Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CH 2
CH 2
The academic performance of students is affected by numerous independent factors that can be
within the school or outside the school system. These include socioeconomic status of students’
family, school leadership, students’ learning skills and study habit, instructional materials, school
facilities and student-teacher ratio. However, Shimada (2010) warns that no single variable has a
strong impact on academic achievement, arguing that the educational process is complex and
several factors create combination effect. Chang (2012) and Engin-Demir (2009) reported in
their study that socioeconomic status of students’ (SES) family is closely related to student
performance. (Chang, 2012:23) further states in his investigation that SES is one of the most
powerful predictors of student academic achievement across all racial and large groups.
Leadership in schools has also been identified as important in relationship to students’
achievement (Louis et al., 2010). Great deal of research has also focused on class size, student-
teacher ratio, learning environment, cultural resource and learning or material resources among
others in relation to academic achievement (Atanda and Jayeoba, 2011; Zwick, 2012; Greenwald
and Hedges, 1996; Weiet al., 2011; Houtveen and Gift, 2012) and the outcome is a mixed. Marks
(2010), argues that ‘other things being equal, students at better resourced schools would be
expected to perform at higher level than students attending poorly resourced schools’.Jebson and
Moses (2012) also observed that learning resources play a paramount role in the teaching and
learning of science subjects and thereby contributing to students’ academic achievement.
Instructional materials are contents that convey the essential knowledge and skills of a subject in
the school curriculum through a medium or a combination of media for conveying information to
a student (Wikipedia). Instructional materials may be provided in form hard backed or soft
backed textbooks, electronic content, consumables, learning laboratories, manipulative,
electronic media, and computer courseware or software. Instructional materials include
textbooks, educational media (library media print, non-print, and electronic resources), computer
software digital content, videotapes.
1.concrete objects; These types of instructional materials include objects and phenomena such
as minerals, rocks, raw materials, semi-finished and finished manufactured articles, and plant and
animal specimens. Included among these materials are reagents and apparatus for producing
chemical and other reactions and for demonstrating and studying such reactions during
laboratory sessions. Also included in the first group are materials and equipment for students’
expeditions and other travel, as well as supplies, instruments, and equipment for production
training and for courses in drafting and the representational arts. Among such supplies,
instruments, and equipment are wood, metal, plastic, and glass objects, measuring and
monitoring instruments and equipment, equipment for the assembling and finishing of various
products, and machines and machine tools
These are equipment for the transmission and assimilation of information recorded on film or on
phonograph recordings: film projectors, tape recorders, phonographs, and television sets.
Monitoring devices include punched cards and various types of automatic apparatus. Teaching
machines include language-laboratory machines, closed-circuit television systems, and
computers.
Learning by student occurs primarily through interaction with people (teachers, peers, resource
persons and parents) and instructional materials (textbooks, workbooks, internet, homework,
projects, quizzes, and tests). Students learn by engaging in cognitive, affective and psycho
motive processes (domains of learning) that are determined by relationship with people and
instructional materials. Instructional materials help to improve students’ knowledge, abilities,
skills and assimilation. Teachers vary considerably in the way they use textbooks, teacher’s
guides, and assessment materials, with some teaching strictly to-the-book and others exercising
considerable flexibility (Donald et al., 1989). Despite such individual variability, in general,
teachers are much more likely to cover topics presented in the materials selected by their school
or district than to cover topics not included; they are likely to follow the sequence of topics in the
selected materials; and their pedagogical approach is influenced by the instructional design of the
materials (Robert et. al.,2003). The evidence is clear that instructional interactions between
students and teachers are framed by the instructional materials that teachers are provided by their
schools and districts. That instructional materials exercise their influence on learning directly as
well as by influencing teachers’ instructional choices and behavior makes instructional materials
all the more important (Mattew and Grovers, 2012).
2.4 SCHOOL FACILITIES AND STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE
Review of relevant literatures on the relationship between instructional materials and educational
facilities on the academic performers of the learners show conflicting views from previous
researchers. Cole mantel(1996) as cited in Aksit (2007:129) claimed then that ‘only a small
portion of variance in student achievement can be accounted for by variation in schools
compared with other factors such as family background’. Also Rutter et al. (1979) as cited in
Aksit (2007:129)concluded in their study that ‘schools make a small but highly significant
difference.’
One possible explanation for finding a weak relationship between classroom and school
resourcing levels and pupils attainment is that schools are inefficient and therefore do not use the
resources more efficiently. However, Owolabi (2012) attributes poor or low performance in
science in school in Nigeria, for instance, to inadequate good instructional materials, equipment,
facilities; lack of qualified teachers and laboratories. It is important to note that these materials
and resources do not work in isolation of a qualified operator. Lewin (2000) reports a positive
connection between the qualification and experience of science teachers, and high levels of
achievement in science. Oladejoet al.(2011) argued that teaching physics without appropriate
instructional materials may certainly result in poor academic achievement. Studies have also
established positive association between library and student’s academic performance (Jaiyeoba
and Atanda, 2011). Ola (1990) as cited in Owoeye and Yara (2011) underscores the importance
of a well-equipped library arguing that it constitutes a major facility and enhances good learning
achievement of high educational standards. Popola (1989) as cited in Owoeye and Yara (2011)
also reports ‘that library correlates well with academic achievement and those with well-
equipped ones normally maintain high academic performance’. However, Farombi (1998) as
cited in Owoeye and Yara (2011) warns that school library may not be effective if the books are
not adequate and up-to-date. Farombi (1998) as cited in Owoeye and Yara (2011) also adds that
the library’s impact is dependent on how often and length of time it is accessible to students.
Positive links between resources and students’ academic achievement have been reported by
Siddhu (2011). Engin-Demir (2009) states that ‘merely equipping schools with such facilities is
not enough to raise student achievement rather what matters most is weather this facilities are
utilized properly’.