Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CI EA Evaluation ToR
CI EA Evaluation ToR
BACKGROUND
Introduction
Trócaire is an Irish development agency that was established in 1973 by the Catholic Bishops of Ireland.
Trócaire’s work is inspired by Catholic Social teachings, with an overarching commitment to social justice.
Trócaire works in 17 countries in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East, working through local
partner organizations and communities to deliver programmes relating to: Accountable Governance and
Human Rights; Natural Resource Use and Resource Rights; Women’s Empowerment and Humanitarian
Preparedness and Response
Trócaire has been working in Somalia for 30 years and established offices in the districts in Gedo in 1991. In
Somalia, we implement projects directly and collaborate with local communities to deliver Humanitarian
programs in the following sectors.
Health
Nutrition
Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Promotion
Education in Emergencies
Protection
Food security and Livelihood
Caritas Somalia is a national catholic organization with a mission to accompany, serve and defend the poor
that was established in 1980 as a response to the amount of refugees in need from the “Ogaden war” in
Somalia. From then, it has been working all over Somalia directly and indirectly, mainly to respond to
catastrophes such as drought, floods, famine and armed conflict.
Caritas Somalia was recognized and affiliated to the Caritas Internationalis in 1983. It was recognized by the
Somali government as a Somali benevolent association on 17th August 1988.
Its current global strategic Framework from 2021-2025 has six priorities, namely:
Migrants and IDPs empowerment
Development Projects
Emergency Response
Education and Health
Women Empowerment
Advocacy &Peace Building
Context
Somalia is currently experiencing one of the worst droughts in recent history as a result of poor
performing rainfall seasons. Whereas sustained humanitarian assistance is viewed as having averted
famine in Somalia during the first quarter of 2023 1, levels of food insecurity remain high across the
country, with over 6.6 million people expected to face Crisis (IPC Phase 3) or worse acute food
insecurity outcomes, and a projected acute malnutrition burden of 1.8 million children (including
477,700 who are projected to be severely malnourished) from January to December 2023 2.
An IPC multi-partner technical released last year indicated that the nutrition situation has deteriorated
across most of the country. Acute malnutrition case admissions among children under age five continued to
rise sharply. Based on the results of 29 integrated food security, nutrition and mortality surveys conducted
by the Food Security and Nutrition Analysis Unit (FSNAU) and partners and subsequent IPC acute
malnutrition analysis conducted, the total estimated acute malnutrition burden for Somalia from August
2022 to July 2023 was found to be approximately 1.8 million children.
The Somali health system is fragmented and under-resourced. An estimated 19% of health facilities are
fully functional, limiting access by a large percentage of the population, especially children and PLW’s and
those in famine-risk districts (HNO 2023). UNICEF reports that some IDP settlements have no water or
drugs and inadequate staffing to meet the overwhelming need for care. Vulnerable populations are most at
risk due to inadequate essential primary health care, MNCH care and services for people with disabilities.
Cholera and AWD are endemic in Somalia , and has been experiencing uninterrupted transmission of
Cholera since 2017. The current outbreak is concentrated among drought-affected, mainly displaced people
who have no access to safe water or sanitation and poor hygiene habits. The prolonged drought has caused
surface water sources to dry up. Furthermore, aquifer recharge has seriously been affected, leading to
dropdowns of ground water levels in shallow wells and boreholes; some of these wells and boreholes have
also dried up. The combination of limited water availability and rising fuel prices to run water pumps has
caused price hikes for water, leaving communities with few options other than unimproved water sources.
Open defecation remains a common practice.
The drought in Somalia has worsened the protection situation and amplified the needs, especially for
women and children Harmful practices (including Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) and CEFM (Child Early
Forced Marriage) persist in Somalia. Crisis disproportionately affects women and girls, exposing them to
GBV ranging from sexual violence and exploitation in the form of communal violence, intimate partner
violence (IPV), emotional and psychological violence, early and forced marriages, to female genital
mutilation. The risk of GBV is heightened with a protection cluster survey indicating that women and girls
1
USAID, ACDI, Mercy Corps, Coping with the drought crisis in Somalia: Formative research findings from the resilience population measurement
(RPM) project, May 2023
2
FSNAU, Somalia mutli-partner technical release on the March 2023 follow up assessment results, https://fsnau.org/downloads/Somalia-
Multi-Partner-Technical-Release-on-the-March-2023-Follow-up-Assessment-Results-25-Apr-2023.pdf
2
Version 2-March 2018
felt less safe since the onset of the drought with 80% of the respondents noting an increase in reports of
violence against girls and women since the crisis/emergency occurred, and majority reporting an increase
of IPV affecting women and girls.
Trocaire and Caritas Somalia sought an emergency appeal from Caritas Internationalis to respond to the
current crisis in Somalia.
For this response, Trocaire prioritized the districts of Belet Hawa, Dollow, Garbaharey, Luuq, and Burdhubo
while Caritas Somalia implemented in Beletweyne, Bulo-Barte, and Huduur through Volunteers for
Agricultural Development - VAD (a local humanitarian and development organization established in 2019).
Programme Interventions
The project’s specific and intended results of the project included:
Impact: To address priority and immediate needs of drought-affected and vulnerable communities through
continued provision and extension of quality integrated health, nutrition, and WASH services
Outcome 1: Contribute to reduction of morbidity, mortality, and malnutrition rates of vulnerable and
marginalized communities in Luuq, Dollow, Belet Hawa, Garbaharey and Burdhubo Districts in Gedo
Outcome 2: Targeted communities provided with improved water, sanitation & hygiene services
Output 2.1: Fuel subsidies provided for IDP and riverine communities
Output 2.2: Water trucking for targeted communities done
Output 2.3: Shallow wells rehabilitated
Output 2.4: Hygiene promotion conducted through CHWs and hygiene promoters
Output 2.5: Hygiene kits provided for targeted communities
Output 2.6: Gender-sensitive latrines constructed in IDP camps
Output 2.7: Garbage collection and clean -up campaigns conducted
Outcome 3: Communities in targeted locations have access to safe, timely and lifesaving GBV services
Output 3.1: CMR and case management services provided in all districts
Output 3.2: Conduct Clinical Management of Rape (CMR) training for health staff and case workers
conducted
Output 3.3: Dignity kits for vulnerable women and girls provided
Output 3.4: Awareness on service availability, prevention, and mitigation of SGBV/FGM raised
Output 3.5: Solar and overhead lamps installed within IDP camps to enhance safety of women, girls and
other community members
3
Version 2-March 2018
Key Stakeholders
The evaluation will target key stakeholders of the project as respondents to the process. These will include
community members, government officials, religious leaders, clan elders, Trocaire staff and sector actors
e.g. from the clusters.
OBJECTIVES
The objective of the evaluation will be to:
i) Assess the relevance, appropriateness, effectiveness, accountability and impact/sustainability
of the programme
ii) Assess the extent to which the project has achieved its purpose based on intended outputs and
outcomes
iii) Identify lessons learned, best practices and recommendations to inform future programme
design
KEY QUESTIONS
Relevance/appropriateness
Was programme design based on an impartial assessment of needs? Are needs assessments
disaggregated by age, sex and disability? Do they include people’s needs, vulnerabilities and capacities?
Did the assistance provided meet the needs of the affected population? Were the persons most in
need identified, selected, and supported by the programme?
Which parts of the assistance were the most appropriate and why? Which were least appropriate and
why? Were activities aligned with the affected population’s needs and priorities?
Were recommendations and learning from past reviews and evaluations applied to the response?
Effectiveness
Was the response timely?
What internal and external factors affected the speed of the response?
Was the internal organizational and managerial structure of the project effective?
Were there appropriate systems in place to monitor activities, outputs and outcomes of the
programme? Did monitoring outcomes inform programme adjustments/revisions?
Did the project activities lead towards the achievement of the expected results/indicators as set in the
Results Framework?
4
Version 2-March 2018
Accountability
To what extent has the affected population been involved in the design or implementation of the
programme?
Were appropriate systems of downwards accountability (participation, information sharing and
feedback/complaints), put in place and used by project participants? Were project participants aware
of the feedback/complaints mechanism?
Were project participants and communities aware of selection criteria?
Were project participants and communities aware of the assistance they should receive?
Coordination
How effective were Trocaire and Caritas Somalia in coordinating internally?
How effective was Trocaire in coordinating with Caritas Somalia?
How effective were Trocaire and Caritas Somalia in coordinating with external stakeholders such as
other agencies, organisations, the local and national government?
What aspects of coordination could be improved in the future and how?
Impact/Sustainability
Has the response strengthened local capacities?
What are the intended and unintended, positive and negative effects of the project?
What, if any, aspects of the programme will have a longer-term impact?
METHODOLOGY
The final evaluation will rely on two main evaluation stages (1) design phase (2) field phase
Design Phase
The evaluator(s) will undertake a desk review of programme documentation including planning
documents, project proposals, situation reports and quarterly reports
The evaluator(s) will review other monitoring and reporting documents from secondary sources e.g.
FSNAU
Field Phase
After the design phase, the evaluator(s) will conduct fieldwork, by visit project sites in-person, to collect
and analyse data in order to answer the evaluation questions
Data collection methods should be inclusive and utilise a range of methods, including focus group
discussions and key informant interviews and with key project stakeholders. The use of surveys and
other remote data collection tools should also be explored by the evaluators to maximise data
collection
The evaluator(s) should ensure a systematic triangulation of data sources and data collection methods
and tools, and seek to validate data through regular exchanges with programme staff where
appropriate
EVALUATION SCOPE
The consultant will be responsible for:
5
Version 2-March 2018
Development of a brief inception report including a comprehensive evaluation protocol.
Desk review of existing program documents (including but not limited to proposal, monthly activity
progress reports, needs assessments, secondary sources e.g. FSNAU).
Development of evaluation tools and upload to CommCare
Data collection, analysis and management.
Development of draft and final report.
General oversight of the assessment process.
Presentation on the evaluation including feedback of findings, to Trocaire management and
programme team.
Overall quality management.
EXPECTED OUTPUTS
The evaluator(s) should produce the following key deliverables:
a. Inception meeting with project staff, review of key relevant documents
b. Develop and submit inception report/ protocol which will include an interpretation of the tasks and
study design & methodologies, sampling procedures and detailed work plan
c. Develop appropriate tools and instruments for gathering information and present to Trocaire team
for approval
d. Conduct survey interviews with households in the field
e. Undertake KIIs and FGDs with key stakeholders in the field
f. Provide raw and cleaned datasets and/or transcripts
g. General oversight and coordination of the evaluation process including logistical arrangements for
data collection in collaboration with the Project Coordinator
h. Draft Evaluation Report to be submitted to Trocaire and Caritas Somalia
i. Final Evaluation Report inclusive of:
Executive Summary
Background
Introduction
Context
Description of Methodology
Main findings
Conclusions inclusive of best practices and lessons learned
Recommendations.
j. PowerPoint presentation on the evaluation to Trocaire management and programme team
TRÓCAIRE RESPONSIBILITIES
Provision of Trócaire specific organisational and programme documents – including policies,
strategies, project plans, needs analyses, and evaluations. Note: this is not exhaustive; it will need
to be supplemented with information from credible external sources.
6
Version 2-March 2018
The intended audience for the evaluation is Trocaire and Caritas Somalia key staff, including senior
management, who have supported the programme, the Caritas Internationalis Humanitarian Department
and the Caritas Confederation.
Evaluation findings will be shared with programme participants as appropriate.
REQUIRED COMPETENCIES
The competencies required from the External Evaluator are:
Advanced degree in social sciences, political sciences, economics, development or related
fields;
Experience in leading evaluations, especially in the field of humanitarian response;
Ability to use participatory approaches to evaluation;
Experience of operational management of humanitarian/development programmes;
Good knowledge of the local context;
Good analytical skills;
Excellent writing skills in English language
Somali language skills required for fieldwork;
TIME FRAME
The evaluation will take 21 days, to be completed by end of September 2023.
BID SUBMISSIONS
Interested firms/consultants with relevant experiences and who meet the above criteria should submit
their Technical Proposal with their proposed methodology of implementing the assignment, experiences
and three referees, Work plan, and CVs of Technical Team; Financial Proposal detailing the professional
fees, facilitation costs, reimbursables, and VAT; and Two Samples of work/reports completed by the
firm/consultants to procurement-som@trocaire.org by 11th Sep t, 2023.
7
Version 2-March 2018