Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Microclimate Summative
Microclimate Summative
Microclimate
Around the School By Radhe Govind Handa
Wind speed at the astro field, the middle of the teachers parking lot and the
bike entrance at the gate for 3 different days
Hypothesis 1
We think that the wind will be stronger at the astro field than the parking.
We checked the wind speed in the centre of the astro field and in the centre
Method
We used an Anemometer to measure the wind speed and it measured the wind
measure for 30-40 seconds. We collected the data on our laptops in a table.
Observations
Astro field 1.6m/s & 5.7k/h 7.3m/s & 26.2k/h 2.2m/s & 7.9k/h
Teachers parking 0.3m/s & 1.03k/h 6.1m/s & 21.9k/h 1.6m/s & 5.7k/h
We can see from the graph and table that the wind speed at the astro field
is faster than the teachers parking. 1.6 in astro field and 0.3 in teachers parking
on 20 October. I expected these numbers because the astro is big without any
Conclusion
Our hypothesis was correct, the wind was stronger at the astro field than the
teachers parking. This is because there are no buildings around the astro field.
Trees are surrounding both places so they are not a factor. Time is a factor.
On 2 November, the data was collected at noon, and noon is the hottest time of
field and the teachers parking and that the microclimates did vary but not much.
I think that geographers are interested in microclimates because it can tell how
different factors affect the weather, like if in the school the natural field is
cooler than the teacher parking because it has grass and more trees
surrounding it.
I chose the astro field because it is big with more surface area and it doesn’t
have any buildings around.
I chose the teachers parking lot because it is far away from the astro field
and has buildings around. I had wanted to see the effect of buildings on the wind
speed.