Fe-Mn 190 note aN ste sone Fe-Mn Phase Diagram Weight Percent Manganese op » ww @ %» % @ 1000? sae" wa7ete 2 (yFe.yMn) g “y ee if (Mn) c a0 bea Magnetic Transformation, 4 om (avn) Fe Atomic Percent Manganese Momic Percent Manganese ei) ery ey rt) cy 2 ™| 2 (yFe,yMn) “BP 5 MP Zs ff £ if . 2 ff (#Mn) é to (aun) 400 bmp i 4 cna aa a a a) Fe Weight Percent Manganese not 70 Mn From (Kubaschewskil 1078 Binary Alloy Phase DiagramsFe-Mg, Fe-Mn Fe-Mo, Fe-N A, Shinyaey, Metalloved. Term. Obrab. ov, and A.A, Gorshikov, Dop. Akad. 66Bur: BP. Burylev, Liteinoe Proizvod. ‘Met, (1), 38.35 (1961) in Russian, Nauk Ur. RSR, (12), 1602-1606 (1963) (10), 27-28 (1966) in Russian 61Tro: PK Trojen and RA. Flinn, Trans in Russi ASM, 54, 549-565 (1961) 68Yue: AS. Yue, J. Inet, Met, 91, 165-168 Complete evaluation contains 2 figures, GiLev: YM. Levchenko, VM. Khokbhol- (1962-1969) B tables, and 27 references Fe-Mn (Iron-Manganese) 55.847 54.9980 ‘The Fe-Mn phase diagram is re- drawn from [Kubaschewskil, Fe-Mo (Iron-Molybdenum) 55.847 98. (yp A. Fermindes Guillermet, Contributing Editor; Bull. Aloy Phase Diagrams, 3(3), Dec 1982 ‘The Fe-Mo system is characterized Fe-Mo Crystal Structure Data by a closed y loop and a noticeable —§ ———— by, elosed 1 loop ands noticosble = Composion Peunon Space Brana of Fe in Mo. Starting from the Fe hse at Mo” _aymbol___ group meng pont, auidus temperatures, (eFo) Owe 2 Imm OntheResichsgefalltoaminimam oe Rn Mo conten¢ mcreasn There are cing MR Pomme ad su eral aoe tel Sioa Eine MR hase diagram is based on evaluation — ay 220587 Ps) Pim DR he of the work of |Hansenl, [Elliott|, fe) < ae {Shunky fiuttgren Bh iMotals| and (Molybdenum). Me iat two phases appear at high temperstares ab nvenul of the pert peitectoid reaction, Ru =2y,'The optimizing the parameters involved tectie reactions, L + aMo =o and existence of the X phase, a Laves Of the thermochemical information L + =R, respectively. ¢ and Rde- phase, has been controversial. In this available, only the Fe activity values compose eutectoidally at tempera- assessment, its existence has been for Land bee at 1823 K were used in tures at which is stable, through accepted. the optimization, = aMo + wand R = (aFe) + w,re- ‘The assessed diagram was con spectively. The » phase appears at structed by applying thermodynamic Complete evaluation contains 11 figures, higher temperatures through the models to the individual phases and 5 tables, and 40 references. Fe-N (Iron-Nitrogen) 55.847 14.0067 tp HLA, Wriedt, N.A. Gokcen, and R.H. Nafziger; submitted to the APD Program ‘The established equilibrium solid (possibly FeNg and FeNs) were re ‘The nonequilibrium phases that phases of the Fe-N system at 0.1 MPa ported; if actually occurring, they may have heen observed are (1) the bet ni- hydrostatic pressure are: (1) the ter- be equilibrium phases. Experimental _tride Fey,Ns, (2) bee martensite, and minal bee solution, (Fe) or (@Fe), data for phases containing more than (3) bet martensite. designations used below 912°C and 0.5 at N are limited to tempera- tits N-rich phase boundaries (ae) above 1394 °C, respectively; (2) the tures below 810°C. The assessed phase coexists with (yFe) from 912 to 592 terminal fee solution (yFey; (3) the fee diagram is based primarily on the °C |75Hill and with FeyN below 592 nitride FeyN; (4) the eph nitride, ¢;and work of {30Bis|, [30Leh], and (50Par|. °C. The corresponding phases cocxist- (6) the orthorhombic nitride Fé,N. In __At clevated pressure, the terminal ing with (8Fe) arc (Fe) from 1394 °C addition, ferrous and ferric azides _eph solution (eFe) is stable. to a peritectic equilibrium [80Gab) at Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams 1079