δ ̅
2 2
0 Atmospheric pressure
1
Δ ̅ ̅ In SI unit
2
Δ 8.073 10 ̅ ̅
12
Pressure Drop is not function of depth!
B A
B
A
13
Dynamic Bottom Hole Pressure
B
1 1
̅ Δ ̅
2 2
0 Atmospheric pressure
1
Δ ̅ ̅ In SI unit
2
In Field unit
Δ 8.073 10 ̅ ̅ 0.052
8.073 10 ̅ ̅ ≪Δ 0.052
A
Δ 0.052
14
Dynamic Bottom Hole Pressure and ECD
Bottom hole pressure under circulating condition: B
Δ 0.052
0.052 Δ 0.052
Δ
0.052
15
Example:
B
Calculate the equivalent circulating density of a 12 ppg drill fluid
if the pressure drop in the annulus is 100 psi and the total
16
Solution:
B
17
Pressure Drop
Pressure drop in
Pressure drop Pressure drop annulus drill
inside drill pipe through bit nozzles pipe/wellbore
Δ Δ Δ Δ Δ Δ
18
Pressure Drop
Pressure drop in
Pressure drop Pressure drop annulus drill
inside drill pipe through bit nozzles pipe/wellbore
Δ Δ Δ Δ Δ Δ
19
Pressure Drop is not function of depth!
Chapter 9
Δ Δ Δ Δ Δ Δ
This presentation
20
Pressure Drop is not function of depth!
Δ Δ Δ Δ Δ Δ
Bit hydraulic
Pump hydraulic
horse power
horse power
Power consumption to
overcome viscous flow
21
Bit Pressure Drop
A
http://www.drillingcontractor.org/
B 2 2
Δ Δ
2 2
Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
22
Bit Pressure Drop
Δ
2
http://www.drillingcontractor.org/
Pressure drop
Discharge Total nozzle
across bit
coefficient area ( )
(psi)
23
Jet Impact Force
Δ
12034
Δ
54.85
24
Jet Impact Force and Hydraulic Power at the
Bit Pressure drop
across bit (psi)
Flow rate (ppg)
Δ
Δ
1714.29 54.85
25
Example
Calculate the pressure drop across a 3 nozzle PDC bit with nozzle sizes of
#13, #13 and #14, where a flow rate of 200 gpm is being circulated. The
Also, calculate the jet impact force and the bit power consumption.
26
Solution
#
4 32
nozzle size
Nozzle A (in2) At
(#)
Nozzle 1 13 0.130
Nozzle 3 14 0.150
10 200
Δ 219.8
12034 12034 0.95 0.409
27
Solution
Δ 219.8 200
25.6
1714.29 1714.29
0.95
Δ 10 200 219.8
54.85 54.85
163
28
Characterising Parasitic Pressure
Δ Δ Δ Δ Δ Δ
Parasitic pressure:
29
Characterising Parasitic Pressure
30
Characterising Parasitic Pressure
• Measurement:
rates
parasitic pressure
parameters.
31
Example:
Two circulation tests have been performed where the pump pressures of
2500 psi and 1850 psi are recorded at flow rates of 300 gpm and 180 gpm. If
the bit has three nozzles with all numbers 13, predict the pump pressure at
flow rate of 250 gpm. Discharge coefficient is 0.95 and the drilling fluid
density is 10 ppg.
32
Example:
#
4 32
nozzle size
Nozzle A( ) ( )
(#)
Nozzle 1 13 0.130
Nozzle 3 13 0.130
33
Example:
Δ
12034
34
Example:
(gpm) pump pressure (psi) (psi) (psi)
Δ
1951.4 300 1951.4 300
1652.5 180 1652.5 180
35
Example:
1951.4 300
Δ
1652.5 180
1951.4 300
log log
1652.5 180
1951.4 300
log log
1652.5 180
1951.4
log
1652.5 0.325 304.85
300
log
180
Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
36
Example:
Δ 304.85 .
10 250
Δ 380.9
12034 0.95 0.389
37
Nozzle Size Optimisation
Δ
Δ
1714.29 54.85
Δ Δ
12034
38
Nozzle Size Optimisation: Max Jet Impact
Force
The nozzles are selected
so that the maximum Δ
amount of impact force is 54.85
applied on the rock surface.
Δ Δ
2
Δ Δ Δ
39
Nozzle Size Optimisation: Max Bit Hydraulic
Horse Power
Δ
The nozzles are selected 1714.29
so that the maximum
amount of hydraulic horse
power is consumed across Δ
the bit.
12034
Δ Δ
1
Δ Δ Δ
40
Example
Optimise the bit nozzle size based on both criterion of maximum jet impact
.
Δ 250 . The pump pressure is expected to be 2,800 psi, mud
41
Solution:
Maximum Bit Hydraulic Horse Power Criterion:
.
Δ 250
0.35
Δ Δ 2800 725.9
1 0.35 1
42
Solution:
Maximum Bit Hydraulic Horse Power Criterion:
.
Δ 250
Δ
12034
12.5 422
725.9 0.515
12034 0.98
43
Solution:
Maximum Bit Hydraulic Horse Power Criterion:
0.515
#
4 32
nozzle
Nozzle A( )
size (#)
Nozzle 1 15 0.172
Nozzle 2 15 0.172 0.517
Nozzle 3 15 0.172
44
Solution:
Maximum Jet Impact Force:
.
Δ 250
0.35
Δ Δ 2800 417.0
2 0.35 2
45
Solution:
Maximum Jet Impact Force:
.
Δ 250
Δ
12034
12.5 627.5
417.0 1.01
12034 0.98
46
Solution:
Maximum Jet Impact Force:
1.01
#
4 32
nozzle
Nozzle A( )
size (#)
Nozzle 1 21 0.338
Nozzle 2 21 0.338 1.01
Nozzle 3 21 0.338
47
Solution:
Graphical Analysis
method is not part of
Drilling Engineering
and Fluids Lab.
48
End of Chapter 6
49
References
Bourgoyne, A. T., Millheim, K. K., Chenevert, M. E., & Young, F. (1986). Applied
drilling engineering.
JONASSON, K., & MACK, C. (2009). Web page. Petroleum exploration, production
and development activity in Western Australia in, 12.
Pusch, R., & Ramqvist, G. (2008). Borehole project-Final report of phase 3: Posiva
Oy, Helsinki (Finland).
Rehm, B., & McClendon, R. (1971, January 1). Measurement of Formation Pressure
from Drilling Data. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/3601-MS