Memo - Province Wide Search

Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region IX, Zamboanga Peninsula
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF ZAMBOANGA DEL SUR
August 11, 2023

DIVISION MEMORANDUM
No. __________, s. 2023
DM-SGOD-2023-08-______
2023 PROVINCE-WIDE SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING

DEPED EMPLOYEES AND OTHER SEARCHES
TO: Assistant Schools Division Superintendents

Division Chiefs
Education Program Supervisors
Public Schools District Supervisors
Public Elementary and Secondary School Heads
Teaching and Non-Teaching Personnel
Provincial Paid Teachers
All Others Concerned
This Schools Division
1. The Department of Education – Schools Division of Zamboanga del Sur, through the
Division PRAISE Committee, announces the 2023 Province-Wide Search for
Outstanding DepEd Employees and Other Searches.
2. The search is in line with the celebration of the 71st Araw ng Zamboanga del Sur
which aims to give special recognition to DepEd employees who manifest profound
commitment, exemplary competence, and remarkable dedication to their work.
3. The following are the categories for this year’s search:
a. Outstanding Teacher
b. Outstanding Master Teacher
c. Outstanding School Head
d. Outstanding Education Program Supervisor
e. Outstanding Public Schools District Supervisor
f. Outstanding Non-Teaching Personnel (School-Based)
g. Outstanding Local Paid Teacher
h. Tiktok Dance Competition
i. Talentadong Guro
4. All QUALCIs shall submit only one (1) nominee per category.
5. The screening committees in different levels shall be organized to assess and evaluate
the documents of the nominees and shall declare the winner.
Provincial Government Center, Dao, Pagadian City

(062) 214 – 1991
depedzambosur@gmail.com
www.suresasur.net
1 | 34
School Screening Committee (for Teachers, MT, Local Paid Teacher, and
School-Based Non-Teaching Personnel):
Chairperson : School Head
Members : 1. Master/Head Teacher/Next in rank as applicable
2. Duly elected Teacher Association Representative
3. Duly elected Supreme Elementary/Secondary Learner
Government (SELG/SSLG) Representative
4. Duly elected SPTA Representative
District Screening Committee

Chairperson : 1. Public Schools District Supervisor
Members : 1. Duly elected District Elementary Teacher Association
Representative
2. Duly elected District Secondary Teacher Association
Representative
3. Duly elected District Elementary School Head Association
Representative
4. Duly elected District Secondary School Head Association
Representative
5. Duly elected Municipal Federated PTA Representative
6. Duly elected District SELG Representative
7. Duly elected District SSLG Representative
Secretariat : Administrative Officer II or Highest Position of Non-Teaching
Personnel
QUALCI Screening Committee

Chairperson : 1. QUALCI Manager
Members : 1. All PSDSs in the QUALCI
Secretariat : Administrative Officer II or Highest Position of Non-Teaching
Personnel where the QUALCI manager is assigned
Division Screening Committee

The Division PRAISE Committee and its sub-committees as indicated in Office
Memorandum no. 38, s. 2023 shall review all the documents of QUALCI nominees,
and the EPS and PSDS categories.
6. The Division PRAISE Committee shall declare the winners and submit it to the
Province of Zamboanga del Sur.
7. The deadline for the submission of documents to the Schools Division Office (SDO)
shall be on September 4, 2023, Monday, before 5:00 p.m. via the Records Section
addressed to the PRAISE Committee. The Awarding Ceremony shall be on September
16, 2023, which shall be announced in a separate memorandum.

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
2 | 34
8. For inquiries and clarifications, contact PRAISE Secretariat/R&R Technical Working

Group thru these numbers: 0917-159-8626/0977-645-8756.
9. Enclosures to this Memorandum are as follows:
• Attachment 1 – Rules and Mechanics

• Attachment 2 – Selection Criteria and Rubrics
• Attachment 3 – Feedback Form
• Attachment 4 – Nomination Form
• Attachment 5 – Nomination Write Up
• Attachment 6 – Score Sheets
10. Immediate dissemination of this Memorandum is desired.
DR. JEANELYN A. ALEMAN, CESO VI

Schools Division Superintendent
Enclosure: As stated
References:
To be indicated in the Perpetual Index under the following subjects:

*PRAISE *Rewards and Recognition

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
3 | 34
Attachment 1
RULES AND MECHANICS
2023 Province-Wide Search for Outstanding DepEd Employees

and Other Searches
I. WHAT ARE THE AWARDS?
There are eight (8) categories to be awarded in the 2023 Province-Wide Search for
Outstanding DepEd Employees and Other Searches. The PRAISE Committee may revoke
an award should the winner be found to have committed falsification of documents
submitted or have been found guilty of any case that was pending during the search
period.
II. WHO ARE ELIGIBLE TO JOIN?
The nominee for the search category must meet the following qualification requirements:
1. Has a good reputation, known integrity, and moral principles in public service;
2. Has good human relations in the school/office and in the community;
3. A permanent employee or a Provincial Paid Teacher who meet the selection
criteria;
4. Has been rated at least “Very Satisfactory” in the last three (3) performance rating
period;
5. Has not been found guilty nor has any pending administrative or criminal offense.
III. WHO CAN NOMINATE?
The following can do the nomination:
For teachers, school-based non- School Head

teaching personnel, and local paid
teacher
For School Heads PSDS
For PSDS and EPS Functional Division Chief
IV. WHAT ARE THE PRIZES?
More than the certificate or plaque of recognition and cash prizes that wait for the
winners, the honor of being named as Outstanding Employee is truly beyond measure.

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
4 | 34
V. WHAT IS THE SEARCH METHODOLOGY?
Paper Screening shall include all supporting documents submitted to the School,
District, and QUALCI Search Committee which shall be evaluated using specific
criteria (see enclosure).
VI. WHAT ARE THE NECESSARY ATTACHMENTS?
Arrange the following attachments in the following order and label/tag for each
document:
• Personal Data Sheet
• Certification that the nominee has not been suspended or charged for any
administrative or criminal offense.
• Supporting documents following the specific criteria on Paper Screening.
Photocopies must be certified true and verified against the original by the
immediate superior of the nominee.
Score sheets indicating the results in the respective level shall also be attached.

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
5 | 34
Attachment 2 – Selection Criteria and Rubrics
Criteria for 2023 Outstanding Teacher and Outstanding Master Teacher
Criteria Means Of Verification Details Points Actual

(MOVs) Points
Earned
A. Authenticated Computation: 35
PERFORMANCE photocopy of the IPCRF
RATING for the last 3 Add the 3
years/Original copy of performance ratings
Certification of divided
Performance Rating for by 3 to get the mean
the last 3 years from AO performance rating.
V Mago
Mean Range: Follow
the IPCR scoring
range
Computation:
Very Satisfactory
Rating
IPCRF Rating 1 – 3.8
3.8+4.2+4.4
=12.4/3 = 4.13
4.13/5*35= 28.91
B. Outstanding Innovations 35
Accomplishments A. Proposal duly
(Any of the approved by the Head of 1. A,B,C & D = 35
following: Office or the Designated 2.A,B, C, & E =25
Innovations, Research Committee 3.Only A,B, & C =20
Publications, per DO No. 16, s. 2017 4.Only A & B = 15
Implemented 5. Only A = 10

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
6 | 34
Research, B. Accomplishment
Recognitions from Report verified by the
Certified Award Head of Office.
Giving
Agencies) for the C.Certification of
last three (3) years. Utilization of the
innovation or research,
within the school/office
duly signed by the Head
of Office.
D. Certification of
adoption of the
innovation or research
by another
school/office duly
signed by the Head of
Office.
E.Proof of citation by
other researchers
(whose study/research.
Whether published or
unpublished, is likewise
approved by authorize
body) of the concept/s
developed the research
Implemented and
completed Research
1. A,B,C & D = 35
A. Proposal duly 2.A,B, C, & E =25
approved by the Head of 3.Only A,B, & C =20
Office or the Designated 4.Only A & B = 15
Research Committee 5. Only A = 10
per DO No. 16, s. 2017
B. Accomplishment
Report verified by the
Head of Office.
C. Certification of
Utilization of the

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
7 | 34
duly signed by the Head

of Office.
D. Certification of
adoption of the
innovation or research
by another
school/office duly
signed by the Head of
Office.
E.Proof of citation by
other researchers
(whose study/research.
Whether published or
Recognitions: National - 35 points
LGUs,
NGAs and NGOs and Region - 25 points
Other Award Bodies for Province/Division -
the last three (3) years20 points
Municipality/District
*Certificate of - 15 points
Recognition Barangay/School -
10 points
C. EMPLOYEE’S Certificate of No Perfect Attendance 20
ATTENDANCE ABSENCES and (No absences for
TARDINESS incurred the current CY) =20
given by the immediate
superior. Absence without
Approved Leave of
Absence from 0 to 3
days within one SY
= 15
Absence without
Approved Leave of
Absence from 4
days and above
days within one SY
=0

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
8 | 34
D. WORKING 10
RELATION
(COMPOSITE
POINTS
Certificate of No No grievance and 5 points
Pending Case from pending
Legal Office administrative case
Certification of No No Office 3 points
Office Memorandum of Memorandum of
Reprimand from direct Reprimand -
superior
Consolidated points of Nominees 2 points
Nominees Evaluation Evaluation
Feedback (Superior, Feedback
Peers/Co
employee/Subordinates Sample
and Parents ) Computation:
Total Raw Score of

Superior = 25
Total Raw Score of

Co employees =23
Total Raw Score of

Subordinate = 28
Total raw Score of

Parents = 25
25 +23 + 28 + 25=
101/4 =25.25/30 x
2= 1.68
TOTAL POINTS 100

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
9 | 34
RATING GUIDE FOR THE SEARCH OF

OUTSTANDING SCHOOL HEADS
(Head Teachers/Teachers-in-charge and Principals)
Outstanding School Head – It is granted to an individual or individuals who excelled

among peers, in this case, among teachers-in-charge of schools or school principals. As
this Search is set by the Provincial LGU, awards, certificates and other forms of incentives
will depend on the Provincial PRAISE Committee.
However, as these individuals will also be recognized in the SDO, cash awards of not less
than the amount provided under relevant existing laws shall be given to these individuals
plus a certificate of recognition or other forms of incentives as the committee may decide.
This Search is open to all qualified school heads—TIC and principal.
A. Performance Rating (At least VS for the last three rating periods) – 20 points
MOV: Copy of the OPCRF for the last three (3) years with approved ratings or
certification of the ratings released by AO V Zenaida E. Mago or her authorized
representative.
Computation: Add the three performance ratings divided by three to get the mean
performance rating
Mean Range: Follow the IPCR scoring range (Five as the highest possible rating)
Final Computation: Average rating/5 X 20 = Points
B. Outstanding Accomplishments – 15 points

Component Points
Awards and Recognition 5 points
Research or Innovation 5 points
Resource Speakership 5 points
i. Awards or Recognition
Outstanding Employee Award.
Means of verification:
• Any issuance, memorandum or document showing the Criteria for the
Search; and,
• Certification of Recognition/Merit
Component Points
National Level Search or Higher 5 points
Regional Level Search 4 points
Divisional Level Search/Province-wide Search 3 points
District Level Search/Municipal-wide Search 2 points
School Level Search/Barangay-wide Search 1 point
Note: Recognitions which are older than three years will no longer be
accepted.

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
10 | 34
ii. Research or Innovation

Means of verification:
A. Proposal duly approved by Head of Office or the designated
representative;
B. Accomplishment report verified by the Head of Office;
C. Certification of utilization of the innovation or research, within the
school/office duly signed by the Head of Office;
D. Certification of adoption of the innovation or research by another
school/office duly signed by the Head of Office;
E. Proof of citation by other researchers (whose study/research, whether
published or unpublished, is likewise approved by authorized body) or
the concept/s developed in the research.
Rubrics:
MOVs Submitted Points (Innovation/Research)
A, B, C and D 5 points
A, B, C and E 5 points
Only A, B and C 4 points
Only A and B 3 points
Only A 2 points
iii. Resource Speakership/Learning Facilitation

Means of verification (All listed MOVs shall be submitted):
• Issuance/Memorandum/Invitation/Training Matrix (where name is
reflected)
• Certificate of Recognition/Merit/Commendation/Appreciation; and,
• Slide Deck/s used and/or Session guide/s.
Note: Certificates should not be older than three years prior.
Rubrics:
Component Points
National Level or Central Office-led 5 points
Regional Level or Regional Office-led 4 points
Division-led/Province-wide Speakership 3 points
QuaLCi-led 2 points
District-led/Municipal-wide Speakership 1 point
C. Compliance to Administrative Reports (Composite Points) – 10 points

• No delayed liquidation of Cash Advances – 3 points
MOV: Certification from Accounting section
• No delayed submission of planning reports – 3 points

MOV: Certification from PRS
• No delayed submission of M&E Reports – 2 points

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
11 | 34
MOV: Certification from SMMES
• No delayed submission of HRD Reports – 2 points

MOV: Certification from HRDS
D. Compliance to Instructional Supervision (Composite Points) – 20 points

• With PSDS-approved annual/monthly supervisory plan – 5 points
• Instructional-related Accomplishment Reports – 8 points
10 months – 8 points
3 months – 1 point
• Records for Technical Assistance provided to teachers – 7 points

Note: Recent School Year only (SY 2022-2023)
E. Stakeholders’ Evaluation – 10 points

See Criteria prepared by SMME
F. Subordinates’ Evaluation (Teachers) – 10 points

G. Superior’s Evaluation (PSDS) – 15 points

H. Computation for E, F and G

• Raw Score/6/5 = Score
Score X Weighted Points = Final Points

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
12 | 34
RATING GUIDE FOR THE SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING EDUCATION PROGRAM

SUPERVISOR & PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT SUPERVISOR
Outstanding EPS/PSDS – It is granted to an individual or individuals who excelled among

peers, in this case, among Education Program Supervisors or Public Schools District
Supervisors. This Search is open to all qualified EPS and PSDS.
1. Performance Rating (at least VS for the last 3 years) - 20 points

MOV: Authenticated photocopy of IPCRF for the last 3 years/Original copy of the
Certification of Rating for the last 3 years from AO V Mago
Computation: Add the 3 performance ratings divided by 3 to get the mean

performance rating.
Mean Range: Follow the IPCR scoring range
Computation: Very Satisfactory Rating
Example:
3.8+4.2+4.4 = 12.4/3 = 4.13 (Average Rating)
Actual Points = Average Rating/Highest IPCRF Rating x Weight Allocation
Example: 4.13/5x20 = 16.5
Mean Range: The following are the Adjectival Rating Equivalences
RANGE
4.500-5.000 - Outstanding
3.500-4.499 - Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 - Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 - Unsatisfactory
below 1.499 – Poor
2. Outstanding Accomplishments - 20 points

(Any of the following: Innovations, Publications, Implemented Research, Recognitions
from Certified Award Giving Agencies)
COMPONENT MOVs DETAILS

INNOVATION A - Proposal duly approved by the A,B,C,D = 20 points
Head of Office or the duly A,B,C = 15 points
designated personnel A & B = 10 points
B – Accomplishment Report A only = 5 points

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
13 | 34
C – Certification of Utilization
D – Certification of Adoption of
Innovation duly signed by the Head
of Office
RESEARCH A - Proposal duly approved by the A,B,C,D,E = 20 points
Head of Office or the duly A,B,C,D = 15 points
designated personnel A,B,C = 10 points
B – Accomplishment Report A & B = 5 points
C – Certification of Utilization of A only = 3 points
Research
D – Certification of Adoption of
Research duly signed by the Head
of Office
E - Proof of Citation by other
researchers
RECOGNITIONS: Certificate of Recognition National - 20 points
LGUS, NGAS Region - 15 points
AND NGOS AND Province/Division - 10 points
OTHER AWARD Municipality/District - 5 points
BODIES Barangay/School -3 points
3. Compliance to Reports (Composite Points) - 15 points

• No delayed liquidation of cash advances 5 points
MOV: Certification from Accounting Section
• No delayed submission of accurate, comprehensive reports

(complete, accurate, authentic) 10 points
MOV: Certification from the Chief
4. Compliance to Instructional Supervision/Technical Assistance

-35 points
• Approved Annual/Monthly Supervisory/TA Plan 15 points

• Approved Accomplishment Report 10 points
• Report on technical assistance provided to schools
and learning centers 10 points
5. Subordinate’s Evaluation
(school head/unit/section representative) - 10 points
- See Criteria prepared by SMME

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
14 | 34
Criteria for 2023 Outstanding Non-Teaching Personnel (School-Based)
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER II
Criteria Means Of Verification Details Points Actual

(MOVs) Points
Earned
A. PERFORMANCE Authenticated photocopy Computation: 40
RATING of the IPCRF for the last 3
years/Original copy of Add the 3 performance
Certification of ratings divided
Performance Rating for by 3 to get the mean
the last 3 years from AO V performance rating.
Mago
Mean Range: Follow
the IPCR scoring range
Computation:
Very Satisfactory
Rating
3.8+4.2+4.4 =12.4/3 =
4.13
4.13/5*35= 28.91
B. Outstanding Innovations 30
Accomplishments A. Proposal duly approved
(Any of the following: by the Head of Office or 1. A,B,C & D = 30
Innovations, the Designated Research 2.A,B, C, & E =25
Publications, Committee per DO No. 16, 3.Only A,B, & C =20
Implemented s. 2017 4.Only A & B = 15
Research, 5. Only A = 10
Recognitions from B. Accomplishment
Certified Award Report verified by the
Giving Head of Office.

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
15 | 34
Agencies) for the last

three (3) years. C. Certification of
Utilization of the
duly signed by the Head of
Office.
D. Certification of
adoption of the innovation
or research by another
school/office duly signed
by the Head of Office.
E. Proof of citation by
other researchers (whose
study/research. Whether
published or
Implemented and
completed Research
1. A,B,C & D = 30
A. Proposal duly approved 2.A,B, C, & E =25
by the Head of Office or 3.Only A,B, & C =20
the Designated Research 4.Only A & B = 15
Committee per DO No. 5. Only A = 10
16, s. 2017
B. Accomplishment
Report verified by the
Head of Office.
C. Certification of
Utilization of the
duly signed by the Head of
Office.
D. Certification of
adoption of the innovation
or research by another

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
16 | 34
school/office duly signed

by the Head of Office.
E. Proof of citation by
other researchers (whose
study/research. Whether
published or
Recognitions: LGUs, National – 30 points
NGAs and NGOs and
Other Award Bodies for Region – 25 points
the last three (3) years
Province/Division – 20
*Certificate of Recognition points
Municipality/District –
15 points
Barangay – 10 points
C. EMPLOYEE’S Certificate of No Perfect Attendance 15

ATTENDANCE ABSENCES and (No absences for the
TARDINESS incurred current Calendar Year)
given by the immediate
superior
D. WORKING 15
RELATION
(COMPOSITE
POINTS
Certificate of No Pending No grievance and 7
Case from Legal Office pending administrative points
case
Certification of No Office No Office 5
Memorandum of Memorandum of points
Reprimand from direct Reprimand
superior
Consolidated points of Nominees Evaluation 3
Nominees Evaluation Feedback points

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
17 | 34
Feedback (Superior,
Peers/Co- Sample Computation:
employee/Subordinates
and Parents) Total Raw Score of
Superior = 25
Total Raw Score of Co

employees =23
Total Raw Score of

Subordinate = 28
Total raw Score of

Parents = 25
25 +23 + 28 + 25=
101/4 =25.25/30 x 3=
2.525
TOTAL POINTS 100

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
18 | 34
Rating Guide for the Search for Outstanding Local Paid Teachers
• Open to all Province-Paid Teachers

➢ Kindergarten
➢ Secondary
Selection shall be done by
➢ District
➢ Qualci
➢ Division
Criteria Poin MOVs

ts
1. Experience 1 pt. per year with a 10 Contract of Service
maximum of 10 pts.
2. Profession 2.1. Education - 25 Transcript of
al 15 pts Records/Certification
Developme ➢ Master’s Degree -
nt 15
➢ MA CAR -
10
➢ Baccalaureate -
5
2.2. Relevant Training Certificate of

3yrs - 10 pts Participation
➢ National -10 pts.
➢ Regional - 8
➢ Division - 6
➢ District - 5
3. Outstandin 3.1. Recognition -LGU, 35 Certificate of

g NGO, NGA and other Recognition
Accomplis Award Bodies
hment ---- 10
➢ Municipal --- 15
➢ Barangay --- 10
3.2. Accomplishments -- Memo,
20 Accomplishment
(Special Assignments related Report
to Teaching) Certified by the
Memorandum --- 5 points immediate superior

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
19 | 34
Accomplishment Report—
15
No. of Teaching Loads (HS)--5

Itinerant Teacher (Kinder)
4. Employee’s • 0 absences during the 20 Certification from

Attendance contract term -- 20 pts. direct superior
-- 1 – 5 -- 15 pts.
6 – 10 -- 10 pts.
11 – 15 -- 5 pts.
16 Up – 3 pts.
5. Working • No grievance and pending 10

Relations case Certification from
• No Office Memorandum of direct superior
Reprimand
• No Negative Feedback
from Peers and Other
Employees
Total 100

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
20 | 34
ARAW NG ZAMBOANGA DEL SUR

2023 GURONG ZAMBOSURIAN
TIKTOK DANCE COMPETITION MECHANICS AND CRITERIA
A. MECHANICS:
1. The performance must be a minimum of 1.5 minutes to a maximum of 2 minutes only.
2. Choice of music is open.
3. The performer/s can use single, or remix music. Dancers may use costume or props.
4. Number of entry participants will range from a minimum of 3 and maximum of 5.
5. The theme shall focus on promoting the province of Zamboanga del Sur.
B. CRITERIA FOR JUDGING:

Choreography and style - 25%
Mastery - 25%
Difficulty of Steps / Synchronization -20%
Interpretation and clarity of the message of the dance -20%
Video presence (deportment/bearing/discipline) -10%
Total : 100%
C. RULES ON VIDEO
1. The camera position must be fixed with no zooming.
2. Performance must be shot in segments taken from the tourist spots of their choice
within the province, with minimal edits of any kind.
3.The camera lens should be positioned to get the full body shot of the dancers.
4.The venue should have ample natural lighting or lit for clean visibility of all dancers.
5. Each video must be a continuous still frame with a minimum of 720p resolution,
colored, whole body.
D. ELIGIBILITY OF PARTICIPANTS AND ELIMINATION ROUNDS

1. Districts shall form group entry with a minimum of 3 and maximum of 5 members who
are regular DepEd employees either be teaching , teaching-related, and non-teaching .
2. QUALCI Level elimination Rounds shall be conducted on August 31, 2023. The venue
shall be decided by the PSDSs comprising respective QUALCIs. PSDSs within QUALCIs shall
convene to discuss matters pertaining to the conduct of QUALCI Level elimination.
3. Respective QUALCIs has to invite judges who are inclined in Tiktok dancing.
4. The winner of the QUALCI elimination shall be the official entry of the QUALCI to the
division competition on September 16, 2023 that will be held at Pavilion Hall, Dao,
Pagadian City.
5. During the division level competition, the winning tiktok video from the 6 QUALCIs shall
be forwarded to the SDO on September 15, 2023 c/o ITO Chester Don E. Bayocot.
6.Physical presence of the group members in the tiktok dance video entry from respective
QUALCIs are hereby requested. Since the first top 3 winners will be performing live after
the proclamation of winners.

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
21 | 34
TALENTADONG GURO MECHANICS AND CRITERIA
A. MECHANICS:
1. Open to all regular teaching and teaching-related personnel of this division.
2. Each district shall have one entry (solo or duo performance).
3. Contestants may showcase any talent.
4.Use of stunts and risky routines are strictly prohibited.
5.All performances must conform to the Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public
Officials and Employees.
6. The performance shall focus on this year’s theme of the celebration.
B. CRITERIA FOR JUDGING:

Talent and Skill -30%
Complexity (Degree of Difficulty) -40%
Uniqueness -20%
Over-all Performance -10%
Total: 100%
C. ELIGIBILITY OF PARTICIPANTS AND ELIMINATION ROUNDS

1. Districts shall have its entry with a minimum of 1 and maximum of 2 members only
who are regular DepEd employees purely teaching and teaching-related.
2.Participants may employ back ups but the judges shall focus on the main performer only.
Performance of back ups is excluded in the judging.
2. QUALCI Level elimination Rounds shall be conducted on August 31, 2023. The venue
shall be decided by the PSDSs comprising respective QUALCIs. PSDSs within QUALCIs shall
convene to discuss matters pertaining to the conduct of QUALCI Level elimination.
3. Respective QUALCIs has to invite judges who are inclined in this contest category.
4. The winner of the QUALCI elimination shall be the official entry of the QUALCI to the
division competition on September 16, 2023, that will be held at Pavilion Hall, Dao,
Pagadian City.
5. During the division level competition, physical presence of the participants from
respective QUALCIs are hereby requested. Since, all of them will perform again for the
judges to choose the best based on their performance.

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
22 | 34
Attachment 3
NOMINEE’S FEEDBACK/EVALUATION FORM
(Category: ______________________________)
NOMINEE Respondent
Name : ___________________________________
Position : ___________________________________
Work relationship to the nominee: _____________
(Please tick the appropriate box.)
Name : _____________________________
District : _____________________________ Nominee’s Superior
School/Station : ____________________________ Nominee’s Peer/Co-Employee
Position : _____________________________
Nominee’s subordinate
Parents /stakeholders
Please rate the nominee on the respective competencies inside the box before each
item using the following scale:
5 (Role model) - If all behavioral indicators had been demonstrated
4 (Consistently demonstrates) - If four behavioral indicators had been demonstrated
3 (Most of the time demonstrates) - If three behavioral indicators had been
demonstrated
2 (Sometimes demonstrates) - If two behavioral indicators had been demonstrated
1 (Rarely demonstrates) - If only one behavioral indicator had been demonstrated
CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES Total

1. Self-Management
1. Sets personal goals and directions, needs and development.

2. Undertakes personal actions and behavior that are clear and purposive and
takes into account personal goals and values congruent to that of the
organization.
3. Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by higher
goals.
4. Prioritizes work tasks and schedules (through Gantt charts, checklists, etc.) to
achieve goals.
5. Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others.
2. Professionalism and Ethics

1. Demonstrates the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms
and Conduct and Ethical Standards for public officials and employees (RA 6713).

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
23 | 34
2. Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into account the
impact of his/her actions and decisions.
3. Maintains a professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of attendance and

punctuality, good grooming and communication.
4. Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization’s needs.
5. Act with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the

organization’s needs, improve system and help others improve their
effectiveness.
3. Results Focus
1. Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the time.
2. Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work methods by placing
organizational needs before personal needs.
3. Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to standard

operating procedures correctly and consistently. Able to produce very
satisfactory quality work in terms of usefulness/acceptability and completeness
with no supervision
required.
4. Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at

waste or inefficiency. May focus on new or more precise ways of meeting goals set.
5. Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve

performance. Examples may include doing something better, faster, at a lower
cost, more efficiently, or improving quality,
customer satisfaction, morale, without setting any specific goal.

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
24 | 34
CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES Total

4. Teamwork
1. Willingly does his/her share of responsibility.

2. Promotes collaboration and removes barrier to teamwork and goal accomplishment
across the organization.
3. Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements.
4. Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions.

5. Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across organizations to
accomplish organization goals and objectives.
5. Service Orientation
1. Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems.
2. Takes personal responsibility for dealing with and/or correcting customer

service issues and concerns.
3. Initiates activities that promote advocacy for men and women empowerment.
4. Participates in updating office vision, mission, mandates and strategies based on

DEPED strategies and directions.
5. Develops and adopts service improvement program through simplified procedures

that will further enhance service delivery.
6. Innovation
1. Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solutions. Foster
new ideas, processes and suggests better ways to do things (cost and/ or
operational efficiency).
2. Demonstrates an ability to think “beyond the box”. Continuously
focuses on improving personal productivity to create higher value and results.
3. Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop original ideas or

solutions.
4. Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve
the work unit and organization.
5. Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilities. Demonstrates

resourcefulness and the ability to succeed with minimal resources.

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
25 | 34
Attachment 4
NOMINATION FORM
Name of Award:
C.Y.
Recent 2x2 ID
Picture of the
SCHOOLS DIVISION PRAISE COMMITTEE
Division of Zamboanga del Sur Nominee
Dao, Pagadian City
After undergoing a thorough evaluation based on the guidelines and criteria set for the
____________________________ Award category for DepEd – Zamboanga del Sur officials and employees, I hereby
nominate;
Name of Nominee:
Category:
Current Position of Nominee:
Section/Unit Assigned and Nature of the Work:

School/District Assigned:
PWD: Yes No
Senior Citizen: Yes No

Sex: Male Female
Gender Orientation:
Note: (Please enclose one to two pages write up about the significant accomplishments of the nominee duly signed by the
immediate head).
I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the accompanying supporting documents
are true and correct. Moreover, the Nominee and the undersigned understands that the decision of the PRAISE COMMITTEE is
final and executory. Thus, we hereby commit to respectfully abide by it and all related rules and regulations.
Name of Nominator: Position:
Signature of Nominator: Date Signed:

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
26 | 34
Attachment 5
NOMINATION WRITE UP FOR ALL CATEGORIES

(Minimum of 250 words and maximum words, A4 size bond paper, Arial #12 font including Executive Summary)
Name of Nominee
Position
Length of Service in the Position
Length of Service in the Government
I. Executive Summary
II. Exemplary Behavior/Conduct Displayed within the last 3 years
III. Impact of Accomplishment (Indicate problems addressed, savings generated, people/office benefitted and
transactions facilitated. Indicate whether or not the accomplishments are part of the nominee’s regular
functions/mandate or the product of his/her/their own initiative. If part of the nominee’s regular duties or mandate,
justify why the accomplishments are considered exemplary or extraordinary).
IV. Other Information (Major Awards. Citations Received/Membership in the Organization)

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
27 | 34
Attachment 6
SCORE SHEET FOR TEACHERS AND MASTER TEACHERS
__________________ Level (School/District/QUALCI/Division
CRITERIA
Working Relation
(10 points
Outstanding Consolidated points of
Performance Employee’s Certification of No Nominees Evaluation FINAL
Nominees Accomplish Cert. of No REMARKS
Rating (35 Attendance Office Memorandum Feedback (Superior, RATING
ments Pending
points) (20 points) of Reprimand from Peers/Co-
(35 points) Case (5
direct superior employee/Subordinates
points)
(3 points) and Parents)
(2 points)
Evaluated by:
________________________________ _________________________________ _________________________________ _____________________

Signature over Printed Name Signature over Printed Name Signature over Printed Name Signature over Printed Name
Member Member Member Member
Attested True and Correct:

______________________________________
Signature over Printed Name
Chairperson

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
SCORE SHEET FOR SCHOOL HEADS

__________________ Level (School/District/QUALCI/Division
CRITERIA
Outstanding Accomplishments Compliance to Instructional Supervision Stakeholders Subordinates Superior’s
Compliance to Administrative Reports (10 points)
(15 points) (20 points) ’ Evaluation ’ Evaluation Evaluation
No delayed No delayed No delayed With PSDS- Records (10 points) (10 points) (15 points)
Perf. No
Research submissio submissio submissio approved Instructional- for FINAL
Nominees Rating Awards Resource delayed REMARKS
or n of n of M&E n of HRD annual/monthl Related Technical RATING
(20 and Speakershi liquidatio
Innovatio planning reports reports y supervisory Accomplishmen Assistanc
points) Recognitio p n of Cash
n reports (2 points) (2 points) plan t Reports e provided
n (5 points) (5 points) Advances
(5 points) (3 points) (5 points) (8 points) to
(3 points)
teachers
Evaluated by:
________________________________ _________________________________ _________________________________ _____________________

______________________________________
Chairperson

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
SCORE SHEET FOR SUPERVISORS (EPS AND PSDS)

________________ Level
Nominees Performance Outstanding Compliance to Reports Compliance to Instructional Supervision/Technical Subord Final Remarks
Rating (20 Accomplishments (any (15 points) Assistance (35 points) inates’ Rating
points) of the ff.: Innovation, No delayed No delayed submission Approved Approved Report on technical Evalua
Research, liquidation of of accurate, Annual/Monthly Accomplish assistance provided to tion
Recognition) cash comprehensive reports Supervisory Plan ment Report schools and learning (10
(20 points) advances (5 (10 points) (15 points) (10 points) centers points)
points) (10 points)
Evaluated by:
________________________________ _________________________________ _________________________________ _____________________

______________________________________
Chairperson

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
SCORE SHEET FOR NON-TEACHING PERSONNEL

________________ Level
Performance Outstanding Employee’s Working Relations (15 points) TOTAL REMARKS
Rating (40 Accomplishments Attendance SCORE
points) (any of the (15 points) Cert. of No Certification of No Consolidated points of
following: Pending Case Office Memorandum Nominees Evaluation Feedback
Nominees
Innovation, (7 points) of Reprimand from (Superior, Peers/Co-
Research, Rewards) direct superior employee/Subordinates and
(30 points) (5 points) Parents)
(3 points)
Evaluated by:
________________________________ _________________________________ _________________________________ _____________________

______________________________________
Chairperson

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
SCORE SHEET FOR LOCAL PAID TEACHERS

________________ Level
Experience Professional Development Outstanding Accomplishments Employee’s Working Total Remarks

(10 points) (25 points) (35 points) Attendance Relations Score
Education Relevant Recognition Accomplishments (20 points) (10 points)
Nominees
(15 points) Training (10 (10 points) (Special Assignments
points) related to Teaching)
(20 points)
Evaluated by:
________________________________ _________________________________ _________________________________ _____________________

______________________________________
Chairperson

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
SCORE SHEET FOR TIKTOK DANCE COMPETITION

________________ Level
Choreography Mastery Difficulty of Interpretation and Video presence TOTAL REMARKS

and Style (25%) Steps/Synchronization Clarity of the Message of (deportment/bearing/discipline)
Contestants (25%) (20%) the Dance (10%)
(20%)
Evaluated by:
________________________________ _________________________________ _________________________________ _____________________

______________________________________
Chairperson

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net
SCORE SHEET FOR TALENTADONG GURO

_______________ Level
Talent and Skill Complexity (Degree of Uniqueness Overall Performance (10%) TOTAL REMARKS
(30%) Difficulty) (20%)
Contestants
(40%)
Evaluated by:
________________________________ _________________________________ _________________________________ _____________________


______________________________________
Chairperson

(062) 214 – 1991
www.suresasur.net

Memo - Province Wide Search

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Memo - Province Wide Search

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Memo - Province Wide Search

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Republic of the Philippines

August 11, 2023

2023 PROVINCE-WIDE SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING

TO: Assistant Schools Division Superintendents

3. The following are the categories for this year’s search:

Provincial Government Center, Dao, Pagadian City

District Screening Committee

QUALCI Screening Committee

Division Screening Committee

Provincial Government Center, Dao, Pagadian City

8. For inquiries and clarifications, contact PRAISE Secretariat/R&R Technical Working

9. Enclosures to this Memorandum are as follows:

• Attachment 1 – Rules and Mechanics

10. Immediate dissemination of this Memorandum is desired.

DR. JEANELYN A. ALEMAN, CESO VI

To be indicated in the Perpetual Index under the following subjects:

Provincial Government Center, Dao, Pagadian City

RULES AND MECHANICS

2023 Province-Wide Search for Outstanding DepEd Employees

I. WHAT ARE THE AWARDS?

II. WHO ARE ELIGIBLE TO JOIN?

III. WHO CAN NOMINATE?

The following can do the nomination:

For teachers, school-based non- School Head

IV. WHAT ARE THE PRIZES?

Provincial Government Center, Dao, Pagadian City

V. WHAT IS THE SEARCH METHODOLOGY?

VI. WHAT ARE THE NECESSARY ATTACHMENTS?

Provincial Government Center, Dao, Pagadian City

Attachment 2 – Selection Criteria and Rubrics

Criteria for 2023 Outstanding Teacher and Outstanding Master Teacher

Criteria Means Of Verification Details Points Actual

IPCRF Rating 1 – 3.8

IPCRF Rating 2 – 4.2

IPCRF Rating 3 – 4.4

Provincial Government Center, Dao, Pagadian City

Provincial Government Center, Dao, Pagadian City

duly signed by the Head

Provincial Government Center, Dao, Pagadian City

Total Raw Score of

Total Raw Score of

Total Raw Score of

Total raw Score of

TOTAL POINTS 100

Provincial Government Center, Dao, Pagadian City

RATING GUIDE FOR THE SEARCH OF

Outstanding School Head – It is granted to an individual or individuals who excelled

B. Outstanding Accomplishments – 15 points

Provincial Government Center, Dao, Pagadian City

ii. Research or Innovation

iii. Resource Speakership/Learning Facilitation

C. Compliance to Administrative Reports (Composite Points) – 10 points

• No delayed submission of planning reports – 3 points

• No delayed submission of M&E Reports – 2 points

Provincial Government Center, Dao, Pagadian City

MOV: Certification from SMMES

• No delayed submission of HRD Reports – 2 points